ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2016 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Friday, May 06, 2016

Kukuruyo attacked, pedofilers feign innocence

Even as they chortle over Chuck Tingle, who they're going to No Award despite their frantic insistence that they totally get his act and think he is so very funny, the pedofilers are pretending that the timing of the SJW attacks on Kukuruyo are pure coincidence.
“No one is targeting artists because of their politics”. That’s a line that i’ve heard a lot from the social justice circles every time an artist is censored, or is attacked so much that they self-censor. It’s a line i’ve read several times in the last week directed at me, when i have commented in social media about some new attack upon myself. I think my experiences over this last week are a clear example on how, yes, artists are being targeted because of their politics, everytime those politics diverge from the progressive ideology.

I’ve always been an artist who does adult content. My hentai creations have been placed on the internet for more than a decade, and i’ve never had any problems because of it. Yeah, sometimes i got a drawing banned from deviantart, but they were very sporadic things, and usualy deserved; one every 2-3 years at most. No one ever wrote anything about what a horrible person i was for doing erotic fanarts and such.

Since i publicy became a gamergate supporter, the ammount of reports i’ve gotten on art sites have increased, many times in very underserved cases (i got a drawing pulled because the characters had sweat. Yes, sweat…) as well as the amount of people lying about me on blogs and such. And i don’t mean making critiques of me, i mean outright lies (one guy even wrote about how i voted for some candidate in the past US elections, which is interesting considering i’m a spaniard living in Spain). Not only that, but my website began to have attemps to break in. At some point i was receiving more than 50 attempts to break in each day, until i upgraded my security.

But this broke into a new level when i was announced as a finalist for best Fan artist at the Hugo awards. Then people in the social justice circles discovered that i support gamergate, and since then, interesting things have been happening one after the other (aside from the wave of verbal attacks, of course).

First one of my gamergate related works got reported and banned from deviantart. Then someone picked a cheap fanart that i was commissioned to do, about a half nude Ms.marvel, and tried to frame me as a pedophile, because aparently the character has 16 in the original canon (something i even didn’t know), ignoring the fact that the character body was adult. This story was writen about in (as far as i know) a blog and then in a comic news article, expanding the idea that i’m a pedophile for an anime style fanart thats no different than the millions upon millions of anime character fanarts out there, and that i was somehow a terrible threat for teenagers out there who have their heroes destroyed by evil me. I was reported in devianart for “pedophilia” and the drawing was taken down. I got reported on twitter. The attemps to break into my website have come arround again. Then they contacted my advertising affiliates, telling them i was hosting child pornography, so they would cease to advertise with me. They acepted a middle ground solution at first, but then they changed their policies, and now i can no longer receive their service. Yes, and advertising website changed their policies just because of me… and just yesteday some guys where trying to get MARVEL to SUE ME because of a fanart!

But hey, i’m sure all of this is just a coincidence! this has nothing to do with the Hugo awards or gamergate. I’m sure it’s just that a whole lot of people randomly decided the same week to try to fuck me up in every way they could, right? this can’t possibly be related with people from a particular ideology, pissed off because someone with the wrong opinions got a Hugo nomination.
As one pedofiler noted, both Kukuruyo and Chuck Tingle were nominated to further the Supreme Dark Lord's evil agenda, but the two resulting stories are unfolding very differently indeed. Which, she fails to note, is exactly as anyone who has read the 2016 finalist for Best Related Work, SJWs Always Lie, would have been able to predict.

The fact is that in addition to always lying, SJWs always try to spin the narrative even as they always try to discredit, disemploy, and destroy those who refuse to submit to their social justice narrative. Kukuruyo is #GamerGate, so SJWs are doing the same thing they did from the very first day Castalia House endorsed #GamerGate; we have been under non-stop script kiddy attacks ever since. Fortunately, the SJW hackers are as incompetent as one would expect them to be; keeping them out has been a simple matter of practicing basic security.

Of course, being SJWs, the pedofilers have to do what SJWs always do.
  • Hard to believe that getting his shitty, sleazy fanart suddenly thrust into the spotlight courtesy of a complete asshat could possibly have any negative consequences for the poor little troll. Actions something something consequences.
  • You lie down with assholes, you get up with shit on you, sonny. Also, like all Perritos, he conflates “wrong ideology” with “no talent” and “slating”. Actions have consequences.
  • Always amusing to see a GGer suddenly discover that “Holy Crap, I can be held responsible for my actions?! I thought that only happened to women!”
  • ’My friend nominated my house for the best garden award and now the cops are all over the meth lab in my garage. I blame literally anyone but my friend.’
  • I remember at least one, possibly two, of the Meedium Geenyuses complaining that someone was trying to hack their Facebook accounts — and claiming that clearly puppykicker SJWs were behind this.... That people are egotistical enough to assume that they are always deliberately targeted because of who or what they are, rather than considering that they may just have been the noticed flavor of the day by trolls and hackers… this is a thing that happens.
So, if the SJWs are to be believed, the attacks on Kukuruyo are just a random thing that happens, but are also an obvious and well-merited consequence of his actions due to his being on the wrong side. Right.

Anyhow, Kukuruyo is  #GamerGate, he's been active in the cultural war longer than the SF-SJWs were aware that anyone was shooting back, and he knows very well how it goes. Like Milo, like Cernovich, like Hulk Hogan, and like me, I have no doubt that he'll come out of this latest SJW assault considerably better off than he was when they first went after him.

And as a result of witnessing it, dozens, perhaps hundreds more people who had previously been neutral will come to understand that no one, however liberal they might be, is ever safe from SJW mobbing.

Labels: ,

50 Comments:

Blogger Cataline Sergius May 06, 2016 8:11 AM  

Just hang tough Kukuruyo.

You know the drill. Never apologize to the zombie-leeches and never forget you aren't alone.

OpenID marsascendant May 06, 2016 8:17 AM  

Vox, A couple questions.
1) What are your feelings on Chuck Tingle's announcement vis a vis having Zoe Quinn accept the award for him if he wins? Do you feel nominating him was a tactical mistake or do you feel the that simply having his work nominated, regardless of his own antics, is enough to help further harm the Hugo's reputation?
2) I have begun saving money in order to purchase supporting memberships for people willing to slate vote at the 2017 worldcon, however I dont know that many people who care enough about the Hugo's to nominate even if I were to purchase a SM for them. If I was willing to provide the capital, would you be willing to provide members of the VFM who both a) can not afford to purchase a membership on their own and b) can be counted on to maintain group discipline?
As an aside I think perhaps next year the slate needs to be heavy on truly offensive Sci-fi. Works that are not only actually racist, sexist etc, but so badly written that both the political theme and writing will help to further discredit the Hugos. Does anyone know if David Duke writes?

Blogger VD May 06, 2016 8:29 AM  

1. I feel fine. No, I do not feel it was a mistake. I would be delighted to see "Space Raptor Butt Invasion" win Best Short Story. It won't. The SJWs now professing to be happy about the horrible blunder I supposedly made are not going to vote for it no matter how they publicly posture. They will No Award the category. This is just their usual Narrative-spinning.

2. Don't purchase any additional supporting memberships now. This is the time to let the SJWs in science fiction shine. Winning awards is not the point.

OpenID marsascendant May 06, 2016 8:39 AM  

VD.
1) Yeah its obvious they are trying to create their own narrative, and I sincerely hope you are correct.

2) At the moment Im simply salting away some cash as I mentioned. But unless they jack up the prices I reckon I'll be able to purchase anywhere from 10-20 SM's by January. And I fully understand that winning awards is not the point, discrediting and destroying the Hugo's is. I may not be a VFM or a Dread ilk, but on this subject I believe our goals align. In either case Ill be checking in regularly so Im sure we will talk further when the time is right.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan May 06, 2016 8:43 AM  

Third law, I assume they are protecting their own pedos right now.

I always scoffed at "Projection" but now after encountering the SJW infection I have become to think of it as a primary defense mechanism for the emotionally/mentally damaged. Maybe I am wrong, but if not I see a weak spot in the defenses.

Blogger VD May 06, 2016 8:43 AM  

At the moment Im simply salting away some cash as I mentioned. But unless they jack up the prices I reckon I'll be able to purchase anywhere from 10-20 SM's by January.

There will be considerably more important projects to support in that time frame. Just trust me on this one.

Anonymous LurkingPuppy May 06, 2016 8:46 AM  

@4: But unless they jack up the prices I reckon I'll be able to purchase anywhere from 10-20 SM's by January.

If you insist on giving more money to the CHORFs, aiming at the 2018 Worldcon would be a better strategy, so the memberships you buy can nominate in three years.

Blogger Christopher Yost May 06, 2016 8:55 AM  

The Tingle Topic...g'damn...

I don't know if it was all planned ahead but...jesus...I could almost become religious again, it is so beautiful.

Blogger Aeoli Pera May 06, 2016 10:00 AM  

Like Milo, like Cernovich, like Hulk Hogan, and like me, I have no doubt that he'll come out of this latest SJW assault considerably better off than he was when they first went after him.

One of these people is not like the other ones. This will be an interesting case study.

Blogger Starbuck May 06, 2016 10:01 AM  

Please forgive my ignorance.

Is Chuck Tingle a real person? Made up? Pen name?

Blogger Josh May 06, 2016 10:22 AM  

Starbuck, you don't think love is real?

Anonymous fop May 06, 2016 10:27 AM  

And yet they consider Samuel Delaney a "luminary".

Wretched vile creatures.

Anonymous Elipe May 06, 2016 10:31 AM  

And if the mainstream media picks this up and runs with it, guess what?

That gives us many more opportunities to destroy what little credibility they have left. I'm ready to kick some ass.

OpenID basementhomebrewer May 06, 2016 10:38 AM  

Sounds a whole lot like the SJWs are victim blaming.

Always amusing to see a slut suddenly discover that “Holy Crap, I can be held responsible for my actions?! I thought that only happened to men!”

Anonymous Patron May 06, 2016 11:09 AM  

For what it's worth, Kukuruyo does do commissions (http://kukuruyo.com/contact) for $30+. Might be a way to show some support for those with a bit of spare cash...

Blogger jay c May 06, 2016 11:10 AM  

One of these people is not like the other ones. This will be an interesting case study.

None of these people are like any of the others, except where they are. Gay, atheist, redneck icon, Christian/AWCA/ELoE-SDL, and now anime something-or-other. It's not the Extraordinary League I would have chosen, but I'm not running the show.

I am most definitely curious why you choose to cultivate some relationships and not others, Vox. My first guess would be a tighter focus on a single goal, where mine would be more diffuse. (Maybe I should say "divided".)

Anonymous BGKB May 06, 2016 11:53 AM  

can not afford to purchase a membership on their own and b) can be counted on to maintain group discipline?

People who read this blog can afford the equivalent of 5 packs of cigs amortized over a year. Let the other side spend money on the homeless and home depot wetback votes.

Blogger Starbuck May 06, 2016 12:17 PM  

Starbuck, you don't think love is real?-Josh

What?!

Come on.. I really am in the dark here.

Blogger Christopher Yost May 06, 2016 12:31 PM  

The dark is the best place to be. So many things that can tingle...

Blogger Snidely Whiplash May 06, 2016 12:35 PM  

None of these people are like any of the others, except where they are. Gay, atheist, redneck icon, Christian/AWCA/ELoE-SDL, and now anime something-or-other. It's not the Extraordinary League I would have chosen, but I'm not running the show.
They have one thing in common

Anonymous MendoScot May 06, 2016 12:49 PM  

The degree of ignorance that they display…

The meta-humour in having Zoe Quinn accept the “slammed in the butt” award would still have me chuckling as they lower my coffin into the cold, hard ground.

That will be the one NA that I will truly regret.

Anonymous fop May 06, 2016 2:13 PM  

Come on.. I really am in the dark here.

You are simply at the far reaches of the tingleverse.

Anonymous VFM #6306 May 06, 2016 2:33 PM  

In the dark is the best place to pound it in the butt. Now you are a real Starbuckaroo.

Blogger VD May 06, 2016 2:54 PM  


I am most definitely curious why you choose to cultivate some relationships and not others, Vox.


1. Anti-SJW
2. Courage
3. Loyalty

I have neither need for nor interest in allies who will run when attacked. If I see someone temporizing, or backing down, or virtue-signaling, I cease to pay attention to them. I don't care if they are smart, or their heart is in the right place, or if they are a fellow Christian.

I know I cannot rely on them, and so I will not.

Anonymous A Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents May 06, 2016 3:28 PM  

The meta-humour in having Zoe Quinn accept the “slammed in the butt” award would still have me chuckling as they lower my coffin into the cold, hard ground.

Especially if there was an asterisk tagged along with it.

Anonymous A Paradigm Is More Than Twenty Cents May 06, 2016 3:31 PM  

The meta-humour in having Zoe Quinn accept the “slammed in the butt” award would still have me chuckling as they lower my coffin into the cold, hard ground.

Especially if there was an asterisk tagged along with it.

Blogger jay c May 06, 2016 4:24 PM  

I don't care if they are smart, or their heart is in the right place, or if they are a fellow Christian.

That last is the only part I have any problem with, but giving it some more thought, I still think it's just a matter of focus. I don't have a problem allying with unbelievers temporarily for the sake of a common cause, but with reservations because I don't want people to think I'm endorsing their gayness or religion or whatever. I can appreciate the good that Milo or Mike does, stand with them against a common enemy, and help them out when our purposes aren't at odds, but making very public alliances doesn't sit well with me. I'm undecided whether this is a real flaw in your strategy or if it's a virtue-signaling instinct in me or moral posturing. I can't tell yet.

Anonymous VFM #6306 May 06, 2016 4:34 PM  

Do you really think anyone cares about your endorsement, jay c? I mean no offense, but, seriously what are you doing? If associating publicly with Milo makes you pro-gay, would his association with you make him an adherent Christian? Your pride is too much.

The answer to your question is: it is moral posturing. Get a grip and follow Jesus. He hooked up with a hell of lot worse sinners than Milo the funny faggot.

Anonymous Longtime Lurker May 06, 2016 5:05 PM  

Need advice: Please tell me exactly what I must do to be able to vote in the Hugo awards. Information on the Worldcon website is a bit dated.

Blogger jay c May 06, 2016 5:20 PM  

Maybe it is moral posturing, 6306. I won't rule that out.

Who cares about my endorsement? I do. I believe God does.

Jesus didn't make public, political alliances with proudly unrepentant sinners, or at least it's not recorded anywhere if he did. If you're confused about what I mean, feel free to reread my original comment.

Anonymous BGKB May 06, 2016 5:21 PM  

I don't care if they are smart, or their heart is in the right place, or if they are a fellow Christian.

Maybe you should worry more about the faggots taking Darth Soros' cash and less about the ones making feminists cry. The entryists are past the moving goalposts. I posted this before from ex-army BlogSpot.

"Once you've allowed the barbarians through the gates, any swashbuckling ruffian who is willing to pick up a sword and push them back out again is an ally. We can worry about what the city should look like once we've put out the fires and have stopped the barbarians from actively setting more of them."

Blogger VD May 06, 2016 5:24 PM  

That last is the only part I have any problem with, but giving it some more thought, I still think it's just a matter of focus.

Why would I ever ally with a cowardly Christian who is going to break and run as soon as he's attacked, or worse, stab me in the back as numerous Christians have done?

I don't have a problem allying with unbelievers temporarily for the sake of a common cause, but with reservations because I don't want people to think I'm endorsing their gayness or religion or whatever.

As has already been said, get over yourself. Your "endorsement" is irrelevant anyhow.

I'm undecided whether this is a real flaw in your strategy or if it's a virtue-signaling instinct in me or moral posturing.

It's conventional Churchian delicacy. You would feel equally uncomfortable about Jesus having dinner with hookers.

Blogger jay c May 06, 2016 5:35 PM  

Why would I ever ally with a cowardly Christian who is going to break and run as soon as he's attacked, or worse, stab me in the back as numerous Christians have done?

I would never suggest you should.

As has already been said, get over yourself. Your "endorsement" is irrelevant anyhow.

And as has already been said, it's not irrelevant to me and I don't think it is to God.

You would feel equally uncomfortable about Jesus having dinner with hookers.

I'm not uncomfortable having dinner with hookers, nor am I uncomfortable with Jesus doing so. Not even with gay male hookers. Maybe if they were cannibals. That might make a little uncomfortable.

Dinner isn't the issue and you know it.

Blogger VD May 06, 2016 5:49 PM  

I would never suggest you should.

You said you had a problem with the fact that I don't care if my allies are fellow Christians. Considering that Paul himself allied with pagan Romans, going so far as to appeal to the pagan Roman Emperor, I think I'm on solid ground here.

Dinner isn't the issue and you know it.

To be blunt, Milo is a better ally than you. He knows never to criticize or call out an ally in public. And while dinner isn't the issue, it isn't relevant. What matters is your motivation. Your concerns are very much the same as those who criticized Jesus: what other people will think of you failing to condemn them and allow yourself to be associated with them.

I haven't even met some of my social media allies. Having dinner with them would be considerably more intimate.

Anonymous VFM #6306 May 06, 2016 5:49 PM  

If it helps, here:

Christianity thrives in but is not synonymous with, Western Civilization.

The pillars of Western Civilization are:

1) Classical Learning and Culture (Greece and Rome)
2) Free, individualistic barbarians who carry personal arms.
3) Christianity - Evangelism, Theology and Practice

Western Civ doesn't survive if any of those go completely dark, or if all three go so dim as to be forgotten.

The West is clearly post-Christian. The individual hold-outs like you are self-cloistered and afraid to publicly ally with anyone who might give you a bad reputation before Satan's world.

The well-armed semi-barbarian freemen are gunning up and praying for peace, but their spiritual supply from Christendom has run thin. They will not wait on heaven forever, so the spirit of the pagan berserker may have to suffice.

The Classics? Hell, even journalists who claim conservatism dismiss even Modern (much less early PostModern) texts as "just 'books'", preferring "action" instead. The Classics are entirely abandoned.

So, that's one pillar standing, and while that pillar is critical to the continuance of Western Civilization, on its own, it is just another pagan nightmare.

Your refusal to connect as a Christian to the one remaining party of uncouth alt-right freemen is a betrayal of Western Civilization and an abandonment of the faith you claim.

You are supposed to be a steward of Christianity, a spiritual occupier in Enemy territory until the Return, a watchman and an investor. This is Matthew 101.

Get to it, you, and all Christian men. Stand up and stop fucking around in the devil's Church. You cannot burn it to the ground if you insist on bunkering under its pews. You can't stand with the Lion of Judah if you are just putting on sheepskin and hoping to be forgiven for inertia.

Your public concerns are worldly concerns. You are a material man and a Son of Satan. Cast those shackles off! They aren't yours too keep! Cast them off and run like damnation means something to you, like there's someone in this world that needs saving, no matter how much the devil and his SJWs tell you to hate the faggot, abandon the sinner, despise the blind and avoid the sick.

You are sucked into the lie, and it is a big one. Happens to everyone.

But a Christian stands up.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash May 06, 2016 6:23 PM  

jay c wrote:Jesus didn't make public, political alliances with proudly unrepentant sinners, or at least it's not recorded anywhere if he did. If you're confused about what I mean, feel free to reread my original comment.]\

You could have stopped with this:
"Jesus didn't make public, political alliances."

Blogger jay c May 06, 2016 6:28 PM  

I would never suggest you should.

You said you had a problem with the fact that I don't care if my allies are fellow Christians. Considering that Paul himself allied with pagan Romans, going so far as to appeal to the pagan Roman Emperor, I think I'm on solid ground here.

I thought the "very public" etc would make my meaning clear enough. I don't mean working with, associating with, talking to, ministering to, helping, etc. Maybe I just don't know the right words.

To be blunt, Milo is a better ally than you.

Probably so. OTOH, since you want comments and you don't want this to be an echo chamber, I thought you'd appreciate a respectfully presented, mildly critical comment.

And while dinner isn't the issue, it isn't relevant. What matters is your motivation.

Motivation matters, agreed.

Your concerns are very much the same as those who criticized Jesus: what other people will think of you failing to condemn them and allow yourself to be associated with them.

That's possible.

Blogger Rusty Fife May 06, 2016 6:30 PM  

Jay c

2 Corinthians 6:14 is the only one you can really hang your argument on. However, VD isn't really yoking himself to them. He points at their good work and doesn't shun them.

Blogger VD May 06, 2016 6:37 PM  

OTOH, since you want comments and you don't want this to be an echo chamber, I thought you'd appreciate a respectfully presented, mildly critical comment.

I don't appreciate criticism on matters that are not any of your fucking business. My friends and my allies are not your concern in any way, shape or form.

Do you think it is appropriate for me to criticize your friends and acquaintances? If not, then why on Earth would you think it is appropriate for you to tell me with whom I should associate or not?

Who the fuck are you anyway?

Blogger jay c May 06, 2016 8:32 PM  

I don't appreciate criticism on matters that are not any of your fucking business. My friends and my allies are not your concern in any way, shape or form.

I thought you intended for others to follow your example. Was I wrong?

Who the fuck are you anyway?

A friend.

I wasn't criticizing so much as asking. I even said that I was probably wrong.

I was going to leave it at my last comment above, but I came back to mention that someone just reminded me that the command to "choose life" takes precedence over almost every other. God gave his laws for life, not death, and if an action that would normally be immoral preserves life, especially the lives of others, then it's not only permissible, it might even be obligatory. I completely agree with you that mass immigration from the third world into Europe and the US is the paramount issue of the moment and stopping it will almost certainly save many lives. Making common cause--even common identity--with gays, atheists, whomever will fight it is a good thing.

I'm not giving my approval. You don't need it. I just thought you'd like to know that I had realized what I was missing.

Blogger jay c May 06, 2016 8:33 PM  

Thanks, Rusty. That's a helpful response.

Blogger Rusty Fife May 06, 2016 10:22 PM  

@40

You're welcome.

Blogger John rockwell May 07, 2016 5:45 AM  

''Then someone picked a cheap fanart that i was commissioned to do, about a half nude Ms.marvel, and tried to frame me as a pedophile, because aparently the character has 16 in the original canon (something i even didn’t know)''

Yeah that totally is proof of pedophilia (sarc).

Pot call kettle black. Hence ensuing that others don't pay attention to their own perversions that are 10 times worse.

Anonymous jOHN MOSBY May 08, 2016 1:41 AM  

Who the fuck are you anyway?
A dunbass. Not a friend as they proclaim, just a dumbass.

Anonymous jOHN MOSBY May 08, 2016 1:52 AM  

I don't have a problem allying with unbelievers temporarily for the sake of a common cause
jay c, ain't you one of them messianic joos?

Anonymous jOHN MOSBY May 08, 2016 2:00 AM  

"I don't appreciate criticism on matters that are not any of your fucking business. My friends and my allies are not your concern in any way, shape or form."
Amen.

Anonymous jOHN MOSBY May 08, 2016 2:11 AM  

"I wasn't criticizing so much as asking. I even said that I was probably wrong."
I can't speak for for Vox, but you are for damn sure wrong. STFU while you still can.

Anonymous jOHN MOSBY May 08, 2016 2:34 AM  







"I just thought you'd like to know that I had realized what I was missing."
Sounds like a personal thing, dont you think ?

Blogger Calbeck May 08, 2016 3:24 PM  

One point to make here, about that opening aside:

The Hugo-Nots are not going to want to No-Award SRBI.

As this all moves forward, they will find reasons to endorse it, using the same logic as they did to No Award five entire categories last year: "we have to burn the city to save it". That's because of Tingle's BRILLIANT - I kid you not, and I do not snark - choice in bringing Zoe Quinn on board. They have just locked themselves into giving that award.

You see, Quinn's history currently appears to be largely unknown to the Hugo-Nots. Because they prefer to think of her only as victim of an online harassment mob, they are unaware that she is a longtime veteran of Something Awful and its Helldump faction... people who mount massed harassment campaigns not for ideology, but for entertainment.

Any move to deny Quinn her time in the spotlight will be met in the same fashion as she has always reacted to snubs: an anonymous online mob will suddenly appear (as recently happened, within the hour of being denied a demand she made of another SJW's project). She will of course claim it's GamerGate or the VFMs, because the targets will believe that without question.

But they will still be under attack until she gets what she wants. They will be doxxed, maligned, slandered, and then their actual dirty laundry will be dragged into public over and over. You will also see Quinn - and her more public allies - pretending to be concerned about the attacks while ALSO suggesting that the attacks aren't ENTIRELY unfounded. She will once again be "the victim", and dozens of news outlets will fall over themselves presenting HER narrative as the victim.

The Hugo Committee will be lucky if anyone even bothers to ask them for comment.

And mark my words... the Hugo-Nots will be just as surprised as the man who drowned trying to help the scorpion cross the river.

Anonymous No Comment May 09, 2016 1:52 AM  

VD wrote:OTOH, since you want comments and you don't want this to be an echo chamber, I thought you'd appreciate a respectfully presented, mildly critical comment.

I don't appreciate criticism on matters that are not any of your fucking business. My friends and my allies are not your concern in any way, shape or form.

Do you think it is appropriate for me to criticize your friends and acquaintances? If not, then why on Earth would you think it is appropriate for you to tell me with whom I should associate or not?

Who the fuck are you anyway?


What does it really matter if it's his business or not? What's it really to you? Why is criticism unacceptable or inappropriate when it comes to friends and acquaintances? Why aren't your friends and allies any concern of his? Or alternatively, what does it matter if your friends and allies aren't his concern or not? Why does that make a difference on whether somebody can criticize?

Also, why did this particular thing seem to set you off?

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts