ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2016 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Wednesday, February 10, 2016

Women, science, and sex

The SJWs in science are setting up their favorite damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't scenario for male scientists. If you don't bring young women along with you on your trips, you're a damnable sexist. And if you do, you're a sexual predator.

On a cold evening last March, as researchers descended upon St. Louis, Missouri, for the annual meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists (AAPA), a dramatic scene unfolded at the rooftop bar of the St. Louis Hilton at the Ballpark, the conference hotel. From here, attendees had spectacular views of the city, including Busch Stadium and the Gateway Arch, but many were riveted by an animated discussion at one table.

Loudly, and apparently without caring who heard her, a research assistant at the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH) in New York City charged that her boss—noted paleoanthropologist Brian Richmond, the museum’s curator of human origins—had “sexually assaulted” her in his hotel room after a meeting the previous September in Florence, Italy. (She requested that her name not appear in this story to protect her privacy.) Over the next several days, as the 1700 conference attendees presented and discussed the latest research, word of the allegations raced through the meeting.

Richmond, who was also at the meeting, has vigorously denied the accusations in a statement to Science and in email responses. (He declined to be interviewed in person or by telephone.) The encounter in the hotel room, he wrote, was “consensual and reciprocal,” adding that “I never sexually assaulted anyone.”

Although the most recent high-profile cases of sexual harassment in science have arisen in astronomy and biology, many researchers say paleoanthropology also has been rife with sexual misconduct for decades. Fieldwork, often in remote places, can throw senior male faculty and young female students together in situations where the rules about appropriate behavior can be stretched to the breaking point. Senior women report years of unwanted sexual attention in the field, at meetings, and on campus. A widely cited anonymous survey of anthropologists and other field scientists, called the SAFE study and published in July 2014 in PLOS ONE, reported that 64% of the 666 respondents had experienced some sort of sexual harassment, from comments to physical contact, while doing fieldwork.

Even a few years ago, the research assistant might not even have aired her complaint, as few women—or men—felt emboldened to speak out about harassment. Of the 139 respondents in the SAFE study who said they experienced unwanted physical contact, only 37 had reported it. Those who remained silent may have feared retaliation. Senior paleoanthropologists control access to field sites and fossils, write letters of recommendation, and might end up as reviewers on papers or grant proposals. “The potential for [senior scientists] to make a phone call and kill a career-making paper feels very real,” says Leslea Hlusko, a paleontologist at the University of California (UC), Berkeley.
It will be interesting to learn if the female scientists entering the field will be sufficient to make up for the male scientists they drive from it. The history of social justice convergence indicates that not only will they fail to make up for it, but that all actual scientific activity will cease once a critical mass is reached.

It's rather remarkable that the Richmond situation is being portrayed as him sexually assaulting her when she was in his hotel room. I suspect that the charge of sexual assault are nothing more than her trying to cover for the fact that she was more or less cheating on her husband. They were out drinking with their colleagues, all of whom would have known that she went back to his room with him.

Remember, it's much better to be deemed a sexist than a sexual assailant. Don't mentor women in person, don't go out of your way to help them, don't befriend them (particularly if you find them attractive), and don't go out to dinner with them alone. If you can't avoid it due to work, insist on lunch. Definitely don't go out for drinks or to a club. Don't hug or kiss them, and don't let them touch you except to shake your hand. Don't ever give the SJWs an opening to take you down.

The SJWs would love nothing better than to try to do to me what they've done to everyone from Jian Gomeshi to James Frenkel. They can't, because I never give them even the slightest molehill out of which to make a mountain.

Labels: ,

84 Comments:

Blogger Derrick Bonsell February 10, 2016 1:33 PM  

I think you're right, she probably was cheating on her SO.

Anonymous VFM #7916 February 10, 2016 1:34 PM  

Another good reason to discreetly (and legally, if possible. If not, it's better than a rape charge) record one's encounters with the opposite sex, especially in a "power imbalance" (>.<) situation...

Anonymous Faceless February 10, 2016 1:36 PM  

The accuser should have no right of privacy and protection of her identity in such cases; she made a very public accusation; she didn't care about her own privacy in the matter; she is not some poor girl shown up at the police door ready to be sent to the hospital for her rape kit who would be truly deserving of compassion and protection. I assume that, when the man is vindicated, the press will still talk of rape shield until her book deal comes out and maybe a little while after.

Blogger praetorian February 10, 2016 1:52 PM  

Another good reason to discreetly record

At this point, I don't see how a father can't recommend that their sons simply use porn while they wait the decade and a half past puberty modern women now expect them to before marriage. Or for sexbots, I guess. Whichever comes first.

Japan went sexless with far less insanity involved. What a clusterfuck.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan February 10, 2016 1:52 PM  

Always get the "Great sex" text on your phone after the act

Blogger Artisanal Toad February 10, 2016 1:54 PM  

@2

Don't just record, be willing to hit "play" in the event a charge like that is made. Scorched earth is the only thing SJW's understand. It was *his* hotel room. Video recorders are so cheap now it's worth it to have several in case one fails. The audio is pretty good on some of them and that's important.

Showing a woman cheating is one thing, but better is the way women talk about their SO/husband when they're in bed with their lover. They might be able to blow off a sex video, but it's the stuff that she'll cheerfully say that she would *never* want to be made public.

Blogger dc.sunsets February 10, 2016 1:55 PM  

Boy, does this apply in spades to people in the workplace.

Short of 24/7 continuous video recorded and saved of every moment away from home, there is no defense against this kind of assault.

Can we imagine a more Orwellian atmosphere than men realizing they need to wear, 24 hours a day, the "body cameras" being pushed for cops because of the presumption of GUILT?

Blogger dc.sunsets February 10, 2016 1:57 PM  

At this point, I don't see how a father can't recommend that their sons simply use porn while they wait the decade and a half past puberty modern women now expect them to before marriage. Or for sexbots, I guess. Whichever comes first.

I assume you're not serious, given the addictive vice that is porn. If the West falls, the epitaph should be a list of free porn sites. It's far worse than heroin.

Blogger Derrick Bonsell February 10, 2016 1:57 PM  

I think you're right, she probably was cheating on her SO.

Blogger VFM #7191 February 10, 2016 1:57 PM  

So on the basis of this woman's accusation alone, the name of the accused is published but the accuser gets to maintain her privacy? Outrageous.

Someone needs to doxx this woman. If she wants to make public accusations, she should have to submit herself to the public scrutiny that goes along with that. A mere accusation is not proof wrongdoing, and the mere word of a woman is no verdict.

Blogger dc.sunsets February 10, 2016 2:00 PM  

Don't mentor women in person, don't go out of your way to help them, don't befriend them (particularly if you find them attractive), and don't go out to dinner with them alone. If you can't avoid it due to work, insist on lunch. Definitely don't go out for drinks or to a club.

Women are masters at appeals to male vanity. Many are master puppeteers, making men dance and sway to the White Knight Lullaby.

Unless you're very cynical, you won't realize that pretty little thing is playing you like a fiddle until years later.

Blogger Dexter February 10, 2016 2:02 PM  

(She requested that her name not appear in this story to protect her privacy.)

As usual, the privacy of the victim of her unproven accusations be damned...

Blogger Alexander February 10, 2016 2:05 PM  

You know, normally women like to claim that a woman might be too 'traumatized' to go to the police but she might trust a college bureaucrat.

Apparently, that extends to just shouting it out in public.

Blogger John rockwell February 10, 2016 2:05 PM  

This is going to result in de facto segregation of the sexes in science.

Blogger jay c February 10, 2016 2:07 PM  

...64% of the 666 respondents had experienced some sort of sexual harassment...

Considering the loose definition of "sexual harassment", the other 36% were either lying or had no contact with another human being during their "field work."

Anonymous Frank B Luke February 10, 2016 2:10 PM  

@14 This is going to result in de facto segregation of the sexes in science.

And then we'll see which side makes progress. Just like forking OSS.

OpenID sigsawyer February 10, 2016 2:11 PM  

My guess as to why this happens so often in the sciences is because most scientists are of low socio-sexual rank. Nonetheless, their power and status in the field gives them the potential to seduce their younger colleagues, who are initially attracted to their position.

Later, the older scientist does something to reveal his lesser-beta, gamma, or omega nature and thus disgusts the woman who once slept with him. To reconcile the incongruity of "I slept with a loser" in her mind (as disgusting to a woman as being cuckolded is to a man, or even more so seeing as there aren't many women with loser fetishes), she reinvents history as sexual harassment: "there's no way I would have slept with him, he must have coerced me".

That being said, I've seen the thirsty and desperate come-ons of intelligent but low-social-status men and it's not hard to interpret it as harassment. I knew one guy who texted a girl I was sleeping with every hour on the hour without any reciprocation on her part. Every girl's been 'harassed' by that definition, but that's the way the genders are. Men have to cope with rejection, women have to cope with unwanted attention.

Alternatively, she's trying to destroy him over something personal. This is likely considering she blurted it out in public at the perfect moment for it to grow into a storm of rumors and suspicion.

Blogger Doom February 10, 2016 2:19 PM  

See, that's the problem with SJW's. I prefer to be both. You don't have to go either way to be both. They aren't even creative, certainly not rightly procreative. On that side, the good thing is they will die dry and most likely barren. Some things just give me a wood.

Blogger kh123 February 10, 2016 2:22 PM  

666 respondents. Am assuming that much like the concept of evolution, this wasn't intentional.

Throw in the PLOS and paleoanthropology. Heh. The number of man indeed, making a concerted effort to get men's numbers, in more ways than one.

Blogger Nick S February 10, 2016 2:26 PM  

Everybody knows that all paleoanthropologists are perverted heathens.

Blogger John Williams February 10, 2016 2:35 PM  

My guess as to why this happens so often in the sciences is because most scientists are of low socio-sexual rank. Nonetheless, their power and status in the field gives them the potential to seduce their younger colleagues, who are initially attracted to their position.
Stick the lead scientist in the field and suddenly he's the hottest guy around. Female hypergamity leads to the same result at a dig as it does at band camp.

Blogger dc.sunsets February 10, 2016 2:40 PM  

Don't knock band camp. Sometimes it's not the size of the fish, it's the size of the pond.

Blogger Skylark Thibedeau February 10, 2016 2:41 PM  

The Misanthrophe Anthropologist.

Blogger Verne February 10, 2016 2:45 PM  

I hate to admit it, but I fell into that. Sweet young girl with her head on backwards asked for my help. Now she says I'm the old guy who "likes her too much". I fell into a fools trap. You can't disprove that change, so there is my reputation. I thank God because it could have been worse. A lesson learned late in life

Blogger Remo - Vile Faceless Minion #99 February 10, 2016 2:46 PM  

Loudly, and apparently without caring who heard her .... charged that her boss—noted paleoanthropologist Brian Richmond, ... —had “sexually assaulted” her... (She requested that her name not appear in this story to protect her privacy.)

How is screaming charges about your boss in anyway conducive to keeping your privacy? And why is she allowed to scream this guys full name, employer, job position, social security number, webpage address, email address, and full biography out to a crowded gathering yet *HER* privacy is the important piece? Just how many contradictions must we endure in this piece?

Blogger Badmojo February 10, 2016 2:49 PM  

> a research assistant at the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH) in New York City charged that her boss—noted paleoanthropologist Brian Richmond, the museum’s curator of human origins—had “sexually assaulted” her in his hotel room after a meeting the previous September in Florence, Italy. (She requested that her name not appear in this story to protect her privacy.)

Remember they'll do everything they can to protect the "victim" but the supposed perpetrator will be assassinated immediately.

Blogger dc.sunsets February 10, 2016 2:51 PM  

In my experience, when a much-younger woman asks for help (or otherwise indulges your ego) she's either practicing her puppeteer act on you for use later on a higher value target, using you to flatter her own ego and/or hoping to inflame your wife's ire.

It's a power trip; she has it, you don't (even when you think you're the powerful one) and the more havoc she causes in your life, the higher her power feels.

And you thought you were just doing her a favor out of common courtesy.

Anonymous VFM #6306 February 10, 2016 2:55 PM  

Literally shouts from a rooftop...for privacy.

Burn the witch.

Anonymous kfg February 10, 2016 2:56 PM  

"Short of 24/7 continuous video recorded and saved of every moment away from home, there is no defense against this kind of assault."

Home alone is one of the most dangerous places you can be if you can't prove it.

Blogger dc.sunsets February 10, 2016 2:56 PM  

Every woman has to be treated like she has a coiled cobra inside, waiting for you to relax and let down your guard.

The vicious, schizophrenic dikes who run Feminism, Inc. got their wish.

Anonymous Meyner February 10, 2016 3:04 PM  

Masculine men do not have to worry about this stuff.

Only effeminate weak men have to worry.

The solution: Men need to man up and quit being weak

Blogger John Williams February 10, 2016 3:12 PM  

@22, Why do you think I was knocking band camp? Yes, that's exactly what I was saying.

Anonymous DT February 10, 2016 3:12 PM  

@8 - I assume you're not serious, given the addictive vice that is porn. If the West falls, the epitaph should be a list of free porn sites. It's far worse than heroin.

But still not as bad as a rape charge.

Anonymous Rip February 10, 2016 3:14 PM  

Nope, "masculine" men will catch it for NOT showing interest out of spite. The only potential solution is to record everything if you cannot avoid being alone with a woman.

Blogger VD February 10, 2016 3:36 PM  

I hate to admit it, but I fell into that. Sweet young girl with her head on backwards asked for my help. Now she says I'm the old guy who "likes her too much".

Whether you are six or sixty, do NOT do her homework for her. Seriously, how hard is this?

I remember girls who normally wouldn't give me the time of day acting all sweet and trying to get me to do their homework for them. "Oh, you're so smart, won't you just HELP MEEEE."

I didn't even do my own homework, so I sure as Hell wasn't going to do theirs. The correct response to a woman asking for help is an amused snort, followed by walking away. Don't even deign to say no.

Blogger VD February 10, 2016 3:36 PM  

Masculine men do not have to worry about this stuff.

That's amusing. Masculine men get played this way all the time.

Anonymous DT February 10, 2016 3:44 PM  

Women are strong and independent and can do everything a man can do...only better...including serving in forward combat positions in the military.

Yet when one is in a room alone with a man she is innocent, naive, and weak. She can be physically forced into sex or even just talked into it because she's emotionally helpless and needs the protection of other strong men in shiny white suits of armor.

But years later she can scream her accusations to the entire world, publicly revealing every detail of the man she thinks wronged her, and nobody dare tell her to be quiet for she is strong.

Having done so, the entire world must rush to her defense in hiding her name because she is so weak she just couldn't bear the thought of people knowing what happened.

The hypocrisy...it...it burns.

Anonymous Jay Will February 10, 2016 3:45 PM  

Hubby I wasn't unfaithful he raped me! Destroy mans life, put at ease cuck husband, move on like nothing happened, zero remorse felt. Get various elitist frauds supporting you, well done you win this weeks progressive prize for contributions to social evolution.

Blogger CM February 10, 2016 3:52 PM  

I hate to admit it, but I fell into that. Sweet young girl with her head on backwards asked for my help. Now she says I'm the old guy who "likes her too much".

Confession (this is hard to admit here)...

I was fresh out of college when I did something similar to this to my boss after an older woman convinced me his playing with my hair (that i hadn't noticed... lots of people played with my hair) was sexual harassment.

He did not lose his job. I was just moved off the project, did not stay in contact w the woman, and started reading Elusive Wapiti's blog.

I'm so grateful he did not lose his job and I'm ashamed I was so easily played.

Blogger Verne February 10, 2016 3:52 PM  

"Masculine men do not have to worry about this stuff
Im a Stone Mason, I doubt anyone here is more masculine that I am. But when a girl, far younger than I would have an interest in, asked me for help. Why would I deny her a conversation in and open room and on a phone? There will be no next time I help. I got slandered over it. It was not too bad, nothing that would make a cop interested in me. But where do I go to get back my reputation? Even masculine guys care about their reputation.

Sadly a lot of girls take pride in guys who "like them too much" And will lie about it. And we are the lucky ones. Some girls will make far worse claims about you

Anonymous Philalethes February 10, 2016 3:58 PM  

Apparently she didn't get the expected 'A' grade for her work?

Seems the target has not (yet) apologized? Kudos; maybe he'll survive.

“The potential for [senior scientists] to make a phone call and kill a career-making paper feels very real,” says Leslea Hlusko, a paleontologist at the University of California (UC), Berkeley.

Unlike the potential for females to make a public scene and kill an entire career without any form of due process, which not only "feels" but actually is very real.

The linked summary notes "...abuses ranging from subtle gender exclusion to sexual assault." As VD writes above, it's another damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't.

Unfortunately, it seems one must be a subscriber to read the whole article, but it sounds like this is only one of a lengthy list of perfect, textbook examples of why women should not be allowed into male spaces. That is, unless the consciously and openly stated intent of the gathering is sexual. They sexualize everything, constantly generating an atmosphere of erotic invitation so they can then choose among the responses – and get what they want in return. This is what females do; they can't help it, the behavior is hardwired, and they're almost entirely unconscious of what they're doing.

In other social species, males and females can work together without (major) problems – until the female goes into heat, and everything changes. In humans, as my UCB anthro professor gently put it 53 years ago, females are always in heat, so never stop exhibiting sexual behavior, at least until they get old enough to be out of the SMP (and even then most of them never stop trying to get what they want with the same old signals). Though the original reasons for this behavior were probably very pressing (the female's need to capture and keep male provisioning while she was caring for offspring, which was nearly all the time), it doesn't come without considerable cost.

I can't see any non-awkward solution to this problem that could satisfy both reason and the hysteria which seems always to be just below the surface of the female mind. As @17 notes above, "Men have to cope with rejection, women have to cope with unwanted attention."

I read an interview done by a woman journalist with a Buddhist monk; she described how they were out in the open, at a picnic table in a public park, and she noticed a young man sitting at another table some distance away, who kept glancing at them. She wondered about that, and the monk explained that according to the Rule he lived by he could not be anywhere in the sole company of a woman. Of course, the fact that he took his vows seriously was also a help. Anyway, this is the only solution that could work.

As Thomas Jefferson wrote 200 years ago, "Were our State a pure democracy, in which all its inhabitants should meet together to transact all their business, there would yet be excluded from their deliberations ... Women, who, to prevent depravation of morals and ambiguity of issue, could not mix promiscuously in the public meetings of men." [Note: "depravation" is not "deprivation"; morals are not deprived, but become depraved in such mixed company.]

Anonymous Athor Pel February 10, 2016 4:00 PM  

Years ago I worked at a place with exactly two women in the office. Both in their twenties, neither of them married. One of them smoking hot and the other a bit pudgy and plain.

I was nice to both of them but only asked one of them out, yes, the hot one. It was a contract job and was only going to last six months. She said no but that didn't stop the other one from getting jealous, angry and accusing me of doing something nefarious like harassment. She was let go.

I was lucky I was working with a bunch of old guys that had been doing that kind of contract work on the road for decades and they needed my work much more than they needed hers. We were also working 12 hour days 6 days a week in an office where everybody could see and hear what everybody else was doing.

Blogger Dexter February 10, 2016 4:03 PM  

Masculine men do not have to worry about this stuff.

Wanna guess how many military officers have been relieved of command and had their careers ended due to precisely this kind of bullshit "sexual assault" charge?

It's a lot.

Especially because many officers are gullible white-knighting fools who cannot resist the chivalrous urge to "help" young women.

Anonymous Boeiw February 10, 2016 4:08 PM  

Well, then don't help women.

I don't take this stuff too seriously.

I've never met a good masculine man who has to deal with this stuff.

Only the socially awkward jerks have these problems

Anonymous greendarner February 10, 2016 4:10 PM  

The Victorians were right...women need chaperones.

Anonymous BGKB February 10, 2016 4:25 PM  

CuckFed judge says women of Texas need more diseased moslem rapists
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/federal-judge-rejects-texas-attempt-block-syrian-refugees

The encounter in the hotel room, he wrote, was “consensual and reciprocal,” adding that “I never showed favoritism to her afterword.

that 64% of the 666 respondents had experienced some sort of sexual harassment, from comments to physical contact, while doing fieldwork on the isle of Lesbos

record one's encounters with the opposite sex, especially in a "power imbalance" (>.<) situation
"teacher busted for having sex with student is suing him for recording tryst, and his mother for calling her a 'predator'"
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/ex-texas-teacher-sues-student-recording-tryst-article-1.2503680

free porn sites. It's far worse than heroin. Every couple years there is "bad heroin" going around killing people. And liberals think guns that go out shooting on there own are scary.

Blogger Chiva February 10, 2016 4:37 PM  

I've never met a good masculine man who has to deal with this stuff.

Then you have never met a good masculine man?

Anonymous Big Bill February 10, 2016 4:40 PM  

Assange ran into the same feminist buzz saw:

http://observer.com/2016/02/exclusive-new-docs-throw-doubt-on-julian-assange-rape-charges-in-stockholm/

Likewise the frat boys at UVA, as shown in Jackie Coakley's fake "Haven Monaghan" text messages:

http://wtvr.com/2016/02/08/jackie-uva-gang-rape-story-twist/

The truth is fungible to females once their gonads take over.



Blogger Cataline Sergius February 10, 2016 4:47 PM  

Remember, it's much better to be deemed a sexist than a sexual assailant. Don't mentor women in person,

That is one of the top ways that feminists have defeated themselves.

Take a look at the Fortune 500 CEOs list. It still a boy's club for the most part and one of the biggest reasons for that is mentoring.

It's about the best fast track to the top that there is. And feminist women have cut themselves out of that loop completely for the most part.

First, no man in his right mind will mentor a woman in this climate. You may as well start spinning the revolver's cylinder and clicking the trigger now because it's only a matter of time.

Second, no woman is going to mentor a younger and more attractive woman. If you think they will on general principle, you need to find out how the world works.

Second.

Blogger VD February 10, 2016 5:06 PM  

I've never met a good masculine man who has to deal with this stuff. Only the socially awkward jerks have these problems.

You're wrong, inobservant, and stupid. I suggest you stop sharing your personal expereriences, Snowflake.

Blogger JDC February 10, 2016 5:29 PM  

A 'masculine' man could be lead to believe his attractiveness and power over women is greater than their deviousness and solipsism...a mistake many machismos' have made.

The "it couldn't happen to me" is the first mistake. Don't even go there. It could happen to you...so don't let it.

Blogger Thucydides February 10, 2016 5:41 PM  

Perhaps even mopre disgusting was the reaction of the crowd. Who there said "Did you go to the Police? Did you swear out a complaint? Did you get a rape kit?"

Followed up with "Why the hell not?"

There is a legal term for her behaviour: Slander. I'll bet if baseless accusations like this were met with immediate response (not apologizing), but a full court press for slander, malicious prosecution, defamation of character and of course a lengthy trial and suit for damages, then the SJW's would have to move to find different targets.

Proper defensive measures like never being alone, never helping/mentoring and so on are very important, but you must also be prepared to take action and curb stomp the people who are trying to destroy you.

Anonymous BGKB February 10, 2016 5:47 PM  

First, no man in his right mind will mentor a woman in this climate.
Second, no woman is going to mentor a younger and more attractive woman.


Avoid having gay men as mentors if you can help it, I can attest the second line translates.

Blogger Doktor Jeep February 10, 2016 5:47 PM  

"[...]but that all actual scientific activity will cease once a critical mass is reached."

Worse.

THEIR science will simply be science.

And we have seen their science.

Global warming.
Animals fats and proteins are bad for you.
People are born transgendered/gay and trading working sex organs for non working fakes is $normal$.
People grow up to be criminals because they were not treated nicely enough and/or didn't have enough money.


This battle for science is not to ruin it. It's to change reality. Having defeated religion, science is next. Hence the Atheism + SJWs and their (ironically) religious approach to SocJus under the auspices of "logic".

We lose this battle we can forget about getting into space for another 1000 years.

Blogger Verne February 10, 2016 5:54 PM  

"The correct response to a woman asking for help is an amused snort, followed by walking away. Don't even deign to say no."

To which I say amen. The funny thing is I was never such a push over when I was sexually attracted to a girl. I knew better. Call it lost wisdom. Or letting down my guard when I thought I was not in the game. The game never ends.

Blogger ray February 10, 2016 6:11 PM  

"The history of social justice convergence indicates that not only will they fail to make up for it, but that all actual scientific activity will cease once a critical mass is reached."


Given time, Team Woman Inc. would do to science what it did to government, law, literature, family, music, education -- co-opt for selfish and vain purposes, while skreeching about fairness and equality. As for males, chief difference between Left and Right guys is the Lefties will tell you that you are privileged while they cuck you. Both obey the FI however. Including 'Christians'.


Unrestrained, men are happy to throw the other guy under the bus, if it means getting ahead, impressing females, or just dumping some spite. That's why males, like females, must be restrained by Scripture. Women and most men are too weak and cowardly even to mind their own business, much less do what is right.

Blogger dee surjourner February 10, 2016 6:15 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger dee surjourner February 10, 2016 6:22 PM  

I agree. Don't help them. Don't be around them alone.

On a very short stint in the military, I opened a door to go into the unit office, to keep the door from slamming into the female directly behind me I held the door out of common courtesy.
Two soldiers who were behind her very emphatically told me, never ever hold the door for a female it would be better to let it slam in her face unless I wanted to risk being brought up on sexual harassment charges.
That occurred in 1987, women are amazed to this day I won't open a door for them.

Thank feminism.
At least they can't say I'm being sexist

Anonymous BGKB February 10, 2016 6:39 PM  

not only will they fail to make up for it, but that all actual scientific activity will cease once a critical mass is reached

Maybe the push to stop science is to keep people from proving IQ is mostly genetic.
http://www.unz.com/jderbyshire/the-science-on-genes-and-iq-an-unstoppable-train/

Blogger BunE22 February 10, 2016 7:06 PM  

Yeah, I don't believe her. You're a grown woman and you wait that long to say something and then you do it publicly, gossiping to others in his field, and hide behind anonymity for an article?

There's more to the story. Like she wanted more but he didn't, or she thought he could open career doors for her but it didn't happen.

Just like the UVA rape hoax, she didn't file charges. He should sue her for slander.

Blogger SS February 10, 2016 7:25 PM  

The SJWs would love nothing better than to try to do to me what they've done to everyone from Jian Gomeshi to James Frenkel. They can't, because I never give them even the slightest molehill out of which to make a mountain.

If you gave the kind of ammunition that's being used against those toads, wouldnt Spacebunny have your nuts on a stick before any of them could even figure out which country to try to get you charged in?

Blogger Charlie Martel February 10, 2016 8:07 PM  

@2 I'm suing the police. There is a hidden camera in case they pull me over and disable the dashcam. Also have a smartpen that doubles as audio recorder. ABC - always be recording.

Blogger Charlie Martel February 10, 2016 8:10 PM  

Oh, as for Jian G... you can't make this up. Lucy got Sarah to testify that indeed Ricky... uh, I mean Jian choked her.

The show had plotlines where she was into BDSM too. Weird, I tell ya...

Blogger Charlie Martel February 10, 2016 8:26 PM  

@39 Mentoring a sweet young girl and realizing that she should run far, far away from the toxic environment we were in led me back to Christ. And I hated people touching my hair when it was long.

Blogger Charlie Martel February 10, 2016 8:28 PM  

@39 Mentoring a sweet young girl and realizing that she should run far, far away from the toxic environment we were in led me back to Christ. And I hated people touching my hair when it was long.

Blogger Charlie Martel February 10, 2016 8:30 PM  

@46 The encounter in the hotel room, he wrote, was “consensual and reciprocal,” adding that “I never showed favoritism to her afterword.

Who is Nathan Grayson?

Gamergate for 400.

Anonymous Man of the Atom February 10, 2016 8:38 PM  

Mentoring of women by me is long over and never coming back. No work feedbacks to women I supervise are done with the two of us alone; now always with another supervisor in tow.

Communications (chats, phone calls, texts) get an e-mail follow-up detailing the conversation and asking for concurrence. Audio and video recorders installed in inconspicuous spots are up next.

Sucks to live like this, but as others have said: it's what the SJWs and the ladies wanted, so they need to suck it up.

Anonymous Millenium February 10, 2016 8:51 PM  

@35 Or you could take the roissyian approach and draw dick pics all over her homework.

Blogger JCclimber February 10, 2016 10:25 PM  

Men, do you have a mission in life? Or are you just kind of drifting along, taking life as it comes?

Yeah, you're vulnerable.

Get a mission. Any woman wants you help, your mentorship? Test to see if it aligns with your mission (protip - it probably won't). Make your mission known. People respect someone on a mission. Someone with focus, who live their life that reflects that mission.

Does being in a room with a woman with no other observers align with your mission? No? then don't be alone with them. Ever. You don't have to be a bitter hard ass about it. Just live it. Always.

and snorting and walking away is not being a hard ass. It is confidently expressing disgust that someone tried to sidetrack your mission. Standing around and railing about honey traps and why you won't help women is not your mission. So live your mission.

Blogger Groot February 10, 2016 10:42 PM  

Tail is addictive. But addiction is bad. Gaze upon that addictive vortex and step around it. You'll need it more and more, and then you're its slave. It's like avoiding getting addicted to heroin: It's more like common sense than some sensei-like Yoda supermagic. Porking the old lady til she screams may not sound like Aristotelian wisdom, and a focus on the kids may not sound like the philosopher's stone, but a glorious marriage with fantastic kids is about as great a bliss as you'll find this side of death or the singularity.

Blogger Chiva February 10, 2016 11:05 PM  

@70. Amen.

Blogger Unknown February 10, 2016 11:45 PM  

Philalethes writes:

"In humans, as my UCB anthro professor gently put it 53 years ago, females are always in heat, so never stop exhibiting sexual behavior, at least until they get old enough to be out of the SMP (and even then most of them never stop trying to get what they want with the same old signals). Though the original reasons for this behavior were probably very pressing (the female's need to capture and keep male provisioning while she was caring for offspring, which was nearly all the time), it doesn't come without considerable cost."

You can argue the same for men. If the signals are live, either party will receive them. However, the argument of, 'She's always asking for it' is the argument that the refugees are using. Is that tenable?

The paper that reports sexual harassment, I venture, used too small samples. It is an anonymous survey. A brave woman that is truly sexually harassed or assaulted will make it clear that she will not be moved or harassed. She will take down the whole field with her. But these women, relying on a SAFE study - note the name - and desire to bring down men of otherwise good standing because they were complimented.

In this case, these women are children, not women. Other female anthropologists grew used to men's leers and dismissed them with a wave of their hand. It didn't stop them from doing their work. A real female scientist that loves her job will let nothing stop her.

But 66% of 666 respondents? Talk about the Devil's Number! I reckon on a bigger scale, many female scientists would report no sexual harassment or come-ons. It's a convenient study for a specific agenda.

Likewise, I'd like to see a study on how gay men sexually objectify straight men/harass them. In order to be truly equal.

Blogger Doc Rampage February 11, 2016 12:15 AM  

I mentored a young woman about 10 years ago. I thought there was no drama and everything went fine. She ended up doing very well professionally. Then a few years later I found out there were rumors going around that she and I had been having an affair. No harm came of it as far as I know, but I can see how it could have gotten ugly if I'd stayed at that company any longer than I did.

The next time a woman hinted that she would like me to mentor her I made up a quick story for why I wasn't mentoring people any more.

Blogger Aeoli Pera February 11, 2016 3:33 AM  

The SJWs would love nothing better than to try to do to me what they've done to everyone from Jian Gomeshi to James Frenkel.

This shouldn't be taken to mean anyone is safe though. Some gals just like to throw a fit and break things, and some people just like to hurt people.

Alexander wrote:You know, normally women like to claim that a woman might be too 'traumatized' to go to the police but she might trust a college bureaucrat.

Apparently, that extends to just shouting it out in public.


Classy. I think the book of Proverbs may have a word or two on this subject.

John rockwell wrote:This is going to result in de facto segregation of the sexes in science.

If only.

Blogger Aeoli Pera February 11, 2016 3:40 AM  

I can't count the number of times I've been sexually harassed by gay men. Including bosses! And you know what? You can just ask them to stop and 99% of them will, and (if you happen to live in a free country) you can just shoot the 1% with your concealed carry.

No woman with a gun was ever sexually assaulted.

Anonymous Robert L February 11, 2016 3:47 AM  

This is like the sex assault charge that opened up Github to the twin track of SJW convergence and hierarchical management. Drive out the competent and you don't have to worry about competition.

In the case of paleoarcheology, that's the narrative of multiple races mixing and expressing neurodiversity, competing with a common human ancestor narrative with the neurodiversity monetised as illnesses.

Anonymous Littlest Hellhound February 11, 2016 4:28 AM  

> No woman with a gun was ever sexually assaulted.

Shits know their targets. If a woman is psychologically willing to shoot a guy in the nuts, 99% of sexual predators won't bother in the first place.

Anonymous Barking Mad February 11, 2016 10:46 AM  

@31

Masculine men do not have to worry about this stuff.
Only effeminate weak men have to worry.
The solution: Men need to man up and quit being weak

@44

Well, then don't help women.
I don't take this stuff too seriously.
I've never met a good masculine man who has to deal with this stuff.
Only the socially awkward jerks have these problems


You two (or one, with two names) are either:

(1) Very young Gammas speaking theoretically
(2) Churchian cucks in longstanding marriages
(3) Women

Regardless, you're idiots.

'Man up' is a big tell, by the way. It used to mean something like "Become stronger, so that you can do your part for the tribe." Now it is a feminized nag term.

Anonymous BGKB February 11, 2016 11:16 AM  

I can't count the number of times I've been sexually harassed by gay men.

Well you are a ginger you know what Milo said about them.

Blogger Kevin O'Keeffe February 11, 2016 11:18 AM  

"...the annual meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists (AAPA), a dramatic scene unfolded at the rooftop bar of the St. Louis Hilton..."

Hey, I'm just enjoying the delicious irony of a meeting of anthropologists being held in St. Louis.

Anonymous John Smallberries February 11, 2016 12:53 PM  

Women, science, sex.

Pick any two.

Blogger Banshee February 11, 2016 3:01 PM  

Let me get this straight.

A person makes a public accusation of criminal behavior, in public, before all of her colleagues who know her. She names names.

However, she asks that other people not name her name, but that only the accused person should be named.

And this is complied with???

Anonymous Shut up rabbit February 11, 2016 4:48 PM  

Having spent many years in academia, those gammas who monetise their amoral autism by doing whatever the free gubbmint money demands of them and the young cockteasers who exploit them are welcome to each other.

Anonymous Aeroguy February 14, 2016 6:46 PM  

It's still damned if you do damned if you don't. When I was a cadet at USAFA during the aftermath of the sexual assault scandal (cadets were making jokes about having to fill out affirmative consent forms 8 years ago) I took a strong "don't do blue" stance of avoiding female cadets. However one of the female cadets (one of the few attractive ones no less, a rare thing) fancied me and word got out of me not availing myself of this opportunity because I don't do blue (angry fem cadets). This put a target on me to be attacked by the resident SJW scorned fem cadets and their betacuck enablers (thankfully I never did anything or failed to meet expectations, but that didn't matter they were able to trump up enough BS about not doing enough to exceed expectations to nearly ruin me, I should have lawyered up way earlier). My recommendation is to treat SJWs like they have plague, keep them out at all costs and if they break through your quarantine run away and make a new quarantine, never share space with them.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts