ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2018 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Wednesday, June 13, 2018

Fraud AND racist

Not only did Albert Einstein rip off and take credit for the work of Newton, Poincare, Lorentz, and De Pretto, but he was a Chinese-hating racist as well:
The publication of Albert Einstein’s private diaries detailing his tour of Asia in the 1920s reveals the theoretical physicist and humanitarian icon’s racist attitudes to the people he met on his travels, particularly the Chinese.

Written between October 1922 and March 1923, the diaries see the scientist musing on his travels, science, philosophy and art. In China, the man who famously once described racism as “a disease of white people” describes the “industrious, filthy, obtuse people” he observes. He notes how the “Chinese don’t sit on benches while eating but squat like Europeans do when they relieve themselves out in the leafy woods. All this occurs quietly and demurely. Even the children are spiritless and look obtuse.”

After earlier writing of the “abundance of offspring” and the “fecundity” of the Chinese, he goes on to say: “It would be a pity if these Chinese supplant all other races. For the likes of us the mere thought is unspeakably dreary. A peculiar herd-like nation, often more like automatons than people. I noticed how little difference there is between men and women; I don’t understand what kind of fatal attraction Chinese women possess which enthrals the corresponding men to such an extent that they are incapable of defending themselves against the formidable blessing of offspring”.
At least we know the drill. Tear down the statues, remove his name from everything, and retroactively strip his Nobel prize. And, of course, bring up the fact that he was a horrible racist every single time anyone mentions his name.

Labels: ,

68 Comments:

Blogger The Kurgan June 13, 2018 4:38 AM  

Albert stole the work of even more men than that. A man called Harold Aspden, whom I had the pleasure to meet before he died, wrote a whole book called something like physics without Einstein. Hard to get but it’s awesome.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey June 13, 2018 4:43 AM  

It would be a pity if these Chinese supplant all other races. For the likes of us the mere thought is unspeakably dreary.

Einstein was a Lothrop Stoddard disciple? Who knew?

https://infogalactic.com/info/The_Rising_Tide_of_Color_Against_White_World_Supremacy

The man was pretty woke. Maybe he wasn't so dumb after all. Or perhaps "the goyim are all exactly the same in every possible way, except that Whitey is more evil" had not yet been completely established as the preferred method for tikkuning the olam.

This was the early 1920s, after all -- Boas' disciples were just starting to establish their control over anthropology. It's almost as if it was a different time, with different taboos, or something.

Blogger Xellos June 13, 2018 4:46 AM  

It would be fun to watch those who defended Einstein against "kike stole our physics" denounce and try to remove him from history. Of course, in that case, I imagine their masters would step up and explain that's verboten, racism isn't high enough on the oppression scale.

Blogger tublecane June 13, 2018 4:55 AM  

Considering everyone was more or less openly racist before 1960 or so (everyone still is; they just know to keep it hidden), how do they decide whom to unperson in this manner? I remember it happening to Mencken not long ago, which was understandable because he went against St. FDR. (Who should be in for a drubbing soon vis-a-vis "red-lining.") What did Einstein do?

Is this meant to sell books, or something?

Blogger tublecane June 13, 2018 4:57 AM  

@2- If he were so "woke," he shoulda gone to Zion instead of hanging around Jersey.

Blogger pdwalker June 13, 2018 5:50 AM  

Reminds me of that old joke that goes, What’s the difference between a tourist and a racist in Africa?

About two weeks.

Blogger Servant of the Chief June 13, 2018 6:06 AM  

This is the second time I have come across the 'Einstein was a fraud' proposition. Total science illiterate here, my background is law, what did he do exactly? How much of his work was stolen?

Also, blogger is being screwy with comments lately

Blogger Al Du Clur June 13, 2018 6:23 AM  

The theory of relativity was cultural appropriation - stolen from Kangz like all science. Time to tear down those statues and take back that Nobel

Blogger PCA June 13, 2018 6:24 AM  

Einstein took credit from Newton?

Blogger Durandel June 13, 2018 6:26 AM  

VD wrote “Not only did Albert Einstein rip off and take credit for the work of Newton, Poincare, Lorentz, and De Pretto”

Where can I read more about this?

Blogger Mark Stoval June 13, 2018 6:34 AM  

Servant of the Chief wrote:This is the second time I have come across the 'Einstein was a fraud' proposition. Total science illiterate here, my background is law, what did he do exactly? How much of his work was stolen?

Also, blogger is being screwy with comments lately


The most glaring evidence against Einstein concerns “his” most famous equation. One website notes “The equation E=mc^2, which has been forever linked to Einstein & his Theory of Relativity was not originally published by Einstein. According to Umberto Bartocci, a professor at the University of Perugia and a historian of mathematics, this famous equation was first published by Olinto De Pretto …two years prior to Einstein’s publishing of the equation. In 1903 De Pretto published his equation in the scientific magazine Atte and in 1904 it was republished by the Royal Science Institute of Veneto. Einstein’s research was not published until 1905… Einstein was well versed in Italian and even lived in Northern Italy for a brief time.”

more here: http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=13400

Blogger weka June 13, 2018 6:36 AM  

I don't care about his opinion of the Chinese.

Nothing new about borrowing. Lorenz reckoned Newton ripped him off: the observations that Einstein used to base his theories on were known within the physics world and the experimental tests are fairly clear.

As Hiroshima would attest.

Besides the Guardian is correct in inverse proportion to the number of times /pol/ is wrong.

Blogger lazing dirk June 13, 2018 6:42 AM  

I am surprised that the feminist historians aren't making more out of the possibility that he stole a good portion of his ideas from his first wife, by all accounts a genius in her field at the time when women were all but absent from it, leaving her with ruined reputation and destroyed mental health... But then again, she was of Slavic descent.

Blogger VD June 13, 2018 6:53 AM  

I don't care about his opinion of the Chinese.

No one cares about your opinion of his opinion. But I'll bet more than one billion Chinese care about his opinion of them.

Blogger Kerryman86 June 13, 2018 7:03 AM  

Don't forget the time dilation effect erroneously attributed to Einstein,

Sir Joseph Larmor FRS[2] (11 July 1857 – 19 May 1942) was a British physicist and mathematician who made innovations in the understanding of electricity, dynamics, thermodynamics, and the electron theory of matter. His most influential work was Aether and Matter, a theoretical physics book published in 1900.
Parallel to the development of Lorentz ether theory, Larmor published the Lorentz transformations in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society in 1897 some two years before Hendrik Lorentz (1899, 1904) and eight years before Albert Einstein (1905). Larmor however did not possess the correct velocity transformations, which include the addition of velocities law, which were later discovered by Henri Poincaré. Larmor predicted the phenomenon of time dilation, at least for orbiting electrons, and verified that the FitzGerald–Lorentz contraction (length contraction) should occur for bodies whose atoms were held together by electromagnetic forces. In his book Aether and Matter (1900), he again presented the Lorentz transformations, time dilation and length contraction (treating these as dynamic rather than kinematic effects). Larmor opposed Albert Einstein's theory of relativity, though he supported it for a short time. Larmor rejected both the curvature of space and the special theory of relativity, to the extent that he claimed that an absolute time was essential to astronomy (Larmor 1924, 1927).

Larmor held that matter consisted of particles moving in the aether. Larmor believed the source of electric charge was a "particle" (which as early as 1894 he was referring to as the electron). Thus, in what was apparently the first specific prediction of time dilation, he wrote "... individual electrons describe corresponding parts of their orbits in times shorter for the [rest] system in the ratio (1 – v2/c2)1/2" (Larmor 1897).

Blogger Dane June 13, 2018 7:04 AM  

Likely Nothing will happen.

1) he is a famous jew. (arguably the most famous)
2) he is an icon of the Atheist/ science worshiping left

Its not like he posthumously endorsed Trump.

The left will ignore it or make excuses like the hypocrites they always have been.

Blogger exfarmkid June 13, 2018 7:22 AM  

"Its not like he posthumously endorsed Trump."

meme: MAGA hat on Einstein?

Blogger Worlds Edge June 13, 2018 7:25 AM  

The left will ignore it or make excuses like the hypocrites they always have been.

Agreed. Kind of like what happened when Gandhi was found to have called Africans all the fun stuff he did.

http://archive.is/10rEw

Blogger Nate June 13, 2018 7:35 AM  

I don't disagree with anything Albert said about the Chinese.

Blogger SmockMan June 13, 2018 7:42 AM  

Surprised no one caught how sexist he was. Believing in gender differences? Literally Hitler. Not the type of fellow white male Science should be teaching little girl physicists. Esp at a time like this:

https://twitter.com/sarahkaplan48/status/1006553864080936960
"Science has a sexual harassment problem."

Blogger insight June 13, 2018 7:45 AM  

" 2) he is an icon of the Atheist/ science worshiping left"

All leftards care about is power via politics, the science fetish is just another false front.

"I don't disagree with anything Albert said about the Chinese."

Second that.

Blogger Shimshon June 13, 2018 7:57 AM  

@19 I don't disagree with anything Albert said about the Chinese.

A billion Nate's can't be wrong.

Blogger VD June 13, 2018 8:02 AM  

Likely Nothing will happen.

Not right away. But his reputation was already melting away. In a generation or two, he'll be a nobody.

Blogger Ledford Ledford June 13, 2018 8:03 AM  

I daydreamed through two semesters of college physics, passed both, so I know a thing or two.

The left will never jettison Alfred Einstein. Too many posters already printed. The Chinese may learn to hate him, but no one can understand what they're saying, so big deal.

He's grandfathered in. Here's a question: who's the last historical figure to get a pass? JKF? Mohammed Ali?

Blogger Zaklog the Great June 13, 2018 8:05 AM  

And, of course, bring up the fact that he was a horrible racist every single time anyone mentions his name.

I don't know. Does the fact that he was Jewish give him any sort of protection here?

Blogger bob kek mando - ( Campaigning to recognize the Democratic voting Rights of Border Collies and Negros ) June 13, 2018 8:09 AM  

VD
And, of course, bring up the fact that he was a horrible racist every single time anyone mentions his name.



as the Jews have been so helpful in defining the terms for us, Jews are *not* "White".

and, thus, they are of the People of Color for whom Racism is not a Disease.

Racism, you see, is only “a disease of white people”.

Blogger James Dixon June 13, 2018 8:20 AM  

> Not right away. But his reputation was already melting away. In a generation or two, he'll be a nobody.

If things continue on their current track scientists as a class will become completely disreputable within a generation or two.

Blogger insight June 13, 2018 8:28 AM  

"I don't know. Does the fact that he was Jewish give him any sort of protection here?"

Leftards will milk his name recognition for power/control even if Einstein's name is memory holed, they are already doing it, Einsteins "prejudice" will be leveraged for more immivasion and they'll probably throw in some climate change propaganda for good measure as a need for more "global governance". Leftards have one fucking gear, get power/control. Any information that reflects badly on them will be spun for more power/control. It's very instructive seeing how they do that with Trump's many obvious successes.

Blogger Cecil Henry June 13, 2018 8:38 AM  

'The Manufacture and Sale of Saint Einstein' by Christopher Jon Bjerknes covers a lot of this in detail.

Worth a look. Its free on interned archives.

Blogger Michael O'Duibhir June 13, 2018 9:01 AM  

@16 "Likely Nothing will happen."

Exactly. Who owns the press?

Blogger pyrrhus June 13, 2018 9:06 AM  

(((Einstein))) will be protected...and while over-hyped, he was an important scientist.

Blogger veryfunnyminion June 13, 2018 9:15 AM  

My take-away is that jews are resistant to yellow fever.

Blogger Mr. B.A.D. June 13, 2018 9:58 AM  

Maybe racism is just natural and common, instead of the eviliest of evils.

Blogger Cloudswrest June 13, 2018 10:12 AM  

weka wrote:I don't care about his opinion of the Chinese.

Nothing new about borrowing. Lorenz reckoned Newton ripped him off



Um, I think you mean Leibniz. Lorenz was two centuries later and a contemporary of Einstein.

Blogger Gritón del Desierto June 13, 2018 10:20 AM  

Wow those are like twenty books in one file

Blogger SidVic June 13, 2018 12:42 PM  

If you doubt VD on the possibility of them tearing down a scientific giant. I invite readers to peruse the comments on a very liberal, very sophisticated NIH biomedical blog. The blog offers advice on grant writing and commentary of interest to the community of medical researchers. They are celebrating the humiliation of J Watson when things go a little wrong for them. Lets just say the comments go south in a hurry! Yours truly is key provocateur.
http://drugmonkey.scientopia.org/2018/05/14/eric-lander-apologizes-for-toasting-jim-watson/

Blogger Freddy June 13, 2018 1:06 PM  

The Theory of Relativity is fake garbage.

Blogger Freddy June 13, 2018 1:10 PM  

And on a related topic, the theory of gravity is laughable. More NAZI/NASA magic that keeps sheeple brainwashed into believing water sticks to a ball spinning at a 1000 mph. Smh

Blogger Manuel June 13, 2018 1:17 PM  

Don't the Chinese call all Westerners "Big Nose Devils"?

Blogger Cloudswrest June 13, 2018 1:31 PM  

veryfunnyminion wrote:My take-away is that jews are resistant to yellow fever.

Doubtful. A statistically high number of male Jews are paired with Asian women.

Blogger Cloom Glue June 13, 2018 2:40 PM  

@38 I am stickier than water. So I am safe.

Blogger Ariadne Umbrella June 13, 2018 3:35 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger weka June 13, 2018 3:47 PM  

@34. You are correct. Typing on the cellphone. Mea culpa.

Blogger Good Will June 13, 2018 4:24 PM  

That's pretty damn good writing -- and spot-on observation -- on Einstein's part. (Did he write that in English? If not, I must say, the translator did a GREAT job!)

Blogger Good Will June 13, 2018 4:30 PM  

Ledford Ledford wrote:

"The left will never jettison Alfred Einstein"?

Blogger SirHamster June 13, 2018 4:44 PM  

Good Will wrote:Ledford Ledford wrote:

"The left will never jettison Alfred Einstein"?


Mein Gott! They already did!

Blogger Nikephoros II Phokas June 13, 2018 4:58 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Nikephoros II Phokas June 13, 2018 5:00 PM  

I'd be more surprised if he went to China and didn't say this.

Blogger Roger G2 June 13, 2018 5:21 PM  

Why-how-is it racist to point to the overbreeding and thus overpopulation of some Oriental(oops, another racist term) peoples such as the Chinese?
Doesn’t this clash with another dimension of the left, the Save the Earth From Overpopulation crowd?

Blogger Don't Call Me Len June 13, 2018 5:24 PM  

You can almost hear the tears of Ze'ev Rosenkranz over the fact that such a "humanist icon" could "sometimes have a very hard time recognising himself in the face of the other". I mean, Einstein was a refugee, how could he fail to be perfect and holy?!

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey June 13, 2018 6:08 PM  

@tublecane

Considering everyone was more or less openly racist before 1960 or so (everyone still is; they just know to keep it hidden), how do they decide whom to unperson in this manner?

Given that Einstein was not only a prominent MOT, but remains the officially-anointed Smartest Man Evah!™, we can probably assume that his place in the narrative is safe, at least for the short to medium term. This will blow over. They have too much invested in him.

Even the brief attempt to portray Woodrow Wilson as "racist" didn't really seem to get much traction, despite his reinstituting officially-mandated segregation in the federal workforce, screening "The Birth of a Nation" (the original, not the remake, of course) at the White House, etc. And he didn't even have the benefit of tribal membership, just the Fed, US entry into WW1, "Wilsonian internationalism" (neoconnery without Israel)...

Blogger Unknown June 13, 2018 6:15 PM  

I'll bet more than one billion Chinese care about his opinion of them

I'll bet they don't. The Chinese care the least about how others feel about them. They don't need to. They can do better than everyone else in almost every way that matters to them.

Interestingly, the Chinese probably wouldn't care less about plagiarism. They'd see taking the work of others as all part of the process. The doing of a thing is far more important to them than the person who invented the thing.

Plagiarism is a very Western taboo, a consequence of the European Renaissance and a deeply-rooted compulsion to glorify oneself. Scientistism is a modern consequence of this.

If you don't belong to a culture that is interested in self-glory, 'plagiarism' is a farcically inert proposition, sort of like 'he opened the cereal box-ism'. But I digress.

Saying the Chinese care the least about racism is not the same as saying the Chinese don't care about racism at all. They might, but as a reminder that Western opinion is relevant only in terms of practicality. The Chinese are an eminently practical people. If Western racism can be used in some way to their advantage, it will be. If not, it's treated as a passing wind - distasteful for those who smell it, but otherwise irrelevant.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey June 13, 2018 6:16 PM  

@tublecane

If he were so "woke," he shoulda gone to Zion instead of hanging around Jersey

True. Though he was far from the only one of his tribe who lacked enthusiasm for the Rothschilds' little project in Palestine at that point.

Blogger Matamoros June 13, 2018 6:42 PM  

There are several articles on the Einstein myth here:

http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-leaders-einstein-hoax1.html

Blogger insight June 13, 2018 7:37 PM  

"Saying the Chinese care the least about racism is not the same as saying the Chinese don't care about racism at all. They might..."

They do. Just call them a gook or chink and see how they react.

Blogger Crew June 13, 2018 8:01 PM  

I know at least one Chinese person who says: "If you throw enough shit at a wall, some of it is bound to stick."

Blogger Solaire Of Astora June 13, 2018 10:09 PM  

Interesting observations about the Chinese considering how long ago that was. I hear people make similar comments about them to this day.

Blogger tublecane June 13, 2018 11:45 PM  

By the way, we already had publicly acknowledged evidence of Einsteinian racism. I don't remember anyone ever complaining about it.

Wait, nevermind. That was about Germans. Doesn't count.

Blogger tublecane June 13, 2018 11:48 PM  

@51- I suppose I should say they're badmouthing Einstein instead of unpersoning him.

The MSM headlines I've seen today are all about supposed "xenophobia." They're not even calling him racist.

Maybe if it had been against blacks instead of Chinamen. East Asians are basically white people in the Current Year. Especially since they started clamoring against affirmative action.

Blogger Steve Trueblue June 14, 2018 1:49 AM  

Einstein was fearful of white Europeans. Strangely, that is a common conversation between jews - Who is the greatest threat to Jews? Everybody wanted to be Einstein's penpal, the general consensus, strangely, was that Mongols were the greatest threat, because they could survive the coldest temperatures and still thrive at the equator. After their threat never materialised, a penpal asked Einstein, So who is the greatest threat to us now? Einstein replied with White Europeans.
Its decidedly odd that jewish society discusses threats to them,in a household way, the way we talk about football and TV shows and whats in the newspaper etc.

Blogger Paul M June 14, 2018 2:43 AM  

@7 "what did he do, exactly?"

The problem isn't that Einstein built on other people's work. That's standard - even Newton said that he saw so far because he stood on the shoulders of giants. The issue (IFAIK) is that he didn't credit them in his paper, as is standard practise.

Einstein, during his "annus mirabilis" - his "miracle year" - published I think four papers that genuinely did revolutionise areas of physics. His analysis of the kinetics of heat, and demonstrating that it accounted for browninan motion, was a clincher for the atomic theory of matter.

The "kike stole our physics!" crowd are bitching about a faux-pas that is forgivable in light of his not being a professional academic and of the importance of his work.

Blogger tublecane June 14, 2018 4:54 AM  

@61- This isn't all about being hard on some patent clerk for insufficient citations. Einstein went on to be an academic, hobnob with the scientific elite, and write popular books on the theory of relativity. He was in the public eye for plenty long enough to set the record straight. I don't think he tried very hard, despite giving props to forerunners like Poincare, Lorenz, Mach, and so forth.

The more important issue is the Einstein Myth that's grown in both popular and higher culture. Nevermind pop culture; that gets so much wrong it's not worth trying. Professional historians and scientists could do a better job of setting the record straight.

Blogger Paleo Osteo June 14, 2018 4:02 PM  

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=T1TUqw96iVw

Blogger rudie June 14, 2018 7:32 PM  

Wow, only couple intelligent substantive comments. It seems when subject is related to Jews public loses their rationality. BTW, Einstein was not zionist.
The Nobel Prize in Physics 1921 was awarded to Albert Einstein "for his services to Theoretical Physics, and especially for his discovery of the law of the photoelectric effect not for relativity theories. While interpretations of special theory were provided not exclusively by Einstein, general theory was developed by him. And it was experimentally confirmed. Of course, later discoveries put some limits on it but it's always the case with any theory.

Blogger tublecane June 14, 2018 9:58 PM  

@64- Liar. Einstein most definitely was a Zionist.

In fact, he was known to have said, "I am against nationalism but in favor of Zionism." A typical mindset for someone of his background .

Blogger steve brown June 15, 2018 9:36 AM  

tublecane, CV please, or are you just drunk?

Blogger steve brown June 15, 2018 10:04 AM  

Vox, any comment on this?
http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2018/06/13/iq-scores-decline/

Blogger Silent Draco June 15, 2018 7:50 PM  

Checking something. Can disregard.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts