ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2018 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Tuesday, May 29, 2018

Vote Right, Vote White

Heartiste and John Derbyshire sum up US politics in 2018:
Personally, I don’t relish a society structured solely around identity politics. It’s gauche, claustrophobic, miserably stressful, and a mockery of the transcendent. But damned if I’m gonna idly sit by as every other group looks out for themselves at my group’s expense. That’s a suicide pact. But the only way out of this inevitability is to restore Whites to demographic primacy in their homelands, from which perch Whites can safely and confidently eschew identity politics without risk of parasitic infection. My idea of a great country to live in: One that’s so explicitly homogeneous that these implicit identity conundrums never need addressing.
- Heartiste

While the Democratic Party is committed to anti-white positions, that swelling number of anti-anti-white whites is electoral gold for the Republican Party. Whether the Republican Party—also commonly known, let me remind you, as the Stupid Party—has enough sense and skill to mine that gold, is an open question. There are some hopeful signs from the White House, although that is of course not the same thing as the Republican Party.
- John Derbyshire
The civic nationalists, the neocons, the neoliberals, and the self-professed colorblind are all totally irrelevant now. Some of them don't quite realize it yet, although even the most stubborn civic nationalists can clearly sense the ground shifting under their feet given their increasingly desperate rhetoric.

This isn't Italy, where a new party can explode onto the scene and into government in two election cycles. The US has a strict two-party system, and one party is the Diversity Party which is resolutely and relentlessly anti-White. To oppose them is to be objectively pro-White, and no amount of self-deception or attempting to avoid the inescapable is going to conceal that.

Because Diversity always favors the Left, in the US context, there is no difference between voting Right and voting White. While they are not conceptually the same thing, they are functionally, practically, and materially the same thing in the current US political context. Accepting this political reality will be vital to constructing a winning electoral strategy in 2020.

There are no identity politics in Japan because Japan is Japanese. There are no identity politics in China because China is Chinese. Identity politics are the unavoidable reality in any polity that is foolish enough to allow demographic diversity and the only solution to them is to reduce the diversity to statistically insignificant levels.

These ideas aren't even remotely new. Both Steve Sailer and I have been writing about it for a long time. It's just that reality has finally caught up to the situation that we saw developing and what was inevitable is now the obvious, and is rapidly becoming the undeniable.

Labels: ,

73 Comments:

Blogger sykes.1 May 29, 2018 11:07 AM  

While White Nationalism might not be possible in Europe, with its deep and ancient nationalities, it is possible in the US, because European immigrants to the US have by and large lost their ethnic identities.

As someone who came of age during the civil rights movement of the 60's, and drank the Kool Aid, I am now a White Nationalist and Separatist. I only vote for White candidates who implicitly support measures that promote White interests.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother May 29, 2018 11:09 AM  

It's interesting how civic nationalists and their downstream brothers will deny the historical facts of the racial and ethnic makeup and priorities of the US at its founding, because they are either super Heinz 57 or they have a really cool / patriotic / hard working friend who is.

Blogger VD May 29, 2018 11:14 AM  

While White Nationalism might not be possible in Europe, with its deep and ancient nationalities, it is possible in the US, because European immigrants to the US have by and large lost their ethnic identities.

True, but rhetorically, you'd do better to call it "American Nationalism". Because you can count on all the Not-Whites to proudly declare their non-American status rather than reject their actual identities.

It's interesting how civic nationalists and their downstream brothers will deny the historical facts of the racial and ethnic makeup and priorities of the US at its founding, because they are either super Heinz 57 or they have a really cool / patriotic / hard working friend who is.

I got an email from a guy explaining his problem with my open support for identity politics. His justification for this involved the playing of not one, not two, but three identity cards.

I didn't bother to point out that he is more caught up in identity politics than I am. It's just not worth the effort required.

Blogger Crew May 29, 2018 11:17 AM  

Meanwhile, the markets are panicked, even if only for a short while, but events in Italy.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-05-29/global-markets-descend-contagious-panic-italy-implodes

Is a breakup of the EU on the cards? And, how much strength will white groups derive from the collapse of globalization in Europe?

Blogger The Chortling May 29, 2018 11:18 AM  

Starbucks' Exclusive Diversity Day should warm the hearths of many an SJW ... not realizing their house is on fire.

Public Day of Sbux shame

Blogger Howard Stone May 29, 2018 11:32 AM  

So Roseanne cuckled. I wonder who wrote the joke for her.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother May 29, 2018 11:37 AM  

Howard,

Link please

Blogger Howard Stone May 29, 2018 11:38 AM  

Check out her twitter. She set herself up in the most obvious of ways.

Blogger Howard Stone May 29, 2018 11:39 AM  

Her new show was Classic Hegelian dialect.

Blogger Howard Stone May 29, 2018 11:41 AM  

And she made Obama’s look like victims.

Blogger Michael O'Duibhir May 29, 2018 11:42 AM  

@3 "...you can count on all the Not-Whites to proudly declare their non-American status rather than reject their actual identities."

Spot on.
But can we count on whites to do something other than employ the I'll-do-whatever-so-long-as-I-don't-get-into-trouble cringe reaction? I'm seeing encouraging signs lately--not a deluge of change but definitely a trickle at least.

Blogger eyeslevel May 29, 2018 11:45 AM  

You may be loyal to humanity, but humanity isn't loyal to you. Blacks are loyal to blacks. Jews are loyal to Jews. Chinese are loyal to Chinese. They laugh at whites who are "loyal to humanity." No one trusts a traitor.

Blogger oyster50 May 29, 2018 12:09 PM  

To paraphrase and old saw - "You may not care about racism, but racism cares about you."

Blogger Azure Amaranthine May 29, 2018 12:14 PM  

Mercy is the prerogative of the strong, and even then too much will destroy you.

Blogger Matthew May 29, 2018 12:17 PM  

Note that Derb leads with "gauche".

That's what's important to "men" like him.

Blogger Matthew May 29, 2018 12:19 PM  

Whoops, I misread the quote. Sorry, Derb.

Blogger Mark Stoval May 29, 2018 12:21 PM  

Pat Buchanan and the rest of us who supported him saw this day coming long ago.

Our enemies claimed that blacks, browns, and other foreign invaders would magically become "Americans" once they got here and embraced the "American Dream". Some call that the "magic dirt theory".

Well, Detroit was once called "The Paris of North America" and now we call it "just another shithole". Why? Everyone knows why --- most just won't talk about it honestly.

From what I can gather from the IQ realists, Race realists, and the HBD crowd; we are playing with the future of the human race with these anti-white measures. Who the hell does the enemy think built this industrial society? Who do they think will make it work after you kill off whitey? (The Asians for awhile perhaps in their part of the world)

If you love humanity, you best love the white race and hope that whitey has a homeland.

Blogger Astrosmith May 29, 2018 12:23 PM  

Vox, some thoughts I have had that you may or may not want to expound upon, are these:

The Left seems to want to use as an excuse for bringing the millions of third world people into western (white) countries this: They deserve to come here to have a "better life".

That may all be well and good. We all know that most of these countries are, as the President may have said, "s-holes", and nobody wants to live in an s-hole.

However: WE CAN'T BRING EVERYONE TO THE WEST. Not only will flooding western countries with third worlders bring the living standards down, but the third world countries will still be there, and the vast majority of their people cannot be relocated. So, for those individuals who move, they may get a "better life", but those they leave behind will not. This is exacerbated by the fact that those who leave are disproportionately the higher IQ population, leaving their less intelligent countrymen to cope.

Why not try to get the third worlders to build up their own countries to a higher standard of living? Would that not be better for everyone?

As a starting point, build the wall and sink the ships.

Blogger Nathan May 29, 2018 12:31 PM  

"For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers" (Matt 23:4)

They haven't changed.

Blogger Longtime Lurker May 29, 2018 12:43 PM  

A few days ago at the Naval Academy, Trump declared, “We are not going to apologize for America. ... No more apologies.”

It won't be long before Trump or someone like him inserts the adjective White before America.

Blogger John S May 29, 2018 12:45 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Johnny May 29, 2018 12:45 PM  

My take on proper behavior is that it is or always should be based on relationships. The problem with radical paternalism is that it is simply declared by one side, and often without the apparent need for any agreement by the other side. It works because in the end it is a conceit. The person declaring the doctrine is implicitly assuming that they are in charge and that feeds vanity.

For the sake of an explicit example, that is why the whole Starbucks thing is likely to end badly. If they want to pander to black, fine, but there needs to be an understanding of how blacks are to accommodate Starbucks. The managements egalitarianism is actually just a conceit, and their employees are the ones who have to bare the burden of it.

Blogger Worlds Edge May 29, 2018 12:51 PM  

Well, Detroit was once called "The Paris of North America" and now we call it "just another shithole".


So pretty much Paris in 2018, then? Or certainly Paris 2025, given current trends. Lauren Southern's Streets of Paris video comes to mind. Not sure what the rule on links is, but YouTube has yet to take it down, so it is easily found.

There are no identity politics in China because China is Chinese.

The Uighur minority might beg to differ. Beijing isn't tolerating their shenanigans at any rate.

Curiously the Hui minority are Chinese Muhammadans who are pretty much left alone. 'Course though they're moon worshipers they also speak Mandarin as their first language and look and in the modern era dress like Han.

Blogger insight May 29, 2018 12:53 PM  

"For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers" (Matt 23:4)

"I will put it into the hands of your tormentors, who said to you, 'Fall prostrate that we may walk on you.' And YOU made your back like the ground, like a street to be walked on." Isaiah 51:23

Blogger pyrrhus May 29, 2018 12:53 PM  

Well, the "gauche" descriptor demonstrates Derb's ambivalence, which plagues people even on the right side of ethnic nationalism...Nobody in Japan or China thinks it's gauche to insist on the primacy and dominance of the Han or Japanese ethnicities. And immigration is all but banned in both countries.

Blogger Mark Stoval May 29, 2018 12:55 PM  

Z-Man has a post up today called "Free Association & Equality Before The Law" that goes hand in hand with Vox's post today. Both are looking at how we got to this sad state of affairs.

He says "Once you dispense with freedom of association, you abandon equality before the law. It also means ever splintering minorities are incentivized to demand special privileges from the state, by forcing the court to choose between groups."

Worth a look: http://thezman.com/wordpress/?p=13981

The 1960s gave us desegregation and quotas. We were promised there would never, ever be quotas. Yet companies better come up with enough blacks and women to meet some federal agencies approval. (the reason black women are so valuable --- they are a 2-fer)

You can't keep blacks out of an area by refusing to sell real estate to them -- against federal law. You must let them move in and destroy the area.

Folks, your federal government has been the biggest enemy of the white American in my lifetime. Bar none.

Blogger Angry Midwesterner May 29, 2018 12:55 PM  

Hui group fought on both sides of the Chinese civil war. Also, the 1 kingdom under heaven thing is the only justification they need to enforce a proper common culture, let the other 50+ ethnic groups and wear funny costumes, and just keep on taming Tibetans and Uighurs

Blogger pyrrhus May 29, 2018 12:59 PM  

"The Uighur minority might beg to differ. Beijing isn't tolerating their shenanigans at any rate. "

The Han have always ruthlessly crushed minority uprisings, with little or no press coverage....Funny how that happens.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother May 29, 2018 1:01 PM  

Longtime Lurker,

In the same speech, in the previous sentence, Trump referred to pioneers taming a continent and forging this country. He's going back yet again to the previous understanding of America as a nation of pioneers. He did that the first time in a campaign speech. He all but yelled "Heritage White America".

Blogger Prionyx May 29, 2018 1:02 PM  

Astrosmith, the Armchair Missionaries of the Lutheran and Catholic Charities no longer wish to risk their own skins trying to uplift the third world.

It's much safer (and cheaper) to do your good works by bringing the third worlders here for the opportunity to have that "better life" while making their continued upkeep someone else's problem.

Although they'll never admit it, they must know that they could spend eternity bashing their heads against the genetic stone of the unfortunates with no effect. And that trying to sculpt them into civilized beings that could maintain their societies without outside help is futile. But they just can't help themselves.

Bringing them here allows the virtue signalers to appear righteous and morally superior while bearing virtually none of the cost themselves.

Blogger Robert What? May 29, 2018 1:04 PM  

How long before the civic nationalists realize that virtue signalling won't save their asses?

Blogger freddie_mac May 29, 2018 1:04 PM  

@18 Astrosmith
However: WE CAN'T BRING EVERYONE TO THE WEST. .. those who leave are disproportionately the higher IQ population

Best rhetorical answer I've found is this 2010 video from NumbersUSA:
Immigration, World Poverty and Gumballs - NumbersUSA.com
https://youtu.be/LPjzfGChGlE


@23 Worlds End
Curiously the Hui minority are Chinese Muhammadans who are pretty much left alone.

I'm willing to bet that the Hui have assimilated quite well into the overarching Han culture, which makes Beijing more willing to overlook a few odd quirks.

Blogger pyrrhus May 29, 2018 1:04 PM  

@26 Yes, the loss of Freedom of Association has been pretty much the mechanism for destruction of American civilization, and ironically the destruction of much of the black community, which was very cohesive even into the 1970s.

Blogger Elijah May 29, 2018 1:05 PM  

can america survive? parts of the country are still sane ( deep south and upper far west) but if you visit any large city, it is like going to a foreign country. if you go to New York, you actually feel like a minority. and English is not spoken.

Blogger El Rojo May 29, 2018 1:10 PM  

Stg58/Animal Mother wrote:It's interesting how civic nationalists and their downstream brothers will deny the historical facts of the racial and ethnic makeup and priorities of the US at its founding, because they are either super Heinz 57 or they have a really cool / patriotic / hard working friend who is.

That "really cool / patriotic / hard working friend" does make it hard for some to get over their mental hurdle to support what needs to be done.


It's never going to be 100% cut and dry, there is always going to be some fuzziness around the edges.


Just going by voting trends in the US, about 5-10% of Blacks (working black men). And 15-20% of Hispanics (with a new found love for their Iberian heritage). Will want to come along for the right wing ride out of pure self-interest.

At the high end, that is only about 15 million combined that have enough brains to do what is best for them long term.


While no one will turn away allies, it is not our job to recruit or convince them. it is their job to recognize what is in their own best interests.


The correct stance on immigration is a hard line one. But all the choices we have to make from here on in are hard ones. There are no "let them down easy" choices left to make. No matter what we do, someone is going to hate us.


It's just a matter of taking our medicine, waiting out the wailing and gnashing of teeth, and trying to come out the other side with running water and light switches that work.
















Blogger Longtime Lurker May 29, 2018 1:13 PM  

@29:

Stg58/Animal Mother,

The President can be such a tease! All kidding aside, the lunatic left is working overtime to make the case for him. All he will have to do is turn the rhetorical key. It's just a simple matter of continued anti-white provocation and presidential timing.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother May 29, 2018 1:28 PM  

That's right, Lurker They make the case for him with their constant escalation and increasingly blatant racial hatred. All he has to do is point at their own rhetoric.

Blogger DonReynolds May 29, 2018 1:29 PM  

Americans take great pride in being FAIR. It is a basic American credo that being FAIR minimizes conflict. It is in the FAIR zone that many people can agree, and where the extremists never venture. Fairness is the basis of authority. WE consider ourselves to be fair and reasonable. The Truth is always FAIR. WE expect the same rules to apply to everyone. That makes it fair, before the law.

Nothing angers Americans quicker than a double standard, and the average American can smell one a mile away. Penalties and laws that only apply to whites is a double standard and automatically unfair. Reciprocity is FAIR and reasonable. No matter what others may do, we have the exact same rights they do. (Gay rights? No such animal.)

The Democratic party has become the UNFAIR party. They want the law to be selective. They want some groups of people to be privileged over others. They want to exempt millions of people from the same laws that apply to everyone else. The average American would recognize the double standard and find it UNFAIR.

I can remember when 90 percent of the US population was counted as white...I was in grade school. Being counted as white in those days was not an distinguishing feature. Nearly everyone was white and anyone who was not, stuck out like a sore thumb.

Blogger Amy May 29, 2018 1:30 PM  

That "really cool / patriotic / hard working friend" does make it hard for some to get over their mental hurdle to support what needs to be done.

Just encourage them to be really cool/patriotic/hardworking, and thereby uplifting of their brethren...in their own country.

We wouldn’t be in this mess if the Advanced Nations of Aboriginal Americans had come together as One to fight the White Plague.

But they didn’t. We will go the same way. Unless.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother May 29, 2018 1:36 PM  

They didn't, because they were too busy fighting each other.

Blogger Lovekraft May 29, 2018 1:41 PM  

There's only so much Political Correctness tut-tutting people's valid opinions until the dam bursts.

No doubt many are waiting to join in the fun and speak truth but are presently waiting for that one lawsuit/admission (Obama or Pope Francis being caught red-handed, for example).

Blogger Wynn Lloyd May 29, 2018 1:42 PM  

"The Uighur minority might beg to differ. Beijing isn't tolerating their shenanigans at any rate.

Curiously the Hui minority are Chinese Muhammadans who are pretty much left alone. 'Course though they're moon worshipers they also speak Mandarin as their first language and look and in the modern era dress like Han."

The Han don't have to engage in Identity politics though, because it's the establishment almost entirely.
The Han are only 93% of the population, but China is nowhere near as "diverse" as many claim, including the PRC government. The largest cities, and virtually all of China proper, are 99% Han.
The minorities live on the periphery. They live in their ancestral homelands and are allegedly "semi-autonomous." They aren't integrated with their minorities in any significant way. The closest to integration is either the Manchus, or the Han settlers being poured into Tibet, in order to colonize the place.
Han culture is way too collectivist and conformist for multiculturalism.

Blogger James Dixon May 29, 2018 1:50 PM  

> If you love humanity, you best love the white race and hope that whitey has a homeland.

Interesting question. Without the white race, what is the carrying capacity of the world population wise? Remember that both the Japanese and Chinese have been dependent on exporting to white countries to fuel their economies.

> Why not try to get the third worlders to build up their own countries to a higher standard of living?

That was the original stated purpose of the Peace Corps. No, I don't believe them, but that's what the claimed.

> How long before the civic nationalists realize that virtue signalling won't save their asses?

Five minutes too late.

> can america survive?

Can? Sure. Trump was elected wasn't he? Will, now that's another matter. The future is not ours to see.

Blogger Jacob May 29, 2018 1:53 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Durandel May 29, 2018 2:05 PM  

If your nations doesn’t have a shared identity, you get identity politics. If it has a shared identity, you get ideological politics.

Why this is hard for people to grasp is beyond me.

Actually, come to think of it, hasn’t America had identity politics for a long while? Prior to 1965, were not the major parties in America mostly split along ethnic lines...just happened to be white ethnic lines that strongly correlated to geographic and state declared boundaries?

Blogger Damn Crackers May 29, 2018 2:07 PM  

Can we just call the Democrats the "anti-white" party during all our political conversations?

Blogger Lyon May 29, 2018 2:20 PM  

Brilliant and succinct. The clear understanding in this post surely must be obvious to all?

While it is true that some people are of low intellect, this does not explain or excuse why a very elementary explanation cannot be absorbed by even the dim among us. There is a real difference between ignorance and nescience.

There is something else in play here when our folk reject the obvious. Willful ignorance comes close to the heart of the matter.

This blog site is an island of sanity. And for that I am deeply grateful.

Blogger MickDundee May 29, 2018 2:32 PM  

Jonah (((Goldberg))) at it again:

Immigrants are Americans who are born in the wrong place

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-goldberg-immigration-paul-gavora-20180529-story.html

Blogger peppermint May 29, 2018 2:48 PM  

Durandel is right. 1A was an attempt at keeping identity out of politics followed by a Puritan/Catholic alliance against Southerns who were then accused of slavery as a proxy for heresy. It took as long at 1965 to now to go from 1789 to 1860. After the War between the States there was occupation, then immigration, and communists taking over labor unions would accuse non-communists of White chauvinism exactly like SJWs of today. Affirmative action goes back as far as Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s degree and the media covering for his sexual proclivities.

The great change recently is Puritans have died out, and the remaining Whites can only have a future as American nationalists.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash May 29, 2018 2:53 PM  

peppermint wrote:Puritans have died out
Where do you think Judeo Christianity, and for that matter, SJWism, come from?

Blogger saintCrispee May 29, 2018 2:59 PM  

White folks in America created and specialized in identity politics from the very beginning. Slavery, Jim Crow. Whites always like a heterogeneous population....All the better to create a vibrant economy on the backs of those that didn't need to be paid or who were used and segregated.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash May 29, 2018 3:08 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash May 29, 2018 3:11 PM  

saintCrispee wrote:All the better to create a vibrant economy on the backs of those that didn't need to be paid or who were used and segregated.
You realize that slavery was actually more expensive than either sharecropping or hiring Blacks, right? That monetarily it was actually a net negative? Except of course that your workers showed up to work and were relatively sober.
You also realize that most Blacks, and certainly most wealthy Blacks, preferred segregation to competition. Being all history-minded and all. Desegregation being the creation of urban Jews working out their neurosis over feeling excluded from WASP society

Blogger Resident Moron™ May 29, 2018 3:24 PM  

Where there IS identity politics, in the greater asian co-prosperity sphere, is where they have muslim enclaves.

The Uighur in China, muslims in Sri Lanka, the Rohingya in Mianmar ...

(The MSM loves themselves some of that "Rohingya" terminology because it means they can avoid identifying them as muslims, since they know damn well every average joe hearing that will go, oh, yeah, and who gives a rat's ass?)

Everywhere there's muslims, there's trouble.

Except in Singapore because in Singapore they hang troublemakers without delay and without remorse.

Blogger Salt May 29, 2018 3:49 PM  

MickDundee wrote:Jonah (((Goldberg))) at it again:

Immigrants are Americans who are born in the wrong place


That's a rip off of a line in Apocalypse Now.

Blogger Ronin F9 May 29, 2018 4:00 PM  

Salt wrote:MickDundee wrote:Jonah (((Goldberg))) at it again:

Immigrants are Americans who are born in the wrong place


That's a rip off of a line in Apocalypse Now.


The line you are thinking of is from Full Metal Jacket

"We are here to help the Vietnamese, because inside every gook there is an American trying to get out." - Pogue Colonel

Blogger Michael O'Duibhir May 29, 2018 4:02 PM  

@18 "They [darkies] deserve to come here to have a "better life".

That may all be well and good..."

No, it's NOT well and good; and the (((Left))) doesn't give a shit about brown skins having a better shot at happiness--that's all a load of bullshit designed to make the goyim feel guilty about putting up any resistance to a program which is secretly designed to topple the country so that it will fall into (((their))) hands.

Blogger AaMcavoy May 29, 2018 4:10 PM  

Astrosmith wrote:

However: WE CAN'T BRING EVERYONE TO THE WEST. Not only will flooding western countries with third worlders bring the living standards down, but the third world countries will still be there, and the vast majority of their people cannot be relocated. So, for those individuals who move, they may get a "better life", but those they leave behind will not. This is exacerbated by the fact that those who leave are disproportionately the higher IQ population, leaving their less intelligent countrymen to cope.

Why not try to get the third worlders to build up their own countries to a higher standard of living? Would that not be better for everyone?


If you accept the Left's moral principles and assumptions, then you've lost the argument already. We must reject the notion that Americans owe anybody anything. Put them on the defensive. They will not compromise with us, so we must not make deals with them.

Blogger English Tom May 29, 2018 4:18 PM  

Is a breakup of the EU on the cards?

Yes. But only because the (((Chameleons))) are intending to fold Europe into their Eurasian Economic Union. Eurasianism is the coming thing dontcha know!

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother May 29, 2018 4:24 PM  

America doesn't owe anyone anywhere a damn thing We are all paid up, and have been for years, with gallons and gallons of interest.

Blogger saintCrispee May 29, 2018 4:28 PM  

"You realize that slavery was actually more expensive than either sharecropping or hiring Blacks, right? That monetarily it was actually a net negative? Except of course that your workers showed up to work and were relatively sober. You also realize that most Blacks, and certainly most wealthy Blacks, preferred segregation to competition. Being all history-minded and all. Desegregation being the creation of urban Jews working out their neurosis over feeling excluded from WASP society"

I can't tell if you are attempting to congratulate urban Jews or not. It certainly sounds like you are. Also, are you suggesting that antebellum Southerners were so stupid that they choose an inefficient economic system over one that was more efficient and profitable?

Blogger Snidely Whiplash May 29, 2018 4:34 PM  

Yo really are a preening little bundle of sticks, aren't you?

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother May 29, 2018 4:59 PM  

Snidely

He's a stupid little troll who's got Goldberg's hand up his ass.

Blogger James Dixon May 29, 2018 5:19 PM  

> Also, are you suggesting that antebellum Southerners were so stupid that they choose an inefficient economic system over one that was more efficient and profitable?

Isn't that what you've always thought? Why are you questioning it now?

Blogger MickDundee May 29, 2018 5:41 PM  

Muh Moldbug

Blogger Were-Puppy May 29, 2018 7:05 PM  

@17 Mark Stoval

If you love humanity, you best love the white race and hope that whitey has a homeland.
---

The rapefugee taking a dump in the street doesn't care about this. It only wants the next bucket o' chicken and some white girls to molest.

Blogger Jack Amok May 29, 2018 10:07 PM  

Bringing them here allows the virtue signalers to appear righteous and morally superior while bearing virtually none of the cost themselves.

None of the cost? Hell, they're getting paid to bring the vibrants here. It's a racket, with "religious charities" getting government money to import barbarians with no idea how to use a toliet, let alone function in a civilized society. The bastards pocket the money (gotta pay salaries for "charity" workers these days, y'know, especially the super-duper important executives).

Blogger Jack Amok May 29, 2018 10:18 PM  

> Why not try to get the third worlders to build up their own countries to a higher standard of living?

That was the original stated purpose of the Peace Corps. No, I don't believe them, but that's what the claimed.


Indeed. I don't believe them either. I used to think the real purpose of the Peace Corps was to give globalists a respectable fig leaf to hide behind while they paraded around as the new Raj in various colorful locations.

Nowadays I still think that, just add a nauseating heap of pedophilia to the mix.

Blogger James Dixon May 30, 2018 6:32 AM  

> (gotta pay salaries for "charity" workers these days, y'know, especially the super-duper important executives).

Yeah. None of the major charities are worth supporting, for that reason alone. And even with their inflated salaries they still have way to much of a record of embezzling and misusing the funds.

Blogger Peter Gent May 30, 2018 7:10 AM  

Amy wrote:That "really cool / patriotic / hard working friend" does make it hard for some to get over their mental hurdle to support what needs to be done.

Just encourage them to be really cool/patriotic/hardworking, and thereby uplifting of their brethren...in their own country.

We wouldn’t be in this mess if the Advanced Nations of Aboriginal Americans had come together as One to fight the White Plague.

But they didn’t. We will go the same way. Unless.

I have always found it interesting that the ANAA never developed any of technology for themselves that they saw the Europeans as having. There appeared to be none of the "lets learn how to do this for ourselves" effort. They bought, bartered, or stole from the Europeans, but never learned to do it for themselves. In some ways, the North American Indians could be classified as Luddites. But it is interesting to look across all of the Americas and see that while in some ways (math, astronomy and agriculture) they were highly advanced, but in the technologies that facilitated building, enabled cities, and that advanced warfare they lagged behind. It was as if the iron age and all that came of it passed them by and when exposed to it, showed no native interest.

I am not sure what to make of this. Similar arguments can be made for most of sub-Sahara Africa.

Blogger Salden May 30, 2018 10:19 AM  

https://pseudoerasmus.com/2014/11/10/slavery_and_industrialism/

http://www.intellectualtakeout.org/blog/no-slavery-didnt-build-america

http://socialdemocracy21stcentury.blogspot.com/2016/02/paul-bairoch-on-industrial-revolution.html

https://pseudoerasmus.com/2016/06/16/eoc/

http://bradleyahansen.blogspot.com/search?q=slavery

http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/slavery-in-the-united-states/

Not only did slavery contribute ultimately little to America's rise (after all, America was hardly the first to practice mass enslavement) but the Confederacy was indeed the inferior power between it and the Union.

Blogger The Anti-Gnostic May 30, 2018 11:32 AM  

#43 - Interesting question. Without the white race, what is the carrying capacity of the world population wise?

Putin made an under-appreciated statement recently. He said, as a Russian why would I have any interest in a world without Russia?

I'm not Russian. I consider myself a white American. I can't get more specific than that. Mostly Anglo-Saxon, but some Prot Irish, and one Swedish and one French ancestor from way back. There's a white-Chickasaw mix in the woodpile too.

No matter - at this point I'm a white American. It's a shallow, deracinated, masochistic culture these days, but it's the only culture that's mine. And if it's a black American culture or latino American culture or asian American culture, then it's not mine.

As a white American, I have no interest in a world without white America.

I should have spent the 80s and 90s organizing militias and telling myself and my friends to have large families. But who could have foreseen that whites would be reduced by 25% as a percentage of US population by now? The entire US sunbelt will be majority non-white by next generation. The future has already been born.

I wish I were younger. I wish for the quirky, ornery, self-reliant, white American culture of my youth.

Oh well.

Blogger Lance E May 30, 2018 12:24 PM  

I'll have to disagree. The U.S. is actually a one-party system. The modern Republican Party is not, and was never intended to be, any kind of serious opposition. It was never viable, nor meant to be viable, as an actual ruling party if voted into "power".

That's the grave mistake some of these pundits are making - imagining that the Republican party is simply too stupid or blind to understand the issues on the table. They understand perfectly well, and they side with the Democrats; they're simply less honest about it.

Donald Trump is in the process of trying to hijack the Republican party and turn it into a sort of quasi-Protectionist party. It's certainly a very interesting experiment, but will of course still fail in the long run, because it doesn't do anything about the system that caused the decline in the first place (immivasion is merely one link in the chain).

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts