ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2016 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Friday, April 01, 2016

Feminist faux-cons drink the Kool-aid

You will probably note that NONE of these women have ever been featured on this blog, with the exception of Dana Loesch, aka Mamalogues, who once played the part of a punching bag when she took umbrage concerning my lack of respect for mommyblogging. That's because none of them are anything but feminists of one wave or another who are attempting to make media careers out of the female imperative.
Female Media Members ask Trump Campaign to Fire Core Lewandowski

The press is to have an adversarial, yet civil approach to those in, or running, for elected office. Never in this line of work is it acceptable to respond to reasonable and legitimate questioning with use of physical force. The photographs, audio, videos, and witness accounts documenting the treatment of Michelle Fields by Corey Lewandowski, Donald Trump’s campaign manager, are inexcusable and unprofessional. Donald Trump should immediately remove Lewandowski from his campaign. However unlike the Trump campaign, we believe in making a statement on the record to clearly highlight the difference between right and wrong,” it concludes.

Signed.

Dana Loesch (Radio America, Blaze TV)
Katie Pavlich, (Townhall, Fox News)
Meghan McCain, (America Now Radio, Cosmopolitan, Fox News)
S.E. Cupp, ( New York Daily News, Glamour, CNN)
Mary Katharine Ham, (CNN, The Federalist)
Christine Rosen, (New Atlantis, Commentary)
Christina Hoff Sommers, (American Enterprise Institute)
Bethany Mandel, (The Federalist, Acculturated)
Emily Zanotti, (American Spectator)
Elisha Krauss, (Ben Shapiro’s radio co-host)
Karol Markowicz, (New York Post)
Kristen Soltis Anderson, (Washington Examiner)
Mona Charen, (Ethics and Public Policy Center, Creators Syndicate)
Sarah Rumpf, (freelance)
Brooke Rogers, (National Review)
Mary Chastain, (Breitbart)
Now notice who is not on it. Ann Coulter. Helen Smith. Ilana Mercer. Camille Paglia. Even Michelle Malkin, who was my original model for a conservative media whore, had more sense than to sign on to this collective conservative career suicide note. If I were a right-wing publisher, I would no sooner rely upon any of them to contribute than the average Jezebelle.

The only real disappointment is Christina Hoff Sommers, but this demonstrates that no woman who calls herself a feminist of ANY kind should be trusted to reliably stand up to the Sisterhood.

Labels: ,

186 Comments:

Blogger pyrrhus April 01, 2016 10:04 AM  

Furthermore, these women seem to have defective eyesight, as well as judgment. Or they haven't bothered to watch the video....

Blogger Alexander April 01, 2016 10:06 AM  

Yeah, saw that at Danger and Play and the only disappointment was CHS...

... but it was more the disappointment of something you suspected would happen eventually but held out some hope it might not. Not particularly surprised or upset, just a slow shake of the head.

The others... trololol.

Anonymous VFM #6306 April 01, 2016 10:06 AM  

Show us on the j-school diploma where the cuckservative didn't touch you, ladies.

Blogger Doseux April 01, 2016 10:07 AM  

Based Mom betrayed us?

You must be right. Never trust a Feminist. There is a point where she must either sacrifice the label or sacrifice a libation to that hungry Goddess in the ground.

OpenID denektenorsk April 01, 2016 10:10 AM  

I note, with concern, that they are not too put out by the male reporter who was slammed to the floor by secret service (and then started kicking like a little girl from the floor).

Where is the faux outrage over this ladies?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vo0-v_3ZFmM

Also, from where I'm sitting he got what he deserved. If you bump secret service then, expect to be man handled. You don't want to be man handled? There's an easy way to avoid it...

Blogger Avraham April 01, 2016 10:11 AM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Elocutioner April 01, 2016 10:11 AM  

I did a Twitter search and it looks like the only thing Malkin did was impartially link the overhead video with no commentary. My guess is she knew it was a setup from the start but didn't want to defend Trump so stayed out of it. Extra points for smart.

Blogger Avraham April 01, 2016 10:13 AM  

The job of the secret service is to protect the candidate. There is no way of knowing before-hand when some attempts to barge through to get to him, what they might have up their sleeve. Their job is, if asking does not work, to physically prevent someone from approaching him when they do not know what they are doing.
Is that assault? Then what about the guy that rammed past three secret service agents in Ohio? Why does he not sue for assault?

Blogger The Other Robot April 01, 2016 10:13 AM  

I think they are afraid that with Trump as president the sinecures will go away.

Blogger Ron Winkleheimer April 01, 2016 10:15 AM  

The only real disappointment is Christina Hoff Sommers

Yeah, that was my first thought also. As for Meghan McCain, I would be embarrassed to be included on a list with her.

As for Dana Loesch, I think Blaze TV says it all.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan April 01, 2016 10:15 AM  

These broads I will bet good fiat have never defender a man from the libel and slander coming from the harpy left fems

That is this group's weak spot

Blogger Ron Winkleheimer April 01, 2016 10:17 AM  

You know, if nothing else, Trump's candidacy is a clarifying event.

Blogger Michael O'Duibhir April 01, 2016 10:22 AM  

Meghan McCain: would have been a media star even if her father hadn't been a famous and powerful politician--she would've, really!

S.E. Cupp: whose claim to fame is that she's a lesbian, atheist iconoclast.

Mona Charen: Zionist neo-con whose loyalties are with Israel.

Mary Katharine Ham: I'm surprised and saddened.

Anonymous DE-173/Code19/Vox Nox April 01, 2016 10:22 AM  

The bizarre aspect of this is that these women are playing the "don't pick on girl's card".

Make no mistake, they are part of the coven and not to be trusted.

And Mona Charen is part of the EPPC, whose position of Trump is known.


Blogger Ron Winkleheimer April 01, 2016 10:22 AM  

Christina Hoff Sommers, (American Enterprise Institute)

Considering her employer, I suppose this was inevitable. Still, disappointed.

Blogger Elocutioner April 01, 2016 10:25 AM  

@13 Someone pointed out MKH's husband was a Democrat activist. The mask is off now. Once exposed as a fraud it's difficult to recover with honorable people.

Blogger Alexander April 01, 2016 10:29 AM  

Sixteen Grrrlz, One Cupp.

Blogger Ron Winkleheimer April 01, 2016 10:32 AM  

@16

Oh yes, that's right. He recently died in an accident.

Regardless of that, marrying a Democrat activist when you are supposed to be a conservative reveals a certain un-seriousness to my mind. These aren't minor differences we are debating. That may have been acceptable back when both parties shared certain values and played by the same rules, but that time is long gone.

That sort of fraternization with the enemy is another indication of just why the government establishment does not understand the anger of the electorate.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan April 01, 2016 10:33 AM  

Maybe Phylis Shafly has stood up to feminists when they have attacked conservative men but these lightweights are useless. Probably poor in bed as well, never mind cooking skills

Anonymous SugarPi April 01, 2016 10:33 AM  

Anne Graham Lotz (Billy's daughter and Franklin's sister) recently referred to herself as an "evangelical feminist." I'm about to become a cussin' evangelical.

Anonymous Culture Heretic April 01, 2016 10:34 AM  

There are people honestly surprised over Hoff Sommers? She and Cathy Young used Gamergate for self promotion, the signs were there, and you believed what you wanted to believe.



OpenID denektenorsk April 01, 2016 10:34 AM  

The bizarre aspect of this is that these women are playing the "don't pick on girl's card".

Equal+. They are just as capable as men in EVERYTHING and they have the special rules to prove it.

Blogger CM April 01, 2016 10:35 AM  

I have been quite annoyed by the sisterhood loyalty in spite of visual acuity.

Also, there are far more feminists in conservative circles than i ever cared to know.

Blogger Dexter April 01, 2016 10:36 AM  

Mary Katharine Ham <-- yeah, that's the only one that surprises and disappoints me.

Blogger tz April 01, 2016 10:38 AM  

Trump has drawn a line and said everyone must take sides. No more fuzzy both/neither side.
That some are surprised at who is on which side is a good sign. Even better is the derangement of the opponents. They are exposing themselves.

Blogger Ignatius P. Garnet April 01, 2016 10:48 AM  

I admit from the outset that I cannot find the reference of where I read about what I'm going to relate (and my exact memory of it is unreliable - see below) but I am speculating that Christina Hoff Summers may have been motivated somewhat by her continued embarrassment at having appeared on Red Ice Radio. She is Jewish and Red Ice Radio entertains open discussions of the so-called 'Jewish Question'. Somehow she agreed to be on it to talk about feminism and word is (and this is where my memory fails me) that she either is upset about being supposedly hoodwinked into appearing, or about someone appearing on the show subsequent to her appearance that she believes is anti-semitic. Her participation in the this letter could have something to do with her trying to manage her image and reputation by distancing herself from Trump, who is disliked by those who might have been pissed off by her 'problematic' appearance on the show.

Anonymous Southron April 01, 2016 10:54 AM  

I was disappointed but not surprised to see Based Mom signed this, she's been going around the bend for the past few months. This just confirms the diagnosis that all is not right in Sommers land.

Blogger Gaiseric April 01, 2016 10:54 AM  

Culture Heretic wrote:There are people honestly surprised over Hoff Sommers? She and Cathy Young used Gamergate for self promotion, the signs were there, and you believed what you wanted to believe.
The only thing I know about CHS is that she wrote a decent little book a few years ago. And even then, I got her mixed up with Helen Smith.

That's the thing; these women aren't as important or as visible as they think they are. I'm only vaguely aware of half of those names, and I consider myself reasonably well read with the pundit crowd.

OpenID ar10308 April 01, 2016 10:58 AM  

At least these women will no longer matter, however they all have a following of rabid White Knights. And we'll see if they have any White Knights on the level of Ben Shapiro.

The best commentary I've heard about this incident is from the Justicar here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoW29PMjbbw
Wherein he suggests that Fields should have been arrested more violently and with more dramatic action to demonstrate to the Press that they have the right to print whatever they want, but they do not have the right to breech protected security.

Anonymous fps April 01, 2016 10:59 AM  

I only care about how hot they are.

Anonymous Thor Son April 01, 2016 11:04 AM  

Christina Hoff Sommers is a jew, thus her genetics compel her to align against strong white men.

Blogger Marie April 01, 2016 11:08 AM  

These women are disgusting. They have no right to believe they speak for moral and decent women.

I wonder what Mrs. Lewandowski thinks of these harpies. They are trying to destroy not only her husband's reputation but his ability to provide for his family. I'm sure she appreciates the sisterhood right now.

Do these women not have _any_ men they care about? Why are their husbands not completely outraged by this?

Anonymous Garrulus April 01, 2016 11:13 AM  

"The photographs, audio, videos, and witness accounts documenting the treatment of Michelle Fields by Corey Lewandowski" are indeed "inexcusable and unprofessional."

Anonymous Thor Son April 01, 2016 11:18 AM  

Garrulus: "The photographs, audio, videos, and witness accounts documenting the treatment of Michelle Fields by Corey Lewandowski" are indeed "inexcusable and unprofessional."

No, actually they are not unless you don't like what the Secret Service does. Lewandowski was actually doing the job that the agent behind Trump SHOULD have been doing: keeping this bimbo from touching the candidate. She had already been warned twice.

Blogger tz April 01, 2016 11:19 AM  

Corsi looks up Fields history of accusations
Maybe CHS can start a gofundme for her fainting couch.
I'm not going to wait for a Factual Feminist on the incident.

Blogger Nate April 01, 2016 11:26 AM  

It shouldn't be seen as a disappointment that Sommers is on this list.

Sommers has never claimed to be anything but a feminist. The fact that she is a different sort of feminist has little to do with the fact that she is still a feminist.

But I would be careful with denouncing Sommers.. as the fellow in the Van Down By The River has been doing so loudly. What makes GamerGate fantastic is the very fact that there is no ideological test for it.

Blogger Akulkis April 01, 2016 11:27 AM  

Yeah... brings to mind the observation about "what do you tell a woman with two black eyes?"

Blogger Doseux April 01, 2016 11:27 AM  

She is Jewish
I don't have my Coincidence Indicator! And I have zero natural Jewdar.

This is also why we should be wary of the gay Jew. He is a dangerous faggot, and says as much on his Twitter bio.

Anonymous Anonymous April 01, 2016 11:28 AM  

What a world we "EXIST" in.

Blogger Anchorman April 01, 2016 11:30 AM  

I saw the PJM interview with Coulter, who also doubled down with Trump in he Lewandowski/Fields fiasco.

Why did all those women sign that . . . I don't know what it is supposed to be.

Because they all imagined if they were in Fields' position. Never mind that most of those women wouldn't go overboard initially after or attention seek after the arm grab/brushback.

They put themselves in the situation and can't objectively assess the situation to see mothers grab their children near traffic in the same way.

Also goes to show you that women are FAR more comfortable with hyper-police states in which you can be charged with a crime for touching another person.

Keep in mind, if there's a law on the books, you're authorizing police to use deadly force to bring people in for those crimes.

Anonymous Jerome Horowitz April 01, 2016 11:30 AM  

Vox, what would be the female compliment to cuckservative?

- Jezservative (Jezebelle)
- Mataservative (Mata-hari)
- Delilaservative (Delilah)

Anonymous Ad Victoriam April 01, 2016 11:31 AM  

@33 "Lewandowski was actually doing the job that the agent behind Trump SHOULD have been doing..."

This was my very first thought. I don't have a shred of a doubt that Trump get death threats an order of magnitude more frequently than the Hildebeast changes her depends. His wife and one of his sons have as well. No one on his senior staff, especially Lewandowski, is going to be unaware. However, there is no use crying over spilt milk. I hope the SS have refocused so that nothing like this CAN happen again.

Anonymous DDT April 01, 2016 11:37 AM  

There's an easy way to defend the attitude these women have: take the position that women are not equal to men, and that the real outrage here was that a woman was allowed to perform what is clearly a male-only job.

Anonymous #8601 Jean Valjean April 01, 2016 11:38 AM  

The debate between Milo and Christina Hoff Summers suggests that she's been anti-Trump from the beginning.

Blogger Nate April 01, 2016 11:40 AM  

"The debate between Milo and Christina Hoff Summers suggests that she's been anti-Trump from the beginning."

Correct. In fact I suspect she's actually no different than so many Cruz supporters. It has less to do with the sisterhood... and more to do with the fact that they hate Trump... and sense they hate Trump... binary thinking leads them to take Field's side.

Blogger Arthur Isaac April 01, 2016 11:43 AM  

Mary Katherine I have a different last name than my dead husband? Of the Hugh Hewitt guest hosting fame?

Blogger Escoffier April 01, 2016 11:43 AM  

Am I coining the term 'jillanape?'
I think I might be.

Blogger Jon M April 01, 2016 11:44 AM  

Thirded on Meghan McCain. The boy and I listen to her radio show on the commute home from time to time just for the lulz. If you didn't know she was genuine you would think she is a parody sketch, and her utter obliviousness to her ridiculousness just makes it all the more funny.

Blogger Escoffier April 01, 2016 11:44 AM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Anonymous Feh April 01, 2016 11:47 AM  

Christina Hoff Sommers is a jew, thus her genetics compel her to align against strong white men.

Unless the man is a Democrat.

Anonymous Roundtine April 01, 2016 11:49 AM  

How come no men signed this? It shows the depth of their progressivism that they didn't even think to fig leaf it with cucks like Ben Shapiro.

Blogger Sevron April 01, 2016 11:51 AM  

Ben is probably putting on a dress as we speak so he can get in on it.

Anonymous Uncle Maffoo April 01, 2016 11:51 AM  

@36

"I'm not telling you to a third time to get back in the kitchen..."

Anonymous Philalethes April 01, 2016 11:51 AM  

Lately I've been struck by how even the "best" women always, sooner or later, revert to type under stress. Even Ann Coulter – whom I much enjoy – was caught the other day lamenting Trump's coarseness of manner. In other words, he doesn't talk or act like a woman – which, on a thinking level, women simply cannot understand (and Coulter is a very thinky woman). She later walked it back. Fair enough. But fair warning.

I'll still hold Coulter to her famous (if perhaps not entirely serious) pronouncement: "It would be a much better country if women did not vote. That is simply a fact." (Quoted at Wikipedia.) Perhaps that could be a useful test to determine if a woman can be counted on "when the going gets tough."

Once again, Jefferson hit it on the head:

Were our State a pure democracy, in which all its inhabitants should meet together to transact all their business, there would yet be excluded from their deliberations, 1. Infants, until arrived at years of discretion. 2. Women, who, to prevent depravation of morals and ambiguity of issue, could not mix promiscuously in the public meetings of men.

Blogger VD April 01, 2016 11:52 AM  

Vox, what would be the female compliment to cuckservative?

The FEMINIST compliment would be jezervative.

Blogger CM April 01, 2016 11:53 AM  

Vox, what would be the female compliment to cuckservative?

The same word suffices. A woman whose husband is unfaithful is a "cucquean", so cuckservative still fits.

However, I'm not sure that word truly fits this situation.

Anonymous Southron April 01, 2016 11:55 AM  

@Nate you're dead on about not out-grouping CHS.

Blogger Marie April 01, 2016 11:59 AM  

Just call them feminists. That's what they are.

They are women who put the female imperative above everything else including common sense, morality and justice.

And it has the benefit of ticking them off....

What more do you want?

Anonymous Philalethes April 01, 2016 12:02 PM  

Christina Hoff Sommers... Some 15 years ago, when I was struggling to come to terms with the damage done to me at birth by an ancient Goddess-worship blood ritual, I came across Sommers' book The War Against Boys. I turned to the index and looked under C, and found not a single mention of the preemptive, surgical first strike in that war, which has been imposed upon American (white) boys almost universally since World War II. I knew then I couldn't take her seriously.

Shortly thereafter I wrote in an online men's forum:

I'm not in the cheering section for such women as "iFeminists" or Christina Hoff Sommers. Sure, she makes more sense than most women these days, but she still thinks as a woman—as this quote makes clear, confirming my previous take on her. "Who stole feminism?" [Her other famous book.] The truth is, nobody "stole" feminism: it was never anything other than what it is now. The only thing that's changed is that feminism's overwhelming success has revealed its true nature to an extent seldom before seen.

I note that the subtitle of The War Against Boys has now been changed, from "How Misguided Feminism Is Harming Our Young Men" to "How Misguided Policies are Harming Our Young Men". Perhaps this had something to do with her translation from "Philosophy Professor" to the American Enterprise Institute?

I didn't know she was a Matriarch of the Tribe; figures – and helps to explain my first paragraph above. Rich Zubaty (from What Men Know That Women Don't):

Superficially Judaism might appear male-dominated, but only someone who has never been inside a Jewish household could accuse Judaism of being a patriarchy. My ex is Jewish. My kids are Jewish. Morning minyan is the only place men can go to get away from the women and that's only because the women are still in bed. Judaism is a Matriarchy disguised as a Patriarchy. Jewish women obey no one – not their husbands, not their God.

(I too was married to a Jewish girl – no children, thank G-d – but that was 50 years ago, and I knew nothing of the Red Pill; however I now understand much better a lot of what I saw while inside the culture.)

Anonymous mp3 April 01, 2016 12:04 PM  

Even though CHS works at the AEI, she is a democrat and as such votes for her party. Paul Elam of AVFM did a expose' on CHS and here is the link.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCdqgrBI_vo

Anonymous Dr. Brooklyn April 01, 2016 12:05 PM  

I followed her on Twitter for a while. She's fully in the tank for Sanders.

Blogger CM April 01, 2016 12:05 PM  

Lately I've been struck by how even the "best" women always, sooner or later, revert to type under stress.

I don't know why. Its very demanding to behave in a way that doesn't come naturally.

Sure, with practice some things get easier, but others can stay difficult.

Being offended by tone is an easy trap for most women, no matter which side they are on. It requires a good deal of thought management to get over how statements make us feel even when we know feelings are unreliable. Trump seriously pushes the edges of that... but that us why he is so good at rhetoric, right?

Anonymous #8601 Jean Valjean April 01, 2016 12:07 PM  

These ladies should be endorsing Trump as the Republican nominee given 1) he's by far the most Alpha and 2) he's probably the most liberal. Even on abortion, he clearly doesn't feel that strongly about it.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash April 01, 2016 12:11 PM  

there a very very few women who believe no woman should be allowed to vote. There are many women who believe that she alone of women should be allowed to vote.

Meghan McCain's job is to embarrass republicans. Being an embarrassment is her one skill. It's like she was born to the job.

Anonymous VFM #6306 April 01, 2016 12:12 PM  

Jezzervative is to identify the feminist entryists to conservatism, Marie. Feminists are poison in general, but the jezzervatives are the poisons who wear the Drink Me sign and go entice the dumb doormat cuckservatives into fully destroying their ostensible "principles."

People hear "Feminist conservative" and think "oh! A good kind of feminist!" They hear jezzervative and think jezebel, betrayal, jizz etc.

It is a good term and very specific to the danger such media whores pose.

Blogger Ron Winkleheimer April 01, 2016 12:13 PM  

lamenting Trump's coarseness of manner

Its not just women that do that. Most of objections to him I have heard, no matter what the stated reasons, always come down to his being unacceptable to "other people" because he isn't conforming to the polite modes of discourse that have stood the Republicans so well.

If we can just rid ourselves of Trump and nominate a moderate, all will be well.

Blogger Sam Lively April 01, 2016 12:15 PM  

@60

Trump has some very strong women supporters on Twitter who use this trait to be offended on his behalf - Diamond & Silk & AJ Delgado spring to mind.

Trump's problem is the media leviathan warring against him has so much to offer ambitious young women - being offended by Trump is a first-class ticket to the front of the camera. And, as Michelle Fields has shown, it's a great way to recruit a personal retinue of well-connected white knight pundits.

Blogger Anchorman April 01, 2016 12:15 PM  

I don't know why. Its very demanding to behave in a way that doesn't come naturally.

I talked about it earlier, but it's really summed up in one word: solipsism.

Blogger BunE22 April 01, 2016 12:15 PM  

This just shows what b.s. feminism is. If you wanted to be truly equal you would take the same treatment that men take, but they only make that claim then use their sex as a weapon whenever they can.

If it was a man that was grabbed they'd say nothing.

If it was Hillary leaving a press conference and a female campign manager grabbed a male reporter they'd say nothing.

Hypocrites, all of them.

Blogger David Power April 01, 2016 12:22 PM  


The media tack I would advise Team Trump to take regarding the farcical Fields/Lewandowski incident, is...

Michelle Fields making a meal (ticket) out of this absurd non-event is setting female journalism back several decades. Her decision to play the weak female victim over such a trivial matter, is an insult to all the genuinely intrepid and professional female journalists who put their lives on the line to report real news stories around the world every day. She should be thoroughly ashamed of herself and no respected news organisation should ever consider employing her again.

My personal theory about what actually happened, is...

As Lewandowski leans across to prevent Fields from harassing his boss, he is distracted by the weasel Ben Terris. As he lightly grabs her arm he feels just how unsteady she is on her feet - due to the ridiculous choice of shoes she has made for such an assignment and the uneven floor surface (see pick below) - So rather than let her fall to the ground he tightens his grip to hold her up. Hence the light bruising on her arm. It is possible that all this occurred so quickly and so instinctively that he didn't even register it at the time.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cevc__kXIAA1UjS.jpg:large

Blogger Nate April 01, 2016 12:23 PM  

"The boy and I listen to her radio show on the commute home from time to time just for the lulz."

wait... You can't see her tits on the radio.

Blogger Nate April 01, 2016 12:25 PM  

"Lately I've been struck by how even the "best" women always, sooner or later, revert to type under stress."

Vox just gave you a list of several women who did not... and Malkin is hardly among the best.

Seriously son... how mean was your mother to you?

Blogger Marie April 01, 2016 12:27 PM  

64. VFM #6306

Ah, that is a very good point. Thank you.

Anonymous Tiny Duck April 01, 2016 12:29 PM  

Why do you guys hate women so much?

It makes one wonder if you have ever had any contact let alone a conversation with one....

Blogger Were-Puppy April 01, 2016 12:32 PM  

@30 fps
I only care about how hot they are.
---

Roll 1d4 / 2

Blogger CM April 01, 2016 12:34 PM  

Seriously son... how mean was your mother to you?

I quote:
Some 15 years ago, when I was struggling to come to terms with the damage done to me at birth by an ancient Goddess-worship blood ritual

Nevermind that Ancient Judaism is not goddess-worship or matriarchal.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother April 01, 2016 12:34 PM  

Wait S.E. Cupp is a lesbian?

Anonymous #8601 Jean Valjean April 01, 2016 12:40 PM  

Even Ann Coulter has been wavering. She called Trump "mental" the other day. I believe it was after Trump sent out the Melania vs. Heid Cruz "who would you rather" pic.

But I'm sure Ann will come back around.

Anonymous BGKB April 01, 2016 12:40 PM  

too put out by the male reporter who was slammed to the floor by secret service (and then started kicking like a little girl

He even self identified as a pussy.

If you bump secret service then, expect to be man handled. You don't want to be man handled? There's an easy way to avoid it

I don't think the list is used to getting handled by men

Sixteen Grrrlz, One Cupp. Its a super sized cup of bonbons.

Someone pointed out MKH's husband was a Democrat activist. The mask is off now. Once exposed as a fraud

Was she pretty enough when she got married to have much choice in who she dated?

Also, there are far more feminists in conservative circles than i ever cared to know.

Have you seen what passes for men at democrat conventions? Feminists would rather have abortion banned than a law saying husbands and future husbands must be informed before a marriage is considered valid of abortions women had, as that would take away potential good men from them.

Sommers is a jew, thus her genetics compel her to align against strong white men.

I almost wish that affected gay jews also.

Blogger SciVo April 01, 2016 12:45 PM  

Tsk. The very same day that she correctly answered the question, Intersectional Feminism: What Is It? (Spoiler: a conspiracy theory.)

Anonymous BigGayKoranBurner April 01, 2016 12:48 PM  

Why do you guys hate women so much? It makes one wonder if you have ever had any contact let alone a conversation

You can either love women or understand them, but you can't go back from the latter.

"The boy and I listen to her radio show on the commute home from time to time just for the lulz."

For years I thought the webcomic Gynostar was made by the biggest shitlord on the internet, only to find out its actually not trying to parody feminism.

Blogger Sir Thermite April 01, 2016 12:50 PM  

Slightly OT, but the highest-ranking NCO in the Michigan National Guard is on leave pending investigation of a complaint made by a woman at a bar near one of their bases, despite a deputy sheriff already concluding that there was no contact that would constite charges for criminal sexual conduct. Disgusting...girls may not run the world, but they do run Amerika
http://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2016/03/31/top-military-official-investigated-over-incident-michigan-bar/82462632/

(apologies for the lack of a hyperlink but I'm typing on my phone and lunch break is ending )

Blogger David Power April 01, 2016 12:54 PM  

As tv viewers were being whipped up into a frenzy over a journalist having her arm tugged, our beloved Middle Eastern allies were executing people in cold blood in broad daylight with hardly a peep from our blame stream churnalists.

Pay special attention to 1:40 to 1:53...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Kr9kl4Ozvcg


Anonymous johnc April 01, 2016 12:56 PM  

Some of these women won't be happy until every male is de-balled. There's nothing wrong with what this Lewandowski guy did.

How are good people going to win any battle if every drop of testosterone is wrung out?

Anonymous #8601 Jean Valjean April 01, 2016 1:01 PM  

@82 How are good people going to win any battle if every drop of testosterone is wrung out?

The Gavin McInnes 30-day wank-free plan is supposed to help with that.

Anonymous Philalethes April 01, 2016 1:03 PM  

@71 Nate:

Vox just gave you a list of several women who did not... and Malkin is hardly among the best.

The play is far from over. All the women in the OP were, if not featured here, generally accepted in "conservative" circles as supporters of the cause – until the right button was pushed. Then the wagons were circled instanter. The others Vox cites – who knows? I got nothing against them, but... I discovered Camille Paglia 20 years ago, and was initially quite excited by (some of) her writing. She even described herself as "a woman who thinks like a man." But after a while I thought, No, Camille, you're a woman who thinks she thinks like a man. Not the same thing, though I still enjoyed her early work. She has, indeed, finally abandoned Hillary – for Sanders. Lotta deep thinking there.

Seriously son... how mean was your mother to you?

Seriously kid (I'd guess I'm about a generation older than you)... My mother was very good to me, as a matter of fact. Born in 1921, she was inevitably somewhat infected by feminism later in her life, but only after she'd done her best for 22 years to be a good wife and mother – which she was, exemplary. It was, in fact, my father who treated me and my sister like shit – which was why my mother finally felt forced to leave him, and regretted for the rest of her life that she hadn't done so sooner. (He was incredibly good-looking and intelligent – once took a battery of IQ tests as a lark and scored 100% on all – but unfortunately an emotional train-wreck; as an 18-year-old, my mother thought she'd caught an Alpha way out of her league, and married him against her parents' advice. Lotta red pill lessons in that story, I now understand.)

I'm not a misogynist – I've always gotten along well with women – but I am a truth-seeker. What else is there to seek? And lately it's becoming more clear that there are just some subjects about which women are incapable of rationality. The particularly offending subject may be different for different women, but I'm simply no longer surprised when a woman suddenly goes ballistic in the middle of what I'd thought was a reasoned discussion. The problem is: How are you to know ahead of time where the wheel-destroying pothole will be? My sister, whom I dearly love, has just disowned me because of my mildly positive comments (not raves) about Trump:

You are a gentle and peace-loving soul, the opposite of Trump, whose spirit can be described, in part, this way: Racist, bully, misogynist, bigot, narcissist, insane, megalomaniac, Liar.  He is crass and vulgar and he has no respect for women; I don't care what he proclaims -  Manifestations don't lie!

A good friend, fellow long-time student of Constitutional/Patriot issues, tells me the same story, about his one surviving family member: "As for arguing the current political adventure with a brainwashed over-emotional sister... I'm not going to go there. Sister T would cast me aside with no further warning and I would never hear from her ever again. Maybe I'd get one Christmas card per year. But boy does she HATE Trump."

*Sigh*

Blogger Giraffe April 01, 2016 1:09 PM  

Wait S.E. Cupp is a lesbian?

Yep. I'm curious, is that a plus or a minus for you?

Blogger Snidely Whiplash April 01, 2016 1:12 PM  

Tiny Duck wrote:Why do you guys hate women so much?


No, it's YOU we hate. I know you feel very pretty today, and have multiple sock puppets, but you're not "women"

Anonymous Scholar-at-Arms April 01, 2016 1:15 PM  

I was very disappointed to see Christina Hoff Sommers on there too, but not terribly surprised. I figured the election would drive a wedge there sooner or later.

Anonymous tublecane April 01, 2016 1:16 PM  

@54-"Cuckqueen" is a silly term thought up by lazy ignoramuses.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash April 01, 2016 1:16 PM  

Stg58/Animal Mother wrote:Wait S.E. Cupp is a lesbian?

Wait, S. E. Cupp is a woman?

Blogger Snidely Whiplash April 01, 2016 1:19 PM  

SciVo wrote:Tsk. The very same day that she correctly answered the question, Intersectional Feminism: What Is It? (Spoiler: a conspiracy theory.)
Feminism itself is an elaborate conspiracy theory, in which a faceless cabal called The Patriarchy, to which all men and most women belong, is responsible for every unhappiness in a woman's life.

Anonymous Philalethes April 01, 2016 1:20 PM  

@74 CM:

Nevermind that Ancient Judaism is not goddess-worship or matriarchal.

See quote from pioneer red-piller Rich Zubaty in @57 above. Like him, I've been inside the house, even considered converting at a time when I was uncertain of my own identity; thank G-d I did not. The "Patriarchy" of Judaism is a front for the real rulers.

I think women rule the world, and that no man has ever done anything that a woman either hasn't allowed him to do or encouraged him to do. (Bob Dylan, Rolling Stone interview, June 21, 1984; guess his tribal ancestry)

@79 BGKB:

You can either love women or understand them, but you can't go back from the latter.

I'd say I now do both, where most of my life I did only the former, to my sorrow. The latter must temper the former, or a man is lost.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash April 01, 2016 1:23 PM  

The traditional term for a woman whose husband fucks another woman is "wife". It's neither uncommon enough nor humiliating enough to have it's own term, and literally no woman has that as a fetish.

Blogger tz April 01, 2016 1:32 PM  

@39: For the she devils, NonServ!ative

Anonymous elmer t. jones April 01, 2016 1:34 PM  

This follows a recent pattern of indignation and outrage from journalismists over the lack of popular respect for their profession.

OpenID denektenorsk April 01, 2016 1:35 PM  


Why do you guys hate women so much?

It makes one wonder if you have ever had any contact let alone a conversation with one....


For me I take women at face value when they say they want to be treated just like men. When they are treated just like men (i.e. they are not given deference or Equal+ treatment) they cry about it. I dislike hypocrites - regardless of their sex. You see, I actually believe in equality. Or, if you want special treatment that's fine too, just don't scream about ME being sexist when YOU want to be treated special.

FFS, she was brushed out of the way. Her initial claims were much worse until video upon video surfaced that didn't support the charges. To hear her account you'd think she was thrown to the ground by a jack booted thug and curb stomped (and no doubt eye raped too, but I digress).

As I pointed out earlier there was a male reporter who WAS thrown to the ground and I see no faux tears over his treatment. Also, he got what he deserved.

As for female contact, stop projecting.

Blogger Teri April 01, 2016 1:39 PM  

@62,

I've come to believe that women shouldn't be able to vote. They vote on emotion not facts. I am a woman, ex-feminist.
But in my defense for continuing to vote, I am a property owner. No kids, so I don't have a stake in how this all plays out.

Anonymous Spartacus xxxxx April 01, 2016 1:40 PM  

Scholar-at-Arms wrote:I was very disappointed to see Christina Hoff Sommers on there too, but not terribly surprised.

Don't be disappointed, she is acting in character.

http://mileswmathis.com/boys.pdf

...like Noam Chomsky and Tom Wolfe and many others I have recently exposed, Sommers appeared to be controlling the opposition... Sommers consistently misdirects us. She asks “Who Stole Feminism?” but utterly fails to tell us...

Sommers is promoting the idea that girls aren't in a crisis: they are doing just fine. She tells us they are doing better than boys in almost every way. While they probably are doing better than boys in the ways Sommers describes, her statistics also appear to me to be pushed. Her conclusions don't fit the obvious experience of anyone with eyes. That experience confirms on a daily basis that neither boys nor girls are doing fine. Everyone in this culture is traumatized, and from my research over the past decade it appears they are being traumatized on purpose. This includes boys and girls, men and women, of all ages and all races.

Blogger tz April 01, 2016 1:41 PM  

@76 - Coulter simply expressed some of the angst over having a swarm of cruzbots buzzing "See! See! Trump is a nasty piece of work" who will come around and be a big bother.

We understand Trump pushes the envelope and that is part of the attraction.

But I would like to get out of the bee keeper's suit for a while - he doesn't have to keep bashing the hive.

That didn't and won't alter support for Trump.

The difference is we are acknowledging a gaffe or error on Trump's part. Cruz supporters won't admit he can't walk on water.

Blogger Nick S April 01, 2016 1:42 PM  

Tiny Duck wrote:Why do you guys hate women so much?

It makes one wonder if you have ever had any contact let alone a conversation with one....


Shutup, T. a D.

Blogger Crowhill April 01, 2016 1:49 PM  

Yes, seeing Christina Hoff Sommers on the list is a disappointment. I enjoy some of her stuff.

Anonymous BGKB April 01, 2016 1:49 PM  

Speaking of drinks, moslems got ahold of some drinking water. Verizon won't say the location that got hacked could it be Flint? I mean govt workers being too stupid to add chemicals to reduce acidity would seem like a stretch for most people.

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/03/muslim-hackers-infiltrate-water-utilitys-control-system-change-levels-of-chemicals-used-to-treat-tap-water

Anonymous tublecane April 01, 2016 1:50 PM  

@89-I'm constantly surprised by who the the MSM throws at me as someone I'm supposed to think is attractive. I know who runs the fashion industry, for instance, and that same cabal or people like or people brainwashed by them control the rest of the advertising/entertainment complex. Which explains the never-ending train of transsexual (looking) sex symbols. But you'd think political punditry, which only requires a head and is there for purposes other than titillation could be allowed to use one or two feminine women. They have enough anchor and reporter slots to fill with man-women.

S.E. Coup isn't ugly, but she's also not feminine. She's not terribly un-feminine. She has legs, in the Fox tradition. But why do I get the feeling I'm supposed to think she's hot? And why don't I get the same feeling for the genuinely feminine women who infrequently trip onto my television screen? Can't we do better?

Anonymous A Visitor April 01, 2016 2:09 PM  

Loesch I used to think was intelligent.

Megan McCain I've never liked.

Mary Katharine Ham...man is that disappointing! I really respected her.

The rest I, save S.E. Cupp whom I've heard of once maybe, I've never heard of. Needless to say, all of them I have no respect for. Even those ostensibly on our side, like Ham and Loesch show their true colors. #Repealthe19th!!!!!

I didn't know Loesch had $44k in liens. Heh! Limbaugh just brought up how feminists will soon ask for tax exemptions for tampons. You know, he's pointing out how Matthews was trying to divide people. Well, if women couldn't vote this issue would be a non-issue.

"Now notice who is not on it. Ann Coulter. Helen Smith. Ilana Mercer. Camille Paglia. Even Michelle Malkin, who was my original model for a conservative media whore, had more sense than to sign on to this collective conservative career suicide note."

Ding ding ding!!!!!

@17 DISGUSTING!!!

@18 Exactly!!

@25 In that case, TRUMPENKRIEG!!!!!! And no, I'm not going to Trumsplain.

@32 The husbands are either snivelling wimps or they aren't married.

@36 Have not heard that one. What?

@62 My best friend's wife is one. This girl I was after for a while was another. They're rare. My friend's wife even identifies fitness testing correctly as a temptation women have of usurping male authority.

@64 I know...*sigh* Actually having an American candidate for POTUS who has a ZFG mentality and is willing to put Americans first...*gasp* so wrong!!!

@72 TIME TO FEED ZE TROLL! Oh, I've had plenty of contact with women. What about you? Ever talked to one from your mom's basement (and no she and your sisters do not count)?

@84 That's a really cool backstory, actually. I'm always jealous of those whose parents were born in the '20s or earlier. One of my favorite priests (he died in 2011) grew up int he 20s.

@95 I echo you, good sir. They wanted equality. They got it! You want to be treated special? Unless you're family (even then I apply equality) give up the 19th and go make me a sandwich!!

@96 I believe that only property owners should vote. Yes, that'd eliminate me immediately but hey, no special rules.

Anonymous #8601 Jean Valjean April 01, 2016 2:13 PM  

@98 TZ

Well said. The Trump supporters that they trot out on the networks sure have their hands full these days. They are constantly put on the defensive by the hosts. Of course, the blame lies largely with the Trump supporters themselves. If they were at all competent, they would turn the tables on the hosts. I think the networks purposely bring out second rate Trump supporters.

Blogger praetorian April 01, 2016 2:21 PM  

If they were at all competent, they would turn the tables on the hosts

Most people aren't Sociopathic Evil Dark Lords of Evil of Supergeniusness. When big media wants to wreck someone, they wreck them. If Trump, the God Emperor and Patron Saint of Unstumpableness, can get cornered like this, what hope to mere mortals have?

ZFG, 1477 (The fourteen leaders of Gamer Gate)

Anonymous BGKB April 01, 2016 2:27 PM  

If they were at all competent, they would turn the tables on the hosts. I think the networks purposely bring out second rate

Any points they scored would be edited out. NBC even edited out the criminal behavior described in George Zimmerman's 911 call to make it sound like he was only calling about a black, and many times they show a cop shooting a vibrant with less than 3 seconds before the shot which would reverse opinion. Even the Chicago cop shooting they didn't show 5 seconds before the shot which would have exonerated the cop when there was 5 min of dashcam footage, that if watched would have people noticing stereotypical behavior.

OT: Man fined for not letting gays into his home. http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2016/03/-illinois-businessman-fined-80000-for-exercising-his-first-amendment-right.html

Blogger M Cephas April 01, 2016 2:36 PM  

I think when it comes to the Jews, a fear of being deported themselves keeps them up at night.

If Americans successfully deport Muslims, and illegals, they take a giant step forward in dealing with any who try and either corrupt or take over their culture.

Blogger 744 Bosoms of Liberty April 01, 2016 2:40 PM  

The only time you take what a woman says seriously is when she's saying, "Harder!"

Blogger CM April 01, 2016 2:41 PM  

But in my defense for continuing to vote, I am a property owner. No kids, so I don't have a stake in how this all plays out.

I'm willing to not vote. Quite honestly, I'd prefer not bothering with politics.

But as long as the loonies are voting, I'll keep voting against them.

Blogger Nick S April 01, 2016 2:42 PM  

BGKB wrote:OT: Man fined for not letting gays into his home. http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2016/03/-illinois-businessman-fined-80000-for-exercising-his-first-amendment-right.html

That's bullshit. "If it keeps on rainin', levee's goin' to break"

Blogger Anchorman April 01, 2016 2:43 PM  

Speaking of drinks, moslems got ahold of some drinking water. Verizon won't say the location that got hacked could it be Flint? I mean govt workers being too stupid to add chemicals to reduce acidity would seem like a stretch for most people.

I thought it trickled out to be upstate NY.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother April 01, 2016 3:12 PM  

Double plus awesome!

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother April 01, 2016 3:14 PM  

Double plus awesome!

Blogger Snidely Whiplash April 01, 2016 3:14 PM  

744 Bosoms of Liberty wrote:The only time you take what a woman says seriously is when she's saying, "Harder!"
Damn, son, that's when you slow down.

Anonymous BlueSwedeShoes April 01, 2016 3:20 PM  

@79

Gynostar certainly has moments of brilliance.

Blogger Nate April 01, 2016 3:22 PM  

"The play is far from over. All the women in the OP were, if not featured here, generally accepted in "conservative" circles as supporters of the cause – until the right button was pushed. "

and what of the thousands of women... like Spacebunny.. or Six's wife.. or my own wife... who heard Trump say women who get abortions should be punished and said, "Damn right they should!"

I realize its difficult to accept but there are still many women out there that are in fact adults and are perfectly able to take responsibility for their actions and be accountable for the results.

Anonymous Scintan April 01, 2016 3:23 PM  

Loesch I used to think was intelligent.

Megan McCain I've never liked.

Mary Katharine Ham...man is that disappointing! I really respected her.

The rest I, save S.E. Cupp whom I've heard of once maybe, I've never heard of. Needless to say, all of them I have no respect for. Even those ostensibly on our side, like Ham and Loesch show their true colors. #Repealthe19th!!!!!


Once you realize that the primary aim of the West can be boiled down to "Don't hurt the girl", and that almost all women, and most men, have this as their first motivation, pretty much everything else falls into place.

feminist/not feminist
liberal/conservative

The labels don't really matter, until they are looked at as secondary characteristics.

Blogger 744 Bosoms of Liberty April 01, 2016 3:24 PM  

Nate wrote:I realize its difficult to accept but there are still many women out there that are in fact adults and are perfectly able to take responsibility for their actions and be accountable for the results.

Which is why we never hear from them. A good and wise woman does not try to counsel men in public.

Blogger Nate April 01, 2016 3:25 PM  

"My sister, whom I dearly love, has just disowned me because of my mildly positive comments (not raves) about Trump:"

fascinating. and what of all the men out there that are doing the exact same thing? Or do you suppose that it is only women taking these steps? Because if you think that you're grossly mistaken. Trump is extremely divisive... there are plenty of scalzied men out there that will cut you out of their lives just like your sister did.

This is what you're missing... its not about the vagina.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash April 01, 2016 3:27 PM  

Nate wrote:This is what you're missing... its not about the vagina.
Then maybe Scalzi isn't the best example.
Just sayin'

Anonymous A Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents April 01, 2016 3:29 PM  

BGKB

You can either love women or understand them, but you can't go back from the latter.


Depends on the definition of "love" I guess.

Personally, the more I understand women, the more I like them.
Like dogs and cats - expecting a cat to be a dog doesn't work, but expecting a cat to be a cat turns out just fine.

Anonymous A Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents April 01, 2016 3:31 PM  

johnc
Some of these women won't be happy until every male is de-balled.

Nah. Just 90%.

Blogger Anchorman April 01, 2016 3:48 PM  

feminist/not feminist
liberal/conservative


I've been giving some thought to post election 2016.

There's a decent chance it could mean the end of the GOP as a presidential contender and maybe even at the state or local (less likely).

Got me thinking of something my uncle said. He said Israel only really holds together because of the Arab pressure. Absent that, they'd fracture.

I wonder if the absence of a viable second party would also lead to the left and hard left fracturing in two or three election cycles.

Blogger Cecil Henry April 01, 2016 3:56 PM  

Christina Hoff Sommers is Jewish.

So nothing is a surprise. Feminism is just a convenience for a bigger agenda. One she is rarely honest about-as we see here.

Anonymous drnick April 01, 2016 4:05 PM  

Anchorman wrote:\
Got me thinking of something my uncle said. He said Israel only really holds together because of the Arab pressure. Absent that, they'd fracture.

I wonder if the absence of a viable second party would also lead to the left and hard left fracturing in two or three election cycles.


Your comment is interesting, but in the sense of America fracturing. Israel would break apart overnight if Arab pressure became insufficient to unite it, in the case of genuinely peaceful and secular neighbors. Say, if an army of unicorns descended and slaughtered all the Muslims. In the same way, American conservatives are visibly no longer interested in dealing with their establishment, or they'd just pick Cruz instead of Trump. So if anything the left and hard left will be united, either by a civil war or by living in a separate country from conservatives.

To the extent that "either" is the word there.

Blogger praetorian April 01, 2016 4:11 PM  

I'm afraid it is mostly about the vagina.

It was always mostly about the vagina.

Blogger FALPhil April 01, 2016 4:12 PM  

So if anything the left and hard left will be united, either by a civil war or by living in a separate country from conservatives.

I vote for hte latter. And I will watch them starve.

Blogger pyrrhus April 01, 2016 4:13 PM  

"I realize its difficult to accept but there are still many women out there that are in fact adults and are perfectly able to take responsibility for their actions and be accountable for the results."

Define "many"...

Blogger Anchorman April 01, 2016 4:18 PM  

More than 1?

Blogger praetorian April 01, 2016 4:27 PM  

"I realize its difficult to accept but there are still many women out there that are in fact adults and are perfectly able to take responsibility for their actions and be accountable for the results."

Hmm.... Are you saying that not all women are like that?

Blogger Arthur Isaac April 01, 2016 4:41 PM  

Feminists like CHF only seem enlightened because they are becoming aware that long term the war on men will hurt women. That doesn't change their original goal, it merely modifies it.

Like the parasite that has adapted to not outright kill it's primary hosts is the feminist like CHF and the Churchian complementarian.

Blogger SteelPalm April 01, 2016 5:14 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Lana J April 01, 2016 5:14 PM  

Completely on topic, guys, this is hilarious Why I Have Resigned From Breitbart News.

Blogger Mastermind April 01, 2016 5:15 PM  

I like Michelle Malkin. She may be a media whore but she's usually fair and reasonable, and even has an Ann Coulter grade troll to her name (she wrote a book justifying Japanese internment). To top it all off she had a feud with Donald Trump long before he ran for president but still manages to cover him fairly for the most part despite not being his supporter, which can't be said for the bulk of cuckservative commentators, men or women.

Blogger SteelPalm April 01, 2016 5:15 PM  

Let's not downplay this; CHF signing this sucks, regardless of whether she still uses the "feminist" moniker or not. And to the commentators, don't act like you predicted it, either. After all, she has been a staunch, effective ally for a long time.

I hope she comes to her senses, but if not, it's unfortunate.

Anonymous WaterBoy April 01, 2016 5:19 PM  

Mastermind: "she wrote a book justifying Japanese internment"

Really? Do tell....

Blogger Arthur Isaac April 01, 2016 5:19 PM  

#135 Yes I'm claiming genius for taking CFH at her word when she declares herself a feminist. We can all be shocked when women are her sole concern.

Blogger SteelPalm April 01, 2016 5:21 PM  

@134

Yeah, I have always considered Malkin to be similar to Coulter, albeit with less of a sense of humor.

I'm not a fan of either woman, but neither do I dislike them, either.

Blogger SciVo April 01, 2016 5:21 PM  

A Visitor wrote:@36 Have not heard that one. What?

Nothin'. You already done told her twice.

praetorian wrote:I'm afraid it is mostly about the vagina.

It was always mostly about the vagina.


Well, that's just because it's not about the nail.

Blogger SteelPalm April 01, 2016 5:25 PM  

@137

Yeah, and Kasich calls himself a "Republican". While Jim Webb calls himself a "Democrat". Which one is actually the more leftist and SJW of the two?

Can you point to any other action by CHF over the last two years that was even remotely treacherous? On the contrary, she was a good friend and ally of Milo's who staunchly fought the SJWs.

Blogger Nick S April 01, 2016 5:59 PM  

Arthur Isaac wrote:Feminists like CHF only seem enlightened because they are becoming aware that long term the war on men will hurt women. That doesn't change their original goal, it merely modifies it.

Like the parasite that has adapted to not outright kill it's primary hosts is the feminist like CHF and the Churchian complementarian.


Yeah, social conditioning/environmental acclimatization is a real problem. Some are more susceptible than other. Fortunately, the effects are reversible given a conducive environment and, as we know, the pendulum swings.

Anonymous Michael Maier April 01, 2016 6:10 PM  

WaterBoy April 01, 2016 5:19 PM
Mastermind: "she wrote a book justifying Japanese internment"

Really? Do tell....


Have I said how much I really love this place lately?

Anonymous Millenium April 01, 2016 6:19 PM  

@68: Now I wonder whether her wearing ridiculous heels she could barely walk on was part of the set up. She was looking to be knocked down right there and then probably start crying about having a serious injury.

Your PR suggestion is the best thing so. Trump has a staff monitoring his social media so if you put up that bolded statement there is a slim chance it might reach Trump or his PR team.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash April 01, 2016 6:22 PM  

SteelPalm wrote:After all, she has been a staunch, effective ally for a long time.


You are so wrong you can't even see right from there.

She has been attacking her own enemies within the feminist movement, not fighting feminism. She hates traditional gender roles as much as the most twisted ball-busting lesbian. She hates the patriarchy. She just wants to be able to have decent sex while she's subverting Western culture.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash April 01, 2016 6:23 PM  

SteelPalm wrote:On the contrary, she was a good friend and ally of Milo's who staunchly fought the SJWs.
Did you listen to her talk?

Anonymous BGKB April 01, 2016 6:33 PM  

White woman fired for noticing color of crime http://stuffblackpeopledontlike.blogspot.com/2016/03/white-pittsburgh-award-winning.html

"Asked to weigh in on the firing, a journalism ethics expert said freedom of speech is a tricky thing when practiced by those who must adhere to the facts."

Blogger Stephen Davenport April 01, 2016 6:41 PM  

Another ploy by the Trump bashers, Almost all of them are known anti-Trujmp, including Loesch, Pavlich, &Charen. At one time I liked all three, not any more.

Blogger Eric April 01, 2016 7:16 PM  

Laura Ingraham didn't fall for this nonsense. Of course she's likely smarter than all of the broads signing this.

Blogger SteelPalm April 01, 2016 7:17 PM  

@144

Whatever her motivations, CHF was attacking the same enemies that we do. Very effectively, too.

This is something that Vox mentions again and again; making allowances for those you disagree with, but who are effectively shooting at the same targets you are.

It's a shame CHF did this.

Blogger Eric April 01, 2016 7:19 PM  

Laura Ingraham didn't fall for this nonsense. Of course she's likely smarter than all of the broads signing this.

Anonymous Cheddarman April 01, 2016 7:37 PM  

Mastermind, Vox beat her like a red headed stepchild over the many idiotic ideas she put forth in her book justifying japanese internment.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash April 01, 2016 7:38 PM  

SteelPalm wrote:Whatever her motivations, CHF was attacking the same enemies that we do. Very effectively, too.
That's why I haven't crticized her.
No enemies on the right is good t6actics, better strategy. She's blown it now.

Anonymous Garrulus April 01, 2016 7:40 PM  

I was joking about how the girls wrote this here, Its most correct interpretation is that the post and reports themselves are "inexcusable and unprofessional.", not the events that actually took place.

[i]Garrulus: "The photographs, audio, videos, and witness accounts documenting the treatment of Michelle Fields by Corey Lewandowski" are indeed "inexcusable and unprofessional."

No, actually they are not unless you don't like what the Secret Service does. Lewandowski was actually doing the job that the agent behind Trump SHOULD have been doing: keeping this bimbo from touching the candidate. She had already been warned twice.[/i]


Blogger Thanks, J. April 01, 2016 7:57 PM  

Christina Hoff Sommers, aka The Factual Feminist.
LOL.

Ok, not to be trusted. No excuse for this.
I always thought she served to keep too many men (and those rare women) from waking up. One of those public intellectuals. Well that's good to know, the B*tch just proved NEVER TRUST A FEMINIST, and yes that includes "the good ones", the "she's different" ones, the self-named "Factual Feminist".

Blogger Thanks, J. April 01, 2016 7:58 PM  

Christina Hoff Sommers, aka The Factual Feminist.
LOL.

Ok, not to be trusted. No excuse for this.
I always thought she served to keep too many men (and those rare women) from waking up. One of those public intellectuals. Well that's good to know, the B*tch just proved NEVER TRUST A FEMINIST, and yes that includes "the good ones", the "she's different" ones, the self-named "Factual Feminist".

Blogger ray April 01, 2016 9:17 PM  

Is this really about a fake journalist and her false accusation of assault?

No, it's about accountability for females in America. Females want to have continued legal and social near-immunity, while pretending through their State and 'churches' that they adhere to Equality and Egalitarianism. Meanwhile they are favored and exempted in every area of life. Weak men (of both parties, but mostly UMC and UC) enable and empower females, both in the pretense of equality and in non-accountability.

When this hypocrisy and double-standard is exposed or threatened, the female herd (and its steers) close ranks and make a collective attack (written demand to fire Corey = control Trump). And !que milagro! immediately thereafter, the issue in which the American female demonstrates the most non-accountability and destructiveness surfaces -- abortion. As soon as Trump suggested any form of female accountability or responsibility, the herd/steers closed and attacked. Trump folded, apologizing and, to date, has affirmed the 'law' on abortion as stands, as his position. Meaning, continued non-accountability for females in the U.S.

This is pretty important because if the 2016 repubs/right cannot limit the power and damage that Team Woman is doing to the nation, this place is going kerplunk fast. Females would gladly choose to impoverish endless future generations, rather than limit their own influence and greed. There are no presidential candidates even capable of setting limits except, perhaps, Trump. So if he's already runnin' that's v bad.

Blogger LP9 Forever Solidified in Gold! Rin Integra S.I.G. April 01, 2016 9:22 PM  

What utterly deceived felled feminists. Feminism is a completely failed, illogical, idiotic worldview.

What a excellent list! I further withdraw any consent, withdraw/withold any support, station time, clicks, links, etc., as I am familiar with the women listed.

Anonymous Rather Naught April 01, 2016 9:39 PM  

Could someone more aware/knowledgeable than I add the ((( ))) to the relevant names on that list?

Blogger Lazarus April 01, 2016 9:51 PM  

ray wrote:This is pretty important because if the 2016 repubs/right cannot limit the power and damage that Team Woman is doing to the nation, this place is going kerplunk fast.

Tyranny of the petticoat.

APRIL 14, 1776
JOHN ADAMS TO ABIGAIL ADAMS

"As to your extraordinary code of laws, I cannot but laugh.

"We have been told that our struggle has loosened the bonds of government everywhere; that children and apprentices were disobedient; that schools and colleges were grown turbulent; that Indians slighted their guardians, and negroes grew insolent to their masters.

"But your letter was the first intimation that another tribe, more numerous and powerful than all the rest, were grown discontented.

"This is rather too coarse a compliment, but you are so saucy, I won't blot it out.

"Depend upon it, we know better than to repeal our masculine systems. Although they are in full force, you know they are little more than theory. We dare not exert our power in its full latitude. We are obliged to go fair and softly, and, in practice, you know we are the subjects.

"We have only the name of masters, and rather than give up this, which would completely subject us to the despotism of the petticoat, I hope General Washington and all our brave heroes would fight."

Blogger LP9 Forever Solidified in Gold! Rin Integra S.I.G. April 01, 2016 9:53 PM  

Conned iFeminists are also neoconned, culled into stateside poisons, they want to keep their precious little jobbies, all credibility free - I condemn you witches.

Where is your empty concern for all your policy issues like immigration, econ, real oppression of women and foreign policy - you know nothing of banking, nothing of econ, nothing of immigration, the entire list is more PC.

I condemn you un-thinking witches. I withdraw any time, ratings or support to your outlets.

As Trump stated to Foxnews(iMegyn), "we do not have time for political correctness."

ifeminist women can hide behind their jobs, credentials, headskarbs, emotions and this support list forever. This media hoax over Corey L is like when little girls want to wear their princess dress outside when the temp is subzero.

GleBeck is holding back info or criticism on Corey - this week around media it was said that Corey L is really bad meanwhile Trump is unmoved and has his bro's back.

136 So, so true. The issue past that is removing the nail and dropping the issue or keep the nail and stop talking to others about the pain which has a solution which is denied because humanity would rather remain stuck than shook free...and totally forget non beneficial things like nails.

156 Women, even I, often refuse and resist accountability and responsibility, this immaturity and stupidity usually fades with harsh reality. There is no snowflaking or compassion for a foolish woman given to foolish failed ideas.

Anonymous johnc April 01, 2016 10:18 PM  

Holy smokes Trump just stepped in it again. Now saying he thinks the abortion law should stay intact, and then immediately afterwards his campaign puts out another one of these "just kidding!" press releases.

Why does he even do these interviews?

I think he'll be very relieved if he doesn't get the nomination. I don't think he wants the job, but needs a somewhat graceful exit path.

Blogger Natalie April 01, 2016 10:21 PM  

Naturally I think I'm an OK voter, but I also would consider it a grave error to vote against my husband. I figure that since women can vote these days it's probably best to consider my vote his second vote. Also, I wouldn't cry if I woke up tomorrow and found out that women couldn't vote. Being an "informed citizen" is a full time job. My husband has about convinced me to declare myself a monarchist anyway. King Trump sounds OK to me.

Blogger Matt@Occidentalism.org April 01, 2016 10:35 PM  

Is this a Jewish thing? Most of the signatories are Jews.

Anonymous DC (#sqrt(-1)) April 01, 2016 11:05 PM  

Katie Pavlich is the one that disappointed me; she did a nice job with her book on Fast and Furious...really thought she was smarter than to pull the vaj card...

"Cuntservatives" fits the bill, I think..."I have a vagina, therefore you MUST listen to MY opionions".

As for Dana Loesch, meh. I knew she was past her sell-by date once she went to work for that crying nutty cuck Beck...

Blogger Derrick Bonsell April 01, 2016 11:30 PM  

They want Trump to lose because it will restore their power.

Blogger ray April 01, 2016 11:35 PM  

#159 --

"Depend upon it, we know better than to repeal our masculine systems."


Heh.

Abby used to write him these long letters about how hard-done-by she and the Sistren were, how abused and oppressed they were, how he wasn't doing enough to fix it all. The poor guy.


Hey Lazarus it's good to see you awake. :O)

Blogger LP9 Forever Solidified in Gold! Rin Integra S.I.G. April 02, 2016 12:48 AM  

163, Nah, its a nutty cuck ifeminist matter.

Where are the husbands of these women?

I guess I could googlefriend pictures of each woman to prove a point but its a waste of time, women in modernity cling and worship error or often emotionalism, wrong headed thinking or straight up vaggy female solipsism.

Who paid them to back a hoax?

I condemn the wrong headed women - while I remain a natural skeptic their views and their appearances are questionable, are we judged by whom hates us, are we judged by the company we keep and then the company that discards us - are we not?

Blogger Scott C April 02, 2016 1:26 AM  

CHS thinks that second (and presumably first-) wave feminism was fine and dandy. She only opposes third-wave feminism.

Anonymous Mr. Rational April 02, 2016 2:26 AM  

@103 re @36 the punchline is "nothing, you already told her twice."

Anonymous tublecane April 02, 2016 2:34 AM  

@168-What are these waves everyone's always talking about? Sounds like advertising. "Tired of the same, old feminism? Try New Feminism, now with less feminism!" Best I can tell, the third wave is exactly like the second wave, only they're allowed to wear lipstick. But most of them are still ugly, anyway.

Both second and third waves are exactly like the first wave, only the first wave was circumspect about advertising their sex mania and communism, for obvious reasons. It's all the same: give women more and more of men's power, while shielding them from responsibility. Especially shield them from the extra responsibilities of womanhood, like the disease of motherhood. Give them "equality," i.e. special status. In other words, standard pc-ism.

One tiny, dark, seldom visited corner is reserved for actually equality in fields where women and men actually can be reasonably equal, or for giving them the liberty to stand or fall on their own, like men.

Anonymous rubberducky April 02, 2016 2:24 PM  

I too am saddened by Mary Katharine Ham and Christina Hoff Sommers here. I'm not surprised to see Ham here, she's been trending this way for a while now. But Hoff Sommers is usually immune to this kind of mewling.

The girls are gunning for Trump bigtime right now, it's gotten out of hand.

Accidentally or not, Trump has exposed the pro-life ones to me. I did not realize they were howling frauds, did you? One after another have come along now reacting to his statement that if abortion were banned you have to punish women who have them. The girl pro-lifers all tell me now that such an idea is misinformed and not reflective of the pro-life movement, as anybody "in the know" could tell you.

Really? I have been a pro-lifer and an active one my whole life, surprise I'm "not in the club" with them. I had no idea that their opposition to abortion was so trivial and insincere, and the entire movement has been co-opted. No wonder we have no real victories!

They want to get rid of it, but have no consequences in case feel they need one. Somehow, punishing a guy who helps them kill their own baby but letting them go scot free is a moral and righteous position.

They want the accolades and leadership feels for taking a pro-life position, but also to retain the female prerogative to trump their way out of a jam should they get "accidentally" pregnant.

What howling frauds.

It's true that nothing in human history has been more dyscivic and destructive than feminism. Nothing, that includes Nazism, Stalinism, Maoism and Pol Potism all added up together and still failing to present the body count and the danger of feminism.

To think, the principle argument used in 1920 for allowing women to vote was the "civilizing influence" that women had on men! Yes, that was the MAJOR argument! And looking back, nothing has sealed our civilizational doom more completely than feminism. Not a thing!

Anonymous Mr. Rational April 02, 2016 3:52 PM  

rubberducky wrote:They want to get rid of it, but have no consequences in case feel they need one. Somehow, punishing a guy who helps them kill their own baby but letting them go scot free is a moral and righteous position.The alternative is to threaten to put women in prison if they cannot prove that a miscarriage abroad was actually accidental.  If women travel abroad for abortions and you call it murder, the planning counts as conspiracy in the USA even if the act occurs elsewhere.

This is the can of worms you're trying to pry open, and possibly not the most Kafkaesque wriggler either.

Blogger LP9 Forever Solidified in Gold! Rin Integra S.I.G. April 02, 2016 4:42 PM  

I was asked to clarify my commentary, when God asks for an apology I will stand before my Lord and be judged, if allowed to speak...if allowed to lift my sinful head before such glory...

I condemn and strongly require the women on the list re-think, repent of promoting and condoning a hoax.

It was stated I'm trashing Christ in condemning the, I condemn men and women or judge them as deeply deceived to promote ifeminism.

I cannot, will not condone ifeminism - this is nothing new of LP and I cannot support or even give one eighth of an inch to a failed, felled, foolish worldview.

Hate me, trash me, love it, I take your bad vibes for mass productivity, thanks. Word is, if there is not a huge media diversion in a few days, the list will be hot topic of error in the news upon 4/4.

I dont care and I won't stand down, ifeminism is utterly WRONG.

Blogger LP9 Forever Solidified in Gold! Rin Integra S.I.G. April 02, 2016 4:44 PM  

Who paid these women to back a hoax?! Foolish women!!

Anonymous johnc April 02, 2016 9:00 PM  

The alternative is to threaten to put women in prison if they cannot prove that a miscarriage abroad was actually accidental.

You might be surprised to hear that that's not how the law works in the US.

In the US, a person is not brought into a court and then told, "Now prove your innocence or you go to prison."

There is no can of worms here.

Anonymous Mr. Rational April 02, 2016 11:14 PM  

johnc wrote:The alternative is to threaten to put women in prison if they cannot prove that a miscarriage abroad was actually accidental.

You might be surprised to hear that that's not how the law works in the US.

In the US, a person is not brought into a court and then told, "Now prove your innocence or you go to prison."

There is no can of worms here.


Do you intend to actually enforce such laws and "save babies", or are they just for moral preening?  Enforcement is going to require scrutinizing travel, expenditures and even communications to see if there is any probable cause that they committed a crime, and questioning women over "suspicious" patterns.  If you don't, they'll just go outside your jurisdiction to get what they want.  If you do, poor women without access to good legal representation will wind up going to jail like they do in El Salvador.

There was a reason for the movement to legalize abortion in the 60's and 70's.  If you ignore it, like the Gods of the Copybook Headings, it will not go away; it will just sweep your morality movement onto the trash-heap of history... again.

Anonymous johnc April 03, 2016 12:27 AM  

It's no different than any other law. If there is a crime committed on the land and there is enough evidence to prosecute, you prosecute.

This is all very basic stuff.

Anonymous Mr. Rational April 03, 2016 1:50 PM  

The "crime" is conspiracy, with the actual act outside your jurisdiction.  I repeat my question:  do you propose to collect, as a matter of routine, the information required to detect and prosecute abortions procured by women in your jurisdiction but performed outside, or would your law just be for moral posturing?

Blogger ray April 03, 2016 2:19 PM  

Here's Mr. Rational, trying to Rationalize his way out of female evil. The past five thousand years of example isn't sufficient for him. Because he is Special! and doubtless so are his women.

This little demonstration shows precisely why the anti-abortion factions have gotten NOWHERE and done NOTHING over the past forty years, while mommy murdered kids by the millions, Right and Left. The political Right (including 'anti-abortionists') suddenly are helpless, when it comes to holding females responsible for their actions. And indeed, why should abortion be any different from any other area of civil or criminal law in the United Sisterhood? Females do whatever they want to males, and to 'their' babies, and then the culture creates 'laws' and holds court sessions to officialize the self-serving malevolence. Very tidy!

As with anti-abortionism, the iniquity and corruption in institutional America cannot be reformed (or even addressed) because 'conservative' America will not allow their Precious Princesses to be called out or punished. Their mega-funded anti-abortion organizations are just another lie, another farce, and always have been. Like America's supposed pastors, the anti-abortionists do not have what it takes to protect kids in the womb. Unintentionally, Trump has exposed these supposed 'hard core' activists and NGO-honchos as cowards and frauds, serving Team Woman, not God. Like Maria Shriver crowed many years ago, it's A Woman's Nation.

Anonymous Mr. Rational April 03, 2016 2:47 PM  

ray wrote:Here's Mr. Rational, trying to Rationalize his way out of female evil. The past five thousand years of example isn't sufficient for him.
In ancient Rome, the paterfamilias held the power of life and death over his descendants.  We can take it for granted that offspring with Down syndrome, spina bifida or other malformations would have generally not lived long enough to be a burden.  This was eminently "pro-family", done for its welfare—and they would have used abortion instead, had it been available.

Pro-lifers resemble liberals in that they don't think through the consequences of what they say they want.  In the case of what it would take to ACTUALLY keep women from getting abortions, the medicine is a greater cancer than the disease.  Besides, getting your way wouldn't fix the birthrate problem; Germany had an effective abortion ban for years and still had way sub-replacement fertility.  I'd have to dig but ISTR that communist Romania had the same issue.

What this goes to show is that abortion isn't the problem, if it is a problem at all.  If you stopped letting it distract you and empower your enemies, you would have a much better chance of getting something done.  Like, oh, repealing anti-discrimination and "disparate impact" laws so that the stupid and violent can be taken out of regular school classrooms, so that White people can use public schools again.

Anonymous Craig April 03, 2016 3:44 PM  

lol at -played the role of punching bag- and -feminist of one wave or another-

Blogger ray April 03, 2016 6:28 PM  

I'm not interested in your White People Agenda there, Mr. Rational. The topic is abortion, but I see you had to make it about the White People Agenda. What's next boy, the Joos Did It, whatever it is?


"In the case of what it would take to ACTUALLY keep women from getting abortions, the medicine is a greater cancer than the disease"


No it isn't. Shit you're in a real big hurry to keep your wimmins from accepting any responsibility for their own actions, aintcha?

It could be done quite efficiently and quickly. The bulk of the criminal aborters (i.e., the un-moms) would conform fast, due to vast social-pressure suddenly brought-to-bear. Women fold fast under social pressure and shame. Without government and law and media and corporations and Mr. Hero Enabler Dads telling them to go for it, why, most females voluntarily would give up abortion as an option, once sanctions exist.

The remaining numbers -- and their enablers -- although a minority, would make excellent examples of what happens to people who continue to abort or to facilitate abortion, in violation of the law. It wouldn't take many of these Most Excellent Examples to re-educate your faultless Darlings concerning basic human conduct, particularly as concerns 'their' babies.

If you Cuckservatives really INSIST upon enhanced penalties for males (and you do, as long as it's Some Other Guy), then male enablers of abortion (whether material or psychological) would be subject to treble damages and/or punishments given the original offender.

Anonymous Mr. Rational April 03, 2016 11:11 PM  

ray wrote:The topic is abortion, but I see you had to make it about the White People Agenda. What's next boy, the Joos Did It, whatever it is?
Abortion is ALL about the White People Agenda.  Nobody else gives a damn.  Blacks certainly don't; 72% of all abortions in Mississippi are given to Black women.
"the medicine is a greater cancer than the disease"

No it isn't.

Rule 2.  I've listed some of the inevitable consequences of a serious attempt to enforce an abortion ban.  Go over them and show how I'm wrong, if you can.
you're in a real big hurry to keep your wimmins from accepting any responsibility for their own actions
I'm in NO hurry to force my daughters to bear non-White offspring conceived in rape or an ill-considered tryst.  I can't be watching them 24/7, but as things stand now I can help prevent them from race-cucking their lineage.  I can also persuade them not to bear babies with Down's or other defects that effectively terminate my posterity.
The bulk of the criminal aborters (i.e., the un-moms) would conform fast, due to vast social-pressure suddenly brought-to-bear.
Are you so silly as to believe women without children are all having abortions, or otherwise wear a scarlet fetus tattoo?  Maybe you are.  Apparently you either did not read or could not understand what I wrote about not thinking things through.
most females voluntarily would give up abortion as an option, once sanctions exist.
You are simply delusional.  History shows that an active illegal abortion industry exists wherever abortion is illegal.
The remaining numbers -- and their enablers -- although a minority, would make excellent examples of what happens to people who continue to abort or to facilitate abortion, in violation of the law.
How are you going to prove that any of them are having abortions, rather than just never getting pregnant?  Apparently you are too dim to understand the ramifications of that little evidentiary problem, despite it being outlined for you just a few comments up the thread.  Today it's never been easier to hide, since all it takes is a couple of pills to abort in the first 8 weeks.

If you make RU-486 as valuable as cocaine, do you think it won't be smuggled just as effectively?  Is all this just about you posturing to prove yourself more morally upright than others—just like SJW virtue-signalling?

And you wonder why I'm disgusted with the pro-lie movement.  The stupid, it burns.

Anonymous Mr. Rational April 05, 2016 7:21 AM  

And call me slow if you like, but I just realized the genius of criminalizing women who procure abortions:  they will have every incentive to keep the secrets of who's providing the procedures or drugs because their freedom is on the line too.  It would make it almost impossible to enforce the law, making it one of those exercises in empty moral posturing that the pro-lie movement loves.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts