ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2016 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Monday, June 27, 2016

The price of speaking out

SJWs will always try to force you to pay for standing up to the Narrative and speaking out against it, lest others do likewise.
Never go full racist. A Tennessee congressional candidate learned that lesson this week after his campaign took out a billboard ad exhorting voters to "Make America white again." From local ABC affiliate WTVC:

Rick Tyler told WTVC he owns Whitewater Grill in Ocoee, but in the coming months will transition to campaigning to represent Tennessee's 3rd District in the U.S. House of Representatives. Tyler says his "Make America White Again" sign, which plays off of presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump's "Make America Great Again" slogan, was taken down on Tuesday evening.

The decision to take the billboard down came after Tyler's business became the target of a boycott.
As if his submission will be sufficient to permit him to be forgiven for the sin of speaking out against the New "America". Is it not remarkable that those who claim to love America are so determined to wipe out literally every last vestige of it?

Whatever this multiracial empire is, it is not the same nation that for its first 130 years required all new citizens to be "of good character" and "white". And it is remarkable how many people who lament the fall away from the U.S. Constitution, designed to benefit the Founders and their posterity, don't make the connection between the abandonment of all three things.

The reality is that the only way to Make America Great Again is to Make America White Again. The two slogans are synonymous. The SJWs know it, which is why both slogans terrify them.

Labels: , ,

169 Comments:

Anonymous Broken Arrow June 27, 2016 4:16 PM  

I've seen some progressives lament that FDR's America and politics are gone and can't seem to come back. Of course the right is the enemy, but the articles I read only puts part of the blame on the right, but is confused as to the failure of the left to bring back this "golden age". The change in demographics never occurs to them.

Blogger Jourdan June 27, 2016 4:43 PM  

I agree, and feel in my bones that this is right. I just don't know what the hell we're going to do, as a majority of children right now are non-White. Not projections, mind you; real-existing kids in the U.S. right now.

Anonymous EH June 27, 2016 4:45 PM  

Who says the billboard was taken down because of a boycott? In the video I saw of Tyler a few days ago with a local news crew on the site of the billboard (great interview), he said it had been taken down in the middle of the night, apparently on the instigation of the billboard owner's wife, and the vinyl display was missing. He was just scheduled to do a press conference at the billboard a couple hours ago, but the video isn't up yet. Tyler also has at least three other billboards up of different designs.

I suspect the PJmedia article is just another example of first law of SJWs.

Blogger Dave June 27, 2016 4:53 PM  

Whitewater Grill

That's so racisss! the water probly isn't even white; should be Brownwater Grill. Doesn't sound appetizing? Too bad!

Also don't forget today is National PTSD Awareness Day as designated by the U.S. Senate. So many triggered by Mr. Tyler.

Anonymous Faceless June 27, 2016 4:54 PM  

And a reminder to us all that PJ Media would be more than happy to feed everyone to their right to the lions provided they got one pat on the head from the mainstream media they once aped and now covet the approval of...

Anonymous andon June 27, 2016 4:55 PM  

Rush Limbaugh always said don't do to them (leftists) what they do to you - as in boycott advertisers. Never made sense to me.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan June 27, 2016 5:02 PM  

SJWs now have an ally, at Drudge right column it seems Al Queda or whatever the CIA is calling it these days says target whites to avoid a "hate crimes" charge.

We certainly have the best enemies the idiots in government can buy, and race does not exist, someone forgot to put that in Arabic.

Blogger The Hammer June 27, 2016 5:05 PM  

As I live a few counties over from where this billboard, I saw this on local news first. I can confirm it was also reported locally that it was removed against his will.

Another thing I haven't seen reported locally or nationally is that he had a big and active business FB page that he had taken down a few days later (3000+ likes if I recall which is a good amount for a local, rural business, and posts every week).

I saw the page before it was taken down. Anti-racists had taken to defacing it with comments on many posts. The despicable part was on the posts before all this, of groups of customers.

Two standouts:

A group shot of some kids, some of whom were not white. The anti-racist said something like, "oh look a bunch of KKK youths".

Another was a picture of a girl with her parents for her birthday. Her name was abbreviated K.K. so of course we know what the anti-racist called her.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan June 27, 2016 5:08 PM  

Cernovich is breaking the internet with his hashtag thing showing the hot chicks for Trump

I hope the left goes full Triggly over it

Anonymous Golden June 27, 2016 5:10 PM  

You really need to read Leonard Pitts.

Complain, gnash your teeth. It won't matter. The demographics are changing and white men will have to play on a level playing field

Blogger JACIII June 27, 2016 5:14 PM  

Golden wrote:You really need to read Leonard Pitts.

Complain, gnash your teeth. It won't matter. The demographics are changing and white men will have to play on a level playing field


Civilization is our game. Only white people play it on a level field.

Blogger SciVo June 27, 2016 5:30 PM  

The demographics are changing and white men will have to play on a level playing field

You mean, without affirmative action? Oh no, Br'er Rabbit, please don't throw me into that level playing field!

Anonymous johnc June 27, 2016 5:30 PM  

@2 I agree, and feel in my bones that this is right. I just don't know what the hell we're going to do, as a majority of children right now are non-White. Not projections, mind you; real-existing kids in the U.S. right now.

Yeah that's true and all but look on the bright side: God is going to wipe this planet off the map big-time in short order. So keep your chin up!

Blogger Matthew June 27, 2016 5:33 PM  

Jourdan wrote:I just don't know what the hell we're going to do, as a majority of children right now are non-White.

Dammit, Jourdan, this is why everybody calls you a defeatist.

As if the children of our invaders are a hard target.

Blogger guest June 27, 2016 5:36 PM  

Golden: "Complain, gnash your teeth. It won't matter. The demographics are changing and white men will have to play on a level playing field"

Unlikely. Not with the high abortion rates among blacks. Then there is the high rate of black mothers who murder their children. Weird.

Blogger guest June 27, 2016 5:36 PM  

Golden: "Complain, gnash your teeth. It won't matter. The demographics are changing and white men will have to play on a level playing field"

Unlikely. Not with the high abortion rates among blacks. Then there is the high rate of black mothers who murder their children. Weird.

Anonymous crushlimbraw June 27, 2016 5:37 PM  

Hey, VD - you might want to go back and see the comments on the article you linked at PJ - looks like Americans are waking up!

Anonymous Elijah Rhodes June 27, 2016 5:38 PM  

The fact that we are seeing more and more people (and in this case a congressional candidate) openly advocating for the interests of whites is indicative of a seismic shift in progress.

Blogger Mike Romkey June 27, 2016 5:46 PM  

But a billboard saying "Make America Mexico Again" would be perfectly OK with the Enemy.

Anonymous Dyskord June 27, 2016 5:46 PM  

Were headed for conflict. The globalists and the ignorant liberals are dashing towards it at full speed. Even though theyre less equipped or mentaly prepared to deal with it than we are. Selfishness,narcisism,fragility and lack of self awareness are laudable character traits for todays liberal. When reality bursts the bubble. Theyre the first to fall. We havent fought back yet and we have them on the defensive.Merely standing up to them has them trembling. When we do fight I dont doubt victory.
Im not white but i support white identity. Because the truly racially motivated regressive anti civilizational cretins ive seen have all been liberal. And their token minorities.

Anonymous John Steed June 27, 2016 5:51 PM  

Let`s look at the four pics on the billboard. Did you notice? 1. Plymouth Landing. 2. General Washington praying. 3. A young white woman with a child. and 4. A white family. All pics are POSITIVE. Remember Vox`s post last winter about a WN poster (sans swastika)? It`s no wonder that the guy HAD to be shut down!

Blogger Snidely Whiplash June 27, 2016 5:52 PM  

"Complain, gnash your teeth. It won't matter. The demographics are changing and white men will have to play on a level playing field."

After 70 years of tilting the playing field, suddenly they want a level one? I'm gonna go with "level playing field" translates to "Tribal antagonisms lead to White Genocide"

Anonymous BGKB June 27, 2016 5:55 PM  

I hear a video made by TRUMP is the reason for this
http://www.thedailysheeple.com/isis-releases-video-that-threatens-san-francisco-and-las-vegas_062016

Anonymous 1337 June 27, 2016 5:57 PM  

When I spoke with him on the phone the billboards had already been removed (2?) and a friend who owned a rafting company threatened to be burned out.

Anonymous John Steed June 27, 2016 6:07 PM  

Interesting website. He uses the slogan `I Have A Dream` while there`s a link at the page bottom `MLK Fraud`.

Anonymous VFM #7916 June 27, 2016 6:14 PM  

@2

Solution: Have more white children. Homeschool them. Live a resilient life.

Also, YOU need to have more white children, or help your children have more white children.

If that's not possible, then find some young white couple that's not SJW and support them in having more white children.

This is the most enduring and personal attack one can make against the forces of SJW.

Blogger Chiva June 27, 2016 6:14 PM  

@Golden

A level playing field? Yes please. Don't cry if the results are not what you expected.

Anonymous BGKB June 27, 2016 6:16 PM  

I just don't know what the hell we're going to do, as a majority of children right now are non-White

Sell the non white kids to Lena Dunham and Barney Frank.

Blogger RobertT June 27, 2016 6:18 PM  

This guy is dumb enough to fit right in with everyone else in Congress.

Blogger Artemis Rand June 27, 2016 6:20 PM  

Just sit tight and make sure you are prepared for the great re-set when it happens. Whether or not the SHTF next month, next year, or next century make sure that either you are prepared, or that your descendents are prepared.

Mother Nature will finish what Uncle Adolf started and unlike Uncle Adolf, Mother Nature is undefeated.

Anonymous Elipe June 27, 2016 6:26 PM  

BGKB wrote:Sell the non white kids to Lena Dunham and Barney Frank.

To be fair, it's not like you would be subjecting these kids to anything they weren't already going to be subjected to anyway.

Except I think it might actually turn out a bit better for the kids. White privilege has a funny way of treating others better than these certain others treat their own, eh?

Blogger TontoBubbaGoldstein June 27, 2016 6:46 PM  

Golden wrote:You really need to read Leonard Pitts.

Complain, gnash your teeth. It won't matter. The demographics are changing and white men will have to play on a level playing field


Careful what you wish for, Chief.


Whitewater Grill

Sounds like something Trump will do to Hillary in a debate...

Anonymous Susan June 27, 2016 7:00 PM  

OT Heads up: Anyone living back in the Virginia area know why there would be flatbeds of white UN vehicles being trucked around on the freeways in that state? Drudge is carrying a huge photo of a flatbed loaded for bear. Daily Mail has the story. According to eyewitnesses, this has been going on all day. Any local info??

Blogger TontoBubbaGoldstein June 27, 2016 7:02 PM  

Dave wrote:Whitewater Grill

That's so racisss! the water probly isn't even white; should be Brownwater Grill. Doesn't sound appetizing? Too bad!



Yeah...but in the "Jesus is just Alt-Right with Me" spirit from the other day, the "Blackwater Grill" would be a pretty cool name.

Blogger JimR June 27, 2016 7:06 PM  

@33 "flatbeds of white UN vehicles "

They're made there. Sold to the UN for use doing shit in the various places the UN stirs shit up.
http://www.alpineco.com/index.php

Blogger Dire Badger June 27, 2016 7:07 PM  



You know, in virtually every single cafe au lait culture, lighter skin equates to higher culture, wealth, and success. In south america and India this is even taken to extremes, but it exists among the desert tribesmen, Africans, and even, to some extent, among Asians. Even the Jews feel inferior, because despite their much-publicized and extremely questionable 'superior intelligence', they cannot seem to achieve anything unless submerged, tick-like, into a white host culture.

People are always asking why hate whites? It's very simple.... envy. Not envy of our culture, or envy of our technology (although those play a part) but simply instinctive envy and an inferiority complex that demands that light skin be destroyed. It wraps up hatred of elite, of overachievers, of the ruling class that oppresses (right or wrong) the 'rest of us'.

This is true for masculinity as well. Thus, those men with white skin are, and always will remain, the epitome of hatred and envy... even those of us who live in a tar paper shack and eat boiled squirrel are perceived as innately and unobtainably superior, and this is not helped by the fact that, in general, when left to our own devices, we tend to prove that superiority in a myriad of ways.

The problem is that this instinctive hate does not suggest a solution, it will never go away no matter how 'nice' whites are... if anything our being nice or charitable or understanding exacerbates the problem, because it is perceived as patronizing, the worst sort of insult to those who already feel innately inferior.

I am not a supremacist, I am not saying that whites are, in fact, superior to all other races in every way, but as a culture drifts farther and farther leftward in an attempt to push 'Perception is reality', This perception of 'white as evil' becomes more and more prevalent. Thus, white men being the enemy of those who feel inferior, always, is as obvious and understandable as normal being the enemy of sexual deviancy.

Blogger tz June 27, 2016 7:09 PM  

Whaterver Michael Jackson did or suffered from.

Required all new citizens to be white except for the millions covered under that amendment after the war of Northern Aggression. Imagine if Lincoln used the North's Industrial might to make a bullet above-ground railroad from Dixie to the Canadian border.

But there will be no Christendom without Christ. Unchristian whites in large numbers have proved to be worse for their greater intelligence just as fallen angels are worse than fallen men.

The "of good character" is a way of neutrally saying "acts like a proper Christian". I'm not talking theological minutiae, instead the obedience to the Natural Law. That is the nonconformist WASP roots, though most denominations of Christianity are compatible.

Though I hold the view that we need to make America Christian Again - really Christian, not this feminized cuck-inanity. It won't work if we keep the heathen and pagans. The demographics follow race.

The very term "multicultural" implies failure. The Constitution requires a very specific culture in many areas. There can be no "multiculturalism".

So the argument at best is if you can convert the heathens and pagans of other races and cultures who seem to like the way they are and have never had any tradition or history of acting like nonconformist protestants. Some have, but that doesn't mean a critical mass can be reached. One can argue, but the hour is late.

Then here is the challenge - if you think it can be done in a multiracial Christian nation - in either case it will require an 80+% super-majority, the correct thing to do is not to argue against race, but to start evangelizing. The Aztec human sacrifice stopped by conversion, the Holy Spirit, not by dialectic or rhetoric.

This is akin to forging a sword out of steel because you know the metallurgy works or trying to forge one out of various alloys - With God, all things are possible, but even Jesus didn't try to make "the brood of vipers" and "sons of the Devil" into disciples - except for Saint Paul, and that was a miraculous conversion - and even he was then opposed in every city on his missionary journeys.

Blogger tz June 27, 2016 7:12 PM  

Of course they want a level playing field, but in this case the arena is an obstacle course.

Blogger tz June 27, 2016 7:16 PM  

@25 - Malcolm Gladwell, who is of that minority, in "David and Goliath"'s last chapter explained one of the bigger MLKjr frauds designed to get into the media.

After slaughtering 60 million babies, we still have the temerity to worry about what happened in the South under Jim Crow. Not that it wasn't unjust, only that we traded acid reflux for stomach cancer.

Blogger Dire Badger June 27, 2016 7:19 PM  

@33- They have manufacturer plates. UN armored vehicles are manufactured in Oshkosh and shipped to various ports along the eastern seaboard.

Of course, the fact that they are being sent to a lot of new ports (they are usually shipped from Norfolk, these appear to be headed to southerly states) suggests that they may be headed to the UK, which is a little sinister.

Blogger dc.sunsets June 27, 2016 7:22 PM  

Complain, gnash your teeth. It won't matter. The demographics are changing and white men will have to play on a level playing field

Level? That would be quite an improvement for white males.

Let's see what Affirmative Action gives us:
1. Every "successful" black/brown must be assumed to be a recipient of "special help" and couldn't actually cut it without the special treatment.
2. Every woman must be similarly assumed to be incompetent for the position until thoroughly proven otherwise.
3. For a white male to land the position, he has to be twice as good, so good that the employer can't justify a "diversity hire/promotion."

The result?

Minorities and women are weakened exactly as would be a protected industry whose owners/managers are bribing politicians to eliminate their competition.

White males are forged in a crucible to be tougher, better, and (when they take the red pill) meaner.

PS: who gets hurt most by "special treatment?" The blacks/browns/women who were competitive WITHOUT it. Can you imagine how much it sucks to be an IQ 140 black (they do exist, albeit rarely) in a world of Affirmative Action? You're surrounded by other blacks who are too stupid to meet standards, and you are then LUMPED IN WITH THEM by everyone by assumption.

Go ahead, clown. Level the playing field.

Anonymous Rolf June 27, 2016 7:25 PM  

The problem with the phrase "full racist" is that to those with racist ears will always find a way to be offended, no matter what you say or intend. So some, simply existing and being white is enough reason to say you are a racist. And yes, the irony escapes them.

Blogger tz June 27, 2016 7:27 PM  

The problem isn't that white men will have to worry about any field, but to have a chance we need white Women to return to being the righteous wives and mothers of a large brood - insisting on strong yet righteous men as husbands.

That will have to happen in any case - there's plenty of room for more K-selected children, but we will see what happens to the r-selected when things collapse.

Neither dialectic nor rhetoric can fix Europe, and the Muslims are basically an r-selected predator species. Cats finding an island of rabbits. People fight emotionally, not intellectually.

Blogger dc.sunsets June 27, 2016 7:29 PM  

Minorities (mostly their Majority leftists addicted to the dopamine of False Moral Superiority) hate the successful.

150 years after slavery ended, and after 50 years of truly astronomical quantities of resources poured onto blacks/browns/women, still they can't be remotely competitive with white (or East Asian) males. NOT REMOTELY.

Evidence of this (SAT, GRE, BAR pass rates, CPA pass rates, Medical Board pass rates, etc.) is mercilessly suppressed (The College Board stopped reporting data by race/household income/household education levels attained in 1996 because it showed conclusively that black kids of parents with graduate degrees and/or the highest cohort of family income ($70k+) still scored lower than whites in families with no more than high school educations and/or earning $10k or less.

The takeaway?

It's all due to racism....and racism won't end (and Utopia won't arrive, the one where reality matches Hollywood's Magic Negro obsession) until there are NO MORE WHITE PEOPLE...PERIOD.

Suffice it to say, I beg to differ.

Anonymous Ominous Cowherd June 27, 2016 7:30 PM  

``Imagine if Lincoln used the North's Industrial might to make a bullet above-ground railroad from Dixie to the Canadian border.''

If it weren't for Booth, Lincoln might have. As I recall, Lincoln was a proponent of repatriation for former slaves.

Blogger dc.sunsets June 27, 2016 7:35 PM  

Waiting for high IQ/high productivity whites to have more kids is going to only coincide with them being relieved of the burden of paying for their own families and the families (kids) of people addicted to Uncle Sam's tits.

My kids are paying for their own kids...and all of Latrina's six kids (none of whom share a last name...hint, hint....true story.)

Call me a "brutalist." Charity begins at home. Welfare ISN'T charity. There can be no entitlement to charity.

150 year ago it was widely believed that poor people were poor for a reason. It was God's plan for them, or they chronically did self-destructive things.

We need to get back to that recognition. I'm not holding my breath...Joe Sixpack is going to have to see his standard of living collapse, and Joe Mainstreet will have to be right behind him, and THEN they'll tell their women to sit down, SHUT the F UP, no more Virtue Signaling BS.

It's coming. Just not quite yet.

Blogger dc.sunsets June 27, 2016 7:38 PM  

Welfare enables people to wallow in self-destructive choices, just as providing heroin to an addict would do so.

I don't love chronically incapable people who won't even try to help themselves, so I won't call it "Tough Love."

It's time a whole lot of people were told, "Tough. Now go away. And if you are inclined to burn your neighborhood, go ahead. If you then try to move to mine, you'll be shot dead."

Blogger Cederq June 27, 2016 7:44 PM  

Damn, dc.sunsets, right on! That has to be the way, won't work any way else.

Anonymous Gen. Kong June 27, 2016 7:46 PM  

45. Ominous
If it weren't for Booth, Lincoln might have. As I recall, Lincoln was a proponent of repatriation for former slaves.

Yes, that thought has struck me as well. Keep in mind that the crooked old Illinoise Railroad Shyster managed to double-cross the (((friendly neighborhood bankstas))) by printing vast quantities of United States Notes to pay for the money they lent him to pursue the military subjugation of the southern states. The war was over when Booth pulled the trigger. No way the outcome would have been altered - indeed the only tangible result was to make things worse for the remaining southern whites. One cannot rule out plain old crazy of course, but the nagging cui bono hangs in the air.

Blogger Rusty Fife June 27, 2016 7:52 PM  

Dire Badger wrote:Even the Jews feel inferior, because despite their much-publicized and extremely questionable 'superior intelligence', they cannot seem to achieve anything unless submerged, tick-like, into a white host culture.

I know the answer to that one. Israel has a hard time putting in a bus line because (((everyone))) on the route ties up permits complaining about it.

Unfortunately, (((they))) are all well versed enough in legalism and have a lawyer in the (((family))) such that (((they))) are really quite effective at it.

I wonder if arguing isn't a sport to (((them))), like football.

Anonymous Ominous Cowherd June 27, 2016 7:56 PM  

``One cannot rule out plain old crazy of course, but the nagging cui bono hangs in the air.''

Booth was plain old crazy - maybe even crazier than the power-mad tyrant he shot ... but did he convince himself that his craziness would be supported and rewarded, or did someone who got burned by Lincoln's greenbacks convince him?

Anonymous John Steed June 27, 2016 7:57 PM  

@33. I`ve been seeing vast numbers of Humvees, Mraps (mainly Oskgosh M-ATVs), even Bradley IFVs pass thru my yard for a great while now. Some are just standard transfers but the rest...lets say the Drivers are super-mum. A lot of the unarmored Humvees are sporting woodland camo pattern paint jobs and are rusting like they have come out of NG storage depots. The IFVs appear to of have had their turret auto-cannon gun mounts changed out for something smaller like a .50 cal. No good for taking on Putin`s Boys, but ideal for hordes of starving `zombies`(Vox`s take on the so-called `FEMA Camps`). Or maybe I`m just seeing things.

Blogger Rusty Fife June 27, 2016 7:58 PM  

dc.sunsets wrote:Welfare enables people to wallow in self-destructive choices, just as providing heroin to an addict would do so.

I don't love chronically incapable people who won't even try to help themselves, so I won't call it "Tough Love."

It's time a whole lot of people were told, "Tough. Now go away. And if you are inclined to burn your neighborhood, go ahead. If you then try to move to mine, you'll be shot dead."


"For even when we were with you, we gave you this rule: "The one who is unwilling to work shall not eat.""

Submitted without comment.

Anonymous andon June 27, 2016 7:58 PM  

10. Anonymous Golden June 27, 2016 5:10 PM
You really need to read Leonard Pitts.

Complain, gnash your teeth. It won't matter. The demographics are changing and white men will have to play on a level playing field


so ill be getting an extra 230 points added to my SAT for my skin color?

I likes that kind of level playing field

Anonymous Gen. Kong June 27, 2016 8:01 PM  

dc.sunsets observations on the nature of welfare are what used to be known as "common sense" in a bygone era. Keep in mind also that welfare payments doled out by the nomenklatura and apparatchiki of the Banana Empire are collected out of the hides of the proles and zeks known as "taxpayers" under threat of violence. Yet how many of the Churchian cucks we see extolling its great virtues as charity and sacrifice (while they pocket money to re-settle Sudanese and Iraqi musloid rapists in rural Idaho)?

Kipling made a similar common-sense observations a century ago but unfortunately few took heed, so the inevitable consequence will be upon us sooner or later unless there's some serious re-thinking on the part of the Joes (Sixpack and Mainstreet alike):

"As it will be in the future, it was so at the birth of man; there are only 4 things certain, since social progress began: that the dog returns to his vomit, and the sow returns to her mire, and the burnt fool's bandaged finger goes wobbling back to the fire, and after this is accomplished, and the Brave New World begins, when all men are paid for existing, and no man must pay for his sins, as surely as water will wet us, as surely as fire will burn, the Gods of the Copybook Headings, with terror, and slaughter, return." - Rudyard Kipling

Anonymous andon June 27, 2016 8:03 PM  

15. Blogger guest June 27, 2016 5:36 PM

Unlikely. Not with the high abortion rates among blacks. Then there is the high rate of black mothers who murder their children. Weird.


I hear the aborigines used to eat their children, lol

Anonymous Hezekiah Garrett June 27, 2016 8:14 PM  

@56 So it's not a racial thing if Caucasoids do it too?

Anonymous BGKB June 27, 2016 8:21 PM  

Can you imagine how much it sucks to be an IQ 140 black

The rainbow unicorns they ride need a special diet.

Israel has a hard time putting in a bus line because (((everyone))) on the route ties up permits complaining about it

So much for Israel being protected from being jewed.

So it's not a racial thing if Caucasoids do it too?

I don't believe metzitzah b’peh involves eating the tip.

Anonymous andon June 27, 2016 8:21 PM  

@ 57 - idk, are aborigines caucasoids?

Anonymous Hezekiah Garrett June 27, 2016 8:47 PM  

@59 That's my understanding, although I learned the scientific understanding of race from the 1957 World Book Encyclopedia. So genetic studies may have disproved tat particular but of trivia.

Anonymous andon June 27, 2016 8:49 PM  

I tend think of them as somewhat like pygmies

Blogger Snidely Whiplash June 27, 2016 8:52 PM  

BGKB wrote:The rainbow unicorns they ride need a special diet.
I've known a couple. Quite a few IQ 110-120 Blacks are in the IT field. Quite a lot of IQ 100 fakers too, but that's true of the wimmens and the Chinese as well. If you can fake it and you're Black you have to make a serious extinction-level mistake to get fired and even then you're probably safe.

For whatever reason, Mexicans in IT tend to be the real deal, probably because they don't get any minority boost in hiring. They're counted as White, so if you see one, he's probably earned his spot.

Indians tend to be all over the place, because hiring and retention in Indian culture usually has nothing whatever to do with competence or hard work. I can't tell you how many times I've had to work with an entitled lazy Brahmin-descended idiot who has a lower-caste person assigned to him who actually does the work. You're not allowed to talk to the competent guy because that wouldn't be fitting. And the Brahmin will completely fail to understand what's going on or what's required.

Blogger JaimeInTexas June 27, 2016 8:52 PM  

Yep. Lincoln worked on the colonization until the day he was shot.

Blogger TontoBubbaGoldstein June 27, 2016 8:55 PM  

Golden wrote:You really need to read Leonard Pitts.



Cry me a river.

I'm more of an Earl Pitts kind of guy.

Anonymous Takin' a Look June 27, 2016 8:58 PM  

@ andon

Australian Aborigines used to brain and cook the lesser twin, the second brother straight out of the womb and feed them to the First Son. Girls used to have their uteruses prolapsed and "circumcised", punched back up and given to packs of boys sic'd on her so the frothy mixture of virginal blood and semen could be used as an antipodean viagra for impotent old men.

This is ultimately, what the SJWs, ((())) and ///\\\ want. They just want it "safe spaced" for them so they can freely indulge in the perversions of their father in hell/hel.

Anonymous jOHN MOSBY June 27, 2016 8:58 PM  

"The reality is that the only way to Make America Great Again is to Make America White Again. The two slogans are synonymous. The SJWs know it, which is why both slogans terrify them."
Amen, Vox. They preach tolerance,







( for thier depravity ) but tolerating a bunch of uppity straight honkie males and the honkette momen , they just can't tolerate that, no siree. We needs to die and the quicker the better, and even that ain't quick enough for 'em.
JAC :
"Civilization is our game. Only white people play it on a level field."
The rules have changed, so we have to adjust to the changing times in order to beat them at the game they are running on us to save what is left of civilization, and restore it to its greatness once more.
Matthew :

"Dammit, Jourdan, this is why everybody calls you a defeatist."

"As if the children of our invaders are a hard target."
I really wish Jourdan was a nattering nabob of negativity, but he is. They bust his ass for it over at MPC also.
I wish I knew what it would take to snap him out of it, but your guess is as good as mine.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash June 27, 2016 9:00 PM  

andon wrote:@ 57 - idk, are aborigines caucasoids?
No. If I understand the current thinking correctly, the ancestors of the Aborigines left Africa several Millenia before the ancestors of modern Asians and Europeans. The populations outside of Australia appear to have been lost or wiped out in the time between their migration and the later migration of our ancestors. There was also some admixture with Asians about 25 millenia ago.
So they are older stock, and actually less closely related to us than Africans.

Anonymous Takin' a Look June 27, 2016 9:02 PM  

"Openly indulge" I mean.

Anonymous jOHN MOSBY June 27, 2016 9:03 PM  

Errata,
" Jourdan was not a nattering nabob of negativity. "
Pardon .

Anonymous andon June 27, 2016 9:16 PM  

@ #65 and #67 - thx, interesting

I had also heard that the Australian women kind of adopted some aboriginal children around the early 1900's or so, (perhaps because of the cannibalism thing?) and are now supposed to be apologizing for it, like they were stealing aboriginal children or something. More revisionism?

Anonymous Bob June 27, 2016 9:17 PM  

Who says only white people understand free speech ...

Blogger dc.sunsets June 27, 2016 9:18 PM  

Paradoxically, I sometimes err in discussing who is paying for whom.

Since 1964/1971, and on afterburners since the bond price bottom (1980?) political spending by Congress has been unconstrained by tax revenue.

Sure, we were treated to, first, endless hand-wringing about "The Debt, The Deficit!" and, second to the lame canard, "Debt doesn't matter, we owe it to ourselves."

In reality, tax receipts didn't matter a bit. Congress could purchase reelection with impunity because every dollar they borrowed and spent was treated as an increase in wealth by the bondholder.

The closest metaphor I can construct is, imagine if the more your taxes went UP, the richer you felt.

The brake was off, and the Uncle Sam Juggernaut took off like a rocket. For 30+ years, the more CONgress borrowed and showered on their buddies, the higher GDP rose, and all that "Bond Wealth" collateralized astronomical buying in the asset markets (real estate, stocks, and corporate bonds.)

In a full-fiat environment, as long as everyone goes along with the gag (by trusting the Full Faith and REPAYABILITY of all those IOU's), every dollar borrowed and spent is another dollar of wealth creation.

As long as all that wealth doesn't flow into life's necessities, who cares how high such credit inflation rises...right? RIGHT?!

What we now have is the largest game of chicken in the history of Man. I'm a relatively smart guy, but the people in Wall St and the Treasury are every bit as smart or smarter...they know this is a crazy game...but as Charles Prince said, as long as the music is playing they have to get up and dance.

Brexit MAY be the catalyst to tell the "playa's" it's time to flinch in the game of chicken. We won't know until the markets have revealed their cards.

What we do know is that hanging in when others lose their nerve has paid people billions of dollars...so far. But when the tide does turn, and interest rates rise, signaling that the mass mind no longer trusts the (impossible) math of bond repayment (instead of perpetual roll-over), then those late to the exit will be trapped as the nightclub burns to the ground.

$billions at stake for the "Men who would be king."

I envision most of today's high-flying financiers will go the way of Kipling's character Danny Dravot.

Anonymous jOHN MOSBY June 27, 2016 9:24 PM  

6. andon
I've heard Limbaugh say several times that boycotts don't work.
And by and large, they don't.

Anonymous jOHN MOSBY June 27, 2016 9:29 PM  

64. TontoBubbaGoldstein June 27, 2016 8:55 PM
Golden wrote:
"You really need to read Leonard Pitts."



"Cry me a river.

I'm more of an Earl Pitts kind of guy."
A- TO THE MEN.

Blogger Lazarus June 27, 2016 9:40 PM  

jOHN MOSBY wrote:Errata,

" Jourdan was not a nattering nabob of negativity. "

Pardon .


Jourdan is a fuss budget and a worry wart.

The polite response is: "There, there, dear. Would you like a nice cup of tea?"

Problem solved.

Anonymous A Visitor June 27, 2016 9:43 PM  

@7 It was the Islamic State; they and Al Qaeda/Jamat Al Nusra are at war with each other.

@8 If I'm ever down in Tennessee, I'll patron his restaurant (I'm just up the road in Naptown).

@10 Never cared for him or Naverette...

@17 It might be in part due to the Ilk commenting there. It's like a screenshot I have of an article from last year. A lib commented, "This must have been linked to Drudge. It's out of control." Can't wait for, "This must have been linked to Vox Popoli, it's out of control."

@18 Franky, I understand where the defeatists are coming from (used to be one myself as I couldn't see post '12 where we were headed but into a deeper nadir). El Trumpencaudillo might not be able to reverse it; nonetheless to paraphrase Ike re: Somoza, "Trump may be a son of a bitch but he's our son of a bitch!"

"Were headed for conflict."

@20 Given what was leaked at Drudge today re: the EU planned super state, it's gonna get ugly.

@21 Well, it's cause #1 and #2 be racisssssss!

"Currently it’s not clear how these video clips were attained. They appear to imply that ISIS sympathizers in the US took the footage, or ISIS could have simply used random videos on the internet that were posted by tourists."

@23 Your post reminded me of this. Makes you wonder how much truly is Islamic terrorism and the rest is SVR SVRing.

"He uses the slogan `I Have A Dream` while there`s a link at the page bottom `MLK Fraud`."

@25 LOL

@26 If the gf and I ended up getting married, we're raising a friggin army! TRUMPENKRIEG!!!!

"You know, in virtually every single cafe au lait culture, lighter skin equates to higher culture, wealth, and success. In south america and India this is even taken to extremes, but it exists among the desert tribesmen, Africans, and even, to some extent, among Asians."

@36 Ding ding ding! I had an ex that was Ecuadorean. She was mistaken for being a foreigner in her own country due to being as white as me. Look at Brazil: whites are held in high regard. So much for colorblind society that a Yahoo! article once toted. I'm not a supremacist either. However, having travelled abroad (and in two cases lived abroad), what people who've never been outside of America (especially libs) don't get is this little tidbit: outside of the US RACE MATTERS!!!!

"Level? That would be quite an improvement for white males."

@41 It's like my father who is an ortho trauma surgeon. He always says, "I'd like to pay my fair share in taxes."

@52 Any chance they're wargaming down at Fort Polk? A buddy in the NG says his unit is scheduled to go against a full time Army unit that specializes in destroying NG and Reservists in wargaming. He's not looking forward to it.

Blogger Were-Puppy June 27, 2016 10:00 PM  

OT - or is it?

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/06/27/racist-pool-safety-poster-forces-red-cross-apologize/

Blogger Were-Puppy June 27, 2016 10:02 PM  

@2 Jourdan
I agree, and feel in my bones that this is right. I just don't know what the hell we're going to do, as a majority of children right now are non-White. Not projections, mind you; real-existing kids in the U.S. right now.
---

Anchor babies away

Blogger Were-Puppy June 27, 2016 10:06 PM  

@9 Mr.MantraMan
Cernovich is breaking the internet with his hashtag thing showing the hot chicks for Trump
---

Now you make me want to get Twitter

Blogger Zaklog the Great June 27, 2016 10:09 PM  

Slightly off topic, but not entirely. I saw something a while ago that I'm trying to find again and it occurred to me that one of the Dread Ilk might have an idea where this came from. It was a chart showing violent crime rates by race and socioeconomic status. That is, I think it had columns for white and black and the rows were, for example, income below $30k, income $30k-$60k, income $60k-$120k, etc.

Does anyone know where to find this?

Anonymous andon June 27, 2016 10:11 PM  

73. Anonymous jOHN MOSBY June 27, 2016 9:24 PM
6. andon
I've heard Limbaugh say several times that boycotts don't work.
And by and large, they don't.


yeah but they seem to work against the right. for ex Hannity used to have GM and other major sponsors and he lost them and mostly the conservative talk shows have these tacky ads where they'd have to say "use promo code Levin" "promo code Hannity" etc. Savage was always complaining about losing sponsors.

the left fights all out war, we should too

Anonymous jOHN MOSBY June 27, 2016 10:15 PM  

"Also, YOU need to have more white children, or help your children have more white children."
May God richly bless you for the words of wisdom ye spake, good sir. My daddy is the baby of 15 , My dear wife's daddy is the baby of 11. They both had families of 3.
Young white American man, find ye a young white American woman , and make lots of young white American babies.
WTF is wrong with that ?
Clue : If you let them outbreed ya, don't be surprised when they lead ya.

Blogger Were-Puppy June 27, 2016 10:24 PM  

@49 Gen. Kong

It's interesting you guys are talking about Lincoln.
I've been wondering the last couple of days if there is going to rise up an EU version of Lincoln. And it looks like it may very well happen.

Blogger Were-Puppy June 27, 2016 10:26 PM  

@52 John Steed

@33. I`ve been seeing vast numbers of Humvees, Mraps (mainly Oskgosh M-ATVs), even Bradley IFVs pass thru my yard for a great while now. Some are just standard transfers but the rest...lets say the Drivers are super-mum. A lot of the unarmored Humvees are sporting woodland camo pattern paint jobs and are rusting like they have come out of NG storage depots. The IFVs appear to of have had their turret auto-cannon gun mounts changed out for something smaller like a .50 cal. No good for taking on Putin`s Boys, but ideal for hordes of starving `zombies`(Vox`s take on the so-called `FEMA Camps`). Or maybe I`m just seeing things.
---

I wonder if they are sending them to Texas for another one of those Jade Helm deals

Anonymous fred June 27, 2016 10:27 PM  

"Anchor babies away"

Actually it'd be anchor babies aweigh. (As in "weigh anchor"). Consider it a Plan B.

btw, Ace has a link in the sidebar to 9 crazy things the Dems have adopted in their platform. And I mean KUH-RAAAAZY. You have to read it to believe it.

I predict the most fraudulent, crooked, violent election in history, with riots and antifa voter intimidation at many polling stations, millions of Trump votes sent to Davy Jones' Locker, and votes for Hitlery mailed in from Tanzania and Mars.

If Hitlery steals this election, we're doomed. And if she wins it fair and square, we're even more doomed. It's civil war within her first term.

Anonymous jOHN MOSBY June 27, 2016 10:29 PM  

" Hannity used to have GM and other major sponsors and he lost them "
andon, they lost those sponsors because of da Obongo bailout clause. Think about it.

Anonymous Mr. Rational June 27, 2016 10:31 PM  

Jourdan wrote:I just don't know what the hell we're going to do, as a majority of children right now are non-White.
Retroactively eliminating birthright citizenship will fix a great deal of that almost overnight.  The children of illegal aliens instantly become deportable along with their parents, and lose employment and welfare rights as well.  The Mexodus will be YUUGE.

Force the remaining welfare rats onto Depo-Provera or a work program and their numbers going forward will drop by at LEAST half.  The problem is that DP encounters fanatic resistance from cuckified Christians.  (Cuckstians?)

Blogger Were-Puppy June 27, 2016 10:32 PM  

@62 Snidely Whiplash

I can't tell you how many times I've had to work with an entitled lazy Brahmin-descended idiot who has a lower-caste person assigned to him who actually does the work. You're not allowed to talk to the competent guy because that wouldn't be fitting. And the Brahmin will completely fail to understand what's going on or what's required.
--

See the dot, save a lot

Anonymous fred June 27, 2016 10:37 PM  

"Retroactively eliminating birthright citizenship will fix a great deal of that almost overnight"

Playing with fire. You can't possibly retroactively revoke on that scale. The precedent set is far too dangerous.

Anonymous jOHN MOSBY June 27, 2016 10:42 PM  

"It's interesting you guys are talking about Lincoln.
I've been wondering the last couple of days if there is going to rise up an EU version of Lincoln. And it looks like it may very well happen."
Let's hope it does, Were Puppy.
It's not going to be the same as it was here in round 1, too many different cultures to deal with. And those potato niggers, don't count on them siding with the EU when it comes down to the nut cuttin'. But hey, that's just me.

Anonymous AmStrat June 27, 2016 10:45 PM  

@fred

It's pretty easy actually. Just rule the 1965 immigration act as non-binding. Bam.

Blogger Ezekiel June 27, 2016 10:58 PM  

fred wrote:"Retroactively eliminating birthright citizenship will fix a great deal of that almost overnight"

Playing with fire. You can't possibly retroactively revoke on that scale. The precedent set is far too dangerous.


Weev had an interesting take on this. A common argument right now is that it would be impossible to deport 11 million people. He has no idea where that number comes from, and suspects that it was just made up by leftists so that they could bargain it down to half and then start screaming about MUH SIX GORILLION and ANNUDAH SHOAH.

Our counter-argument is that it's actually about 50 million that need to be deported, and our point of compromise should be that we're willing to not behead any of them in the meantime.

Anonymous Gen. Kong June 27, 2016 11:39 PM  

When it comes to enforcement - people tend to forget that it's much simpler to come down with boots on a couple of thousand Chamber of Commerce Cucks, seize their assets and send them to spend some time learning to serve Shitavious in Club Fed than it is to round up millions of leeches and parasites. Cut off the flow and the vast majority will self-deport.

Anonymous Rhetoric Boy June 27, 2016 11:43 PM  

If "The only way to make America Great Again is to make America White Again" then the proponents of making America great again can only pursue one option if they are serioius: Expelling all non-whites from the country.

Vox: Are you in favor of expelling all non whites from America or do you not want to make America great again?

Anonymous andon June 27, 2016 11:51 PM  

86. Anonymous jOHN MOSBY June 27, 2016 10:29 PM
" Hannity used to have GM and other major sponsors and he lost them "
andon, they lost those sponsors because of da Obongo bailout clause. Think about it.


yeah I think you might be correct in that case but overall conservative talk radio cant get mainstream sponsors because any that sign up, the left threatens them with boycott and then the shows are left with these cheesy "promo code Levin" stuff

maybe its different now though, I haven't listened for prob 3-4 years

Anonymous fred June 27, 2016 11:56 PM  

"It's pretty easy actually. Just rule the 1965 immigration act as non-binding."

I'm not a lawyer so I don't know whether the action would be legitimate or not. My point is that rewriting the legal past on such an epic scale sets precedents that would certainly come back to bite us in the ass. When the next criminal gang of leftards comes to power, as they certainly would, they'd retaliate by say, calling 2A non-binding. There's an awful lot of retaliation in American politics, much of it invisible to the public.

Far better to deport the parents for prima facie cause, then say, "we're not breaking up your family, just take your kids back with you to Mexico." (I believe under Mexican law, any Mexican living anywhere or born anywhere, still has citizenship status in Mexico.) If they refuse, we tell them fine. "So you're going back to Mexico regardless, and your kid stays here. We'll raise him in a shitty orphanage which is like a bullet train to prison later on. I'm sure he'll write."

Blogger Bill June 27, 2016 11:58 PM  

Vox's views validated, again. Might be more interesting nuggets in the discussion.

"Unfortunately, as a researcher here you have to publish 2 papers a year to renew your job contract, and since a "negative" scientific result (i.e. I tried curing this disease with blah blah but it didn't work) is not considered publishable data, there is a shit-ton of pressure to oversell your work and its implications. I still love science, but I've lost a lot of faith in the research that's been put out there."

and

"As a scientist with a 15 year career behind me so far, I am afraid that my experiences reflect this. Peer review is excellent in theory but not in practice. Much of the time, the only vetting the papers get are two relatively junior people in a field (often grad students or postdocs) giving it a thumbs up or thumbs down. That is absolutely it. In theory, the editors should make the decisions with the recommendations of the reviewers, but the editors rarely have the time or the expertise to judge the papers and often automatically defer to reviewers. Also, the papers should be reviewed by luminaries of the field, but these folks rarely have the time, and either decline invitations or bounce the work to a student or another trainee. It's not just bad papers that get through, but also good, rigorous, papers that are bounced by this system.
Many if not most of the people in academic science today, at least in biology (my field), are overwhelmed with the need to publish in such high volumes, few people with the needed expertise can afford the time to go over the results in detail. All this while, at the same time and for the same reason, the volume of papers that needs to be reviewed goes up. I've heard of (and had myself) papers havve lingered for 4+ months before they even went out for review.
And, in our rush to publish, we often don't read this literature carefully ourselves but start citing papers anyway, which weaves these potentially weak or erroneous papers even more tightly into the fabric of their field.
It's difficult to care a lot about the quality of your work when you know the extra effort often doesn't help something go through this fickle review process, and when you know people will cite it without really reading it closely. There is little incentive to spend longer on a paper to make sure everything is right and the results are reproducible because there is very little accountability for errors and huge rewards for being prolific."

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/4q6q8s/serious_scientists_of_reddit_whats_craziest_or/

Blogger Snidely Whiplash June 28, 2016 12:03 AM  

jOHN MOSBY wrote:Young white American man, find ye a young white American woman , and make lots of young white American babies.
Done with mine, but I racked up a score of 11, and 9.5 grandkids so far, which, like so many other things, makes me 99.9th percentile.

Anonymous SciVo June 28, 2016 12:10 AM  

fred wrote:"Retroactively eliminating birthright citizenship will fix a great deal of that almost overnight"

Playing with fire. You can't possibly retroactively revoke on that scale. The precedent set is far too dangerous.


Oh noes, we might unsettle the precedent that judicial fiat matters more than original intent! OMFG, people that want to change our laws would have to actually pass new laws through the legislature. Unprecedented!

Anonymous SciVo June 28, 2016 12:25 AM  

Rhetoric Boy wrote:If "The only way to make America Great Again is to make America White Again" then the proponents of making America great again can only pursue one option if they are serioius: Expelling all non-whites from the country.

Whoa boy, hold your horses. One step at a time.

Pause immigration, then remove financial incentives (jobs and welfare) for illegals, and see how things look. If necessary (which I'm sure it will be), then retroactively revisit the poor legal decision that bizarrely makes anchor babies a thing, and see how things look.

Are you a Minuteman in bed, or do you take your time and pay attention to feedback? Do you "like" your country, or do you "love" your country, or do you just want to screw it hard and fast? Rhetorical questions, natch.

Anonymous jOHN MOSBY June 28, 2016 12:34 AM  

Done with mine, but I racked up a score of 11, and 9.5 grandkids so far, which, like so many other things, makes me 99.9th percent
God bless ya, good sir. You damn sure did your part.

Anonymous SciVo June 28, 2016 12:40 AM  

fred wrote:I predict the most fraudulent, crooked, violent election in history, with riots and antifa voter intimidation at many polling stations, millions of Trump votes sent to Davy Jones' Locker, and votes for Hitlery mailed in from Tanzania and Mars.

That is true. We need Hand-Eye Coordination: an alliance of bikers and lawyers (and it needs to be presented in that order) to keep the peace and watch the process.

Anonymous Rhetoric Boy. June 28, 2016 12:46 AM  

"Pause immigration, then remove financial incentives (jobs and welfare) for illegals, and see how things look. If necessary (which I'm sure it will be), then retroactively revisit the poor legal decision that bizarrely makes anchor babies a thing, and see how things look."

This won't make America great as it doesn't address the millions of Blacks in the country, let alone the Asians, Jews, Arabs and others.

You need to deport them all to make America White again. Now, I suppose slavery of all non whites would do the trick too. It certainly would bring down labor costs in America.

Of course this would result in the U.S suffering severe economic sanctions and likely kill off most of our exports.

The economy would fail. BUT, America would be White and Great again.

Blogger Rusty Fife June 28, 2016 1:06 AM  

Rhetoric Boy. wrote:"Pause immigration, then remove financial incentives (jobs and welfare) for illegals, and see how things look. If necessary (which I'm sure it will be), then retroactively revisit the poor legal decision that bizarrely makes anchor babies a thing, and see how things look."

This won't make America great as it doesn't address the millions of Blacks in the country, let alone the Asians, Jews, Arabs and others.

You need to deport them all to make America White again. Now, I suppose slavery of all non whites would do the trick too. It certainly would bring down labor costs in America.

Of course this would result in the U.S suffering severe economic sanctions and likely kill off most of our exports.

The economy would fail. BUT, America would be White and Great again.


That's some nice crazy bait you got there.

Blogger Noah B June 28, 2016 1:09 AM  

A future in which low-skilled workers are replaced by robots is going to make the slavery of past European cultures look kind by comparison.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash June 28, 2016 1:11 AM  

yeah, he's trying a reducto ad absurdam, but obviously can't tell the difference between a general statement and an absolute. He hasn't got the intellectual horsepower to get his moped up that hill.

Blogger IreneAthena June 28, 2016 1:35 AM  

Wow! The billboard is an ecologically friendly way of setting a burning cross in the front yards of all the blacks in that part of Tennessee. Some rhetoric goes way too far.

Anonymous andon June 28, 2016 1:57 AM  

103. Anonymous Rhetoric Boy. June 28, 2016 12:46 AM

Of course this would result in the U.S suffering severe economic sanctions...


by who?

the rest of the civilized world would be doing the same thing (deporting all the trash) and they'd being saying "ABOUT DAMN TIME!!"

Anonymous SciVo June 28, 2016 2:18 AM  

Speaking of the price of speaking out, Fareed Zakaria needs to learn to keep his forked tongue fenced in. Of course he's too much of a hateful anti-white narcissist to hear the putrid filth that spews from his vain mouth when he opens the tooth gate for his lies.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash June 28, 2016 2:23 AM  

IreneAthena wrote:Wow! The billboard is an ecologically friendlyblah blah blah stay in school

Shut up Tad.

Anonymous andon June 28, 2016 2:47 AM  

@ #109 - I noticed that too, he really hates whites.
but I'd rather he keep speaking

Anonymous Discard June 28, 2016 3:16 AM  

89. fred: We have affirmative action in this country, deliberate discrimination against Whites solely on account of their race, and the SCOTUS upholds it again and again. Given that, anything is possible, including ex post facto laws. I'd settle for the evenhanded enforcement of the 1965 Civil Rights act. 30 years in prison for violating somebody's civil rights, and no statute of limitations. That would put every elected Democrat behind bars, and most elected GOPers. It all comes down to force, not any legal theory or Constitutional precedent.

Anonymous Discard June 28, 2016 3:29 AM  

103. Rhetoric Boy: The whole non-White world knows that Whitey is just eating their shit. They will squawk and wheedle when we stop, but only for show. They know it's coming, but they're taking advantage of our position while they can. And after we send the shit home, they will follow our example and get rid of their own unwanted.

And just what American exports will other countries boycott? Cars? Nope, they don't buy them anyway. Shoes? Nope, we don't make but a few. Weapons? Nope, they will take all they can get. Food? Let them starve.

And if we got rid of the invaders and parasites, we could live almost entirely off our own resources anyway. There is no plausible threat to an American nation, run by and for Americans.

Anonymous Moonbear June 28, 2016 4:08 AM  

@113 You forget the threat to America is from within, it is your poison that seeps into other white countries not the other way around.

OpenID marsascendant June 28, 2016 6:44 AM  

"You know, in virtually every single cafe au lait culture, lighter skin equates to higher culture, wealth, and success. In south america and India this is even taken to extremes, but it exists among the desert tribesmen, Africans, and even, to some extent, among Asians."

Dire Badger, as someone who has been living in S.E. Asia for the last 6-7 years I can state unquestionably that S.E. Asians at least, are obsessed with being as white as possible. Every single skin lotion on sale here heavily advertises its whitening capabilities. As I sit here typing this A bottle of "Vaseline healthy white instant fair visible fairness lotion" is sitting on my desk (my GF left it there). Many S.E. Asians use umbrellas on sunny days in order to avoid getting any darker and there are "whitening clinics" everywhere and Glutathione is in damn near evrything. I don't know if its the same in China or Japan as I've never been but in Indonesia, Malaysia, The Philippines, Myanmmar, Laos and Thailand at the very least, the local attitude is "whiter is better"

Blogger Avalanche June 28, 2016 7:53 AM  

@41 "You're surrounded by other blacks who are too stupid to meet standards, and you are then LUMPED IN WITH THEM by everyone by assumption."

This is a comment I love:
================
A commenter at this link: http://www.stuffblackpeopledontlike.blogspot.com/2015/05/will-last-white-person-to-leave.htmlishe

=====================
I don't mourn the loss of Baltimore. Or Detroit, Chicago, Gary, Atlanta, etc etc etc.

It is ultimately a huge benefit to have Negroes concentrated in these huge teeming Petri dishes.

As always I advocate the complete White withdrawal from these horrible urban shitholes, and as always I advocate that since Negroes do not want to be policed, to immediately stop policing them.

And to anyone who might be naive enough to say "hey, there are good people in those neighborhoods, who try to work and raise their kids, who obey the law and who abhor the lawlessness and rioting as much as anyone".... my response is that these same IKAGO's voted for a Negro president, for Negro mayors, Negro city council members, Negro police chiefs and Negro school superintendents, and now they are getting exactly what they deserve, good and effing hard.

I have ZERO sympathy for blacks.
================

Anonymous Eric the Red June 28, 2016 8:47 AM  

Rhetoric Boy:
Obviously you're trying to agree and amplify. Sorry, won't work here. But here's what will happen instead:

- 99% of the illegals will self-deport; bye-bye, good riddance, you won't be allowed back in.

- Freedom of assembly will now also mean freedom of association; it's one of the penumbras and emanations of the Constitution.

- American-born blacks will be compelled, upon pain of losing their EBT's and other benefits, to take up residence in only one state, e.g., Michigan; all the other blacks will be face the same if they don't have a job and/or commit a crime; with 97% of them essentially moved out of the way, the historical black problem of this country will finally be solved.

- All mohammedans will be required to renounce jihad and sharia, and take a loyalty oath to the Constitution; if they don't, or if it can be proven that they are lying, they will be stripped of US citizenship and given 90 days to leave the country.

- All remaining non-whites will mostly be married to white men, and will therefore conform to their husband's culture; what few minorities remain will either get with the white cultural program or suffer the consequences.

- For leftists like you, we will invade mexico and occupy an area to which to ship you permanently; you will all be stripped of US citizenship of course, but you will have a chance to build your little progressive paradise from scratch (good luck with all that chuck-0).

- No more anchor babies, no more extended immigrant families, no H-1B's, no dual citizenship, no military service allowed if not a citizen, and other such loopholes will be closed forever.

In summary, the country will then be at least 93% white forever after, the economy will boom, and anybody outside in some multiculti fantasyland can cry a river while the USA is reunified and revitalized beyond their wildest dreams.

Anonymous EH June 28, 2016 9:02 AM  

Dire Badger wrote:

People are always asking why hate whites? It's very simple.... envy. [....]

This is true for masculinity as well. ... even those of us who live in a tar paper shack and eat boiled squirrel

[....] it will never go away no matter how 'nice' whites are... if anything our being nice or charitable or understanding exacerbates the problem, because it is perceived as patronizing, the worst sort of insult to those who already feel innately inferior. [....]

Thus, white men being the enemy of those who feel inferior, always, is as obvious and understandable as normal being the enemy of sexual deviancy.



Great comment. Will redistribute your verbal wealth to the disadvantaged. (None dare call it plagiarism. Maybe envy.:)

Anonymous BGKB June 28, 2016 9:18 AM  

I've heard Limbaugh say several times that boycotts don't work.And by and large, they don't.

They don't when the left calls for them because leftists are weak willed. All it takes is mention of a rough shower scene with 3 boys in Ender's Game to get people to break the boy cot.

OT - or is it? http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/06/27/racist-pool-safety-poster-forces-red-cross-apologize/

Whoever made the poster must have been a life guard at a diverse pool. Blacks not following the rules is so stereotypical.

Actually it'd be anchor babies aweigh. (As in "weigh anchor"). Consider it a Plan B.

ZIKA anchor babies will cost taxpayers more than their birth weight in gold every year they survive.

Playing with fire. You can't possibly retroactively revoke on that scale. The precedent set is far too dangerous.

The Dominican Republic did it with Haitians and they share the same island.

an alliance of bikers and lawyers (and it needs to be presented in that order) to keep the peace and watch the process

The 911 biker rally in DC didn't get any coverage in the ludenpress but it scared leftists shitless.

as it doesn't address the millions of Blacks in the country, let alone the Asians, Jews, Arabs and others.

We can keep the east Asians they are capable of sustaining civilization.

Anonymous Mr. Rational June 28, 2016 9:21 AM  

fred wrote:Playing with fire. You can't possibly retroactively revoke on that scale. The precedent set is far too dangerous.
So you'd rather have another Rwanda?  Because this is how you get Rwanda.  Besides, the Dominican Republic is doing it just fine.  Are you saying they're smarter than we are?

Revoking birthright citizenship from children of illegal aliens is just recognizing that it is stolen from the American people and taking it back.  If they really want to be American, let them apply for entry.

fred wrote:When the next criminal gang of leftards comes to power, as they certainly would, they'd retaliate by say, calling 2A non-binding.
They've already done that.  Birthright for illegals is a gross mis-interpretation of the 14th; all we need is legislation clarifying it.

Rhetoric Boy. wrote:This won't make America great as it doesn't address the millions of Blacks in the country, let alone the Asians, Jews, Arabs and others.
Stop feeding & breeding them.  In Mississippi, 72% of all abortions are procured by Black women.  Depo-Provera will eliminate most of the demand for abortion, if used properly.  Arabs will re-patriate if Islam is de-classified as a religion and made to pay taxes, moslems subjected to investigation for sedition, etc.  Not too hard.

Anonymous Rhetoric Boy June 28, 2016 9:29 AM  

"In summary, the country will then be at least 93% white forever after, the economy will boom, and anybody outside in some multiculti fantasyland can cry a river while the USA is reunified and revitalized beyond their wildest dreams. "

That's a lot of legislation. I'm wondering how we will convince representatives from NY, CA, TX, OR, WA, NY, MA, DE, RI, IL, and numerous other states to compel our blacks out of their homes and force them to MI. It would take some significant changes to the constitution. And you know how hard it is to change the constitution.

Anonymous Rhetoric Boy June 28, 2016 9:32 AM  

"In Mississippi, 72% of all abortions are procured by Black women. Depo-Provera will eliminate most of the demand for abortion, if used properly."

What would be the legislative route to denying blacks food and forcing them to take the drug?

Blogger IreneAthena June 28, 2016 11:48 AM  

@110 Snidely Whiplash. You claimed I was Tad and you misquoted me.
The first was you making a mistake, the second was you making a lie.

What I said was:
"Wow! The billboard is an ecologically friendly way of setting a burning cross in the front yards of all the blacks in that part of Tennessee. Some rhetoric goes way too far."

Anonymous Mr. Rational June 28, 2016 11:49 AM  

Rhetoric Boy wrote:I'm wondering how we will convince representatives from NY, CA, TX, OR, WA, NY, MA, DE, RI, IL, and numerous other states to compel our blacks out of their homes and force them to MI.
I'd like to ask why Michigan (a state of ~10 million) should have to take 40 million Blacks, when the state wasn't even in the union when the US stopped its part of the trans-Atlantic slave trade?  Georgia, the Carolinas and Mississippi are far more appropriate destinations, both historically and climactically.

Rhetoric Boy wrote:What would be the legislative route to denying blacks food and forcing them to take the drug?
Condition of parole for criminals, condition of benefits for the indigent.  You no likee, you say no but you no get bennie.

Anonymous BGKB June 28, 2016 11:56 AM  

I'm wondering how we will convince representatives from NY, CA, TX, OR, WA, NY, MA, DE, RI, IL, and numerous other states to compel our blacks out of their homes and force them to MI.

The only state that would object is MI especially now that section 8 can put blacks in gated communities like the McKinney dime girl pool party attack.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash June 28, 2016 12:17 PM  

IreneAthena wrote:@110 Snidely Whiplash. You claimed I was Tad and you misquoted me.

The first was you making a mistake, the second was me being a huge faggot.


Shut up Tad

Anonymous andon June 28, 2016 12:42 PM  

124. Anonymous Mr. Rational June 28, 2016 11:49 AM

I'd like to ask why Michigan (a state of ~10 million) should have to take 40 million Blacks, when the state wasn't even in the union when the US stopped its part of the trans-Atlantic slave trade? Georgia, the Carolinas and Mississippi are far more appropriate destinations, both historically and climactically.


you're complaining? sounds like a great opportunity

Anonymous andon June 28, 2016 12:46 PM  

123. Blogger IreneAthena June 28, 2016 11:48 AM

.....What I said was:
"Wow! The billboard is an ecologically friendly way of setting a burning cross in the front yards of all the blacks in that part of Tennessee. Some rhetoric goes way too far."


what kind of message is it when a black Atty Gen says there are too many whites in govt?

Blogger Bob Roddis June 28, 2016 1:34 PM  

The 2010 Census reported the following Michigan demographics:

• White American: 78.9% (Non-Hispanic Whites: 76.6%, White Hispanic: 2.3%)
• Black or African American: 14.2%
• American Indian: 0.6%
• Asian American: 2.4%
• Pacific Islander: <0.1%
• Some other race: 1.5%
• Multiracial: 2.3%

In the same year Hispanics or Latinos (of any race) made up 4.4% of the population.

The political problems of Michigan could be easily solved by a change of heart by the vast white majority upon whom the blame should fall for the present situation. Welfare, the drug war, public schools and causes of action for private discrimination could be ended quickly.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan#Demographics

Anonymous Rhetoric Boy June 28, 2016 1:38 PM  

"What would be the legislative route to denying blacks food and forcing them to take the drug?

Condition of parole for criminals, condition of benefits for the indigent. You no likee, you say no but you no get bennie."

Hmmm. Would this be the conditions just for blacks..or for whites also. If it's just for Blacks, then you run up against the problem of the 14th Amendment


"The only state that would object is MI especially now that section 8 can put blacks in gated communities like the McKinney dime girl pool party attack."

You don't think any state's representatives or lawmakers outside of MI would object to a law that required expelling blacks from their homes? Even though it violates the constitution?

I do.

Anonymous Eric the Red June 28, 2016 2:59 PM  

Rhetoric Boy:
Same tired old song and dance from a leftist...
'The law for thee but not for me.'
...and simultaneously...
'Flexible Constitution for me but not for thee.'

You can ponder all that after you've been relocated in mexico. Good luck, chuck-0.

Anonymous Rhetoric Boy June 28, 2016 4:17 PM  

Mr. Red:

You make a point. Unfortunately the point is too incoherent to understand. Still, I'm sure if you try you can muster the ability to explain how you'll get by the 14th amendment in your plan to force blacks from their homes, force their relocation and deny them their property rights.

Anonymous Mr. Rational June 28, 2016 4:22 PM  

Rhetoric Boy wrote:Would this be the conditions just for blacks..or for whites also.
Everyone.  Of course, all such measures would have "disparate impact".  That's the intent.

It's somewhat ironic that if anti-miscegenation laws were still enforcable, Heidi and Samantha Walker would probably both still be alive today.  "Civil rights" and "anti-racism" killed them... both going back to the 14th Amendment.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash June 28, 2016 4:27 PM  

When was the last time the constitution mattered in terms of government doing exactly what it wanted to do?

The constitution is used by the Left as a barrier for cucks, and that is, so far as I can tell, that is the only way it matters.
They do exactly what you're doing here.
"You can't do that, it's contrary to the 14th amendment. No, the constitution has nothing to do with affirmative action. The SC said so."

Anonymous Rhetoric Man June 28, 2016 4:29 PM  

How cute. Rhetoric Boy appears out of nowhere and rides my coat tails.

“Whatever this multiracial empire is, it is not the same nation that for its first 130 years required all new citizens to be "of good character" and “white”."

Yet, the Founding Fathers enabled American citizens, via the Constitution, to alter that criteria to reflect demographic changes. It is not surprising that they developed those initial standards considering that 1) only propertied men could vote, 2) European men had “founded” the United States, and 3) groups other than European were deemed inferior based on the available scientific and socio-cultural evidence of the time period. Remarkably, however, is that Thomas Jefferson’s “all men are equal” mantra came to fruition through legislation.

“And it is remarkable how many people who lament the fall away from the U.S. Constitution, designed to benefit the Founders and their posterity, don't make the connection between the abandonment of all three things.”



The natural rights of the sovereign body refers to citizens at that point in time, which happened to be white Europeans. That did not mean, however, that Congress lacked the authority to include people other than white Europeans to that sovereign body, given the fact that Congress wanted granted the authority to decide the criteria for citizenship for future generations. That is why it is farcical for anyone to focus exclusively on the Naturalization Act of 1790 as being the SOLE arbiter regarding posterity.

“The reality is that the only way to Make America Great Again is to Make America White Again. The two slogans are synonymous. The SJWs know it, which is why both slogans terrify them.”

The reality is that white Americans collectively will decide who is and who is not an American. They certainly do not need elitists cajoling them to initiate a “pure white reboot” of the United States.

JACIII…

“Civilization is our game.”



American civilization, not Western Civilization.

VFM #7916…

“Also, YOU need to have more white children, or help your children have more white children.”

No, whites do not NEED to have more white children. They have the choice to procreate amongst their own kind or interracially, or adopt non-white children. Requesting that whites pop out more kids is essentially a command among the pro-white crowd. In the end, whites will make their own decisions. #nosuchthingsawhitegenocide

tz…

“But there will be no Christendom without Christ.”


Likewise, Americans decide for themselves what is their faith and how they practice that faith, mindful that the United States, while being founded by Christians, also enables non-Christians to freely ply their religious trade.

dc.sunsets…

“White males are forged in a crucible to be tougher, better, and (when they take the red pill) meaner.”

Psychotic white males, yes.

“It's coming. Just not quite yet.”

The race war? No.

Eric The Red…

“All remaining non-whites will mostly be married to white men, and will therefore conform to their husband's culture; what few minorities remain will either get with the white cultural program or suffer the consequences.”



In reality, whites and non-whites will continue to make their choices as to who they will associate with, who they marry, and when they will have children.

“In summary, the country will then be at least 93% white forever after, the economy will boom, and anybody outside in some multiculti fantasyland can cry a river while the USA is reunified and revitalized beyond their wildest dreams.”



You have a future in science fiction writing.

Anonymous Rhetoric Boy June 28, 2016 4:29 PM  

"Everyone. Of course, all such measures would have "disparate impact". That's the intent."

I'm constantly amazed how some folks can so righteously and positively promote solutions that have zero chance of being enacted. It's as though their convictions are sustenance for their fantasies and nothing more.

Anonymous Rhetoric Boy June 28, 2016 4:35 PM  

"When was the last time the constitution mattered in terms of government doing exactly what it wanted to do?"

Yesterday...at the supreme Court, when the Texas Abortion restrictions were ruled unconstitutional.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash June 28, 2016 4:48 PM  

Rhetoric Boy wrote:Yesterday...at the supreme Court, when the Texas Abortion restrictions were ruled unconstitutional.
Precisely my point.
What clause of the Constitution for the United States takes away the state of Texas' right to regulate medical care within it's borders? What clause gives the Supreme Court any say in this matter at all?

Anonymous Rhetoric Boy June 28, 2016 5:15 PM  

Mr. Whiplash:

You implied the court didn't ever stop government from doing what it wanted. I gave you a perfect example.

If you want to debate the right to privacy, that's another issue altogether.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash June 28, 2016 5:56 PM  

False, I stated explicitly that the Constitution does not stop the government. And in this case the Constitution was invoked but NOT respected.

And, you refuse to answer the question. Which clause of the Constitution gives the Supreme Court the authority to decide this case, or the US government the power to make any such determination. You can't cite one because there isn't one.

Anonymous Rhetoric Boy June 28, 2016 6:14 PM  

"And, you refuse to answer the question. Which clause of the Constitution gives the Supreme Court the authority to decide this case, or the US government the power to make any such determination. You can't cite one because there isn't one."

Article 3

And for the record, your exact comment was: "When was the last time the constitution mattered in terms of government doing exactly what it wanted to do?"

The Constitution sure mattered yesterday, so to speak. The Court, using its powers under article three, stopped the government of Texas (and numerous other states) from imposing undue burdens on the people of those states.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash June 28, 2016 6:55 PM  

No, the Federal government , without remit and in violation of the Constitution, enforced it's own will on the people of Texas.
Article III is only half an answer. The article lists the proper jurisdiction of the Supreme court. Presumably, you want to use section 2, as this would be a suit arising under law or equity from the Constitution itself. Since the law at issue does not in fact arise under any provision of the constitution, the SC has no jurisdiction.

Since any rights not enumerated under the constitution are reserved to the state, or to the people, before you can blithely assert "Article III" you must show how the regulation of medical care is delegated to the Federal government by the constitution.


No, the Federal government usurped the the authority of the people of Texas, in direct violation of the constitution.

Anonymous Rhetoric Boy June 28, 2016 7:21 PM  

Mr. Whiplash:

Denying judicial review, are we? Not a very original tack...if you live in 1800.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash June 28, 2016 7:27 PM  

Not at all. Please read what I wrote, rather than skimming until you find what you think is a gotcha.

If this were a suit over freedom of religion, or the right to keep and bear arms, then it would indeed be justified under the constitution. It is rather simply a case of the Supreme Court and the various executive administrations and congresses arrogating to themselves the power to arrogate power.

Anonymous Rhetoric Boy June 28, 2016 7:33 PM  

"If this were a suit over freedom of religion, or..."

Ah...you deny there is any right to privacy inherent in the constitution, but you don't deny that the courts has the power of judicial review.

Another interesting, yet contradictory position.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash June 28, 2016 8:06 PM  

Which clause of the constitution establishes a right to privacy? There is a common law right, and a 4th amendment right not to be searched or have your stuff taken by government agents, but no such general right whatsoever can be found under the constitution.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash June 28, 2016 8:09 PM  

How is this contradictory? The obvious purpose of the SC is judicial review, and I have no time for people who deny it. But the judicial review only extends to the powers delegated under the constitution by the states to the federal government. Just as the Federal Courts have no business setting schools budgets, (which one federal court did back in the 1980s), they have no place arguing over regulation of medical care.

Anonymous Rhetoric Boy June 28, 2016 8:12 PM  

Which clause of the constitution establishes a right to privacy? There is...no such general right whatsoever can be found under the constitution."

Neither is there specific mention of judicial review. Yet you accept that interpretation of the constitution. Having your cake and eating too are you?

Blogger Snidely Whiplash June 28, 2016 8:16 PM  

Judicial review is inherent in the role set out for the Court in Article III, when seen in light of the Anglo-Saxon (Common Law) legal doctrine of legal precedent.
Where is the right of privacy similarly inherent?

Even the court itself could not come up with one. They had to invent new terminology to try to describe "we're pulling this one out of our collective ass" in a quasi-legal way.

Blogger IreneAthena June 28, 2016 8:57 PM  

@126 Slightly Whipped Lush, "Shut up, Tad." I am rubber, you are glue...
Honestly though, Grown-up to Grown-up. How are some of you men alpha enough to stand up to people who dissed Vox's purple blog tribute to Prince, and then go all kinds of Zeta when those same dissers are loudly applauding a billboard that flips a giant bird to every black person in the area -- including some pretty good black musicians, possibly Prince's kin?

Anonymous Mr. Rational June 28, 2016 9:57 PM  

Rhetoric Boy wrote:I'm constantly amazed how some folks can so righteously and positively promote solutions that have zero chance of being enacted.
How many gun controls and bans were enacted and enforced despite the plain language of the 2nd Amendment?

You don't seem to understand the nature of things like preference cascades; many things look totally impossible, until overnight they're suddenly obvious.  America is fed up with Black entitlement and bad behavior, and the laws and precedents which enable it today are not long for this world.

Snidely Whiplash wrote:No, the Federal government , without remit and in violation of the Constitution, enforced it's own will on the people of Texas.
I must disagree with you also.  Citizens of the state of Texas were prevented from exercising their will and personal discretion by the state government; the SCOTUS told the state government to butt out of (that particular part of) its citizens' personal decisions.  It's one of the rights reserved to the people, not the state's business.

IreneAthena wrote:How are some of you men alpha enough to stand up to people who dissed Vox's purple blog tribute to Prince, and then go all kinds of Zeta when those same dissers are loudly applauding a billboard that flips a giant bird to every black person in the area -- including some pretty good black musicians, possibly Prince's kin?
Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash June 28, 2016 10:05 PM  

IreneAthena wrote:@126 Snidely "Way more man than I am" Whiplash said: "Shut up, Tad."
I am rubber, you are glue...

Honestly though, Blah blah blah pretending to be masculine blah blah blah stay in school.


Shut up Tad.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash June 28, 2016 10:10 PM  

Mr. Rational wrote:I must disagree with you also.  Citizens of the state of Texas were prevented from exercising their will and personal discretion by the state government; the SCOTUS told the state government to butt out of (that particular part of) its citizens' personal decisions.  It's one of the rights reserved to the people, not the state's business.
Different ways of saying the same thing. Yours is emotionally loaded language intended to rouse the reader to protect his own freedom. Mine is emotional language designed to rouse the indignation of the reader at the officious interference of the Fedgov in the affairs of the people of Texas.

Al of which is beside the legal point that's being argued.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash June 28, 2016 10:12 PM  

Mr. Rational wrote:It's one of the rights reserved to the people, not the state's business.
The right to regulate medial care? 'Fraid not.

Blogger IreneAthena June 28, 2016 11:32 PM  

@151 Rhett Buttinsky aka Rational. I knew you didn't give a damn. That's why I didn't ask you!

@152 But you Snidely Whiplash, I expected more from you, based on your brilliant repartee. I assumed that once you recognized that had finally been thoroughly exhausted, you would give an honest answer to an honest question. I'm genuinely curious about what I perceive as an inconsistency. Please answer, and I promise I'll let you have the last word. (Unless your answer is, "Shut up, Tad.)
Third time's a charm.

Anonymous Rhetoric Boy June 28, 2016 11:41 PM  

"Judicial review is inherent in the role set out for the Court in Article III, when seen in light of the Anglo-Saxon (Common Law) legal doctrine of legal precedent."

Not everyone thought this was the case, even up to and for a time after John Marshall interpreted the Constitution, as you say, to have an inherent directive of judicial review—despite the fact that it is found nowhere stated in the Constitution.

"Where is the right of privacy similarly inherent?"
In the 14th Amendments Personal Liberty guarantee. This is where it is said to be inherent, despite not being—just as judicial review is not—perfectly outlined in the Constitution.

Anonymous Rhetoric Boy June 28, 2016 11:45 PM  

"How many gun controls and bans were enacted and enforced despite the plain language of the 2nd Amendment?"

Relatively few. Of course some are considered entirely constitutional, such as the ban on automatic weapons.


"It's one of the rights reserved to the people, not the state's business."

The right to abortion (privacy)is not, in fact, found in the 9th Amendment.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash June 28, 2016 11:52 PM  

IreneAthena wrote:But you Snidely Whiplash, I expected more from you, based on your brilliant repartee. I assumed that once you recognized that had finally been thoroughly exhausted, you would give an honest answer to an honest question. I'm genuinely word word word word, blah blah blah blah, winners don't do drugs blah blah stay in school.
Third time's a charm.


Shut up, man with two women's names.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash June 28, 2016 11:59 PM  

Rhetoric Boy wrote:Relatively few. Of course some are considered entirely constitutional, such as the ban on automatic weapons.

The ban is entirely framed within the commerce clause. Since 1986, it is illegal for a licensed gun manufacturer to sell any newly made automatic weapon to a private party. It is also illegal to import them.
That is why guns in circulation prior to 1986 are still able to be purchased and sold.

So far as the courts have been concerned, that makes it a commerce clause case, which is not subject to 2nd amendment review.
I would disagree, but being the grandson of a judge somehow doesn't qualify me to make that decision. As far as I am concerned, this is like prohibiting the interstate sale of newspapers, on the grounds that it's commerce, not free speech.
Then again, there's an entire political party that has dedicated itself to the reversal of the Citizens United decision.

Anonymous Rhetoric Boy June 29, 2016 12:05 AM  

"So far as the courts have been concerned, that makes it a commerce clause case, which is not subject to 2nd amendment review"

The second amendment does not trump the commerce clause and vice versa. Another example of the various parts of the constitution needed to be weighed against each other is the 21st amendment (repeal) and the commerce clause. The 21st Amendment gave the states the rights to regulate the sale and distribution of alcohol within their borders. But the commerce clause gives the federal government the right to regulate commerce between the states. So, a state can't discriminate against the alcohol products from another state despite having the right to regulate the sale and distribution of alcohol in their state.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash June 29, 2016 12:19 AM  

Well, the current extremely expanded jurisprudence around the commerce clause is a crime against the constitution in and of itself. The Congress and the Court have used it to give the Fed virtually unlimited authority in almost every aspect of our lives. We rarely see anything asserted by the controllers as being under the commerce clause turned down by the courts.
"We find that since liquid Nitrogen is an article commonly in commerce between the states, and Nitrogen being the major constituent of air, that therefore, the federal government has justifiable authority to regulate the use of that air, even in so personal an act as breathing."

Maybe not quite, but pretty damn close.

Unless it touches even tangentially on sex. Then we know the Court will not allow any interference. I'm surprised we still have human trafficing laws

Anonymous Eric the Red June 29, 2016 12:31 AM  

Snidely, I admire your acumen, but you are arguing with a leftist whose black-robed henchmen have already screwed with and screwed up the Constitution using every legalist machination in the book. At this point, arguments are variations on "is" versus "ought".

But at the core of those arguments is "Who, whom?" Over the decades Rhetoric Child and his kind have forced confrontation after confrontation, gaining more power with each step, because their ideology contains no inherent limits and can't stop itself. The latest Texas ruling is just one more piece of that power grab, and they will try more in the future.

There is a rationalization for every evil under the sun, and the left uses all of them. However, now the al-right knows these tactics for the raw power grabs they are. The left has always had gullible idiots instead of true opposition in their dirty culture war. Soon they will be stopped, and thereafter defeated. Trump is the first step in doing so, and their terror-filled little excuses for brains, the left knows it.

Blogger IreneAthena June 29, 2016 3:01 AM  

@158 Snidely Whiplash You Still Lose!
But here's a thank you just the same.

Anonymous Mr. Rational June 29, 2016 7:33 AM  

Snidely Whiplash wrote:Mr. Rational wrote:It's one of the rights reserved to the people, not the state's business.

The right to regulate medial care? 'Fraid not.

When the state forces a particular, socially-stigmatized set of practitioners to have admitting privileges at local hospitals, but not practitioners in other specialities with higher rates of complications, the state has overstepped the boundaries of legitimate authority and become a tyrant.

@161 Excellent example of tyranny, and not all that far from the actual decision in Wickard v. Filburn.

Anonymous Rhetoric Boy June 29, 2016 8:12 AM  

"There is a rationalization for every evil under the sun, and the left uses all of them. However, now the al-right knows these tactics for the raw power grabs they are. The left has always had gullible idiots instead of true opposition in their dirty culture war. Soon they will be stopped, and thereafter defeated. Trump is the first step in doing so, and their terror-filled little excuses for brains, the left knows it. "

The Alt Right can't even muster a coherent philosophy to sell to the most right wing republican. They can't get their hands on the governing apparatus. They can't find a standard bearer in the U.S. outside the Knights of the KKK. And they are going to compete with the Left?

This leaves the Alt Right with only one alternative strategy: hope. They must hope for chaos, breakdown and violence to overwhelm the U.S. It's why you so often hear them looking forward to the Race War or the Uprising or Secession. They believe that following such a thing Americans will be just fine with authoritarian racist policies that result in killing and expelling jews, blacks, hispanics and others. I'll admit, it's a strategy. And a fantastic one in the fullest sense of the word

Blogger Snidely Whiplash June 29, 2016 9:54 AM  

Mr. Rational wrote:When the state forces a particular, socially-stigmatized set of practitioners to have admitting privileges at local hospitals, but not practitioners in other specialities with higher rates of complications, the state has overstepped the boundaries of legitimate authority and become a tyrant.
Don't overwork your hamster, Emoting Man.

Blogger IreneAthena June 29, 2016 1:02 PM  

@128 andon, please forgive me; I didn't see your comment to me 'til this morning.
andon wrote:what kind of message is it when a black Atty Gen says there are too many whites in govt?

Oh, I hear you. A similarly irritating remark was made recently by Susan Rice, the black female White House National Security Advisor, who lamented that national security agencies are too "white, male, and Yale." This is pretty rich, seeing as Rice went to a private girls' high school in DC and then Stanford University, which ranks right up there with Yale for populating the government with elitist control-freaks!

Here's the thing, though. Whites and blacks--more of them are beginning to realize this--have a common enemy in those elites. Whites should be making allies out of blacks in the shared goal of removing that elitist hegemony from power. Instead, Whites are alienating Blacks by hip-hip-hooraying a "Make America White Again" billboard that screams "Get Out of Town" to every single black person driving by.

Anonymous SalHarvest June 30, 2016 1:30 PM  

Golden wrote:You really need to read Leonard Pitts.

Complain, gnash your teeth. It won't matter. The demographics are changing and white men will have to play on a level playing field


It's almost like progressive whites are going to be set up for a fall from all sides.

Anonymous SaltHarvest June 30, 2016 1:47 PM  

Rhetoric Boy wrote:The Alt Right can't even muster a coherent philosophy to sell to the most right wing republican. They can't get their hands on the governing apparatus. They can't find a standard bearer in the U.S. outside the Knights of the KKK. And they are going to compete with the Left?

This leaves the Alt Right with only one alternative strategy: hope. They must hope for chaos, breakdown and violence to overwhelm the U.S. It's why you so often hear them looking forward to the Race War or the Uprising or Secession. They believe that following such a thing Americans will be just fine with authoritarian racist policies that result in killing and expelling jews, blacks, hispanics and others. I'll admit, it's a strategy. And a fantastic one in the fullest sense of the word


The altright wouldn't need to compete against the left as the left is content to self-destruct under all their various intersectional fractures and illusionary creeds. The seeds of chaos have long been sown and many are expecting a time of reaping. The philosophy and standard bearers of the new societies have not been fully conceived yet, let alone come to recognizable form.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts