ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2016 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Monday, August 15, 2016

The fruits of cuckservative Churchianity


Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
- Matthew 7:15-20

If an apple tree brings forth a withered pear, it is not a good apple tree, but a corrupt one. So it is with men.

There was a time when Americans considered America blessed by God. What sort of madman would dare to make that claim now?

UPDATE: the cartoon was created and commissioned by Faith and Heritage. Clearly an organization that understands the concept of good rhetoric.
Not so, however, with ‘cuckservative.’ Not only does it not suffer from the vagueries of its close equivalents; it also cuts much deeper because its targets cannot be in doubt. It lays finger on the more personal dimensions of treason – the relinquishment of one’s own house, wife, and children to invasive predators. The power of its poignancy lies in the fact that it highlights the abdication of a man’s most intimate duties. It brings home the implications of liberalism on border and race issues as violating the principle of 1 Timothy 5:8, disregard of one’s own family. It impugns the manhood of its subjects, and concomitantly any and all professions of a man’s Christian faith as well. So yes, the acerbic potency of this word is couched in the most basic allegiances and undergirded by the biblical understanding of familial duty. Even if it would seem indecipherably archaic to post-family Marxists, those yet anchored to traditional categories, however so tenuously, still comprehend the gravity and accuracy of the charge.

The caterwauling it has evoked from so many so-called conservatives is indicative of not only its power, but the identity of those to whom it most applies. As the old chestnut goes, “When you pitch a rock into a pack of dogs the one that yelps is the one you hit.” Its targets simply cannot be mistaken. Yes, they may cavil that allusions to cuckoldry are somehow just not cricket. But none putting on the most delicate Victorian airs presently ever imagined the term cuckold as improper before now; in the works of Chaucer, Shakespeare, or the whole roster of English literati since, it appears no one ever took the term ‘cuckold’ as unchristian, uncharitable, or inappropriate till the dawning of the age of the Social Justice Warrior and Neo-Christianity. Clearly, the reason so many Beltway Conservatives* balk at it is that it crystallizes the depth of their betrayal and heaps burning coals upon their heads.
I have to say, I kind of like these guys.

Labels: ,

108 Comments:

Blogger The Aardvarkl August 15, 2016 7:10 PM  

The cartoon is like a Chick tract gone horribly wrong.

I LOVE it!

Anonymous johnc August 15, 2016 7:17 PM  

Maybe Americans just worship themselves and their pluralistic American ideology more than Our Lord and the Holy Faith?

The other day in a public speech Marco Rubio reportedly said that the first command from Scripture is to love one's neighbor.

Umm... what Gospel is that? That error seems to permeate modern Christianity. Combine it with the other error -- which is that "love" means being a quivering doormat of niceness -- and here we are with cuckservatism.

OpenID paworldandtimes August 15, 2016 7:18 PM  

Add the Israel flag and it's perfect.

PA

Blogger JDC August 15, 2016 7:19 PM  

This is what the LORD Almighty says: “Do not listen to what the prophets are prophesying to you; they fill you with false hopes. They speak visions from their own minds, not from the mouth of the LORD. 17 They keep saying to those who despise me, ‘The LORD says: You will have peace.’ And to all who follow the stubbornness of their hearts they say, ‘No harm will come to you.’ 18 But which of them has stood in the council of the LORD to see or to hear his word? Who has listened and heard his word? 19 See, the storm of the LORD will burst out in wrath, a whirlwind swirling down on the heads of the wicked. Jeremiah 23:16-19

Blogger Aeoli Pera August 15, 2016 7:21 PM  

We're lucky God doesn't seem to care a whit about America.

Blogger JDC August 15, 2016 7:21 PM  

Umm... what Gospel is that? That error seems to permeate modern Christianity.

Amen to that. When you boil the Gospel (which is a promise) into a law (e.g. love your neighbor), than the Good News becomes nothing but a condemning law. Liberals / Cucks always take something good and turn it into something bad.

Blogger Eric Wilson August 15, 2016 7:23 PM  

Rick "Pissdad" Wilson?

Blogger CM August 15, 2016 7:23 PM  

"Step out of our comfort zone..."

My mother and I have discussed how the open borders shenanigans of the church is being instigated by people who are too cowardly to give up their comfort to go into the world and spread the gospel, instead importing the world to their air-conditioned, first-world homeland to proselytize.

Anonymous DissidentRight August 15, 2016 7:25 PM  

Shivtacular! Dear Supreme Dark Lord: May I post this elsewhere?

Blogger SirHamster August 15, 2016 7:26 PM  

johnc wrote:The other day in a public speech Marco Rubio reportedly said that the first command from Scripture is to love one's neighbor.

Did he actually say that verbatim? Can't find transcript, but I saw a Breitbart article making that summary claim.

Very wrong if true, but haven't verified it yet.

Blogger VD August 15, 2016 7:26 PM  

Shivtacular! Dear Supreme Dark Lord: May I post this elsewhere?

It's not my meme. Do as you please.

Blogger CM August 15, 2016 7:28 PM  

They keep saying to those who despise me, ‘The LORD says: You will have peace.’

Muslims

And to all who follow the stubbornness of their hearts they say, ‘No harm will come to you.’

Homosexuals, Transgenders, Feminists, etc...

Blogger SteelPalm August 15, 2016 7:29 PM  

Really phenomenal cartoon. Love it, especially the details on the baby. Any way to support the artist?

Although I will note a very slight criticism; while this cartoon does describe a lot of Cruz supporters, there are many (especially ones who liked him earlier in the election cycle) who would find it as repulsive as we do. Furthermore, there are many cucks who didn't like Cruz at all.

So it distracts a little from the universality of this behavior.

Blogger Viisaus August 15, 2016 7:33 PM  

Those Christians who keep the Book of Revelation strongly in their mind, and seriously consider the possibility that we might be entering End Times, will NOT fall to the banal optimistic error of thinking that "it'll all be okay." Because they know that things will NOT be okay, in the earthly sense that is.

The Book of Revelation describes the time when the New Testament period of mercy draws to the end, and the Old Testament style judgment begins. Jesus Christ is depicted in it as a sword-wielding war chief who rides on a white horse. This does not fit the pacifistic notions of Churchian cuckservatives.

And in this Revelation passage, for example, the OT prophets like Moses and Elijah are recalled, and their divine power to inflict punishment on the enemies of God:

"4 These are the two olive trees and the two lampstands standing before the God of the earth. 5 And if anyone wants to harm them, fire proceeds from their mouth and devours their enemies. And if anyone wants to harm them, he must be killed in this manner. 6 These have power to shut heaven, so that no rain falls in the days of their prophecy; and they have power over waters to turn them to blood, and to strike the earth with all plagues, as often as they desire."

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation+11&version=NKJV

These two mysterious prophets then die martyr's death (as the wicked fallen world rejoices), but they hardly are some push-over doormats.

Anonymous DDT August 15, 2016 7:36 PM  

At first I thought, wow, this comes across as a bit racist.

Then I realized it can't be, because why would David French star in a racist ad? We're all good here.

Anonymous Lazarus North August 15, 2016 7:39 PM  

The cartoon is from Faith and Heritage.

Some others from the same artist appear in articles by "Ehud Would" on the same site.

See also:Social Justice Warrior Marcus Pittman

Anonymous Icicle August 15, 2016 7:41 PM  

JESUS HAD TWO DADS and he turned out JUST FINE TOO.

Blogger SteelPalm August 15, 2016 7:42 PM  

@3 Totally off-topic, but read your blog for the first time just now, paworldtimes, and there are plenty of good articles there.

Anonymous r August 15, 2016 7:42 PM  

They all say that, the infernal (literally) cucks. Anything to weasel out of the actual first command from Scripture, to love God - i.e., to put truth first in all things, the primordial truth being "I AM".

Blogger LonestarWhacko August 15, 2016 7:42 PM  

Well, if anyone is interested.....God has always kept account of Bloodguilt. He has specifically set forth regulations concerning such. The Baal worshippers killed their children. America has killed over 50 million and counting.

Yeah, women have the right to choose.....Go's has always let folks show who they are. Are ya'll familiar with the really bad parts of the Bible? Those are coming attractions. BTW, God has said that He gives people over to madness.....so that their works may become manifest.

Okay, just a few words....

Blogger J A Baker August 15, 2016 7:42 PM  

A pastor told me a story about a woman named Grace who went to his church. She was a hair dresser.

The pastor's birthday was coming up so Grace told him to stop into her salon and she'd give him a shave and a haircut as a gift.

So the Pastor's birthday came around and he went down to see Grace at her salon and she fixed him up with a free shave and hair cut like she promised.

Well a week goes by and the Pastor gets up one morning and decides to shave, only thing is he doesn't need to. His face is as smooth as a baby's bottom.

A week later the Pastor runs into Grace at church. He says to her, "you know since you shaved, me I haven't had to be shaved since."

She says, "Don't you know? You were shaved by Grace! Once shaved always shaved!"

Anonymous Ken7- August 15, 2016 7:43 PM  

The country was delivered over to the God of this World some time ago and it is his poisoned fruits we see in this broken country today. Multiculturalism, diversity, open borders and PC lies are the Whore of Babylon fruits pushed by the (((Revelation 2:9 people))) and it is greedily eaten up by God's rejects who Pridefully proclaim themselves to be "progressives" who are "on the right side of history". Moloch worshippers, the entire lot of them.

I'm not sure where the cuckolds of the right fit in in regards to what sins they're lavishly pouring over themselves as they pat themselves on the back for being "good people" who believe in "equality" and "tolerance". All they're really tolerating is the Devil's obvious little black lies while lapping up spoonfuls of his Prideful offerings. Such good people you are!; you fake Christian cuckservatives who only ever seem to work for the side of darkness.

Time is close at hand now..

Blogger Snidely Whiplash August 15, 2016 7:43 PM  

Those Christians who keep the Book of Revelation strongly in their mind, and seriously consider the possibility that we might be entering End Times, will NOT fall to the banal optimistic error of thinking that "it'll all be okay." Because they know that things will NOT be okay, in the earthly sense that is.

Dude, it'll al be okay, because Rapture.

OpenID paworldandtimes August 15, 2016 7:45 PM  

Really phenomenal cartoon. Love it, especially the details on the baby

I was gonna say that the cuck is perfectly drawn but then so is the divirce-bitch, so are the Mex, etc.

PA

Blogger Murray August 15, 2016 7:45 PM  

@2 It's a common misconception these days. From Matthew 22:

34 But when the Pharisees heard that he had silenced the Sad′ducees, they came together. 35 And one of them, a lawyer, asked him a question, to test him. 36 “Teacher, which is the great commandment in the law?” 37 And he said to him, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind. 38 This is the great and first commandment. 39 And a second is like it, You shall love your neighbor as yourself. 40 On these two commandments depend all the law and the prophets.”

The first and greatest commandment is to love God before all else; the second is to love thy neighbour. And love, per Aquinas, is "willing the good of the other." It's very different from the sentimentalist view that prevails today.

Anonymous billo August 15, 2016 7:47 PM  

"Umm... what Gospel is that? That error seems to permeate modern Christianity. "

It comes from Mark 12 and Matt 22:

'One of the teachers of the law came and heard them debating. Noticing that Jesus had given them a good answer, he asked him, “Of all the commandments, which is the most important?”

“The most important one,” answered Jesus, “is this: ‘Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one.e 30Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.’f 31The second is this: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’g There is no commandment greater than these.”'

Rubio would have been more correct to say that it is the second command. However, it is the "first" (and essentially only) command with respect to how we treat our fellow man, and I think it's clear that's what he meant.


With respect to cultural Christianity as opposed to real Christianity, this is a recurring problem. The best response to it I've ever read was "Real Christiantiy" by William Wilberforce, written in response to the nadir of Christianity in 1797 at the beginning of the Second Great Awakening. There is an excellent paraphrasing of the book in modern English by Bob Beltz. My wife and I read it together, and we spent the entire book going "Oh my God, this could have been written today!"

It might also be useful, if one has not already done it, to read "The Fundamentals," from which we get the now debased term "fundamentalist." These are essentially the equivalent of the Federalist Papers for Protestants who believe in the literal existence and divinity of the Christ.

Anonymous Ezekiel Cassandros August 15, 2016 7:54 PM  

If you keep throwing your children off the roof of the Temple, eventually angels will start catching them.

Blogger Aeoli Pera August 15, 2016 7:54 PM  

JDC wrote: Umm... what Gospel is that? That error seems to permeate modern Christianity.

Amen to that. When you boil the Gospel (which is a promise) into a law (e.g. love your neighbor), than the Good News becomes nothing but a condemning law.


The context of "love your neighbor" wasn't the Gospel. Different things.

Blogger Aeoli Pera August 15, 2016 7:56 PM  

The Bible is not a spellbook.

Anonymous stress management August 15, 2016 7:58 PM  

Virtually every Christian I know is grossly unfamiliar with the vast quantity of Scripture that qualifies or limits the simpleton's 'love-love-love-the-unbelievers' chant. All they seem to know is John 3:16 and 1 Corinthians 13 (which, incidentally, unbelievers LOVE to quote against us to prove we're racists, haters, Pharisees, misogynists, blah blah blah if we try to operate in reality).

For every biblical exhortation to love, there are AT LEAST an equal number of passages warning believers not to be stupid about it, not to waste it on those who trample on it, not to conform to worldly standards for it, not to get entangled by it with those outside the church, etc. What Christians are fed today from the pulpit is an incredibly cherry-picked fraction of the truth by a pack of Baby Boomer seminary pussies.

Tell them to actually read their Bibles for a change.



Blogger Paul August 15, 2016 7:58 PM  

"The American Conservative" in one headline.

Anonymous billo August 15, 2016 7:58 PM  

"The Bible is not a spellbook."

No, it is a guidebook.

Blogger Lazarus August 15, 2016 8:00 PM  

A glimmer of hope??


‘You Are Arrogant, Cruel, And Stupid, You Don’t Deserve To Exist, and One Day We Will Kick You Out’ Former Foreign Affairs Officer For Finland Rips Islam And Muslims At Rally
By Andrew Bieszad on August 12, 2016



Michel Paulat is a former Foreign Affairs Office for Finland. Calling them cowards, stupid, and worthless at a recent anti-Islam rally, he ripped Islam, Muslims, and promised that one day Europe would rise up against them and defeat them:



Especially to you migrants and Muslims. I know you, I am not like most of the Finnish.

I lived in your country for ten years and I’ve seen how cruel, arrogant and stupid you are.

You have not created anything.

You have not done nothing.

You have absolutely done nothing.

You’re just a sick who don’t respect your women.

You force them to be your slaves.

You do not respect other religions, you do not respect the Christian religion. I’ve seen it disappear for ten years.

I have seen you murdering Christians.

And if you don’t like [that] the truth, you are supposed to be tolerant according to your remarks but your not tolerant.

Have you seen a church in Saudi Arabia?

Have you see a Christian in Saudi Arabia who can have his his faith?

You want us to celebrate your holidays?

Do you celebrate Christmas?

Do you celebrate Easter?

You are absolutely out of this world. You should not even exist.

And you should be banned from any civilized society.

But do be spared one day we will kick you out.

All of you and [the] young ones.

You left – you left your country to collapse.

You did not even fight, you have no guts.

You did not stay to fight for your country, for your people, for your family, for your children, you just run away.

But – be assured – be assured, one day. Most of Europe will rise against you.

You tried before to conquer with weapons by war.

But we will defeat you because you are not worth it.

I ask one thing, Finnish people, rise up! Do not let the Islamification grow. Just – just stand up, be men, you have proved it before and [will] prove it again!

Now: Fight for your freedom. Join us, raise your hand, and suomi ensin!

Blogger Aeoli Pera August 15, 2016 8:01 PM  

Snidely Whiplash wrote:Those Christians who keep the Book of Revelation strongly in their mind, and seriously consider the possibility that we might be entering End Times, will NOT fall to the banal optimistic error of thinking that "it'll all be okay." Because they know that things will NOT be okay, in the earthly sense that is.

Dude, it'll al be okay, because Rapture.


My dad's retirement plan is the rapture. Sure, it's funny, but it's completely impossible to discuss realistic future planning with him. More's the pity, he was a prepper back in the day he was a private builder, but he went back to the corporate world and transformed into a cuck.

Anonymous Icicle August 15, 2016 8:06 PM  

Tell them to actually read their Bibles for a change.

Let's make gymnobiblism great again!

Blogger Snidely Whiplash August 15, 2016 8:20 PM  

Paul wrote:"The American Conservative" in one headline.

For those who aren't going to click the link to the headline; "Why I Am a Conservative Leftist".

Blogger LonestarWhacko August 15, 2016 8:21 PM  

As the Bible observes.....only a FEW will be chosen.....and those thru fire. We are told repeatedly just how to recognize apostate shepherds.....and we're told why they act that way.

As for the coming Great Tribulation....the Bible once again says.....only those with a tested quality of faith will endure.

This Country has a great deal of Bloodguilt that has to be paid.As a Prophet of old said....."get ready to meet God."

I firmly believe that the woes and plagues that are going to overtake us are deserved.

Anonymous stress management August 15, 2016 8:25 PM  

@34-Icicle
Great idea, let's put it all back in Latin again, so you and Pope Argencornholio and the cuck seminarians can tell us it really means OPEN BORDERS.

Blogger mushroom August 15, 2016 8:26 PM  

billo wrote:"Umm... what Gospel is that? That error seems to permeate modern Christianity. "

It comes from Mark 12 and Matt 22:

'One of the teachers of the law came and heard them debating. Noticing that Jesus had given them a good answer, he asked him, “Of all the commandments, which is the most important?”

“The most important one,” answered Jesus, “is this: ‘Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one.e 30Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.’f 31The second is this: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’g There is no commandment greater than these.”'

Rubio would have been more correct to say that it is the second command. However, it is the "first" (and essentially only) command with respect to how we treat our fellow man, and I think it's clear that's what he meant.

...


I don't think it is clear at all. I think Rubio, like most liberal Christians, believes sentiment and good intentions equal being Christ-like.

Those two commandments are like a cross. The vertical commandment is first and points us to God. The horizontal commandment is second and offers the love of God to the world through us.

The horizontal must hang on the vertical. It can't be the other way and the horizontal cannot stand alone.

Blogger JWM August 15, 2016 8:27 PM  

mohammed was the ravening wolf. islam the poison tree

JWM

Anonymous Wooly Phlox August 15, 2016 8:37 PM  

I'll always refer to etymology regarding the word "nice".

It means "pretend you don't know", essentially.

ne + scire = no knowledge. Be nice. Pretend you don't know.

Being nice is the ultimate cuck/coward expression.

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=nice

Anonymous Wooly Phlox August 15, 2016 8:41 PM  

I bet Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom were really nice to their torturers and killers.

Anonymous kfg August 15, 2016 8:42 PM  

@32:

Remember:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ed/Simo_H%C3%A4yh%C3%A4%27s_grave.jpg

Anonymous Gen. Kong August 15, 2016 8:48 PM  

@32. Lazarus.
All well and good. It won't even begin to happen until the Finns

a) Overthrow their rulers who serve the (((oligarchs)));
b) leave the EUSSR; and
c) completely purge their churches and other institutions of not only the open SJWs, but the Churchian cucks like the one portrayed in the cartoon.

The Churchian is truly a Judas, working hand-in-glove with all the enemies arrayed against what's left of actual Christianity - from Golden Dindu to Mahomet's Golden-Fried Kebabs to the frothing ADL/$PLC SJWs paid by (((Soros))) to organize mobs like BLM.

Anonymous BGKB August 15, 2016 8:49 PM  

Its crazy some are still blaming TRUMP for the Hispanic killing a moslem in Queens.

people who are too cowardly to give up their comfort to go into the world and spread the gospel, instead importing the world to their air-conditioned

They also have the taxpayers foot the bill.

public speech Marco Rubio reportedly said that the first command from Scripture is to love one's neighbor

He did outreach at foam parties.

JESUS HAD TWO DADS and he turned out JUST FINE TOO.

That guy goes by HeyZues, he steals hubcaps from cars. Here is the Hispanic in Boston you are talking about http://metro.co.uk/2016/08/11/man-spends-thousands-in-bid-to-get-the-perfect-bum-and-we-cant-stop-looking-6062012/

Anonymous Alice De Goon August 15, 2016 8:57 PM  

God's commandment was to love your neighbor AS YOURSELF. Cucks like to forget the "as yourself" part of that little statement. That means you don't love your neighbor MORE than you love yourself. You don't sell out your children's future and force them to compete with their enemies in the political and economic marketplace as that would be hating yourself, and that would go against God's commandments.

Love your neighbor, but don't will him your house so your children are forced to live out in the street.

Blogger JaimeInTexas August 15, 2016 8:59 PM  

@14. Viisaus August 15, 2016 7:33 PM

Those of us Christians who do not think that the currently popular interpretation of the book of Revelation understand that it may well be the hyper-dispensationalists who setup for a whole lot of hurt in this world. If they think that the Church's Translation, the Rapture, will keep them from immense suffering, they should read the history of the early Church. Why would we be spared that same type of suffering?
Maybe the inordinate concern for current day Israel, regardless of what Israel's government does, is the delusion that is to befall the Church?

Blogger Bard August 15, 2016 9:02 PM  

Billo said it, the first command is to hear, not love. Let him who has ears hear what the spirit says to the churches.

Blogger Bard August 15, 2016 9:03 PM  

Fantastic cartoon BTW.

Blogger JaimeInTexas August 15, 2016 9:03 PM  

To "Love your neighbor as yourself." without the primacy of "Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength" is called idolatry.

Anonymous Anonymous August 15, 2016 9:04 PM  

LOL the Cruz for Prez button

Anonymous Joe August 15, 2016 9:11 PM  

Even the Catholics are getting in on the fun. Post from a Catholic question and answer forum about his wife's new son:

http://i.imgur.com/8ns9iIh.jpg

Blogger residentMoron August 15, 2016 9:12 PM  

I love that line about Jesus' two dads. It's the perfect encapsulation of churchian idiot cuckoldry.

What did Jesus himself say?

"Call no man on earth your father"

People who pay no attention to the commands of Christ don't get to be called Christian.

Blogger James Dixon August 15, 2016 9:21 PM  

> God's commandment was to love your neighbor AS YOURSELF. Cucks like to forget the "as yourself" part of that little statement.

They also forget that he defined neighbor in the parable of the good Samaritan.

Blogger Solaire Of Astora August 15, 2016 9:30 PM  

I believe the country officially lost its blessing when the market fell -777 points back before Obama won his first presidential election. It was certainly the writing on Wall Street.

Anonymous billo August 15, 2016 9:40 PM  

mushroom wrote:

"Those two commandments are like a cross. The vertical commandment is first and points us to God. The horizontal commandment is second and offers the love of God to the world through us.

The horizontal must hang on the vertical. It can't be the other way and the horizontal cannot stand alone."


Sure, but Rubio is exhorting Christians, who presumably accept the "vertical." He is reminding believers of their obligation to others. Those who would *ignore* the second exhortation by invoking the former are certainly in no position to condemn Rubio for doing the converse.

But he is not doing the converse. Consider the words of Jesus as he exhorts Peter in John 21:

When they had finished eating, Jesus said to Simon Peter, “Simon son of John, do you love me more than these?”

“Yes, Lord,” he said, “you know that I love you.”

Jesus said, “Feed my lambs.”

16Again Jesus said, “Simon son of John, do you love me?”

He answered, “Yes, Lord, you know that I love you.”

Jesus said, “Take care of my sheep.”

17The third time he said to him, “Simon son of John, do you love me?”

Peter was hurt because Jesus asked him the third time, “Do you love me?” He said, “Lord, you know all things; you know that I love you.”

Jesus said, “Feed my sheep."

That is what Rubio is saying -- *If* you love Jesus, *then* you will love your neighbor. It is a perversion to use the fact that the first phrase is implied as an excuse to ignore the second.

The point is that Christians certainly should be Christians, but that Christianity is expressed through loving one's neighbor. The fact that one should love God first does not excuse one from the obligations of that love. And, if one is speaking to other Christians, it is not inappropriate to focus on that obligation. By their fruits you shall know them, and the fruit that Jesus wanted was for us to love our neighbors.

In spite of however much we don't want to.

Blogger White Knight Leo #0368 August 15, 2016 9:43 PM  

I realize I'm in the minority here, but I object to the Cruz button on his chest. It should have said "Jeb".

Blogger Crude August 15, 2016 9:55 PM  

Even the Catholics are getting in on the fun. Post from a Catholic question and answer forum about his wife's new son:

That's from 2014, as rotten as it is.

I'm Catholic, but the Church has problems, putting it mildly. I remember one time in a forum watching some guy post about how he found out his girlfriend had sex before they met. He mentioned feeling disappointed, how he wanted to be with a woman who he'd marry and it'd both be their first time, etc, and now he can't help but feel this girl wasn't someone he could see a future with anymore if she had such an attitude towards sex.

The resident Catholic women went nuts, immediately. And I mean tearing into this guy, 'how DARE you judge her', 'break up with her because you don't DESERVE her, you CLEARLY never loved her ever if one mistake makes you think less of her!', 'she can do BETTER than you', etc.

And the whole ordeal was obviously a case of 'These women realize that if this guy has a point, then they or their family and friends are guilty of something that makes them less desirable'.

Regardless, relating to the OP: I figured out a fairly easy test for the sincerity for these people. If they only demand unconditional love, sacrifice and more from one group - typically straight Christian males - then they're full of shit. And urging them to demand it of others is the test. Let's see them tell BLM that they need to unconditionally love cops, or white people. Let's see them tell muslims that they need to unconditionally love. ('But they're muslims! They're not Christians!' is the reply, but 'You're supposed to preach to people like that, you know?' is pretty obvious.)

The unconditional love shit is only encouraged in one direction. The same people who eagerly, even angrily demand it of Christians and men and whites, etc, dodge like crazy when they're told to apply the standard to anyone else. Because they are completely full of shit.

Anonymous Aphelion August 15, 2016 9:59 PM  

The Faith and Heritage website where this cartoon comes from has many thoughtful articles on Christian belief from the perspective of Kinism. They believe that at Babel, God divided the people into various groups and that these groups are meant to stay separated. They also believe that since then, God has blessed some people and cursed others, and those blessings and cursings continue. To mix with different peoples is to risk passing their curses onto your own children, (If those others are cursed.) While not a white nationalist, I am a Christian nationalist and believe that Christians should remain within their communities to build strong churches and raise good children. We certainly should send missionaries to other people, and pray for their conversion but Christ never commanded us to bring all the pagan and heathen into our community and then think about converting them later. That is the action of liberal Lutherans that appears to have created little Somalia in Minnesota. According to press a majority of the 25,000 Somalis in Minnesota want Sharia. The liberal Lutherans (Catholics and Methodists, etc.) who brought them here have thus brought a curse to our land.

So we, Christians have a challenge, we must fight for and reclaim our land. We must accept our true Christian brothers and sisters whatever their race and help them understand that the Christian Kingdom, that Zion in Revelation, and Jerusalem all required walls to keep the enemies of God out and that God and God's people live in the safety of a fortress. While we should pray for our enemies, we must keep them out of the fold, seperate the sheep from the goats. Build a wall, expel our enemies, and pray, and vote and work to reclaim the US for Christ.

Blogger The Other Robot August 15, 2016 10:01 PM  

Twitter seems to be having some problems. Takes multiple refreshes to get them to show things. Otherwise you get a screen showing there is a technical problem.

Blogger James Dixon August 15, 2016 10:02 PM  

> Those who would *ignore* the second exhortation by invoking the former are certainly in no position to condemn Rubio for doing the converse.

If he had quoted the second in it's entirety, understood who classified as a neighbor, and acknowledged that it was the second and not the first; you might have a point. Since none of those are the case...

Blogger CM August 15, 2016 10:08 PM  

Those two commandments are like a cross. The vertical commandment is first and points us to God. The horizontal commandment is second and offers the love of God to the world through us.

The horizontal must hang on the vertical. It can't be the other way and the horizontal cannot stand alone


Why I love reading here...

They also forget that he defined neighbor in the parable of the good Samaritan.

This one is quite fascinating because Samaritans were foreigners in Judea. The man who had been robbed and beaten was a Judean in Judea and the man who stopped to help him was a foreigner... and it was this foreigner who helped the native that was the neighbor...

Not the priest calling him to give up his life for the robbers, not the fellow-countrymen calling him a racist, not the lawyers equivocating on laws of the land that they don't intend to keep. It was a foreigner who showed him kindness.

How many of our foreigners are treating us like this?

Anonymous Hoyos August 15, 2016 10:11 PM  

@32 Ha! That's perfect.

Reminded me of a great story about Haille Selaissie (don't let the Rastafarians fool you, that was a real King with lessons to teach). The Saudis came to him to say that, because of the history of Islam in Ethiopia they would like to sponsor some mosques. He said, "Wonderful! And because of the history of Christianity in Arabia, I will sponsor one church for every mosque, as a sign of friendship between our two countries."

The Saudis went home. No mosques were built.

Blogger CM August 15, 2016 10:17 PM  

@48
Even the Catholics are getting in on the fun. Post from a Catholic question and answer forum about his wife's new son:

I know stonings for adultery are out, but I will never question the reasonableness of such a law.

There is a reason why Jesus allowed for divorce from an unfaithful spouse.

Blogger Whisker biscuit August 15, 2016 10:25 PM  

The mud shark looks like a girl I knew.

She coal burned. Worked at a salon. Smoked Newports. Had little bastard porch monkeys. Rinse and repeat.

Blogger freddy August 15, 2016 10:26 PM  

Ha, cultural retreatist eschatology at its worst.

Blogger Elder Son August 15, 2016 10:29 PM  

The worst thing they ever did to the bible, was put it in verses. Making it to easy to take it out of context as a whole word.

@20 LMAO!

Blogger tz August 15, 2016 10:32 PM  

@14 Assuming you believe in disp(s)ensationalism. Hal Lindsey is so last century (though he keeps revising his interpretations so he is never wrong about what he wrote earlier).
Many end-times evangelicals want Israel to do more so they can be annihilated and we can bring on all the horrors of Revelation.

Blogger Were-Puppy August 15, 2016 11:18 PM  

That would make a great cover for
Cuckservatives 2: The Trumpageddon

Blogger Were-Puppy August 15, 2016 11:23 PM  

SteelPalm wrote:Really phenomenal cartoon. Love it, especially the details on the baby. Any way to support the artist?

Although I will note a very slight criticism; while this cartoon does describe a lot of Cruz supporters, there are many (especially ones who liked him earlier in the election cycle) who would find it as repulsive as we do. Furthermore, there are many cucks who didn't like Cruz at all.

So it distracts a little from the universality of this behavior.


Cruzlims and Cucks are not necessarily the same thing. Cruzlims are more like a cult of personality.

Anonymous Andrew E. August 15, 2016 11:27 PM  

I realize I'm in the minority here, but I object to the Cruz button on his chest. It should have said "Jeb".

Too easy. The truth needs to sting harder, hence Cruz.

Blogger CM August 15, 2016 11:32 PM  

I realize I'm in the minority here, but I object to the Cruz button on his chest. It should have said "Jeb".

Too easy. The truth needs to sting harder, hence Cruz.


Its next to impossible to pin them, but most NeverTrumpers I've come across were not Cruz-supporters. The Reluctant-Trumps seem to be predominately Cruz supporters. Rubio and Jeb voters are big block in NT.

Which is odd... because Rubio endorsed and Cruz did not... which just looks like Cruz made himself a useful idiot the way Rubio did with Immigration.

Blogger Austin Ballast August 15, 2016 11:34 PM  

Snidely,

I plan on taking the first flight out (Rapture). God's wrath is for His enemies, not me.

That doesn't mean I can avoid all of man's wrath and we are due for quite a bit of it, most likely before He pours His out.

Some people need to really study things better on BOTH sides of the issue.

Blogger Were-Puppy August 15, 2016 11:36 PM  

@42 BGKB
Its crazy some are still blaming TRUMP for the Hispanic killing a moslem in Queens.
---

Finally a Mexican doing the job Americans won't do

Blogger Were-Puppy August 15, 2016 11:44 PM  

@58 CM
How many of our foreigners are treating us like this?
---

It would be like a white boy gets beat up and robbed by some BLMs and left in a ditch.

Then a friendly muslim... nm, that won't work.

Then a friendly Mexican .. umm

Then a friendly Canadian, helped him out !

Blogger haus frau August 15, 2016 11:44 PM  

@48 That was painful. I feel physically repelled by the evil dressed up as Christianity on that thread. It isn't just about this man's particular choice. It's that all of these good Christians would have excoriated the man if he had decided to leave, as he should have.

Anonymous Eric the Red August 16, 2016 12:27 AM  

Niceness is not goodness. Equality is evil.

Until a whole new generation is raised who thoroughly understand those two precepts, churchians will keep on finding endless misinterpretations of the Bible to support their slide into darkness.

Blogger Doom August 16, 2016 12:28 AM  

I haven't seen any signs of the end times. I have seen the obvious signs of the end of an economic era. I am absolutely sure the Romans, when they fell, each time... the Greeks when they fell, Britain when it fell, all wondered if it was the end times. It's... not. If it is, you won't ask... especially if you have read the bible, or even paid attention in a church where it was read thoroughly. And, Rapture? The Blondie song? :p The rapture is a modern theory... about as old as America, give or take. I don't buy into it. Still, do as you like.

To be honest, if all we get is going broke, having to start over from the bottom, not being able to afford to go to war or involved ourselves with the wars of others? I'm good with that. There is hope in it. That is where hope lives. I am not at all certain that is it. Time will tell. Though, something to think about? It doesn't have to be the End Times for it to be your end time. Trim those wicks. Go to the meal that is prepared, and dress appropriately. It really isn't just because. What happened to those who did not dress appropriately? Truly, it is more than just this and that and want. But it isn't that difficult unless you make it difficult.

Blogger Mountain Man August 16, 2016 12:37 AM  

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3740824/Trump-stop-issuing-visas-screenings-inadequate.html

All journeys begin with one small step.
A new day is dawning !. Just the fact that a major presidential contender is saying this signifies a hopeful future.
It will bring tears of joy to my eyes to see every last one of them being herded onto boats and sent back to where they belong.!

Blogger Kona Commuter August 16, 2016 12:45 AM  

LULZ www.realtruenews.org/single-post/2016/08/07/CLINTON-COLLAPSE-INSIDERS-SAY-MAY-DROP-SOON

DNC: "We bought fake followers. That used to be what everyone did. Trump? His guys are all real. We've got media-established narratives. Our coms-team works with the major outlets to shape the stories. That's traditional. He doesn't even have a Coms Team--he just fires off tweets and they all go viral. Every last damn one. "



"We have our response team go hard--racist. Sexist. Social Justice up the ass. It just pisses everyone off. It changes nobody's mind. We've got Black Lives Matter. He's got Milo [ Yiannopoulos ]. We've paid like--like 300k for Politico. They paid nothing and they've got Brietbart. You know who Trump voters trust? Brietbart. Look at the numbers."



[ shakes his head ]



"Hillary's in a panic. She's always been on some kind of medication--but they've been upping the hell out of it. She's freezing. She's having panic attacks. The Secret Service is trained to get her out of these . . . fugue states--but one's going to happen in public and it'll all be over. Why do you think she doesn't talk to the press? No one knows what to do about the debates. It's going to be a disaster."

Blogger Snidely Whiplash August 16, 2016 12:50 AM  

Austin Ballast wrote:I plan on taking the first flight out (Rapture). God's wrath is for His enemies, not me.



Wow, Austin, where in the Bible do you get that little aphorism? God's wrath is for obstinate sinners, and I can personally guarantee that you are an obstinate sinner.
Was God's wrath not for the victims of Diocletian? of Vespasian? for Charles Luanda and companions? for the ten thousand Vietnamese martyrs?
Do you really think that being a faithful and convicted follower of Christ will protect you? Even if it did, what about the kind of Christian you are?

Anonymous Eric the Red August 16, 2016 12:55 AM  

@48...
Yeah, that is not only painful it's disgusting.

These people are running on empty in the thinking department. They have nothing upstairs except a few useless memes that they regurgitate ad nauseum...
"hate", "fear", "no right to judge", created by our Lord".

That marriage is over. The woman in this escapade is completely untrustworthy. Without trust, love is empty, useless, dead. God can (is able to) forgive this woman, but there is no reason in Scripture for the man to do so. He should immediately divorce this excuse for a wife, even if the misandrist courts saddle him with child-support payments.

Anonymous Eric the Red August 16, 2016 1:02 AM  

@76 Kona Commuter..

I hope all that is true.. one can but hope.

"I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: 'O Lord make my enemies ridiculous.' And God granted it." - Voltaire

Blogger Unknown August 16, 2016 1:25 AM  

1 Thessalonians 2
14 For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews:
15 Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men:

John 7 (KJV)
1 After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would not walk in Jewry, because the Jews sought to kill him.
2 Now the Jew's feast of tabernacles was at hand.
3 His brethren therefore said unto him, Depart hence, and go into Judaea, that thy disciples also may see the works that thou doest.
4 For there is no man that doeth any thing in secret, and he himself seeketh to be known openly. If thou do these things, shew thyself to the world.
5 For neither did his brethren believe in him.
6 Then Jesus said unto them, My time is not yet come: but your time is alway ready.
7 The world cannot hate you; but me it hateth, because I testify of it, that the works thereof are evil.
8 Go ye up unto this feast: I go not up yet unto this feast: for my time is not yet full come.
9 When he had said these words unto them, he abode still in Galilee.
10 But when his brethren were gone up, then went he also up unto the feast, not openly, but as it were in secret.
11 Then the Jews sought him at the feast, and said, Where is he?
12 And there was much murmuring among the people concerning him: for some said, He is a good man: others said, Nay; but he deceiveth the people.
13 Howbeit no man spake openly of him for fear of the Jews.

Anonymous EH August 16, 2016 1:48 AM  

Here's a bluegrass gospel antidote:
He Will Set Your Fields on Fire
The Country Gentlemen,
Originally on Live in Japan, 1971

(Fast-picking, antiphonic harmony with Charlie Waller lead vocal, oom-pah-ish trotting beat)

There's a call that rings from the throne it springs
To those now gone astray
Saying "Come ye men from your load of sin
There at the alter lay"
Many do not heed that the chains of greed
that their conscience never tire
Be assured my friend if you still offend
He will set your fields on fire

Now if you don't from sin retire
He will set your fields on fire
You have heard Jesus' call
And in death your soul must fall
Now my friend if you desire
You may join the heavenly choir
And rejoice with him free from every sin
When He sets this world on fire

You have heard his voice seen His soul rejoice
That trusted in his grace
You have blushed with sin as He knocked within
But still you hide your face
From the blessed Lord and His own true word
But still you say retire
Leave the downward path kindle not His wrath
Or He'll set your fields on fire

Anonymous Alice De Goon August 16, 2016 2:01 AM  

"Hillary's in a panic. She's always been on some kind of medication--but they've been upping the hell out of it. She's freezing. She's having panic attacks. The Secret Service is trained to get her out of these . . . fugue states--but one's going to happen in public and it'll all be over. Why do you think she doesn't talk to the press? No one knows what to do about the debates. It's going to be a disaster."

The Dems are so gung ho to break the tape on having the First Woman President that they'll drag that woman's carcass across the finish line. This is taking years off of Hillary's life. No one who cares about her would let her go on with this (which makes you wonder how many people around her truly care about her.)

Blogger Leo Little Book in Shenzhen August 16, 2016 2:57 AM  

"If an apple tree brings forth a withered pear,"

Adopted niglet = withered pear.

Blogger ChickenChicken Sweep August 16, 2016 3:40 AM  

makes you wonder how many people around her truly care about her

About as many as she truly cares about.

@48 - Gotta love the lazy emotional blackmail of "if you truly love her", which is always a call to roll over and take whatever she dishes out. Of course, "if she truly loved me, why'd she fuck someone else" is the worstest sort of wrongthink.

Blogger Lazarus August 16, 2016 3:56 AM  

Doom wrote:I haven't seen any signs of the end times.

Do you not have your night vision goggles?

The natural man does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God. For they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned.

Blogger residentMoron August 16, 2016 4:02 AM  

ChickenChicken

Inevitably that was his fault, too.

Blogger docweasel August 16, 2016 4:04 AM  

whoa.
That image posted at the top of post isn't what I'd call "Christian"- I'm the last one to be over-sensitive or pulling the race card, but that image is flat out racist.

No one who calls themselves Christian or bemoans the loss of Christian ethics has any business posting something like that, or else they have a thin grasp of exactly what Christianity is in the first place.

I only started reading this site regularly a few months ago when a link from somewhere else brought me here. If this is the tone I don't guess this is the place for me.

Blogger docweasel August 16, 2016 4:06 AM  

"Adopted niglet = withered pear."

Seriously, wtf is wrong with some of you? Niglet? Really?

Anonymous Red August 16, 2016 4:08 AM  

>That image posted at the top of post isn't what I'd call "Christian"- I'm the last one to be over-sensitive or pulling the race card, but that image is flat out racist.


In what way? I don't see anything in that image that doesn't confirm with reality. Is there a racial stereo type I'm missing from it?

Anonymous Red August 16, 2016 4:13 AM  

>Seriously, wtf is wrong with some of you? Niglet? Really?

Comes from this video by a black comedian:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_ew_4KNxAE

Blogger residentMoron August 16, 2016 4:31 AM  

Bye bye cuckweasel.

Blogger Lazarus August 16, 2016 4:34 AM  

docweasel wrote:I only started reading this site regularly a few months ago when a link from somewhere else brought me here. If this is the tone I don't guess this is the place for me.

Did you not read Discredit. Disqualify. Deplatform. below?:

I pay no heed to thought police, speech police, tone police, or relationship police.

Bu-bye.

Anonymous John August 16, 2016 5:32 AM  

CM wrote:Even the Catholics are getting in on the fun. Post from a Catholic question and answer forum about his wife's new son:

I know stonings for adultery are out, but I will never question the reasonableness of such a law.

There is a reason why Jesus allowed for divorce from an unfaithful spouse.


If I'm not mistaken, the old punishment in Christian countries for an adulteress was to have her hair cut off and paraded through the sheets. Other times they had their nose and ears cut off. Other times they were simply killed (in various ways).

The idea that there should be no punishment whatsoever for adultery is absolutely insane. The only justification for it is that the state hates the institution of the family and wants it to be abolished.

The women who are extremely scandalised when a man says that he wants his wife to be a virgin on her wedding day, obviously have defiled consciences. It's really sad actually. So, so many women, who would have been decent if they had grown up in a normal society, threw away their virginities on some idiot in order to meet the depraved expectations of a depraved society, and then had to lie to themselves and corrupt their own consciences in order to convince themselves that they didn't regret what they know was a horrible mistake. This is why you have feminists arguing that "the concept of virginity" is a "social construct" - corrupt conscience. All women understand - they understand it more than men, they understand it instinctively - that a woman is supposed to be chaste, exactly as all men know that a man is supposed to be brave. You never see a human being as nasty as when one woman calls another woman a slut - this is because all women know that they are, as women, supposed to be chaste. There is hardly anything more disgusting in this world than a shameless slut, which is what the scourge of feminism has released on society. Once a woman knows that she can use sex to manipulate men, and uses that knowledge, she becomes corrupt and needs to be put in her place. This is one of the effects of marriage: to put would-be harlots in their place. But marriage has been so gutted by bad laws that it hardly has that effect anymore; often, marriage seems to be empowering these sluts rather than disempowering them, as it is supposed to.

Anonymous John August 16, 2016 5:51 AM  

I want to expand a little on what I said just above.

I said that marriage has been gutted by bad laws. I think that it's EXTREMELY important to understand what marriage is.

Marriage is NOT:

- A civil institution.
- A religious institution.

Marriage IS:

- A natural institution.

What do I mean by a natural institution? I mean that marriage exists in nature before any state / civil society, and before any religion. The state or religion does NOT found, institute, or create marriage; rather, they merely recognise marriage. This is an extremely important distinction to make. Many people are deluded on this point; some think that marriage is merely a social / civil construct, others think it is a purely religious matter. The truth is that marriage/matrimony means motherhood, and refers to the primitive fact that men and women can come together in sexual union in order to reproduce - that is marriage, and the state/religion merely recognises its existence and, in a just state/religion, lends its support to marriage.

Why is this important? Because if marriage does not exist in nature, and is merely a civil institution, then the state gets to define what marriage is; which means that the state can tell us that a sodomitical "union" is equal to matrimony/motherhood. It means that the family itself is a social construct that gets to be defined by the state.

This definition of marriage is biblical. The Church has never said that it creates marriage. Christ never said that He instituted marriage (except insofar as He is God, He made them man and woman in the beginning). The Catholic sacrament of matrimony does not create marriage, it only sanctifies/blesses it.

It's important to know this because the state has no right to break up your marriage. If you marry a woman and you each take a vow of fidelity, and then either of you decides to abandon the other (divorce), it used to be that you could demand that the state intervene to UPHOLD your marriage and force the other to return to you. Now, it's the other way around. If you want to be rid of your spouse, you can get the state to intervene and break up your marriage, to get your spouse away from you. The state has no natural right to do this, it is completely contrary to the natural law / natural state of marriage. The rights of marriage are, in a sense, above the state, because they exist prior to the state. To have the state intervene in your marriage to break it up is a profound violation of justice and of your natural rights. Once a man and woman come together in marriage, either party has the right to demand the fidelity of the other.

Anonymous Eric the Red August 16, 2016 6:54 AM  

re docweasel..

That image is meant to portray the degenerate sickness and depravity that now passes itself off as Christianity.

For churchians like docweasel, never let the Truth get in the way of anti-racism and equality that they worship as the pinnacle of God's Word.

Blogger rob August 16, 2016 7:22 AM  

post no 88 is such a waste of good digits, isn't it


hope your outrage is merely pretended my dude

Anonymous Captain Picard August 16, 2016 8:11 AM  

88. docweasel August 16, 2016 4:06 AM

"Adopted niglet = withered pear."

Seriously, wtf is wrong with some of you? Niglet? Really?


Yes, it's an ugly neologism. The correct term, as all literate people know, is piccanin.

Anonymous billo August 16, 2016 8:27 AM  

James Dixon:

"If he had quoted the second in it's entirety, understood who classified as a neighbor, and acknowledged that it was the second and not the first; you might have a point. Since none of those are the case..."


He was exhorting Christians and reminding them of their duties to their neighbors. It's simply denial to try to ignore the commandment to love one's neighbors by claiming that he ignores his duty to Christ. Of all of the candidates, Rubio is one of the ones who is both most open and sincere about his faith.

As to who is "classified" as a neighbor, I'll refer you to the parable of the Good Samaritan:

In reply Jesus said: “A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, when he was attacked by robbers. They stripped him of his clothes, beat him and went away, leaving him half dead. 31 A priest happened to be going down the same road, and when he saw the man, he passed by on the other side. So too, a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side. But a Samaritan, as he traveled, came where the man was; and when he saw him, he took pity on him. mHe went to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine. Then he put the man on his own donkey, brought him to an inn and took care of him. The next day he took out two denarii[e] and gave them to the innkeeper. ‘Look after him,’ he said, ‘and when I return, I will reimburse you for any extra expense you may have.’

“Which of these three do you think was a neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of robbers?”

The expert in the law replied, “The one who had mercy on him.”

Jesus told him, “Go and do likewise.”


Choosing to play the Levite in that story is probably not the best way to go...

And using Rubio's phraseology to deny the Christian truth of his meaning is probably not so hot, either. Are you really telling me you are going to tell God that "I don't have to love my neighbor because it's only the second most important commandment in Christianity, not the first! So screw them."

Anonymous Pennywise August 16, 2016 9:38 AM  

Most Christians today view “cuck” and their acolytes of this meme as false prophets themselves, especially those who have the audacity to label their own family members in this capacity and those who claim God commanded against groups intermixing. Matthew 24:24 applies here--For false Christs and false prophets will arise and perform great signs and wonders, so as to lead astray, if possible, even the elect.

Anonymous BGKB August 16, 2016 11:31 AM  

Don't worry Dockweasel the black size thing is a myth but here are some facts from an old Vox Day post

To shark or not to shark?
A few statistical observations regarding biracial children:
•More than 50 percent of the relationships between white women and black men end upon "the disclosure of the pregnancy."
•72 percent of the white women whose children have black fathers never marry the father.
•82 percent of the biracial children of white women with more than one child have different black fathers.
•92 percent of the biracial children of black fathers are born illegitimate.
•97 percent of the biracial children of black fathers and white mothers are born illegitimate.
•98 percent of white mothers never receive any financial support from the black fathers of their children even if they are married to them.

Blogger ace August 16, 2016 4:59 PM  

"Clearly, the reason so many Beltway Conservatives* balk at it is that it crystallizes the depth of their betrayal and heaps burning coals upon their heads."

Nice. This is also why I'm such a fan of the word and its derivatives. It's a knife right into the heart of our enemies. If anything can save the West now, it's shame.

Anonymous Unamused Flyover Resident August 16, 2016 7:16 PM  

With regard to the parable of the Good Samaritan, notice what the man did: he took the injured man to an inn and paid for care from his own pocket.

Now, notice what the good Samaritan didn't do: he didn't take the man to his home or his village. He didn't displace his family or his neighbors and he most especially didn't use the threat of (government) force to require his neighbors to pay for the man's care.

I see many lessons for today's churchians and Catholics in the parable of the Good Samaritan.

Anonymous Anonymous August 21, 2016 11:21 PM  

..."from the beginning it was not so. A man would leave his mother and father, and cleave to his spouse, and the two shall become one flesh". Because of the hardness of their hearts, MOSES permitted them to divorce... "what God has joined together, let no man put asunder".
There is no 'allowance'for divorce from an unfaithful spouse. The vows are "for better or worse, in sickness and in health, for richer for poorer...'til death do us part". Sorry, theRe is no way out. If people take marriage seriously, it is a covenant one to another - and God. - Blazing Apostle

Blogger Robert American August 23, 2016 5:43 PM  

The hour is latter than we think. We need to start to make real life connections. The war has only just begun. There are still a lot of good Christians out there. knightsofthewest.com

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts