SJWs fear exposure
It's been interesting to see the reaction of SJWs on Twitter to The Complete List of SJW. The mere announcement of its existence has both SJWs and moderates alarmed:
Translation: the idea that their actions will be tracked and they will be identified and potentially held responsible scares them.
This is why it is absolutely vital to be accurate and conservative in identifying SJWs. They are going to try to transform what is quite clearly a list of harassers into a false claim of being harassed. Don't give them any ammo; only definite and self-defined SJWs who can be confirmed to have attempted to disemploy or no-platform people in defense of social justice ideals should be included. And take the time to provide the archived evidence of their SJW activity or self-designation. The stricter we are, the more effective the list will be over time.
As for the idea of not stooping to their level, I am the Supreme Dark Lord of the Evil Legion of Evil. We delve deeper than they even imagine.
time cube denier @yung_kachoNotice the wide variety of conventional responses. We have the Lolipop response, the "I'm telling Dad" response, the "it's not me, it's you" response, the "aren't you above this?" response, and the McCarthy response.
oh vox. never stop being batshit insane
Ana @ #SweetsJam @SpaceDoctorPhD
Excuse me, why am I not on your blacklist? Can't even bully people properly, what a mess.
/wooo/'sDolphZiggler @DZwooo
"Have you now, or ever been, a Social Justice Warrior?"
Mariconcito @armlessphelan
You're an idiot. You don't fight censorship and blacklists with censorship and blacklists.
Big Dog Barack @BarackSaysWooo
I HAVE IN MY HANDS A LIST OF 50 STATE REPRESENTATIVES WHO HAVE TIES TO THE SJW PARTY
/M/ischief Reborn @Mischief_Arises
Can you build a waiting list for the gas chamber and put yourself on it? Thanks
Anonymous Damn Crow @CrowReturns1
What is this? A list of people you plan to harass? Don't even think about it.
Anonymous Damn Crow @CrowReturns1
Looks like a list of people targeted for harassment
Anonymous Damn Crow Retweeted Supreme Dark Lord
This is a list of people targeted for harassment. Really sucks. #Anonymous
deepseadiva @thedeepseadiva
LMAOO this is the funniest thing I've ever seen
Nightwing @Daltimus_Prime
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HOLY SHIT. Whatever happened to "being the bigger person" and "not stooping to their level?"
Translation: the idea that their actions will be tracked and they will be identified and potentially held responsible scares them.
This is why it is absolutely vital to be accurate and conservative in identifying SJWs. They are going to try to transform what is quite clearly a list of harassers into a false claim of being harassed. Don't give them any ammo; only definite and self-defined SJWs who can be confirmed to have attempted to disemploy or no-platform people in defense of social justice ideals should be included. And take the time to provide the archived evidence of their SJW activity or self-designation. The stricter we are, the more effective the list will be over time.
As for the idea of not stooping to their level, I am the Supreme Dark Lord of the Evil Legion of Evil. We delve deeper than they even imagine.
Labels: SJW
172 Comments:
I'm starting to think McCarthy really didnt go far enough tbh. They really dont like it when their own tactics are used against them.
Nightwing @Daltimus_Prime
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HOLY SHIT. Whatever happened to "being the bigger person" and "not stooping to their level?"
*Leftist punches rightist in the face*
*Rightist draws back fist to retaliate*
Leftist: Whoa, whoa, whoa! I thought you were better than all this!
Vox,
I understand what you're getting at.
Well he is obviously trying to prove that the right is a bunch of hypocrites, Weir... Wyrd. There is nothing more to it, the right is composed of ignorant, fascists and hatred-filled people, that is just the prove he or she needs. Is not much really, is just confirmation bias.
"Being the bigger person" and "not stooping to their level" are fictions invented by the left in order to appeal to their own moralities when they just want you to obey. Was Britain the bigger person after the blitzkrieg? Or did they bomb the hell out of germany? Those who show no mercy, get no mercy.
For a 20 minute project, it sure has caused quite a stir. Thanks to all the people who have started making edits. I'll upload a suitable logo this evening when I get back to my computer.
Some time ago, I saw video footage from the 1960s which consisted of a leftoid hippy cussing out a crowd of working-class whites about how racist, sexist, capitalist, etc they all were. And then he pulled out an American flag and wiped his ass with it. At that point, the blue-collared folk promptly beat the ever-lasting shit out of him. It brought a tear to me eye, it did. Well done, lads.
Sort of like the sexual predator list, this is a SJW predator list.
To get on it, I assume you need to try is not succeed in having someone lose a job or income.
Wait-shouldn't there be a defined set of behaviors for list editors-we'll call it a "code of conduct"-included in the-
*dodges flying blunt objects*
You're missing the poster child---Ben Schapiro--who said we are going to hunt Racists down and make them lose their jobs! Min 7:40 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDq6XYa0h0I
Roger that, Roger. (What is you vector Victor)
Don't worry man I am pretty sure that in the end of the page the editors will thank you for coding... Conduct-coding.
There is. It's "obey the Admin or you get tossed out". See the list of rules for guidence.
Don't confuse distance and mocking for fear
The Western man's greatest weakness is allowing his enemies to define his morality.
I love watching the rabbits freak out when their efforts to do that fail.
Good idea. Take the fight to them. A good offense will always beat a defensive posture.
We're here! We're queer! I can't even!
This makes me wonder: is there a list of SJW-converged businesses so we know who not to do business with?
I definitely think we can make this grow into a very powerful movement.
I'd also set it so that edits cannot be made without signing in. You can expect vandals soon.
"Mr. Eich, Have you now, or ever been, a supporter of Proposition 8?"
I went to the site, made an account and then added Ben Shapiro, my special SJW enemy. --we are going to hunt racists down and hurt their jobs.
That is SJW par-excellence!
Linday, half the blogosphere is probably your arch-nemesis right now XD.
Good idea. I added a list of organizations as a page.
Whatever happened to "being the bigger person" and "not stooping to their level?"
Madame, you appear to have mistaken us for Republicans
I'd add Chris Kluwe to the list but let's face it, no one is going to hire him again.
Ben Shapiro racial theorist slash SJW, onto the list he goes.
One tiny suggestion, in the name of justice and fairness and all that. A way for a SJW to be removed from the list, and I suggest that if they can fill out a 10 page handwritten single spaced document in triplicate detailing their US government certified standing in one of the "Protected Classes" that they not be held responsible for their actions.
Just a suggestion, not that it would help Stover I don't see him in a protected class unless maybe he is gay or trans, he certainly looks and acts crazy maybe that is a protected class.
Well I guess I speak for everyone when I say that we have to include a diverse group of people as editors. I mean we need the rich guy, the poor guy, the middle guy, and that hot chick to keep everybody motivated!
What? Not diverse enough? Okay what about we add a moderate guy that plays the Fool?
Done.
Based on those responses I'll nominate Anonymous Damn Crow to be first. Or among the van at least. By merit.
Perhaps there are others far worse? and so will leave it to those better informed.
@23 - we are the bigger person, when they bite our ankles, we grab them by the collar, lift them to our level, then administer a proper chastisement.
Went to the site, made an account and then added Ben Shapiro, my special SJW enemy. --we are going to hunt racists down and hurt their jobs.
That's legitimate, Wheeler. Good job.
Hot shrieking amygdalas! You guys are good.
The fear of their many enemies fighting back, with the same weapons they have been using. An alt conservative in the HR department maybe? They suspect that there are conservatives who would never hire them, if they knew what they were. And they are right about that. It is already happening. Only SJWs feel the need to be public about such things. Others just do it and shut up about it.
"being the bigger person" "not stooping to there level"? This may be profitable and even preferable when in order to do so you have to assert the enemy ideology or philosophy (e.g. Femenism, Scientific Socialist, etc.) but this is NOT the case when asserting your own in the case of discrimination, judgement, revilings... if you do not revile what is evil, you end up permitting it.
Lots of Haskellers on that list. There's definitely been a ton of convergence in that community. Thank God for Chris and Julie, at least.
https://twitter.com/alexirvine
http://steed.bangordailynews.com/
@35 A Haskeller:
Lots of Haskellers on that list.
Inevitable since it was seeded from a letter a bunch of them signed about a functional programming conference, and Haskell is one of the hottest current functional languages.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HOLY SHIT. Whatever happened to "being the bigger person" and "not stooping to their level?"
Oh cute. He should read up on WW1 and mustard gas, or WW2 and fire bombing civilian targets. Gentlemen's agreements are not a one-way arrangement and our friends have already repeated established the rules of the game.
Wyrd wrote:
Some time ago, I saw video footage from the 1960s which consisted of a leftoid hippy cussing out a crowd of working-class whites about how racist, sexist, capitalist, etc they all were. And then he pulled out an American flag and wiped his ass with it. At that point, the blue-collared folk promptly beat the ever-lasting shit out of him. It brought a tear to me eye, it did. Well done, lads.
I would pay good money to see that. Do you have a link?
*repeatedly. Gawd damn, I need an editor...
"Mr. Eich, Have you now, or ever been, a supporter of Proposition 8?"
"Ms. HilLIARy, Have you now, or ever been, whoring for over $40million from nations that execute gays while secretary of state?"
*repeatedly. Gawd damn, I need an editor..."
google "how do I turn my spellcheck on" ;)
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE ADD MICHAEL ERIC DYSON!!!!!!
Thank you for The Complete List. It is now bookmarked for future reference.
Yesterday squash free speech of enemies, today complain about unacceptable McCarthyism of said enemies.
But…but…but….but…It's different when we do it!
@denektenorsk
I would pay good money to see that. Do you have a link?
Currently cursing myself for not having bookmarked it back then. Funny thing is my searches are now turning up multiple links for footage of the black Trump supporter sucker-punching the dipshit whose girlfriend was wearing a Klan-hood at a Trump rally. Top kek indeed. Will return with proper link if found.
"Paypal/Apple/BofA, have you now, or ever been in business with governments who have made being gay illegal?"
SJWs/Commies/Mecha/anti Trump protesters at Portland State Students for Trump meeting:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJ50XmALd54
Openly advocating doxxing Trump supporters along with @1min20s "You wanna get f'ed up by a effin faggot"
We've been reliably informed that Vox lives on the fringe of the Right and has very little real influence so why all the excitement?
Does it matter that in the video of Shapiro he's talking about hunting down the racist on the left? Decrying their attempts at recreating apartheid
Might be a good idea to include a "Victims" section in each wiki page, to show who was targeted by each SJW and for what. For example, the page for SJW Connie St Louis would include Sir Tim Hunt under "Victims". Ben Shapiro's page would include Corey Lewandowski, etc.
"Known Allies/Supporters/Associates" would also be useful.
In regards to the comment: 'What ever happened to the bigger person and not stooping to their level'
We need a picture of some one at a grave site maybe label the site 'freedoms' and have the person at it pissing on it and saying 'Hey! Thanks for being the 'better' man and not stooping to our level!'
Cause that's what I think of whenever I hear that stupid line. Defending yourself against leftists and wackos is wrong? No, I don't think so.
And 'Stooping to their level?' Hey, if it didn't work, they wouldn't do it! And if they knew it would be done right back to them, they wouldn't do it!
(Little historical note, all of the people on McCarthy's list, did in fact turn out to be Russian spies. Every Single One.)
I am the Supreme Dark Lord of the Evil Legion of Evil.
awesome!
Three years ago, the Neoreactionary community decided to try to come up with a list of people who have been purged by what became known as SJWs.
https://handleshaus.wordpress.com/2013/12/26/bullied-and-badgered-pressured-and-purged/
It's hard to tell who exactly was behind many of these purges, and whether or not they belong on the SJW list. But it's something to consider.
That would be rather useful. You can create an account and start adding it for the ones you know.
I'm wondering if we should add William F. Buckley that fired both Joe Sobran and Pat Buchanan? Could Buckley, this "arch-conservative", be a partial SJW?
Still seeing numerous uncited additions to that last.
@55 perhaps we need a nominee page with the name and a link-archive of where they attempted to purge.
another:
okcupid (their founders - Eich)
What about broadening the definition for inclusion to include SJWs who make death threats, or the "I think so and so should get raped by a bunch of NAM! because they disagree with me!" folks?
@54 we can do a cuckservative list later, however it would be redundant.
Generally those who don't like Trump and produce the screeching monkey irrationality as the reason.
I just thought I'd highlight and emphasize this progression from question to speculation to "factual" statement:
Anonymous Damn Crow @CrowReturns1
What is this? A list of people you plan to harass? Don't even think about it.
Anonymous Damn Crow @CrowReturns1
Looks like a list of people targeted for harassment
Anonymous Damn Crow Retweeted Supreme Dark Lord
This is a list of people targeted for harassment. Really sucks. #Anonymous
I have never seen fear in action so plainly before. No wonder so many things get twisted out of proportion by these freaks. They're literally shaking in their boots, pissing their pants, and seeing bogeymen in every doorway.
Hmmm, what is up with calling anonymous for help? Why would this people care about? Have they ever engaged in attacking you people?
I'll toss Neil Patrick Harris in there. He's a homo-rights trumpeteer and a general SJW priestess.
Is that how this game is played? Or is it limited to tech and publishing?
I don't think anyone under the age of 30 should be on the list unless they personally purged someone. Hitler said
IT IS my conviction today that a man should not take
any active public part in politics before the age of thirty,
except in cases of outstanding ability. He should not do
so because up to that time the formation of a general plat-
form takes place from which he examines the various
political problems and defines his own final attitude to-
wards them. The man who has now matured at least
mentally may or should take part in the political guidance
of the community only after reaching a fundamental view
of life and, with it, a stability of his own way of looking
at the individual current problems.
If this is not the case, he runs the risk that some day he
will have to change his attitude towards vital questions,
or, despite his better knowledge and belief, to uphold
points of view which reason and conviction have long since
rejected.
I know that I went through a Libertarian, a Progressive, a Christian, and a Neoreactionary phase on my path towards National Socialism. If someone kid merely showed up at a meeting or piled on on Twitter or showed up at a protest or whatever, that doesn't necessarily indicate that they'll still be an SJW later in life.
Payback is a bitch
Well Ray, the rule seems to be ANYONE that have tried to destroys a person livelihood or silence them by de-platforming them, while using SJW principles as the reason for doing so... Does your target has done any such thing? If yes then, technically she goes in the list.
We aren't harrassing, we're documenting criminal behavior.
peppermintfrosted wrote:I don't think anyone under the age of 30 should be on the list unless they personally purged someone.
SJW infiltrator spotted.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HOLY SHIT.
Laughing is SJW for "You're hurting me." They measure victory and defeat in goodfeelz and badfeelz.
tz wrote:Sort of like the sexual predator list, this is a SJW predator list.
To get on it, I assume you need to try is not succeed in having someone lose a job or income.
Correct. Attempted criminal behavior is also criminal behavior.
Pera
He really mean it dude. He is just a soft Nazi, but i think he means it.
for some reason though I get a strong conviction in my soul that God does not want me to hang out here, not because the site isn't awesome bc it is, but because I am just not a good fit here and I dont belong here,
but in all seriousness God Bless everyone!
Wheeler, Buckley died in 2008. I'm pretty sure most potential employers will screen for that sort of thing automatically before offering him a position.
Remember, the key objective of this list is to provide SJWs a means of clustering and concentrating themselves in places of employment where SJW behavior is welcomed.
However, your point that he was an entryist SJW is absolutely accurate. But he's only the good kind of SJW: the dead kind.
Yeahhh the Nazi guy was scary u_u. Well CraigP some other places offer better commodations. The blog has being going radical and radical as this year went by, but as a person with too much time in my hands and with the power to spend an entire day reading Vox's posts; I can tell you that reading for the owner's ability is more then fulfilling.
Anyways comboxes sucks too... Don't blame ya.
For reference:
http://web.archive.org/web/20160409160255/https://statement-on-lambdaconf.github.io/
http://web.archive.org/web/20160409223826/http://sjwlist.com/index.php?title=LambdaConf_Signatories
I've hesitated a while to say this person because I think it will be fairly controversial. Please feel free to disagree and put your counter-arguments forward, and im definitely willing to be convinced otherwise.
Christina Hoff Sommers.
To explain my thought process - I've been aware of her for quite a few years before Gamer Gate and always been highly suspicious. She seems a consummate chameleon with layers on layers. Whenever she feels really comfortable she lets slip a bit of what she really thinks (and what she is secretly pushing for) but the second she gets any real world push back she immediately pushes it down again and continues her public persona.
I think she is the main person who has cynically made use of their gamer gate fame to push themselves onto a whole new audience which isn't as aware of all their past actions (some could argue that about other figures, but I consider the rest to be at least inherently genuine/consistent even if they've received a significant boost)
This nonsense with her signing the petition I hope gives more people an insight of her true loyalties and opinions.
Anyway that's just my take on things.
We aren't harrassing, we're documenting criminal behavior.
Or even if not actually criminal, we are documenting actual harassment and attempts to get people fired, disinvited, lose contracts or opportunities merely for expressing an opinion, often a factual one based on evidence, or saying something clearly in jest.
I think I would add Glenn Beck to the list given the Michelle Fields white knighting and "advice to his son" and a number of other things. It would be hard to see how TheBlaze isn't converged given he runs it, but they appear to be more balanced in their news. Not perfectly but sufficiently, maybe it would be too obvious to put a constant stream of Cruz walks on water and Trump hates everyone on their news site to duplicate his radio show.
Maybe if Facebook didn't delete truth about illegals and moslems it wouldn't be low on content.
"`context collapse'Facebook tries prompting more personal types of posting
Facebook Inc. is working to combat a decline in people sharing original, personal content, the fuel that helps power the money machine at the heart of its social network, according to people familiar with the matter."
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-04-07/facebook-said-to-face-decline-in-people-posting-personal-content?cmpid=yhoo.headline
tz wrote:We aren't harrassing, we're documenting criminal behavior.
Or even if not actually criminal, we are documenting actual harassment and attempts to get people fired, disinvited, lose contracts or opportunities merely for expressing an opinion, often a factual one based on evidence, or saying something clearly in jest.
I would be in favor of making the definition more clear and concise, but we have to keep in mind that our system of law is Orwellian. Having consensual sex with someone 13 years ago is "criminal", but massive bankster fraud is not? Fuck that, let's call a spade a spade, and criminal harassment against disenfranchised people (who apparently lack basic legal standing) is still criminal harassment.
tz wrote:I think I would add Glenn Beck to the list given the Michelle Fields white knighting and "advice to his son" and a number of other things.
Has he tried to disemploy anyone or otherwise harass them for their political or religious beliefs? If so, document and post. If not, he doesn't belong on the list.
I'm wondering if we should add William F. Buckley that fired both Joe Sobran and Pat Buchanan? Could Buckley, this "arch-conservative", be a partial SJW?
No, because Israel is not a social justice ideal. Stop looking to stretch the definition.
I think I would add Glenn Beck to the list given the Michelle Fields white knighting and "advice to his son" and a number of other things.
Seriously, how fucking hard is it to understand the point? Glenn Beck is many things, but he's not a fucking social justice warrior!
You idiots are looking at this from PRECISELY the wrong perspective. To be effective, the definition and the application must be very narrow. The more you broaden it in order to include someone you don't like, the less meaning the definition has and the less effective the list will be.
If you're coming up with rationalizations and justifications, you've completely missed the point. Just knock it the fuck off!
This REALLY isn't that hard.
Christina Hoff Sommers.
No. She's a feminist, not a social justice warrior. Learn the difference.
This isn't that hard. If they're running around screeching about making Social Justice games, they're an SJW. If they're signing petitions to shut down a conference or no-platform a speaker at a non-political event, they're an SJW.
If they did something once you disagreed with politically, they're almost certainly not an SJW.
STOP TRYING TO STRETCH THE DEFINITION!
Since you already thought it was going to be "controversial", that indicates you knew better. Knock it off.
Cynic In Chief wrote:Good idea. I added a list of organizations as a page.
SJW vandals are camping the page and resubmitting edits.
What about broadening the definition for inclusion to include SJWs who make death threats, or the "I think so and so should get raped by a bunch of NAM! because they disagree with me!" folks?
No. Broadening the definition is self-defeating.
@77 Glenn Beck (and others) called for Lewandowski to be fired, though he (nor others who have called for the same thing) won't say it is merely political.
He has called for Grover Norquist to be removed (now recalled) from the board of the NRA for something involving the "muslim brotherhood".
I'll see if there is a clearer example.
@79 Then perhaps the precisely narrowed definition ought to be given explicitly.
I can think of several examples of Glenn Beck doing something which are likely over the line and could probably document them, but they aren't the most obvious and newsworthy stories and I listen more.
Being a cuck and SJW are not mutually exclusive.
Lay down the law and I can attempt proper prosecution.
ALREADY!?!
Wow, you gotta be kidding... Less than a day XD.
Wow so what they want to add, you got me interested.
The point of naming SJWs is to help sane people prevent the SJWs from engaging in their entryist tactics. So we don't need to add Glenn Beck - he's not trying to infiltrate your organization and screw it up with their idiocy.
But adding the folks who wanted to no-platform Moldbug, yes, that's helpful. They're the ones we need to watch out for.
"I don't think anyone under the age of 30 should be on the list . . ."
Right. So instead of "Don't trust anyone over 30," it becomes, "Don't distrust anyone under 30."
I don't think so. There are plenty of people under 30 not to trust, and for exactly the reason you specify to exclude them; their positions are not to be trusted.
If, at some later date, they see the light and petition for repatriation, it can be dealt with then on an individual basis.
These heartless storm troopers have been harassing innocents and ruining their lives for years with their pernicious leftist venom. You can line them up against the wall as well as on a list as far as I am concerned.
Vos Day mate...
Are Social justice not the ones you hate hahahhahah. Is just that maybe you must make it crystal clear what is a social justice warrior! Otherwise anyone with social worries that can be fixed by the left will fall under the definition
Yes it is that hqrd to understand XD.
Eduardo wrote:ALREADY!?!
Wow, you gotta be kidding... Less than a day XD.
Wow so what they want to add, you got me interested.
...I might have been misinterpreting Snidely Whiplash's edits.
Snidely, bro, you need to butch up your prose a little. Think Hemingway, not pajamaboy.
@2 - *Leftist punches rightist in the face*
*Rightist draws back fist to retaliate*
Leftist: Whoa, whoa, whoa! I thought you were better than all this!
*Rightist hangs head in shame and offers apology.*
*Leftist punches rightist again.*
*Lefist calls police and media, claims rightist raped her.*
The history of the Cuckservative party in a nutshell.
I'm getting 503s for sjwlist.com now. Looks like the faggots are attacking it.
Probably want some moderation in place before soliciting involvement from larger communities like Reddit and Slashdot, yes?
I would be surprised if this thing isn't getting slashdotted by Monday afternoon.
What are the changes that Rust has been converged given that it is sponsored by Mozilla?
I'll see if there is a clearer example.
No. Drop it. Now. Glenn Beck is not an SJW. He is a cuckservative. They are two different things.
I'm getting 503s for sjwlist.com now. Looks like the faggots are attacking it.
Precise opposite problem. A Dangerous Faggot supported it on Twitter.
Can we get Emily Garland on the list of SJWs? She clearly meets the criteria, though I don't know her current legal name. This post http://latining.tumblr.com/post/141567276944/tabletop-gaming-has-a-white-male-terrorism-problem makes her intent clear.
Fantastic work, guys. I have already joined and posted a resource (another signed SJW letter) for us to add names from.
Vox, any way you can help us coordinate better?
And yes, I echo the sentiment that we should add actual, clear-cut SJWs, not unreliable allies (Sommers) or lousy cuckservatives (Beck).
Probably want some moderation in place before soliciting involvement from larger communities like Reddit and Slashdot, yes?
Is it possible to only let users add text, but not subtract anything? That might limit the vandalism. Otherwise, it's likely to be a constant edit war, and SJWs are very good at those. Some admins will be needed soon; only Dread Ilk or VFM should be trusted.
Vox, any way you can help us coordinate better?
If you are VFM... and you want to be an admin, email me with your VFM number. I'll pass it on. Only volunteer if you have the time to edit war and police the site. Put SJW LIST in the subject.
VD wrote:Probably want some moderation in place before soliciting involvement from larger communities like Reddit and Slashdot, yes?
Is it possible to only let users add text, but not subtract anything? That might limit the vandalism. Otherwise, it's likely to be a constant edit war, and SJWs are very good at those. Some admins will be needed soon; only Dread Ilk or VFM should be trusted.
I haven't read that far in "Wikipedia for Retarded Internet Whackjobs" yet.
I'm glad I pulled the list into a spreadsheet two seconds before it got blitzed.
VD wrote:Vox, any way you can help us coordinate better?
If you are VFM... and you want to be an admin, email me with your VFM number. I'll pass it on. Only volunteer if you have the time to edit war and police the site. Put SJW LIST in the subject.
Can haz? Don't got no number, tried to e-mail a while back but couldn't remember the instructions.
E-mail confirmation for registered users wasn't working, last I checked.
Okay, I want to make a big style decision, but first I'm checking. Right now we have Firstname Lastname, I want Lastname Comma Firstname so it's easier to do massive additions from lists. Allows you to sort alphabetically in a spreadsheet without any shenanigans.
Plus, comma separation makes everything database-friendly.
@ 5 Kevin Blackwell
"Being the bigger person" and "not stooping to their level" are fictions invented by the left in order to appeal to their own moralities when they just want you to obey.
Alinsky rule 4 turns your morality against you. It is why "we don't care" stumps them.
* RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.
Guys, lay off the celebrities for the most part. They're irrelevant. Stupid virtue-signaling does not make one a proper SJW.
Plus half of them probably don't sign their own name to anything, it's more likely a PR person.
@109
Understood. Will apply a stricter standard to them.
To be clear, are major producers/moguls (Weinstein brothers) with a history of bankrolling SJWs and their propaganda (Michael Moore, for instance) still count?
Or the plethora of names, like Samuel L Jackson, Mickey Rourke, etc. that have threatened violence against Trump or vowed to leave the country if he is elected?
"""Whatever happened to "being the bigger person" and "not stooping to their level?"""
For me at least it happened that I'm sick of being a punchback for voicing an argumented opinion.
So I will spread this list as much as I can, as often as I can.
Can I suggest that to the description of a SJW, be added going after the career of those who do not believe in Climate Change crap?
Adria Richards is a FAR more relevant type of addition than any celebrity. Even the rare Hollywooder who is primarily famous for being an SJW (Wil Wheaton) is typically going to be small potatoes in the SJW pool compared to Sarkesian.
Lol... to the real Alt-Rigth you know who is a social justice warrior? Answer is (((Vox Day))) and any other Jew, including the ultimate Jewish cult known as (((Christianity)). You SJW kikes can go blow Milo and your priests every Sunday.
And I thought I was a drunk!
@87 -
Work on your rhetoric because you aren't very good at it. I don't feel insulted nor angry. I didn't even get a chuckle out of it. Please try harder in the future to entertain me.
@ 49. Krul
Might be a good idea to include a "Victims" section in each wiki page
I second that.
The victims section, if added, should include the victim's bitcoin address, patreon or fundme page (if known) so that people can support them.
In addition the website itself should have a bitcoin address so that supporters can make anon donations. This is the kind of website that is destined to face continuous hacking and DDOS attacks. High level tech support costs money.
Please disregard my last post. The original post 87 I was responding to seems to have vanished.
Aeoli Pera wrote:Okay, I want to make a big style decision, but first I'm checking. Right now we have Firstname Lastname, I want Lastname Comma Firstname so it's easier to do massive additions from lists. Allows you to sort alphabetically in a spreadsheet without any shenanigans.
Actually, if I do this it's going to break all the existing links. I mean, there's work and there's work.
@116
There are Wikibots to seamlessly implement such global changes. Definitely something to do for the future.
To be clear, are major producers/moguls (Weinstein brothers) with a history of bankrolling SJWs and their propaganda (Michael Moore, for instance) still count?
No. Leave them off.
Or the plethora of names, like Samuel L Jackson, Mickey Rourke, etc. that have threatened violence against Trump or vowed to leave the country if he is elected?
No. Leave them off. If they are a celebrity, ignore them. We can do a celebrity section later.
Do you have the link?
"Notice the wide variety of conventional responses"
It's called mocking. You must be familiar with it.
Whoever is an admin, find out who the SJW vandal "Sasha" is and then IP-ban him. I have been reverting his vandalism a lot in the past half hour.
VD wrote:
No. Leave them off. If they are a celebrity, ignore them. We can do a celebrity section later.
That disqualifies most of judas.watch.
I have to get stuff off my chest about celebrities... they play these games with me thru the media, they have this all this money, they have all the advantages over me in the games that they play, its bullying, its torture and then they make me feel like the bad guy when I go off on them with some internet comment as they torute me year after year, I am sick of their crap I want a lot of them to just like disappear and not exist bc they torture me
SteelPalm wrote:Whoever is an admin, find out who the SJW vandal "Sasha" is and then IP-ban him. I have been reverting his vandalism a lot in the past half hour.
I'll take over Sasha-sitting at 10:30 EST.
if you are watching celebrities take a look at Vox Poppoli, that is how you need to be, that is what class is, that is what honor is that is what treating people right is, learn something from Vox
anyway I hate when I give them any attention, they don't deserve my attention,
This is a really great list so far and it's incredible watching so many red links turn to blue in real time.
But once word of this site circulates, it's going to be a full-time job keeping it running. Not just the usual vandalism or DDOS concerns. Expect all manner of attacks: pressure and complaints with the ISP or domain registrar, hacking, legal threats, doxxing and persecution of the owners or contributors. VD will absorb some of the heat but the SJWs are always on the lookout for softer targets.
So start thinking a couple of steps ahead, because it's going to be an interesting week. What does it take to keep wikileaks or thepiratebay going? Constant vigilance, motivated administrators, and as @114 mentioned, funding.
Tortious interference.
It should be possible for people to sue the SJWs that ruin their lives. Hulk Hogan accused Gawker not of ruining his life but of releasing his private sex tape (and ruining his life).
Would Brendan Eich win a lawsuit if he ever found out who fingered him for the donation? Maybe not now, but if we can push back hard enough against SJWs, maybe people can start winning tortious interference lawsuits, and PC can be over.
re 123 125 126: never mind about that, We are all created by God, we are all God's children and He loves us all. Peace, I shouldn't have posted that
The list goes on and on. How about categories? [[Category: Purger]] for people who got at least one person purged, [[Category: Hooligan]] for people who got an event cancelled or disrupted, [[Category: Snitch]] for people who got someone arrested for hatespeech
@128 take a look at this thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/4bd15s/are_sjws_going_after_your_employment_you_have/
Many attorneys are afraid to represent clients in cases that involve SJW abuses; they consider it tantamount to defending neo-Nazis. Perhaps a more likely possibility is that Alison Rapp (or equivalent) initiates legal action against her tormentors, and this sets a precedent for others to follow.
Craig wrote:re 123 125 126: never mind about that, We are all created by God, we are all God's children and He loves us all. Peace, I shouldn't have posted that
Now Craig. What did I say yesterday to you? Do you remember? You are still killing me. You have to stop this. I don't think I can stand it anymore. I am going to pee my pants.
truthfully the celebrities are very nice people, God Bless them may they hold their heads up and do whatever it is they do
The hysteria and paranoia are palpable.
RE: VFM status,
Sent the requisite request a few weeks ago, assumed high backlog, should I resend?
Craig wrote:truthfully the celebrities are very nice people, God Bless them may they hold their heads up and do whatever it is they do
But Craig, what they do is they play these games with you thru the media, they have this all this money, they have all the advantages over you in the games that they play, its bullying, its torture and then they make you feel like the bad guy when you go off on them with some internet comment as they torture you year after year. Would it not be beholden upon you to at least feel some resentment for their vile contempt for your feelings?
peppermintfrosted wrote:The list goes on and on. How about categories? [[Category: Purger]] for people who got at least one person purged, [[Category: Hooligan]] for people who got an event cancelled or disrupted, [[Category: Snitch]] for people who got someone arrested for hatespeech
Peppermint you are killing it in there. Awesome work.
Notice the wide variety of conventional responses. We have the Lolipop response, the "I'm telling Dad" response, the "it's not me, it's you" response, the "aren't you above this?" response, and the McCarthy response.
You missed one. Vox Day's 1st law: "Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from insanity."
time cube denier @yung_kacho
oh vox. never stop being batshit insane
Don't give them any ammo; only definite and self-defined SJWs who can be confirmed to have attempted to disemploy or no-platform people in defense of social justice ideals should be included. And take the time to provide the archived evidence of their SJW activity or self-designation. The stricter we are, the more effective the list will be over time.
---
I'm basically linking to other sites with no commentary. Put a ton about Twitter on there.
@10 W.LindsayWheeler
You're missing the poster child---Ben Schapiro--who said we are going to hunt Racists down and make them lose their jobs! Min 7:40 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDq6XYa0h0I
---
Please learn the difference between a Cuck and an SJW. Shapiro is a Cuck.
@19 kfg
"Mr. Eich, Have you now, or ever been, a supporter of Proposition 8?"
---
That reminds me of some funny date questions a couple of us came up with years ago.
One was "Are you currently, or have you ever been, a man?"
Nightwing @Daltimus_Prime
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HOLY SHIT. Whatever happened to "being the bigger person" and "not stooping to their level?"
---
WTH, does this clown think we could possibly achieve the vastness and lard assedness of an SJW?
"Are you currently, or have you ever been, a man?"
Well that'll smoke out an SJW in a hurry.
@110 Sillon Bono
Can I suggest that to the description of a SJW, be added going after the career of those who do not believe in Climate Change crap?
---
I added a couple links under Twitter banning for a couple climate change guys. They were banned for "abusive behavior" which probably means they disagreed with a 500+ pound fat Eunuch who thinks it's a woman.
@112 Wyrd
And I thought I was a drunk!
---
I can't make heads or tails of that gibberish. You know that old thing where when someone is really drunk, only someone else who is drunk can understand them? :P
@123 Craig
I have to get stuff off my chest about celebrities... they play these games with me thru the media, they have this all this money, they have all the advantages over me in the games that they play, its bullying, its torture and then they make me feel like the bad guy when I go off on them with some internet comment as they torute me year after year, I am sick of their crap I want a lot of them to just like disappear and not exist bc they torture me
---
Are you trying to say you need a safe space /facepalm
Add Jennifer Keller-Burns, of Thunderf00t infamy.
"GoLocalPDX reported that a Portland baker, Lisa Watson, of Cupcake Jones, started her own campaign to contact GoFundMe and report the Sweet Cakes campaign as being in violation of their terms of service."
http://www.oregonlive.com/business/index.ssf/2015/04/sweet_cakes_owners_direct_dono.html
Not to mention GoFundMe.
Aeoli Pera wrote:...I might have been misinterpreting Snidely Whiplash's edits.
Snidely, bro, you need to butch up your prose a little. Think Hemingway, not pajamaboy.
Fuck you. Eat me bitch.
@130 "The list goes on and on. How about categories? [[Category: Purger]] for people who got at least one person purged, [[Category: Hooligan]] for people who got an event cancelled or disrupted, [[Category: Snitch]] for people who got someone arrested for hatespeech"
You're losing sight of the purpose here. It's to be a resource for organizations that don't want to allow SJW entryists. It needs to be easily searchable. Get in, lookup a name, get the result, get out.
It doesn't have to be pretty and it doesn't have to make for entertaining browsing.
May have been asked already, but don't Leftists already have lists of us?
Lost Sheep wrote:Add Jennifer Keller-Burns, of Thunderf00t infamy.
Good one. Easier if you provide links, but it'll do.
Gathering myself I wanted to apologize to the celebrity community one last time for my bad and erratic behavior I wish them all peace love happiness and good things
May have been asked already, but don't Leftists already have lists of us?
Yes, that's why anytime I do anything, whoever I am working with is immediately contacted and subjected to the "do you know...." routine. It's been that way for at least eight years now, maybe a bit longer.
The Truth is, the celebrity community has been very very nice to me, and I am ashamed of myself that I don't return their kindness, with consistent kindness back, my issues are all my fault, Hopefully I can start a consistent streak of always being nice to them all the time, I owe that to them
Speaking of SJWs, it seems that Alison Rapp is now working as a prostitute:
http://www.dailystormer.com/disgraced-nintendo-pedo-alison-rapp-is-a-literal-prostitute-allegedly/
Good hunting to be found at the NSFW Encyclopediadramatica Social_Justice Category. They source their stuff, so you can easily do parallel construction without having to source them directly (and for all their manifest faults, or is that style, they are often more useful than Wikipedia).
I'm finding this educational - in particular the effort Vox has to make to stop people from turning it into a list of everyone they dislike.
Human nature in action.
Now I think I'll google around a bit and see what's on Teh Internetz about this. Lots of chuckle-worthy outrage and posturing, I expect.
150
The purpose of metadata is to keep track of lots of data. There are too many names for one person to know each of the stories behind them all or verify them.
We have a list of LambdaConf signatories. We can compare that list to the list of people listed in the LambdaConf signatories category, then we know if anyone is missing or erroneously listed.
It's easy to look through a category to verify that everyone in it meets the criteria for inclusion. If they don't, we remove them.
Then we look at the people who aren't in a category other than journalist or academic, and wonder why they're on the list.
Data maintenance is a huge issue for a project that lots of people are going to be working on for a long time. Every bit of metadata helps.
I truly wish the celebrity community all the best
@155 Mature-Craig
The Truth is, the celebrity community has been very very nice to me, and I am ashamed of myself that I don't return their kindness, with consistent kindness back, my issues are all my fault, Hopefully I can start a consistent streak of always being nice to them all the time, I owe that to them
---
Craig, I have the answer for you.
Start watching WWE. There, you are encouraged to love, hate, mock and cheer all kinds of people. Then, after about 6 months, the ones you cheer you can then hate, etc.
@156 Matamoros
http://www.dailystormer.com/disgraced-nintendo-pedo-alison-rapp-is-a-literal-prostitute-allegedly/
--
What a weird Celtic Nazi Legend of Zelda Man in the Maze symbol they have there.
@158 Peppermint
I agree. But I don't know how to add the category.
Also, I ran across a couple things in the Twitter part yesterday, Block Bot and some GG Autoblocker. Would those be a category or something else?
That Would Be Telling wrote:they are often more useful than Wikipedia
Which was kinda the point
I am haunted by guilt of bad things I say on the internet in a good person I just lose my mind on the internet I ask people for prayers bc it is very serious I hurt innocent people with words and I don't know how to fix it I have to starry off the internet I wish everything i ever wrote could be destroyed
@127 Gird your loins: "So start thinking a couple of steps ahead, because it's going to be an interesting week. What does it take to keep wikileaks or thepiratebay going? Constant vigilance, motivated administrators, and as @114 mentioned, funding."
I lack the skills or interest for doing any editing, admin, or other online work, but fully support this project and would like to contribute funding. To whom (and how?)? Should we avoid PayPal since it just cancelled a facility in North Carolina re gender bending law? Can I send a personal check to Vox?
Please let me know.
"I'm not gonna be a blabbermouthed whore, but they is doxxin' on me right to the now."
Yes,alison, they be doin' it rat now.
Bitch axed for it.
164. craig,
Stop worrying about how people think about what you feel,think or say.
Life is way to brief to ponder on that my friend.
"Should we avoid PayPal since it just cancelled a facility in North Carolina re gender bending law?"
O hells to the yeah.Fuck libshit faggotry.
Two possible candidates for the list:
Chris Hanrahan from Evil Hat Games and freelancer Brian Engard for their involvement in getting James Desborough's satire card game about GamerGate pulled from DriveThruRPG.
KotakuInAction over at Reddit covered the whole story pretty well: https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/2onx9x/tabletop_rpg_drivethrurpgs_removes_gamergate_card/
and I wanted to pray for healing of an awesome married couple and their beautiful family. and for them to just know that I admire and have the utmost respect for them, and I want them to know that I just support them all the time in any way I can
@Craig
You're not doing yourself any good by blubbering on a blog while drunk.
you are right, forget all that, I go thru brief little episodes of sober blubbering, I am feeling like a man today though, (I feel like a man 90% of the time) My challenge is to manage commenting on the internet and also taking care of my life responsibilities and not falling apart, I find it very difficult to balance both but I am determined to take on that challenge bc gosh darnet I feel like I have some important useful insights to provide
Post a Comment
Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.