ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2016 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Tuesday, September 06, 2016

A good reason to vote for Trump

Fred Reed, no die-hard Alt-Righter, explains:
A good reason to vote for Trump, a very good reason whatever his other intentions, is that he does not want a war with Russia. Hillary and her elite ventriloquists threaten just that.  Note the anti-Russian hysteria coming from her and her remoras.

Such a war would be yet another example of the utter control of America by rich insiders. No normal American has anything at all to gain by such a war. And no normal American has the slightest influence over whether such a war takes place, except by voting for Trump. The military has become entirely the plaything of unaccountable elites.

A martial principle of great wisdom says that military stupidity comes in three grades: Ordinarily stupid; really, really, really stupid; and fighting Russia. Think Charles XII at Poltava, Napoleon after Borodino, Adolf and Kursk.

Letting dilettantes, grifters, con men, pasty Neocons, bottle-blonde ruins, and corporations decide on war is insane. We have pseudo-masculine dwarves playing with things they do not understand. So far as I am aware, none of these fern-bar Clausewitzes has worn boots, been in a war, seen a war, or faces any chance of being in a war started by themselves. They brought us Iraq, Afghanistan, and Isis, and can’t win wars against goatherds with AKs. They are going to fight…Russia?
Every now and then, one starts to conclude that Fred has lost his fastball in his old age. After all, this is the man who used to write articles like this one, about his adventures with tankers at Fort Hood. But the old man still indubitably has it.

Of course, there is another straightforward reason to vote for Trump beyond avoiding a suicidally stupid war, and that is the fact that he can engage in high-risk activities such as drinking water without running a high risk of keeling over before Christmas.

Labels: ,

106 Comments:

Blogger dc.sunsets September 06, 2016 8:15 AM  

The globalist media would have people vote Clinton because "anyone but Trump."

Many Trumpsters intend to vote Trump because he's "anyone but another oligarch, or oligarch-puppet."

Whatever happened to just voting for the lesser of two evils? Life was so simple back then..... (just kidding.)

Blogger Robert Divinity September 06, 2016 8:16 AM  

pseudo-masculine dwarves

fern-bar Clausewitzes

Ben Shapiros.

Damn good stuff.

The dying, corrupt old criminal cunt Clinton is a prepaid war for the AIPAC/military/Big Conservatism, Inc., complex. Given CNN--yes, CNN--now has Hillary's gagging and coughing old ass behind, look for these monsters to try to start an international incident in the next couple of weeks. The American people may not be easily distracted this time, though, as the True Conservatives! demands an invasion of NoOneGivesAFuckAStan and goyim children to die in the cause of Israel and crony capitalism. The worm has turned.

Anonymous Steve September 06, 2016 8:25 AM  

Also:

Trump can climb a flight of stairs.
Trump has never been investigated for treason by the FBI.
Trump has never sold American interests for cash.
Trump doesn't curate an enemies list.
Trump doesn't dress like Kim Jong Un in drag.
Trump has never giggled about someone being sodomised with a knife.

Blogger Verne September 06, 2016 8:45 AM  

The only thing Fred has lost is his desire. Comes a time to slow down and enjoy the cheap red wine of Mexico. Fred has reached that time of life. Yes he is slowing down

Blogger The Other Robot September 06, 2016 8:49 AM  

No need to get excited! The comedy gold has moved online.

Blogger The Other Robot September 06, 2016 8:50 AM  

Trump has never been investigated for treason by the FBI.

Don't worry. We can fix that. HRC.

Blogger CarpeOro September 06, 2016 8:50 AM  

This points directly at Hillary's weakest point: the idea that the Democrats are the peace party to many who have the right to vote. True, to any that have paid any attention to the last century, this is laugh out loud ridiculous. Remember though, we are talking not just bi-factional voters but Democratic voters. Women are especially susceptible to the "Hillary is a woman so Hillary is more peaceful" meme.

Fortunately, there is so much evidence, other than the Bush family, that the Democrats are the war party that it takes a few minutes to pull out evidence against it. Given 15 minutes you can pull video of Hillary's drum banging to really squelch that idea. Talking to female members of my family on why Trump, this is my go to point. Nothing worries them more than someone who decreases safety of the family.

Blogger Dexter September 06, 2016 8:58 AM  

Eh, Hillary doesn't want to fight Russia. She and her minions did all that posturing because Trump's supposed "Kremlin connections" came out. If she gets elected it'll be back to the old "gee Vlad let's push the reset button and be friends" thing again.

Blogger rumpole5 September 06, 2016 9:02 AM  

Trump lost any direct credibility with me when he called Ben Carson, of all people, a psychopathic child abuser. However, that being said, I like all of his stated positions, and especially his America First stance. Therefore, much like "little Rubio", and Ben Carson himself, I support Trump. I've donated money to his campaign, and I have his campaign sticker on the back of my Prius. I really don't see how any informed person who gives a damn about our future could do otherwise. HRC as POTUS would cause multifaceted catastrophe.

Anonymous NateM September 06, 2016 9:06 AM  

shows again that the Left doesn't care if something is right or wrong, just that the right people are saying. How badly they mocked Romney when he said virtually the same thing about Russia being the biggest threat during the last election. There was even a sound bite of Obama mocking him for it. But now it's Super Important (TM) that we fight Russia, cause reasons.

Anonymous Hunsdon September 06, 2016 9:06 AM  

Dexter said: If she gets elected it'll be back to the old "gee Vlad let's push the reset button and be friends" thing again.

Hunsdon said: Not convinced. There is a large, large part of the American elite who seem to think provoking Russia is just great good sport. Maybe they're still hacked off about Berezovsky and Khodorkovskii, and think there should be more looting of the public till. Maybe, a la Masha Gessen, they're deluded sociopaths who want to destroy marriage and figure, hey, let's start here! Maybe they're like General Breedlove who is convinced that Russian tank armies are rampaging through Ukraine. Nah, I think you're pretty much wrong on this one, Dexter, although I'm game to debate it if you please.

Blogger dc.sunsets September 06, 2016 9:06 AM  

Since nukes exist, sooner or later they'll be used. MAD only works if your ruler(s) actually care about the complete Carthaginian destruction of "their" people.

Given that the USA's political ladder is only open to pederasts, coprophages and other assorted demons (because only people with horrific, sick crimes documented for blackmail purposes need apply), the USA is actually the country in the nuclear club most likely to place a complete psychopath in position to initiate a confrontation with an ICBM-owning nation that leads to nuclear war.

50 years of Monetary Madness has placed the fate of humanity in the hands of Dollar-rich oligarchs who will be utterly destroyed when Emperor T-Bond's "new clothes" are revealed as IOU's We Never Intend to Honor.

Such people might actually embrace the notion that reducing the planet's human population by 99% via fallout and 5 years of ash-cloud global cooling is a good thing. These are dangerous times, indeed.

Blogger swiftfoxmark2 September 06, 2016 9:08 AM  

Dexter wrote:Eh, Hillary doesn't want to fight Russia. She and her minions did all that posturing because Trump's supposed "Kremlin connections" came out. If she gets elected it'll be back to the old "gee Vlad let's push the reset button and be friends" thing again.

It's really funny because Trump was making an off the cuff joke about the Russians "hacking" her email server.

Suddenly, he's got Russian ties and the MSM runs with it.

Blogger dc.sunsets September 06, 2016 9:12 AM  

@8 Dexter Eh, Hillary doesn't want to fight Russia.

Yeah. No one in power in 1913 intended to engulf Europe in all-out war, complete with the new toy from Mr. Maxim, over a crappy little country located between the Great Powers.

Really. Bad. Shit. Happens. because the clowns people entrust with power begin to believe their own PR, believe in their own omniscience, and then play with the matches THE PEOPLE entrusted to them while said rulers are standing in the Powder Magazine.

Do you really think Hillary Clinton is sane enough to do what Eisenhower, Nixon and a bunch of others have done, which is NOT poke the bear? I don't.

Blogger Robert Divinity September 06, 2016 9:21 AM  

Eh, Hillary doesn't want to fight Russia.

This corrupt old liar is a sick, dying puppet. Hillary does what those pulling her strings and pumping millions to her corrupt foundation want her to do. Those neocon, corporatist, globalist monsters want war with Russia. Reed absolutely is right. No normal American wants such a thing, but the only recourse they have is a vote for Trump. There also could be massive American military desertions if another war-for-profit is attempted, but that's not likely, at least yet.

The bottom line is what Hillary wants or doesn't want is based on what her puppetmasters demand. Reed's piece is solid and he's absolutely right this insanity would bring the Banana Empire to its knees.

Anonymous Thersites September 06, 2016 9:24 AM  

So why is Russia so concern with her to become president? That is something to ponder about. Hillary is not the one that is going to pull the strings, it her handlers and donors that will.

Anonymous Pope Cleophus I September 06, 2016 9:39 AM  

Eh, Hillary doesn't want to fight Russia.

This corrupt old liar is a sick, dying puppet.


George Soros is her puppetmaster and he is itching for a war with Russia. In large measure the Arab Spring was his doing to get the fireworks started. Then Ukraine, Moldova, the Baltics, you name it you find his slimy Nazi fingerprints all over it.

Blogger Johnny September 06, 2016 9:40 AM  

Part of this may be that the Russians ran the Jews out. Well, they did not so much run them out but encouraged them to leave and most of them did. Russia is the only mostly caucasian nation of significance that does not have a Jewish minority. They are also the only caucasian nation that is not going along with the liberal lefty agenda. Hmmm.... Maybe there is something to it?

Blogger S1AL September 06, 2016 9:43 AM  

"I have his campaign sticker on the back of my Prius"

Well, my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle.

Anonymous Josh Gold September 06, 2016 9:47 AM  

So, basically, the alt-right are cowards.

Good to know.

Blogger Aeoli Pera September 06, 2016 9:50 AM  

I don't believe Hillary when she threatens war against Russia because she isn't a serious person. I do believe she'd start as many small wars as she possibly could because she has no understanding of restraint or the limits of the military.

Blogger Aeoli Pera September 06, 2016 9:51 AM  

Josh Gold wrote:So, basically, the alt-right are cowards.

Good to know.


Can we please start posting IP addresses for these guys?

Blogger Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus September 06, 2016 9:52 AM  

I've been warning the knucklehead "True Conservatives / Muh Constertooshun" types on Facebook that Ted Cruz was just another idiot trying to refight the Cold War. Not that any of then listened, of course. Because "principles" or something.

Anonymous Tiny Duck September 06, 2016 9:52 AM  

Trump is unpopular with the young

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/trumps-millennial-outreach-backfires-jokes-925564

Blogger VD September 06, 2016 9:57 AM  

So, basically, the alt-right are cowards.

Good to know.


You and Israel are welcome to take on Russia all by (((yourselves))). Except, wait a minute, I know a number of Israelis and none of them are that stupid either.

Good luck invading Russia, (((Josh))).

Blogger Mr.MantraMan September 06, 2016 10:01 AM  

America cannot even win in Chicago, the bodies were stacked this weekend.

Blogger Nick S September 06, 2016 10:02 AM  

Even without the increased potential for conflict with Russia, a Clinton presidency will unequivocally expedite the demographic collapse of western civilization. How anyone with two brain cells to rub together could vote for that woman and maintain any claim to moral integrity is beyond me.

Blogger al September 06, 2016 10:06 AM  

John Mearsheimer says the rise of China will likely not be peaceful, and suggests that we do all we can to hinder their economic growth and isolate them like the Soviet Union was during the Cold War. I don't think the Clinton camp actually intends to fight Russia, or is even primarily motivated by fear of Russia. The main adversary is China, and we were trying to convince the Russians to help us isolate China and stall their economy. Additionally Russia supplies the only petroleum flow to China that isn't vulnerable to our naval supremacy. Initially we tried the "reset" with Russia, but apparently after being pillaged by people like Larry Summers in the 90s the Russians didn't trust us enough to help destroy our only rivals economy. So if Russia won't join us in isolating China, then we have to isolate Russia as well by inciting conflict with their neighbors to find excuses for sanctions. The TPP would have helped isolate China from its southern neighbors, at the low low cost of thousands of American jobs and loss of sovereignty. Also it's helpful to keep Europe in line by maintaining a veto on east-west trade by controlling countries like Poland and Ukraine. China's rise is a major threat; and though I'm generally against policing the world, a powerful China actually is concerning to me. I'm not sure what the right answer to this problem is.

Blogger Johnny September 06, 2016 10:15 AM  

By current circumstance Russia is more naturally an ally than an enemy. They have Arabia to contend with, expansionist China, and after their last experience it would seem unlikely that they would want to take parts of Europe, with the Ukraine the exception here.

Blogger residentMoron September 06, 2016 10:15 AM  

"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid. We must acquire proficiency in defense and display stamina in purpose. We must be willing, individually and as a Nation, to accept whatever sacrifices may be required of us. A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both."

Of course, it shouldn't need to be said, but probably does, that stupidity is a weakness.

Oh, Dwight D Eisenhower, First inaugural address, 20 January 1953.

Anonymous Elijah Rhodes September 06, 2016 10:18 AM  

The Russians are the boogyman that Obama is using to steal the election.

Last week they announce they want to federalize the election:

http://washex.am/2cd84vW

And right on cue we now hear about election gerrymandering from the Russians:

http://wapo.st/2c1CnC2

Blogger residentMoron September 06, 2016 10:21 AM  

@27

Putin didn't want Ukraine and still doesn't. He didn't even want the bit he took, but it was either that or have another Syria on his doorstep. So he took the Crimea and shouldered the cost of keeping it more or less civilised, a cost the Russian economy can ill afford.

Blogger Cogitans Iuvenis September 06, 2016 10:24 AM  

It seems that 88 retired US Generals and Admirals agree with Fred

https://assets.donaldjtrump.com/MILITARY_LETTER.pdf


Blogger Robert Divinity September 06, 2016 10:24 AM  

So, basically, the alt-right are cowards.

I'm sure there is a recruiting station near you. You also could try the IDF but they still have standards.

Blogger dc.sunsets September 06, 2016 10:25 AM  

@24

Depends. I thought we were in the process of defining "Hyphen"-Americans out of America (to my hearty approval) so when African-Americans are slaughtering each other in Englewood, I'm not sure America's got a dog in the fight.

Next, we could arrange a Thunderdome round-robin between NR, WaPo, NYT, etc. More non-American Americans killing each other...heads America wins, tails America wins.

Blogger Robert Divinity September 06, 2016 10:27 AM  

It seems that 88 retired US Generals and Admirals agree with Fred

Reed referred to these types in the linked article, true, patriotic nationalists. The corrupt political wing of the United States military support Clinton because they are cronies of the global elite.

Blogger Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus September 06, 2016 10:30 AM  

So he took the Crimea and shouldered the cost of keeping it more or less civilised, a cost the Russian economy can ill afford.

That's exactly it. People here in the USA are all afeared of Russia, but the Russians can't even digest Crimea without some major acid reflux. They're certainly not going to be going after Poland or the Baltic states or Alaska. Further, while Russia's armed forces have received some favourable press recently, they're still more or less a paper tiger. They can blow up some ragheads in Syria, but it's highly doubtful they'd be able to take on the American or European armies in a serious shoooting war, even in our emasculated state.

It'd be better for Russia and the West to combine their strengths, rather than allow the globalists to set us at loggerheads.

Blogger Mountain Man September 06, 2016 10:42 AM  

Putin is the Emmanuel Goldstein of today's political theater. 2016 is the new 1984

Anonymous Gen. Kong September 06, 2016 10:48 AM  

The European armies couldn't fight their way out of a paper bag. As for the Banana Empire's legion, it's filled with cucks, dindus, aliens and the orders are issued by genocidal traitors. The fact that neither the European or the Banana Empire military have not turned their weapons upon the treasonous and criminal elites and their apparchiks who staff the officer corps tells you all you really need to know. As Reed noted, the Banana Empire's legion cannot even defeat goat-men with AKs in the poppyfields of Pashtoonistan. It's amazing how many folks even here think it's still 1985.

Blogger CarpeOro September 06, 2016 11:02 AM  

Josh Gold wrote:So, basically, the alt-right are cowards.

Good to know.



Which holds so much water from someone who never served... Beat those manboobs, chickenhawk.

signed VFM 105 (who did serve)

Anonymous Dave September 06, 2016 11:04 AM  

Hillary's plan is actually a good one: First, purge our military of straight, white, Christian men, and replace them with feminists, faggots, trannies, Jews, browns, and blacks. Then invade Russia. Sometimes two wrongs do make a right!

Blogger Josh (the gayest thing here) September 06, 2016 11:12 AM  

It seems that 88 retired US Generals and Admirals agree with Fred

88! Top kek...

Blogger Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus September 06, 2016 11:13 AM  

As Reed noted, the Banana Empire's legion cannot even defeat goat-men with AKs in the poppyfields of Pashtoonistan. It's amazing how many folks even here think it's still 1985.

Don't be an idiot. The problems with fighting the "goatmen" is conceptual, not material. the failure lies in the American "leadership's" inability to understand 4GW, or even to have a decent perspective on 3GW.

That would not be an issue in an actual fight with the Russians. Russians who, we might note, similarly couldn't handle the "goatmen," and that was back when their military were fully funded and triple the size they are now. The Western allies still have better equipment, and the large part of their rank-and-file is still non-cucked, despite the naysaying by morons such as yourself.

The reason we don't want to fight the Russians has nothing to do with the sort of dick-measuring contest you seem to want to engage in. It has everything to do with the fact that it woulds be mutually destructive, counter-productive, unnecessary, and would divert both of our resources away from dealing with the radical Islamic threat to our civilisation.

Anonymous GoldRM September 06, 2016 11:15 AM  

No one , including the author, has shown where Hillary wants to go to war with Russia. Why the lies?

Blogger Nate September 06, 2016 11:16 AM  

can we take a moment and acknowledge the greatness that Fred has given us here?

Hillary and her remoras?

This is high art people.

Blogger Nate September 06, 2016 11:19 AM  

also... How can anyone claim the world is safer when tensions between the US and Russia are high?

It is beyond stupid.

Dubya had many faults... but he handled Russia and Putin extremely well and the whole world was safer for it.

Anonymous Fred James September 06, 2016 11:20 AM  

The American AltRighters don't have the courage of their convictions. None are moving to their beloved Russia. Or maybe it's easier for them to stay in the U.S. and get their pay checks from Putin.

Blogger Nate September 06, 2016 11:20 AM  

"No one , including the author, has shown where Hillary wants to go to war with Russia. Why the lies?"

dude. Hillary is the hawkiest hawk to ever walk.

Anonymous ZhukovG September 06, 2016 11:24 AM  

@Fred James, Putin can't afford me. However Soros is definitely paying you too much; or you're just another idiot.

Blogger James September 06, 2016 11:24 AM  

Fred Reed is essentially correct except I would like to point out, or I should say to remind everyone, that the purpose and intention of our wars has not been to win them, not for a long long long time. I used to think that WWII was the last war the US tried to win, but I'm not convinced that even that one was a won war or even was intended to be "won." So the fact that the US never wins doesn't mean that the warmongers aren't winning whatever it is they are fighting for, if that makes any sense.

Blogger Dexter September 06, 2016 11:26 AM  

There is a large, large part of the American elite who seem to think provoking Russia is just great good sport.

There is a large, large part of the American elite who has been desperately trying to cut a deal with Russia since 1933. They regarded the Cold War as an annoying, unnecessary distraction. Shrillary is one of that crowd. So is Henry Kissinger, who is supposedly about to endorse her.

Anonymous Fred James September 06, 2016 11:26 AM  

Buy some Cheetos with your Rubles, Zhukov

Blogger praetorian September 06, 2016 11:26 AM  

So, basically, the alt-right are cowards.

Let's you and him fight, (((she))) said.

Blogger Robert Divinity September 06, 2016 11:26 AM  

No one , including the author, has shown where Hillary wants to go to war with Russia. Why the lies?

The dying, corrupt criminal cunt Clinton wanted to establish a No-Fly zone in Syria while she was bilking money as Secretary of State. Guess who flies there? That's just starters. Educate yourself about what this evil pissflap wants and has said.

Blogger Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus September 06, 2016 11:27 AM  

dude. Hillary is the hawkiest hawk to ever walk.

I'd say that she puts the "chick" in "chickenhawk," but I'm not absolutely sure that that's true.

Anonymous GoldRM September 06, 2016 11:28 AM  

Where does she say she wants to go to war with Russia?

Blogger Robert Divinity September 06, 2016 11:28 AM  

The American AltRighters don't have the courage of their convictions

There is a recruiting station near you. Take your fat pig ass there and sign up.

Blogger Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus September 06, 2016 11:28 AM  

@ 45 - Or maybe it's easier for them to stay in the U.S. and get their pay checks from Putin.

Wait, you can get paychecks for this? How come nobody told me?

Blogger Robert Divinity September 06, 2016 11:29 AM  

Wait, you can get paychecks for this? How come nobody told me?

Paid trolls can't believe people comment for free.

Anonymous GoldRM September 06, 2016 11:29 AM  

Where did she say she wants to go to war with Russia

Anonymous Satan's Hamster September 06, 2016 11:45 AM  

"Where did she say she wants to go to war with Russia"

Clinton has never seen a war she didn't like. She and her beard started the whole 'invade the world!' mess with their attack on Serbia in the 90s.

If she gets into the White House, she'd start WWIII just to hide the fact that she couldn't survive to the end of her first term.

Blogger Arthur Isaac September 06, 2016 11:57 AM  

Hillary is vindictive. If she's blaming Putin for her latest hacker woes maybe a war is the only way she thinks she can arrange his "suicide".

Anonymous GoldRM September 06, 2016 12:00 PM  

"Clinton has never seen a war she didn't like. She and her beard started the whole 'invade the world!' mess with their attack on Serbia in the 90s."

Where did Hillary say she wanted to invade Russia?

Anonymous Jack Amok September 06, 2016 12:13 PM  

Do you really think Hillary Clinton is sane enough to do what Eisenhower, Nixon and a bunch of others have done, which is NOT poke the bear? I don't.

Excellent comparison with WWI dc.sunsets. Yes, I see the same parallels with a pompous elite that drastically overestimates it's ability to handle crises throwing match after match onto the tinder. Eventually something is going to explode.

I have a son who will be draft age before this next presidential term is over, and the all-volunteer army is done. If the next president wants to fight an overseas war, it'll be with conscripts.

Blogger Noah B September 06, 2016 12:22 PM  

It is a bit funny to see Fred writing about the punishing winter weather of central Texas.

Anonymous Mr. Rational September 06, 2016 12:56 PM  

Fred James wrote:The American AltRighters don't have the courage of their convictions. None are moving to their beloved Russia.
Hope this isn't your only job, the hasbaras have a very short lifespan here.

Noah B wrote:It is a bit funny to see Fred writing about the punishing winter weather of central Texas.
i endured a winter in Austin once.  The ice storm was mighty slippery and shut everything down, and the cold tap water was actually COLD for a while!

Which reminds me, I need to change the oil in the snowblower while the weather is still clement.

Anonymous tublecane September 06, 2016 1:09 PM  

Fred Reed's (I'm assuming this is the same one) book "Nekkid in Austin" had the greatest subtitle ever: drop your inner child down a well.

Anonymous tublecane September 06, 2016 1:15 PM  

@8-Let's put it this way: we want Russia's stuff, and we want them to be good little boys in the New World Order. The Anglo-American conspiracy...err, International Community demand it. Which, if pursued to the fullest, would inevitably lead to war.

Blogger John Watkins September 06, 2016 1:18 PM  

To quote Edmund Blackadder, the best kind of war is done fighting 2 feet tall natives armed with dried grass. War with Russia? Really? That's an actual thing now?

Blogger Nick S September 06, 2016 1:23 PM  

Josh (the gayest thing here)

Makes me laugh every time I see it. How this title came to be will surely go down in the anals of Ilkish folklore (pun intended).

Blogger Cogitans Iuvenis September 06, 2016 1:43 PM  

@61

Via her actions. She supported arming Syrian rebels to oust the Assad government, who are a de facto client state of Russia/Iran, for the sole purpose of replacing said government with one hostile to both Russia and Iran.

Let me ask you this? Why is our government, and our elites, have such a hard on about punishing Russia for not being tolerant or progressive enough yet they have no problem letting countries who are arguably more regressive have a seat at the international table?

Anonymous BigGayKoranBurner September 06, 2016 2:15 PM  

Its not war with Russia that we need to avoid its a bad result from Civil War II.

America cannot even win in Chicago, the bodies were stacked this weekend.

What are you talking about my wallet seems heavier already.

Don't be an idiot. The problems with fighting the "goatmen" is conceptual, not material.

It would help if we would still attack their headquarters when they placed it under a kindergarten

If the next president wants to fight an overseas war, it'll be with conscripts.

You can't gay your way out of the draft anymore either.

Josh (the gayest thing here) Makes me laugh every time I see it. How this title came to be

I did give up Home Depot wetbacks, or I could challenge him for the position.

Blogger Sioux September 06, 2016 2:25 PM  

I read all of Fred's columns since I discovered him about three years ago. He and I are about the same age (the dreaded Boomer group). He volunteered for Vietnam and got his eyes nearly destroyed by a broken windshield in his jeep that was blown up. That he can do what he does is amazing especially after the VA eye surgeon destroyed what was left of his vision in a gross act of malpractice a few years ago. Now his wife has to type up his columns, and English is not her first language (he lives in Mexico now and his wife is Mexican).

That all being said, I would note that the reason America doesn't win wars has not changed - it's all about the Debt that the Big Bankers enjoy so much. Quick decisive wars would not serve that overriding Goal.

Anonymous 5343 September 06, 2016 2:34 PM  

I did give up Home Depot wetbacks, or I could challenge him for the position.

Steve, you will always be the gayest thing here. No contest.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash September 06, 2016 2:36 PM  

Fred James wrote:The American AltRighters don't have the courage of their convictions. None are moving to their beloved Russia. Or maybe it's easier for them to stay in the U.S. and get their pay checks from Putin.

The American Neo-cons don't have the courage of their convictions. None are moving to their beloved Israel. Or maybe it's easier for them to stay in the U.S. and get their pay checks from Soros.

Blogger Elder Son September 06, 2016 2:38 PM  

They are very serious about Russia. Massive amounts of heavy armor/light armor are being distributed and placed from Estonia, all the way around to Georgia. Continual combat exercises around and up to Russia's borders. 172 combat exercises planned in 2017 in the Baltic States alone. US combat exercises in Ukraine. US combat training of UkrArmy on the Dombas front-lines.

US-NATO is not going to "attack" Russia. It is more about containment and intimidation while US-NATO is bringing the non-integrate Gaps into the integrating globalist NWO Core in the Middle East, N. Africa, and Persia. It is about NGO's (snicker) attempting to create a Russian Spring, internal stress. It is about the globalists controlling commodities-economies. It is about: https://youtu.be/VtlO39wIRWs but then, this in and of itself is just a tool of the globalists.

Of course, this comes with a serious probability of blow-back. Russia can capitulate to the intentional stress put on her, or do what any self-respecting world power would do. Get US-NATO off her front porch. The fact is, US-NATO, the tool of the globalists, are intentionally poking the Bear. If Russia reacts militarily, the globalists will say, "See? Russia has aspirations for its old USSR ways."

Bad Russia.

John Kirby; Note the "little green men" comment. There has always been "little green men" in Crimea, before the USA, was the USA. Anyhow, pure, adulterated BS: https://youtu.be/eW5HV69LKUs

Blogger Jed Mask September 06, 2016 2:41 PM  

Yep. That's why I voted for Mr. Donald J. Trump. Amen.

~ Bro. Jed

Anonymous Rolf September 06, 2016 3:33 PM  

Scratches head..... just supposing that the Parkinson's Disease diagnosis is correct. She's effectively a puppet, a terminal basket-case. So who among her inner circle (other than the generic "Da Jews!") are really pulling the string and controlling things? What specific names have the pull, the connections, the profit potential, the means to be masterminding it? I know *why* a lot of people might want to make a president of their personal meat-puppet, and the list of people *possibly* involved, but who is it most likely, for real, and what evidence is there for it(again, other than a generic "Da Bilderbergs!)?

Blogger Aeoli Pera September 06, 2016 3:38 PM  

BigGayKoranBurner wrote:
I did give up Home Depot wetbacks, or I could challenge him for the position.


Is it Lent already?

Anonymous Lazybug September 06, 2016 4:30 PM  

On a scale of one to invading Russia in the winter, how stupid is your idea?

Blogger TontoBubbaGoldstein September 06, 2016 4:37 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger TontoBubbaGoldstein September 06, 2016 4:37 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Marc DuQuesne September 06, 2016 4:57 PM  

Her incompetent interventionism is the most likely to stumble into a hot war with Russia. Whether in Syria or elsewhere in Russia's sphere of influence she will virtue signal her way into open warfare. She's also publicly declared her support of responding to suspected Russian hackers militarily. In her disease clouded mind it's perfectly rational to consider a database hack a casus belli.

"Russia even hacked into the Democratic National Committee, maybe even some state election systems. So, we’ve got to step up our game. Make sure we are well defended and able to take the fight to those who go after us.

As President, I will make it clear, that the United States will treat cyber attacks just like any other attack. We will be ready with serious political, economic and military responses."

Anonymous BGKB September 06, 2016 4:58 PM  

I did give up Home Depot wetbacks, or I could challenge him for the position...Is it Lent already?

Since fleeing die verse city after seeing the nigapocalypse preview on 10-12-2013 were the food stamp system went down for 8 hours in 16 states, at the Whitopia we moved to, the nearest home depot doesn't stock wetbacks.

Blogger dc.sunsets September 06, 2016 5:33 PM  

@62 Jack Amok,I have a son who will be draft age before this next presidential term is over, and the all-volunteer army is done. If the next president wants to fight an overseas war, it'll be with conscripts.

I understand your concern. My sons are moving away from that risk-age.

FWIW, I think the USA lacks the cohesive popular consent necessary to institute conscription. The Single "center" Narrative that sustained the country for a very long time is breaking into mutually antagonistic sub-Narratives.

Do we imagine Trayvon will muster with Billy Bob will muster with Peyata will muster with Jose all to go fight for...what?

The "all volunteer" military was the only way to implement the bombs&bullets side of the No-Limit-Charge-Card CONgress wielded these past 35 years. The public would have crushed any attempt to be so adventurous with their conscripted kids.

Anonymous Hillary Clinton's Halls September 06, 2016 5:40 PM  

Cough, cough, cough, Putin hacked my unsecure server right when Donald Trump started to run for President cough-cough-cough it's a conspiracy!

COUGH!

Anonymous Noah Nehm September 06, 2016 5:56 PM  

I work in Silicon Valley and have noticed something interesting on the freeways. In 2008 and 2012, every leftist in the valley had an Obama bumper sticker festooned on their car and a smug expression plastered on their face.

This year: hardly any Hillary bumper stickers. Question: Will the Left sit out the election this year?

Anonymous tublecane September 06, 2016 6:21 PM  

@12-"Since nukes exist, sooner or later they'll be used"

They were used, almost right away.

Blogger Elder Son September 06, 2016 6:29 PM  

FWIW, I think the USA lacks the cohesive popular consent necessary to institute conscription.

OMG! OMG! OMG!

Those dirty MF'ers!

USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! Remember 9-1-1! USA!

People are sheep.

https://youtu.be/MEhSk71gUCQ

Blogger TontoBubbaGoldstein September 06, 2016 7:05 PM  

5343 wrote:I did give up Home Depot wetbacks, or I could challenge him for the position.

Steve, you will always be the gayest thing here. No contest.



Soccer posts coming in at #2. Glocks... Umbrella drinks...

Not sure Josh even makes the top 5.

Blogger GFR September 06, 2016 7:42 PM  

@85

"This year: hardly any Hillary bumper stickers. Question: Will the Left sit out the election this year?"
.
I work in the North Bay and I have seen that too. In fact I would say that the number of OLD "Obama" bumper stickers exceeds the number of NEW "Hillary" bumper stickers by a factor of ten.
.
Interestingly enough I have seen a few hillary stickers on the back of shipping containers being carried by 18-wheelers. It's almost like somebody WANTED to show support for hillary but they weren't willing to risk somebody seeing it on their car.
.
Still see a shitload of "Bernie" stickers everywhere, and quite a few "Trump" stickers on the back of pickup trucks up towards Vacaville..

Anonymous Gen. Kong September 06, 2016 7:46 PM  

Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus wrote:As Reed noted, the Banana Empire's legion cannot even defeat goat-men with AKs in the poppyfields of Pashtoonistan. It's amazing how many folks even here think it's still 1985.

Don't be an idiot. The problems with fighting the "goatmen" is conceptual, not material. the failure lies in the American "leadership's" inability to understand 4GW, or even to have a decent perspective on 3GW.

That would not be an issue in an actual fight with the Russians. Russians who, we might note, similarly couldn't handle the "goatmen," and that was back when their military were fully funded and triple the size they are now. The Western allies still have better equipment, and the large part of their rank-and-file is still non-cucked, despite the naysaying by morons such as yourself.

The reason we don't want to fight the Russians has nothing to do with the sort of dick-measuring contest you seem to want to engage in. It has everything to do with the fact that it woulds be mutually destructive, counter-productive, unnecessary, and would divert both of our resources away from dealing with the radical Islamic threat to our civilisation.


While your point about 4GW is correct, as is the one about the Soviet failure to conquer a place known as the graveyard of empires, the naked assertion that the majority of the military is non-cucked is disproved by its continuing support and obedience to treasonous genocidal regimes. They are nothing more than badly paid mercenaries for a lawless criminal oligarchy. They'll obey any orders issued from it as well.

As for the laughable militaries of the EUSSR, what percentile of the ranks if made up of wymyn, kebabs, dindus and SJWs? 80%? 90%? As for the threat to western civilization posed by Islam, the threat has been fostered and grown by these same treasonous and genocidal rulers of the west, every single one whom should have been overthrown by military coup decades ago and sent to the wall to face instant justice from the barrels of guns for their crimes. The ruling elites of the west and their allies are a far greater and deadlier threat to western civilization's survival than all of the Ummah combined. The fact that the militaries of the west meekly submit to the rule of such criminals demonstrates that they themselves are either cucks, careerists who care only about their 30-pieces of promised pension, traitors, or the worthless dindus, kebabs, and other aliens who are there for the gibs and should never have been allowed in the ranks to start with. Who's the moron again?

Anonymous BGKB September 06, 2016 7:51 PM  

If anyone tells you groids are in fear of cops show them this video
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/kass/ct-chicago-violence-kass-0831-20160830-column.html

Blogger GFR September 06, 2016 8:01 PM  

Does hillary want to start a war with the russians?
.
Bill started a war with the Serbs to keep the Monica scandal off the front-page, and the Serbs were Russian clients, so I suppose it's possible.
.
I think it really comes down to who would pay her to do so.
.
Putin seems to have the Russian (((Oligarchs))) under control, but it may be that they would pay for a war with the US if that lead to Putins downfall and their rise.
.
The only other candidate is China...

Blogger Lazarus September 06, 2016 9:56 PM  

dc.sunsets wrote:The "all volunteer" military was the only way to implement the bombs&bullets side of the No-Limit-Charge-Card CONgress wielded these past 35 years. The public would have crushed any attempt to be so adventurous with their conscripted kids.

Ain't that the truth. Vietnam lesson learned. Keep the unemployed numbers up and the patriotic BS on high and away you go.

Reminds me of the day the draft was ended. I was at a basketball playoff game in Corvallis, Oregon. Travelling through the States with a draft dodger with a fake Canadian I.D.

Heady times.

Long gone.

Blogger residentMoron September 06, 2016 10:17 PM  

Historically, the USA goes to war against helpless foes, the weaker the better.

WW1 & 2 look like exceptions but really weren't. Germany was already over-extended and the USA interest was in preventing Soviet conquest of Nazi Europe. The word "vulture" rises to conscious view. Kind of looks a bit like a bald eagle with a bad mood. If you squint.

The Japanese were goaded into war with the US by FDR because he knew they were also over-extended in China, the Pacific, and totally vulnerable to interdiction of their oil supplies.

Yes, they were riskier plays than usual, but not the existential crises they're made out to be by the hollywood history division.

The USA will foment civil war in Russia long before it ever goes to open war with her.

Naturally, that is no less dangerous but looks like it to people who've been paid handsomely for using the same tactics for decades.

And none of us should ever forget that the unthinkable looks impossible right up until the day it happens, cf. Soviet Union, fall of.

Blogger Were-Puppy September 06, 2016 10:47 PM  

@82 Marc DuQuesne

Her incompetent interventionism is the most likely to stumble into a hot war with Russia. Whether in Syria or elsewhere in Russia's sphere of influence she will virtue signal her way into open warfare. She's also publicly declared her support of responding to suspected Russian hackers militarily. In her disease clouded mind it's perfectly rational to consider a database hack a casus belli.

"Russia even hacked into the Democratic National Committee, maybe even some state election systems. So, we’ve got to step up our game. Make sure we are well defended and able to take the fight to those who go after us.

As President, I will make it clear, that the United States will treat cyber attacks just like any other attack. We will be ready with serious political, economic and military responses."
---

A link to back up your statements -
http://www.infowars.com/hillary-threatens-war-with-russia/

Blogger Were-Puppy September 06, 2016 10:49 PM  

@85 Hillary Clinton's Balls
Cough, cough, cough, Putin hacked my unsecure server right when Donald Trump started to run for President cough-cough-cough it's a conspiracy!

COUGH!
---

You don't say!

Blogger rumpole5 September 06, 2016 11:18 PM  

Hey, I'm retired after 30 years as a criminal prosecutor. I don't take ANYTHING seriously. The possible cognitive dissonance of my Trump sticker on the back of the SJWs' favorite car model is delightful. Although a chosen, I may just add a rainbow sticker for a little extra jolt!

Blogger Elder Son September 07, 2016 1:16 AM  

the USA interest was in preventing Soviet conquest of Nazi Europe.

Guess who gave E. Europe to Stalin.

And for the same reason Patton was sacked.

Political reasons mind you.

Blogger residentMoron September 07, 2016 4:12 AM  

Deals were done, but I doubt any of them trusted each other to keep them. Would you?

Blogger Tim September 07, 2016 8:41 AM  

I often disagree with Fred, but he is always worth reading.

Anonymous Rezny September 07, 2016 11:29 AM  

@20
Imagine you are invited to a personal duel to the death with me an anonymous Russkie on some large enough open field near Moscow. Bare handed until the victor blows other one's brains out. And I mean you personally, not some contract merc of US military.
Are you manly enough to die for the old hag and Soros? You personally, not the soldiers of America and her citizens paying the war bill?

The problem of politicians for the last 110 years or so was instigating wars they never risked injury or death in.
At least 300 years ago both Charles XII and Peter I personally fought on the very field with their very troops.
Charles is well known as is, and Peter didn't mind to personally lead Russian boarding parties to Swedish battleships, with axe and grenade in hands, not bomber drone remote.

I dare you to imagine the old hag on the battlefield, or at least her supposed husband.
At least imagine her breathing in the radioactive dust you and your city may very well turn into.
And I mean risking her very life to bullets and rockets, not drinking marshmellow coffee in some bunker with reinforced concrete walls thicker than an average American.


Even though Russia may be the apex military of the world, I don't support any Russian military action except when an existential threat to us is evident, and even then to keep everything under control.
I'm honest enough to apply "am I willing to die horribly on the battlefield for my personal interests?" method to my attitudes to other countries and policies applied to them.

Manlets crying for blood from their momma basement's safety presumably don't apply said method, hence don't have any right to call anyone a coward.

Blogger Robert What? September 07, 2016 2:15 PM  

Another good reason to vote for Trump: all the Leftie celebrities who promise to leave the country if Trump is elected. Although they'll probably welch.

Blogger Daniel September 07, 2016 9:52 PM  

Lots of so called celebrities said the same thing if mauricio macri won here in Argentina. No one left, not a single one. Suckers

Anonymous Avalanche September 07, 2016 10:23 PM  

@16 "George Soros ..., you name it you find his slimy Nazi fingerprints all over it."

You insult the Nazis!

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts