ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2017 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

Step 2: Eau de Poopy

The marketing possibilities are endless! Also, newsflash! People lie to survey-takers about politically correct issues:
A 2012 study by the Pew Research Center found that interracial marriages in the U.S. had doubled between 1980 and 2010 to about 15 percent, and just 11 percent of respondents disapproved of interracial marriage.

But new research from the University of Washington suggests that reported acceptance of interracial marriage masks deeper feelings of discomfort—even disgust—that some feel about mixed-race couples. Published online in July in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology and co-authored by UW postdoctoral researcher Caitlin Hudac, the study found that bias against interracial couples is associated with disgust that in turn leads interracial couples to be dehumanized.

Lead author Allison Skinner, a UW postdoctoral researcher, said she undertook the study after noting a lack of in-depth research on bias toward interracial couples.

"I felt like the polls weren't telling the whole story," said Skinner, a researcher in the UW's Institute for Learning & Brain Sciences.

The research involved three experiments. In the first, 152 college students were asked a series of questions about relationships, including how disgusted they felt about various configurations of interracial relationships and about their own willingness to have an interracial romance. The participants overall showed high levels of acceptance and low levels of disgust about interracial relationships, and pointed to a strong negative correlation between the two.

In the second experiment, the researchers showed 19 undergraduate students wedding and engagement photos of 200 interracial and same-race couples while recording their neural activity. The researchers asked the students to quickly indicate whether each couple should be included in a future study on relationships, a task that was intended to ensure participants were socially evaluating the couples while their neural activity was recorded.

Participants responded faster to images of same-race couples and selected them more often for inclusion in the study. More significantly, Skinner said, participants showed higher levels of activation in the insula—an area of the brain routinely implicated in the perception and experience of disgust—while viewing images of interracial couples.

"That indicates that viewing images of interracial couples evokes disgust at a neural level," Skinner said.

As with all neuroscience studies, Skinner said, it is impossible to be certain whether the insula activation reflected a disgust response, since the insula is sometimes responsive to other emotions. But in combination with the other experiments, the authors believe it is evidence of a neural disgust response.
This part cracked me up: "Some people are still not comfortable with interracial relationships, or at least they're a lot less comfortable than they would appear to be," she said. "Acknowledging these biases is the first step to figuring out why people feel that way and determining what can be done so they won't."

What's the point of attempting to neutralize the natural human disgust response? Why, it's obvious!

Step 1: Fix the instinctive human reaction to interracial couples by artificially suppressing the disgust instinct.

Step 2: Launch Eau de Poopy perfume.

Step 3: Profit!

Labels: ,

68 Comments:

Anonymous veryfunnyminion July 18, 2017 3:07 PM  

See, it's not enough to observe a reality, that disgust with interracial relationships appears hared-wired, and try and figure out why that might be. The real point of science is to figure out how to turn reality into what it's supposed to be, because feelz.

Wonder what else they're putting in the water supplies in Western countries besides fluoride and estrogen, especially in Germany and Sweden.

Anonymous veryfunnyminion July 18, 2017 3:07 PM  

aargh, hard-wired disgust

Anonymous Damn Crackers July 18, 2017 3:11 PM  

Crackers' Law: All progressive cultural, legalistic, and political change is designed to normalize pedophilia.

Blogger Worlds Edge July 18, 2017 3:12 PM  

I wonder how many black women were in that sample? Some of the stuff I've seen on Twitter in the past year or so vis a vis black women hating on white women has been simply amazing.

Anonymous I'm Not a Fascist. But My Sons Are. July 18, 2017 3:21 PM  

Acknowledging these biases is the first step to figuring out why people feel that way and determining what can be done so they won't.

Bias about bias while being biased about biasing the bias.

Wat.

Blogger Dexter July 18, 2017 3:23 PM  

Here is some of her other important work! Apparently you can teach your baby to be rayciss without saying a single word.

Children can ‘catch’ social bias through nonverbal signals expressed by adults

Most conscientious adults tend to avoid making biased or discriminatory comments in the presence of children. But new research from the University of Washington suggests that preschool-aged children can learn bias even through nonverbal signals displayed by adults, such as a condescending tone of voice or a disapproving look.

Blogger tz July 18, 2017 3:23 PM  

I wonder at the Virtue Signalling ads that feature interracial couples.
While I'm not revolted, it gives me pause as the difficulties are well known even among culturally identical people.
Even Clarence Thomas and his wife.

Anonymous AB.Prosper July 18, 2017 3:26 PM  

Considering interracial marriage also means White/Asian which has often been tolerated Hispanic/Black and other mixes and the Demography is vastly different , this doesn't show as much change as the miscegenation lobby wants people think.

Blogger beerme July 18, 2017 3:26 PM  

Healthy people feel disgust, freaks don't. Freaks aren't as common as they appear on the TV. The only way to get rid of that disgust is to turn healthy people into freaks, which seems to be the #1 goal of mass media and pop culture.

Anonymous Looking Glass July 18, 2017 3:30 PM  

2012 was the year that public polling broke completely. The only people that still respond, in mass, to surveys are white, college-educated middle & upper class. Everyone else has pretty much stopped responding and/or gone to straight up lying. This is part of the reason it looked like Romney should win. (Historic cycle nature said so as well.) Obama would have won 2012 without voter fraud, but it should have been closer.

Now it's really clear that not only do the polling companies outright lie, but the people taking surveys are as well. The Age of Polling is over. All data built on it is now fraudulent.

Anonymous andon July 18, 2017 3:35 PM  

"Acknowledging these biases is the first step to figuring out why people feel that way and determining what can be done so they won't."

or maybe instead of "fixing" people, you just mind your own damn business

Anonymous Orville July 18, 2017 3:37 PM  

We need an affirmative action drug (Normatrol) to target the insula. Problem solved.

Blogger Theproductofafineeduction July 18, 2017 3:40 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger dc.sunsets July 18, 2017 3:42 PM  

The joy of modern times is the plethora of means for people to declare themselves unfit for marriage, unfit for friendship, unfit to be hired for a job, unfit to be tolerated....frankly, unfit to pee on even if they were on fire.

Gaudy, meaningless tattoos. Weird piercings. Che T-shirts. Mauve hair. Obese. Savage kids. Drugs/Porn/FB addictions. Whites aping black "culture." (My fav: wearing the baggy pants of prison convicts willing to do anal.) Can't get their faces unglued from their phone (which was smarter than are they at least three updates ago.) SJW cause-of-the-week. Hoplophobe. Utterly divorced from the implications of open borders and African population explosions.

In the past it required considerable dialogue before you could see the content of a person's soul. Now they paste the "L" right on their forehead.

Blogger Theproductofafineeduction July 18, 2017 3:43 PM  

There is, I suspect, a difference depending on the type of interracial marriage, but then it doesn't matter; you can't change something instinctual, period.

Now, as someone who is in an interracial marriage, I could care less how someone who is not family feels. But then I guess that is the difference between r/k selection.

Blogger dc.sunsets July 18, 2017 3:44 PM  

@10 Polls were always meaningless.

Actions (alone) are revealed preference. This is why the Left hates secret ballots.

Blogger dc.sunsets July 18, 2017 3:50 PM  

Theproductofafineeduction wrote:There is, I suspect, a difference depending on the type of interracial marriage, but then it doesn't matter; you can't change something instinctual, period.

Now, as someone who is in an interracial marriage, I could care less how someone who is not family feels. But then I guess that is the difference between r/k selection.


Comfort in being a hybrid is directly related to social mood. Today's is maniacally high. If the socionomic hypothesis is right, both mood and the comfort of being visibly between two camps will decline hand-in-hand.

In times of tumult, existing between two camps is referred to as being in No Man's Land.

We live in a time when actions are sold on the basis of all the features & benefits, while the potential costs and risks are downplayed if not entirely omitted. I find it sad that so many people make so many decisions in the absence of a firm grasp of the costs.

I feel sorriest for the children born "between." Life is complicated enough without adding such special sauce.

Anonymous VFM #7916 July 18, 2017 3:55 PM  

@1 Paxilon Hydrochlorate

Anonymous Shut up rabbit July 18, 2017 4:01 PM  

interracial marriage - lol.

Most interracial "activity" is black men w. dyscivic white women. As was pointed out on this blog some time ago; statistically, the dyscivic woman has as much chance of being murdered by her beau as having a successful marriage with him...

"What we need is a great big melting pot...

Anonymous VFM #7916 July 18, 2017 4:06 PM  

@19

As I recall the probability of spousal support for the example you present is 2%, indicating that the probability of a successful marriage is lower than that. The fatality chance is higher, I think.

Anonymous Grayman July 18, 2017 4:09 PM  

@12 Orville

It's called Prozac..... the right dose and you can watch your daughter get gangbanged by a bunch of vibrant immigrants without the least bit of disgust.
Xanax and Haldol are close runners up

Blogger bosscauser July 18, 2017 4:14 PM  

White people are guilty...end of story!

Gab.ai/GaryCauser

Anonymous SnowKang July 18, 2017 4:15 PM  

As a long-time parent of 5 kids of my own, I've noticed women (White, Hispanic, Asian, etc) who have kids with black males, seem to understand unconsciously that their children are low IQ, prone to obnoxious behavior, criminality, novelty, present-time orientation etc etc. Just noticed this from the playground, to parents' school meetings, to (yes even) sports, to academic stuff..this sense of resignation...

You can see it in their eyes and the fatigue of their bodily and facial expressions. They seem to "get" that they made a bad choice and are ALWAYS going to be playing catch up to the White/Asian or purely Mestizo kids--even in the area of sports, when it comes to listening to directions and coaches. I've noticed this over nearly 20 years of parenting. It's very real, and you can tell they had no idea this was going to be the end result. Black kids are just uniformly bad kids and very difficult to parent in American culture--even with political correctness run amok. I think these women "get" that everyone is tip-toeing around the issues, editing their own comments, rewording things..."Jamal is just getting MORE confident with building lego towers" (while other kids are building all sorts of things). "Jamal is learning how to work with others on a team". These women, particularly white women, KNOW their kids are WAY BEHIND, but can do nothing about it. Other parents tend to politely shun them too. I've noticed this "disgust", with black kids generally, is MUCH HIGHER with non-whites-like Asians and Latinos.

Blogger Elocutioner July 18, 2017 4:19 PM  

Seems the ADL came out with a new list of badthinkerz. Congrats, Vox!

https://archive.is/PXDfj

Anonymous Grayman July 18, 2017 4:24 PM  

@22
White people are guilty...end of story!

Ok. So we might as well role with it and fire up the ovens and the woodchippers. If we are already guilty I guess we dont have to feel bad about it either.

If only the left could pay attention for 30 seconds and see that the line of thought above is where constant condemnation leads to.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash July 18, 2017 4:26 PM  

Theodore Beale aka Vox Day is a champion of the alt right movement who claims to have popularized the term “cuckservative.” A science fiction writer, video game designer and blogger, Beale is best known in alt right circles for his online blog “Vox Popoli” (Voice of the People) where he posts misogynistic, white supremacist diatribes. Beale’s white supremacist beliefs are on full display in one of his primary talking points: “The Alt Right believes we must secure the existence of white people and a future for white children.” This is an unabashed homage to the white supremacist “14 words” mantra.
But of course, no link to the 16 points, no discussion, fingerpoint and badfeels.

Blogger McChuck July 18, 2017 4:27 PM  

I am shocked, shocked I say! To find that college students polled by their peers on liberal campuses would not admit to their inherent disgust at seeing a beautiful white woman with a barely-human primate. They should be celebrating the diminution of the gene pool. They obviously affirm her decision to be beaten and left pregnant and alone. They would never, ever lie or conceal their true feelings to their fellows on campus, much less to professors who control their grades and Title IX witch hunts.

Anonymous AB.Prosper July 18, 2017 4:29 PM  

VFM #7916 wrote:@1 Paxilon Hydrochlorate

Shiny.

Anonymous Grayman July 18, 2017 4:30 PM  

@23. SnowKang

Wait until things get sporty and lead flies. The those mixed breed kids becoome a potentially lethal liability. The blacks wont take mom and the kid and they will generally be shunned by the whites. Even if they are initially allowed in group with whites, once the kid becomes too disruptive or too much of a burden sentiment will change quickly, and probably amongst the mothers first.

It is a beautiful thing when it is difficult to find your daughter because most of the girls in the group, on the playground, are blue eyed, blonde little girls with pony tails.

Blogger Nate73 July 18, 2017 4:33 PM  

So in essence once rabbit scientists figure out genetic engineering then we're all doomed?

Blogger Robert Divinity July 18, 2017 4:37 PM  

I wonder how many black women were in that sample? Some of the stuff I've seen on Twitter in the past year or so vis a vis black women hating on white women has been simply amazing.

It doesn't matter 'cause...black women.

The research is intended to promote miscegenation and eventual elimination of whites. Any others are of no concern unless it makes the rate of mixed marriage higher.

Anonymous BBGKB July 18, 2017 4:40 PM  

@10 Polls were always meaningless. Actions (alone) are revealed preference. This is why the Left hates secret ballots

Only the ballots they can't stuff.

Blogger tublecane July 18, 2017 5:30 PM  

"that in turn leads interracial couples to be dehumanized"

Pffft. Mad demotism must be warping this study's perspective, because treating people differently, worse even, isn't to strip them of their humanity. Hey, did you know as a society we actually lock people in cages when they're found guilty of committing crimes? Like animals! Except not like animals, because we still know they're human.

We even knew slaves were human, which is why we tried to save their souls. So don't tell me interracial couples getting guff is dehumanizing.

Blogger tublecane July 18, 2017 5:37 PM  

@4-Black women "hate on" white women for stealing their men, but black women would be more than happy to jump races themselves. No one will let them, because they're at the bottom of the racio-sexual hierarchy. Black men aren't much desired, either, but at least they have the tall, dark stranger angle.

Lesser whites and others would be willing to go with choice black female stock, if they could find them. The races are fairly segregated, and outside of college and such there aren't many opportunities. No obstacle for black men, who, being men, will stalk their prey for as long and far as it takes.

Anonymous Jeff July 18, 2017 5:45 PM  

I wonder how many black women were in that sample? Some of the stuff I've seen on Twitter in the past year or so vis a vis black women hating on white women has been simply amazing.

Black women's hate for white women is somewhat understandable. Every race of man loves white women, including black men.

Blogger tublecane July 18, 2017 5:59 PM  

@7-I too am confused by the number of interracial couples in ads, most of which are black. But there's a clue right there, because blacks are way overrepresented in advertising generally. I tend to think that's because, as with everything else but basketball, blacks lag behind other races in avoiding ads. Also because blacks watch more commercial television.

Someone once explained to me that blacks won't be interested in anything unless black people are doing it. Either they physically see black people in ad, or the message is lost on them. Whites, on the other hand, are probably easiest to get to if they can identify with the people in the ad, but it's not absolutely necessary that the people look exactly like them. There's more wiggle room.

That would explain it, though Madison Avenue could just be shoving interracial sex down our throats.

Blogger Phelps July 18, 2017 6:06 PM  

veryfunnyminion wrote:See, it's not enough to observe a reality, that disgust with interracial relationships appears hared-wired, and try and figure out why that might be.

It's not even that -- disgust itself is hardwired. It is our outward reaction to it that is learned. You can learn to control disgust, but it never goes away. You get accustomed to picking up your dog's shit in a plastic bag, but that disgust reaction in your brain never goes away.

And if you are liberal, you are less likely to have it at all.

Blogger Benjamin Kraft July 18, 2017 6:21 PM  

Just another step in thought policing/mind control by your hostile global overfaggots.

Blogger pnq8787 July 18, 2017 6:42 PM  

I hate to counter-signal this but the statement that rates of interracial marriage/breeding is going up is very believable, at least from the perspective at my spot in the Empire.

Anonymous c matt July 18, 2017 6:56 PM  

participants showed higher levels of activation in the insula—an area of the brain routinely implicated in the perception and experience of disgust

Maybe the said couples were just ugly? Did they control for that?

OpenID markstoval July 18, 2017 7:02 PM  

Good thread. Many fine observations.

The one thing that I don't get is why white people are accused of "White Supremacy" when they want to be with other white people. Why is freedom of association called "Supremacy"?

Anonymous VFM #6306 July 18, 2017 7:05 PM  

Why would they? Thay would only further prove that interracial couples are more likely to be ugly.

Anonymous andon July 18, 2017 7:19 PM  

....get" that they made a bad choice and are ALWAYS going to be playing catch up to the White/Asian or purely Mestizo kids

whats a pure mestizo?

Blogger Daniel July 18, 2017 7:34 PM  

Fake. I have seen that most of young black men are smarter, maturer, fitter and more self confident that their white counterparts in all tv shows. Shame on you sir

Anonymous Pennywise July 18, 2017 7:38 PM  

SnowKang...

As a parent with several children of my own, I've seen women who also had kids with black men, and it is clear there is not this unconscious thinking that they ultimately made erred in judgement. If anything, there is love and affection for their kids, and not this "doom and gloom" in how they made what you describe to be a "poor choice". And whether it be on the playground or at school, white parents generally do not shun or have "disgust" as the non-white parents or kids.

In the end, it comes down to freedom of association--whites making their personal decisions who they will marry and have children.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash July 18, 2017 8:00 PM  

markstoval wrote:Why is freedom of association called "Supremacy"?
Because saying Supremacy used to make Whites feel bad and stop doing what you don't want them to do.

Anonymous SnowKang July 18, 2017 8:20 PM  

Pennywise, not so, especially when the white women were semi--upper class, and in areas of white achievement and intact families...particularly since most black males LEAVE white women (and fail to provide for them: see this for example: http://www.clutchmagonline.com/2015/10/study-claims-92-of-biracial-children-with-black-dads-are-born-out-of-wedlock/), a black woman did a similar study that Stefan Molyneaux quotes.

You must not live in an upper class area, it's embarrassing to see how "over dramatized" the white women are "my son too, my son too!", at the pool, chess club, band, even soccer. Other families avoid them, perhaps (if there is any validity to your belief it's not race) because MOST families who are "intact" don't want their kids around children (esp boys) of single moms...which most women who have half-black kids create--kinda like the last president (i.e. "your president").

You can believe whatever alternate world you want, but if you don't believe the latter part (parents avoid having their kids hang with children of single moms) then you either are not a parent, or you completely clueless to social customs.

Most children of black males will NEVER receive support,and their mother will raise them alone, use public assistance, have problem children, and spend their lives playing catch up.

Anonymous SnowKang July 18, 2017 8:28 PM  

I should also add that while many single moms, particularly those with only one child, will remarry (or marry for the first time) and even have more children, women who have black biracial children are COMPLETELY shunned by white and hispanic men (I am White/Hispanic myself). It's worse of course, in the Asian community. That may account for why you so often see white grandparents pushing around "halfricans" at the store.

Generalizations and stereotypes exist for a reason. If they are wrong, or due to a temporary condition of society, those stereotypes vanish (like white boxers/fighters), otherwise, they tend to track closely with the source I provided.



Blogger Bob Ramar July 18, 2017 8:28 PM  

Did the redhead that was Sydney Poitier's love interest in 'Guess Who's Coming to Dinner' ever work in film again?

Blogger Snidely Whiplash July 18, 2017 8:38 PM  

Katharine Houghton was Katherine Hepburn's niece, the only reason she got the role.
She's kind-of known in live theatre circles, has written a couple of plays and appeared on Broadway a few times.
She's also done a few TV shows and rubber-suit monster movies, but to answer your question; no, not really.

Anonymous SnowKang July 18, 2017 8:57 PM  

True enough. I also think it's interesting to note that 50 years after Loving vs. VA, and despite now TWO, if not THREE solid decades of miscegenation signaling, there actually still seem to be SO FEW black male/white female couplings, and even fewer black female/white male couplings, although the latter seems to be growing.

What's interesting is how biracial black kids are shunned by the black community as well (watch some Tommy Sotomayor, he discusses this). In the Latino/Hispanic community, of which I am somewhat on the fringes of, yet part of, ANY Latina, unless she is identifiably mixed with black herself (PR, DR, etc) is immediately cast out of the family and community--which may account for why it seems so rare to see. I knew of gal who's daughter (very black looking) could not get anyone to come to her Quinceañera.

Blogger VD July 18, 2017 9:04 PM  

And whether it be on the playground or at school, white parents generally do not shun or have "disgust" as the non-white parents or kids.

You're lying. The mudsharks almost always have to hang out with the black parents. And most of the time, they're alone, without the father.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash July 18, 2017 9:08 PM  

SnowKang wrote:and even fewer black female/white male couplings, although the latter seems to be growing.
It's growing because Omegas and low Gammas have discovered that some Black women are desperate for a husband and Black women generally have a very high sex drive, driven by their testosterone levels. For a guy who has trouble getting a girl in the sack, that can be a very powerful combination, certainly better than becoming whatever Alexandra Erin is. It also has the advantage of sometimes helping them go from Gamma to Delta. I've seen this happen personally.

Blogger Thucydides July 18, 2017 9:09 PM  

This isn't entirely hard wired into us, our distant ancestors, after all, were the original party animals, interbreeding with Neanderthals and Denisovans and possibly other hominid species.

Being flexible enough to go outside the local gene pool probably has enough advantages (like avoiding inbreeding) that there will always be a small percentage of people inclined to do so regardless. Even laws against Miscegenation in the old South were not enough to stop the practice.

However, the social costs are still pretty steep, something which is much harder to deal with.

Anonymous Mr. Rational July 18, 2017 9:09 PM  

dc.sunsets wrote:Can't get their faces unglued from their phone (which was smarter than are they at least three updates ago.)
Know why people love smartphones?

Opposites attract.

Anonymous Jack Amok July 18, 2017 10:12 PM  

So in essence once rabbit scientists figure out genetic engineering then we're all doomed?

We're safe. Rabbit scientists don't do genetic engineering. They do "studies" where they show people pictures and make up stories about what they imagine those people thought.

Blogger DonReynolds July 18, 2017 10:25 PM  

AB.Prosper wrote:Considering interracial marriage also means White/Asian which has often been tolerated Hispanic/Black and other mixes and the Demography is vastly different , this doesn't show as much change as the miscegenation lobby wants people think.

Completely agree. This sort of bait-and-switch nonsense has been going around for a long time. White and black are races, but they are not the only races that fit the definition of "interracial". Another important aspect is the genders attached to the races. White female/black male is entirely different from white male/asian female. Hispanic male/white female is entirely different from white male/black female. But researchers with an axe to grind, who are looking for a specific ideological outcome want to aggregate all interracial marriages into means, while ignoring what may be important facts. That is the sign of a bad researcher. A good researcher follows the important facts wherever they lead, regardless of their own personal agenda. These people are bad researchers.

I am always suspicious when "science" people want to dabble in politics. They are never any good at it.

Blogger HardReturn¶ July 18, 2017 10:45 PM  

When Vox linked to data (from CDC I think) a while back showing that 90%+ of mulattoes of the black father/white mother variety don't have intact family during childhood, it essentially means the probabilities are stacked against such kids. Somebody here back then commented that it means either father or mother or both never really had any honest intention to stick together. If he wanted pump-and-dump and she wanted dump-and-run the common denominator is the inevitable dump. People coming from very different cultures can have great difficulties with a lifetime's romance, if that's what they really wanted anyway.
And polls are useless, because either they can't get a truly representative sample or enough people have caught on and just regurgitate Official Narrative or poison the well with disinformation. It's like a Gresham's Law of Propaganda: the feigned sincerity of propaganda displaces real sincerity. And before too long, a still tongue makes a happy life.
Glad to be back after a long absence. Glory to VFM and Dread Ilk!

Blogger DonReynolds July 18, 2017 10:59 PM  

Jeff wrote:I wonder how many black women were in that sample? Some of the stuff I've seen on Twitter in the past year or so vis a vis black women hating on white women has been simply amazing.

Black women's hate for white women is somewhat understandable. Every race of man loves white women, including black men.



It is more than that, Jeff.
Back in the late 1980s, I taught sociology courses at a small private college. At the time, it was clear in the sociology literature that Negro women were the LEAST likely to engage in an interracial relationship.

Next in line, for LEAST likely was white men. However, a certain subset of white men have been known to cross the color line due to military service....Korea, Vietnam, and assignment to Asian-Pacific outposts have led to fairly significant numbers of white male/asian female marriages. (The effect of long term and repeated assignments in the Middle East in recent years probably had less of an impact.) But this willingness shown for white males to take asian brides has not shown to extend to Negro women, which are still relatively rare.

The point being, it is not just the low ranking of Negro females that makes interracial marriage unlikely, they simply do not want an interracial relationship for themselves. As you noted, they do not approve of Negro men leaving the tribe either.

It should be worth mentioning, the extreme imbalance in males and females in the Negro population. A large proportion of the male population is either incarcerated, on probation, or dies at an early age, meaning the imbalance in male to female ratios is pretty extreme. We have not seen anything similar in this country since the asian migrations up to a century ago.... which were nearly all males and very few females. The same imbalance we see today in the Hispanic and Muslim migrations....nearly all young men and very few females.

Blogger Lazarus July 18, 2017 11:04 PM  

Jack Amok wrote:They do "studies" where they show people pictures and make up stories about what they imagine those people thought.

And call it some kind of Geography, to make it sound like they are not just masturbating.

Anonymous Jack Amok July 18, 2017 11:58 PM  

And call it some kind of Geography, to make it sound like they are not just masturbating.

Mary Jo Kopechne would've been an awesome geographer.

Blogger Nate73 July 19, 2017 2:20 AM  

@56 I hope you're right, so that the nightmare scenario in the title of this post never comes to pass.

Anonymous SciVo de Plorable July 19, 2017 3:01 AM  

You did all see this, right?

Somali Asylum Seeker Accused of Raping Helpless Pensioners and Killing An Elderly Woman

Because of course that's what an ethnic German would do if he got drunk, is rape two old paralyzed men and kill an old woman that might stop him.

So that's what Merkel's subjects have to look forward to in their old age, when guys like that are employed there.

Anonymous SciVo de Plorable July 19, 2017 3:15 AM  

HardReturn¶ wrote:When Vox linked to data (from CDC I think) a while back showing that 90%+ of mulattoes of the black father/white mother variety don't have intact family during childhood, it essentially means the probabilities are stacked against such kids. Somebody here back then commented that it means either father or mother or both never really had any honest intention to stick together. If he wanted pump-and-dump and she wanted dump-and-run the common denominator is the inevitable dump. People coming from very different cultures can have great difficulties with a lifetime's romance, if that's what they really wanted anyway.

What is wrong with you? Over 90% of unmarried black men just don't support their half-white kids because meh. Stuff the false equivalence, mudsharks are stupid and immoral and preemptively depriving their future kids.

Anonymous SciVo de Plorable July 19, 2017 3:21 AM  

That is "[black men not married to white women that they have kids with]." Just clarifying.

Blogger Duke Norfolk July 19, 2017 8:30 AM  

"Acknowledging these biases is the first step to figuring out why people feel that way and determining what can be done so they won't."

Re-education camps forthcoming, if these people have any say in it. Oh they have plans, such plans!

Anonymous Pennywise July 19, 2017 10:54 AM  

"Pennywise, not so, especially when the white women were semi--upper class, and in areas of white achievement and intact families"

Not necessarily. That is YOUR individual experience.

"...particularly since most black males LEAVE white women (and fail to provide for them: see this for example: http://www.clutchmagonline.com/2015/10/study-claims-92-of-biracial-children-with-black-dads-are-born-out-of-wedlock/), a black woman did a similar study that Stefan Molyneaux quotes."

As it turns out, when reading the paper, the vast majority of the subjects came from the Internet which leaves out a portion of the population. Not only that, there are other parts of the sample selection that also restrict the reliableness of generalization. The sample population also had low income. Without control data, how do we know the conclusions were not because of income, not ethnicity?

"You must not live in an upper class area, it's embarrassing to see how "over dramatized" the white women are "my son too, my son too!", at the pool, chess club, band, even soccer."

I live in an upper class neighborhood that is quite mixed up. From my experience, there is no "avoiding".

"Other families avoid them, perhaps (if there is any validity to your belief it's not race) because MOST families who are "intact" don't want their kids around children (esp boys) of single moms...which most women who have half-black kids create--kinda like the last president (i.e. "your president")."

That would the 1970's you are talking about, not really today.

"You can believe whatever alternate world you want, but if you don't believe the latter part (parents avoid having their kids hang with children of single moms) then you either are not a parent, or you completely clueless to social customs."

Some parents, absolutely. But it's not as widespread as you think.

"I should also add that while many single moms, particularly those with only one child, will remarry (or marry for the first time) and even have more children, women who have black biracial children are COMPLETELY shunned by white and hispanic men (I am White/Hispanic myself)."

Certainly in some cases.

Anonymous Bb July 19, 2017 6:16 PM  

What's the point of attempting to neutralize the natural human disgust response?

So poopy diapers can get changed

So autopsies can be performed

So difficult human (cow, horse,...) live births can be helped along

So brilliant persons with unattractive faces can be interviewed & employed in furtherance of an organization's core mission

So nations of the world don't (often) resort to nuclear attacks in order to resolve disputes relating to access to fishing grounds, trade routes, electromagnetic bandwidth, satellite positions...

So about 100 billion commercial and social interactions that occur every day can take place without undue friction, or with good cheer

--

Let's now ask: What's the point of asking the above question?

So 130+ IQ bloggers with messianic pretensions can weaponize 95 IQ anxiety-ridden malcontents to be mass murdering stormtroopers

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts