ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2018 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Tuesday, June 26, 2018

"Show us where the Jew hurt you"

49 Comments:

Blogger Warunicorn June 26, 2018 1:02 PM  

Notice how they get all uppity when we...notice. lol

Whatsa matter, Chosenites? Don't like it when we point this out?

Blogger CM June 26, 2018 1:07 PM  

His explicit acknowledgement where Sailer's explicit statement made absolutely no accusations...

Blogger Robert Divinity June 26, 2018 1:11 PM  

Many child abuse victims could point below the waist to answer Podhoretz. It's probably an outright majority in Hollywood.

Blogger NO GOOGLES June 26, 2018 1:18 PM  

"It's OK because we're the Chosen people, goy"

Blogger Resident Moron™ June 26, 2018 1:20 PM  

Antisemitism is self-fulfilling prophecy.

I’m married to a jew but even she understands why people don’t like them after encountering John pedorhetz.

Blogger Lazarus June 26, 2018 1:20 PM  

Podhoretz cries out in pain as he strikes Sailer

Blogger Conan the Cimmerian June 26, 2018 1:24 PM  

The Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you

Blogger Noah B The Savage Gardener June 26, 2018 1:30 PM  

Tribalism is good when it's good for the Jews.

Blogger Noah B The Savage Gardener June 26, 2018 1:36 PM  

Looks like he deleted that Tweet already.

Blogger pyrrhus June 26, 2018 1:38 PM  

(((Podhoretz)))...every single time...

Blogger pyrrhus June 26, 2018 1:39 PM  

Methinks the Jew doth protest a bit too much....

Blogger Mr.MantraMan June 26, 2018 1:45 PM  

I know people get all triggered and hot under the collar when a certain group of people are mentioned but folks the Pod is just begging for a zinger.

Blogger Lyon June 26, 2018 1:48 PM  

Re: Show us where the Jew hurt you

Where to begin?

Dr. E Michael Jones wrote "The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit - And its Impact on World History" to answer that very question. His premise is that what we call Judaism today began aprox. 70 ad as a reaction to Christianity and a rejection of Logos. They revolt against and reject Logos.

Here is one review:

“… to the mortification of decent Jews like myself, Jews are often on the vanguard when it comes to trashing Christian mores and human dignity, and creating dysfunction whether its undermining gender and marriage or peddling promiscuity, pornography or abortion. … Organized Jewry has sought to portray man as inhabiting a mechanistic universe devoid of inherent design and meaning. In this view, God is an impotent fool who neglects His creation, and Christianity is fogbound superstition. … Organized Jewry has used our idealism to deceive us with Socialism, Communism and Zionism. But to warn Jews of this deceit now constitutes ‘anti-Semitism.’ Surely, Jewish leaders who start wars are the real anti-Semites. They create anti-Semitism to keep ordinary Jews in line. … Jones is the foremost scholar of our time and predicament. This is because he studies the masterful Masonic-Jewish takeover of Western civilization now almost complete. … For a complete history of the New World Order from its inception over 2000 years ago, I recommend The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit.” Henry Makow, Ph.D

Blogger Lovekraft June 26, 2018 1:56 PM  

I thought it was pretty well established that the NYT is a left-wing rag. Nothing it does is worth considering until certain conditions are first met, and I don't think there are enough pink-slips to go around.

Blogger Manuel June 26, 2018 2:09 PM  

Just started reading the e Michael Jones book. The introduction contains a good summary of the traditional views on jews that neocons and evangelicals have distorted.

Blogger Vaughan Williams June 26, 2018 2:18 PM  

Henry Makow is the original Jordan Peterson.

Blogger Damn Crackers June 26, 2018 2:23 PM  

I always thought the editorial board of the NYT were the modern Sanhedrin. What was the problem with what Sailer wrote?

Blogger Mr.MantraMan June 26, 2018 2:29 PM  

John Pod a member of a notorious grooming gang. "Hey young lady you sure are pretty young nation, would you like some drugs, zero bound interest rates and endless war?"

"Yes, well let's party!"

Blogger Colin Flaherty's baby momma June 26, 2018 2:50 PM  

Vatican II was called in 1962 and has been termed the French revolution in the church, though it was more communistic than rationalist there is some truth to it. A certain Cardinal Bea met with Bnai Brith prior to the council starting, who got him to convince the pope that Catholic teachings encouraged antisemitism. A document was adopted at the council called Nostra Aetate which basically puts into words the whole Judeo-Christian meme, and even says nice things about Muslims because there was concern that cozying up to the Jews without Muslims would have negative effects in the middle east. After the council it was as if the church has gone insane, seminaries and convents emptied, the mass was changed, the faithful were scandalized by a "new theology" (not scare quotes, it was literally called that.) The bible translation that had been in use after the counter reformation council of Trent was replaced by a watered down version, and another shitty version rendered from a dodgy French translation known as the Jerusalem bible became widely used. The hierarchy cucked, and the church that "can never change" changed.

Part four speaks of the bond that ties the people of the 'New Covenant' (Christians) to Abraham's stock (Jews). It states that even though some Jewish authorities and those who followed them called for Jesus' death, the blame for this cannot be laid at the door of all those Jews present at that time, nor can the Jews in our time be held as guilty, thus repudiating an indiscriminate charge of Jewish deicide; 'the Jews should not be presented as rejected or accursed by God'. The Declaration also decries all displays of antisemitism made at any time by anyone.

True, the Jewish authorities and those who followed their lead pressed for the death of Christ; still, what happened in His passion cannot be charged against all the Jews, without distinction, then alive, nor against the Jews of today. The Jews should not be presented as rejected or accursed by God, as if this followed from the Holy Scriptures. All should see to it, then, that in catechetical work or in the preaching of the word of God they do not teach anything that does not conform to the truth of the Gospel and the spirit of Christ. Furthermore, in her rejection of every persecution against any man, the Church, mindful of the patrimony she shares with the Jews and moved not by political reasons but by the Gospel's spiritual love, decries hatred, persecutions, displays of anti-Semitism, directed against Jews at any time and by anyone.


The first draft, entitled "Decretum de Iudaeis" ("Decree on the Jews"), was completed in November 1961, approximately fourteen months after Cardinal Bea was commissioned by Pope John XXIII. This draft essentially went nowhere, never having been submitted to the Council, which opened on 11 October 1962.
https://infogalactic.com/info/Nostra_aetate

Blogger Colin Flaherty's baby momma June 26, 2018 2:52 PM  

In 1523, a catholic priest at the time, Martin Luther, founder of the Lutheran Church, wanted to very much help the jews of his time. He accused Catholics of being unfair to jews and treating them “as if they were dogs, " thus making it difficult for jews to convert. "I would request and advise that one deal gently with them [the jews],” he wrote. Being a compassionate Christian, Luther said, "If we really want to help them, we must be guided in our dealings with them not by papal law but by the law of Christian love. We must receive them cordially, and permit them to trade and work with us, hear our Christian teaching, and witness our Christian life. If some of them should prove stiff-necked, what of it? After all, we ourselves are not all good Christians either."

Then, a funny thing happened to Luther on the way home from the synagogue.

After working feverishly to patch things up between Christians and jews, for some unknown reason, I can't be sure what, he inexplicably had a change of heart toward the jews. He no longer cared if they converted. In fact, he came to understand attempting to convert jews was hopeless.

Although a compassionate and Godly man, Luther eventually came to understand the true nature of jews. His experiences dealing with them caused him to make some new recommendations:

(1)"burn their schools and synagogues";
(2) "transfer Jews to community settlements";
(3) "confiscate all Jewish literature, which was blasphemous";
(4) "prohibit rabbis to teach, on pain of death";
(5) "deny Jews safe-conduct, so as to prevent the spread of Judaism";
(6) "appropriate their wealth and use it to support converts and to prevent the lewd practice of usury";
(7) "assign Jews to manual labor as a form of penance."

On later reflection, Martin Luther added:

“They rob and fleece us and hang about our necks, these lazy weaklings and indolent bellies; they swill and feast, enjoy good times in our homes, and by way of reward they curse our Lord Christ, our churches, our princes, and all of us, threatening us and unceasingly wishing us death and every evil. Just ponder this: How does it happen that we poor Christians nourish and enrich such an idle and lazy people, such a useless, evil pernicious people, such blasphemous enemies of God, receiving nothing in return but their curses and defamation and every misfortune they may inflict on us or wish us? Indeed, we are as blind and unfeeling clods in this respect as are the Jews in their unbelief, to suffer such great tyranny from these vicious weaklings, and not perceive and sense that they are our lords, yes, our mad tyrants, and that we are their captives and subjects. Meanwhile they wail that they are our captives, and at the same time mock us — as though we had to take this from them!

But if the authorities are reluctant to use force and restrain the Jews’ devilish wantonness, the latter should, as we said, be expelled from the country and be told to return to their land and their possessions in Jerusalem, where they may lie, curse, blaspheme, defame, murder, steal, rob, practice usury, mock, and indulge in all those infamous abominations which they practice among us, and leave us our government, our country, our life, and our property, much more leave our Lord the Messiah, our faith, and our church undefiled and uncontaminated with their devilish tyranny and malice. Any privileges that they may plead shall not help them; for no one can grant privileges for practising such abominations. These cancel and abrogate all privileges.”

Blogger Colin Flaherty's baby momma June 26, 2018 2:54 PM  

Martin Luther, leader of the Protestant Reformation, in 1543 wrote On the Jews and Their Lies
"Therefore know, my dear Christians, that next to the Devil, you have no more bitter, more poisonous, more vehement an enemy than a real Jew who earnestly desires to be a Jew. There may be some among them who believe what the cow or the goose believes. But all of them are surrounded with their blood and circumcision. In history, therefore, they are often accused of poisoning wells, stealing children and mutilating them; as in Trent, Weszensee and the like. Of course they deny this. Be it so or not, however, I know full well that the ready will is not lacking with them if they could only transform it into deeds, in secret or openly."

"What shall we Christians do with this rejected and condemned people, the Jews? Let us apply the ordinary wisdom of other nations like France, Spain, Bohemia, et al., who made them give an account of what they had stolen through usury, and divided it evenly; but expelled them from their country; For as heard before, God's wrath is so great over them that through soft mercy they only become more wicked, through hard treatment, however, only a little better. Therefore, away with them!"

"However, they have not acquired a perfect mastery of the art of lying; they lie so clumsily and ineptly that anyone who is just a little observant can easily detect it. But for us Christians they stand as a terrifying example of God's wrath."

"However, we must avoid confirming them in their wanton lying, slandering, cursing, and defaming. Nor dare we make ourselves partners in their devilish ranting and raving by shielding and protecting them, by giving them food, drink, and shelter, or by other neighborly"

"The sun never did shine on a more bloodthirsty and revengeful people than the Jews, who imagine themselves to be the people of God and who believe that they should murder and crush the Gentiles. Do not their Talmud and their Rabbis say that it is no sin if a Jew kills a Gentile, but it is a sin if he kills a fellow Jew? It is no sin if he does not keep his oath to a Gentile. Therefore, to steal from a Gentile, as they do with their money-lending is a divine service. And they are the masters of the world, and we are their servants; Indeed, their cattle."


"Should someone think I am saying too much—I am saying much too little! For I see in [their] writings how they curse us Goyim and wish as all evil in their schools and prayers. They rob us of our money through usury, and wherever they are able, they play us all manner of mean tricks . . . No heathen has done such things and none would to so except the Devil himself and those whom he possesses—as he possesses the Jews."

Blogger CM June 26, 2018 3:07 PM  

Shapiro has an awesome take on The Golden Rule at NR today. It isn't the first I've seen this explanation of how the Christian rule is inferior to the Talmudic one, however I am still a bit shocked by its repetition in such consistency on Center-Right(ish) publications. Is Republicanism turning into a Jewish party?

Blogger Damn Crackers June 26, 2018 3:12 PM  

@22 - Taleb says the same thing as Shapiro (did he steal it?) in his Skin in the Game book. Silver Rule is more universal and flexible than the Golden Rule according to Taleb.

Blogger Matamoros June 26, 2018 3:27 PM  

@19-21 Colin Flaherty's baby momma

1. The REAL Douay Rheims (1610) is back in print see www.realdouayrheims.com

The notes and annotations are awesome and the text is unaffected by modernists or sectarians.

2. Vatican II is a great con job. It was a pastoral council not a doctrinal council so it could not change anything doctrinal at all.

As for the Jews please note the statement of Arbp. Carli of Segna whom Paul VI asked to write the official statement on the Decree on the Jews. This is taken from “The Beleaguered City: The War Against Catholics”

Dagobert Runes in his THE WAR AGAINST THE JEW states:

Pope Paul VI further advanced Ecumenism by placing at the head of his Curia, charged with the task of “solving the Jewish problem,” Bishop Luigi Carli of Segni.… Carli’s version…came out with a re-emphasis on the Jews as Christ killers and a sly ‘deploration’ of anti-Semitism…

To make certain that he was not being misunderstood, Carli followed his pronouncement with a lengthy article explaining that Judaism is condemned by God. Whoever follows Judaism cannot but be damnable.

Pope Paul’s choice as head of the Ecumenical curia also decreed that “all people of Israel were faithless” and that “the term deicide applied to all Jews is theologically faultless and the only apt definition.”

It is doubly tragic to have to report Pope Paul VI not only approved Carli’s version of the Ecumenical declaration but actually sponsored it.

The fact that Vatican “liberals” managed to add to the vicious denunciation of the (sic! [Runes]) Jew as Christ killer the sop, “Of course not all Jews of today are to be considered guilty of deicide,” would be ludicrous were it not so tragic. No Catholic in his or her right mind ever considered the Jewish plumber across the street as being literally and specifically a killer of Jesus.

Runes adds concerning Bishop Carli’s work:

“As recently as April, 1966, Bishop Luigi Carli of Segni, who was appointed by the Vatican to head the four-man Ecumenical Curia formulating the “Jewish Declaration,” wrote in the clerical review, Palestro del Clero:

“ ‘Judaism carries by its very nature the judgment of condemnation of God.’

“ After fifteen centuries this judgment still stands: ‘Present-day Judaism is illegal before God and as a religion carries by its very nature the judgment of condemnation by God.’

“ These are the exact words written by Bishop Luigi Carli, whom Pope Paul VI chose, of all prelates, to head the Curia committee charged by Vatican II with preparation of the official “Declaration on the Jewish problem.”

The Bishop concluded his article, which is the official note of what the Declaration on the Jews really meant, by stating uncategorically:

“In conclusion, I hold it legitimate to be able to affirm that in the time of Jesus all the Jewish people were responsible in solidum for the crime of deicide, although only the leaders physically consummated the crime.

“It follows that Judaism must be considered as accursed by God.” Palestro del Clero, April 1966.”

To pound the fact of the officialness of the good Bishop’s statements, Runes adds:

“Carli’s insolent and vicious attack on the Jews appeared near the close of the Ecumenical Council in the Vatican review, Palestro del Clero.

Pope Paul VI has not only endorsed Carli’s promulgation, but sponsored it and thereby identified himself with traditional Vatican anti-Semitism. Paul VI, unlike the late Pope John XXIII, whose nobility transcended the Dark Ages, embodies the Catholic motto: ‘Semper idem * Always the same.’” (Runes)

3. As you note, Martin Luther wrote “The Jews and Their Lies” after causing the revolt against the Church financed by the Jews who promised he would lead them to Christianity and then reneged. You can read about it in “The Plot Against the Church” and by Rabbi Louis Newman in “Jewish Influence in Christian Reform Movements”. Both are in print.

Blogger Noah B The Savage Gardener June 26, 2018 3:27 PM  

Shapiro yet again demonstrating what a dishonest intellectual lightweight he is. The same lies that pervert the application of the Golden Rule would similarly affect an application of the Silver Rule.

Blogger exfarmkid June 26, 2018 3:31 PM  

And Podhoretz grooves a fastball down the middle of the plate.....

Blogger pyrrhus June 26, 2018 3:56 PM  

O/T Argentina's midfield finally shows up, dominates, wins great game despite a dumb penalty given up to Nigeria.

Blogger pyrrhus June 26, 2018 3:59 PM  

"Show us where the Jew hurt you."
To save space, look at any American institution controlled by Jews, starting with the Fed....

Blogger pyrrhus June 26, 2018 4:01 PM  

The silver rule...how many pieces of silver is that, again?

Blogger VD June 26, 2018 4:08 PM  

Is Republicanism turning into a Jewish party?

No, it's just the so-called "conservative" media. Which has been disproportionately Jewish for at least the last 20 years. Like the "intellectual dark web" and the New Atheists, they all quote each other and talk each other up to create a false impression of influence.

Blogger Don't Call Me Len June 26, 2018 4:17 PM  

"I asked if it was because as émigrés, once they get any success they want to identify with something very English like a local football team, but (((Keston))) didn't think so. 'It's probably just that Jewish fans draw attention to themselves so much. There always looks a lot of them around.'"

Blogger Colin Flaherty's baby momma June 26, 2018 4:18 PM  

24. Matamoros:
Thank you for the information, moor Slayer.

This is another example of why they work so hard to disconnect us from real history & current reality, to prevent people from noticing patterns.

Blogger Gen. Kong June 26, 2018 4:20 PM  

J-Pod, Mr. Reversion-to-the-mean himself, demonstrating that massive super-intelligence at work again.

Blogger Dire Badger June 26, 2018 6:17 PM  

And people wonder why I consider Lyndon Johnson the most evil and corrupt president ever.

Blogger insight June 26, 2018 7:19 PM  

Jews go too far, even this Jew sort of admitted it, 4th paragraph down...

http://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/dont-cry-rachel-maddow/

Blogger tublecane June 26, 2018 7:37 PM  

@14- In the meantime, it might be fun to stir up "intersectional" trouble. The Jews have a-hurtin coming to them like they don't know if they don't abandon Team Vibrancy and get with Team White.

Blogger tublecane June 26, 2018 7:44 PM  

@16- No, no. Makow is serious about going after the left, feminists and homos especially, whereas Peterson is wishy-washy at best. Makow also has a clear enemy that he pursues relentlessly: the global commie Jewish Satanic Illuminati conspiracy. Jordan Peterson only consistently attacks ideology and group identity.

Which isn't to say Makow isn't wrong. He sees baseball everyone as an agent, a plant, or stooge. But he does one thing Peterson would never do: he Names the Jew. Possibly because he is himself Jewish, as I recall.

Blogger tublecane June 26, 2018 7:51 PM  

"Show us where the Jew hurt you"

In the back, where I was stabbed.

That was too easy.

Blogger Cecil Henry June 26, 2018 8:18 PM  

There are so many, its endless:


According to the President of the Jewish Community in Oslo, Norway is TOO WHITE!

Translation: He hates White people and advocates their destruction. When will he be held accountable for this evil??

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DgnL0xuW0AARUQJ.jpg:large

Blogger Lazarus June 26, 2018 10:56 PM  

CM wrote:Shapiro has an awesome take on The Golden Rule at NR today. I

I bet not. Link?

Blogger Unknown June 26, 2018 11:34 PM  

The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 was pure JFK 1960 platform.

Blogger D. June 27, 2018 12:14 AM  

ot but maybe funny:

https://twitter.com/Carpedonktum/status/1011809412745433088

Blogger Resident Moron™ June 27, 2018 2:43 AM  

Guys n goys

“Christ killer” might be historically and theologically indefensible but it’s still devastating rhetoric.

A significant degree of its rhetorical power derives from its inherent illogic. The target knows you’re not seriously accusing them personally of deicide but provoking an emotional reaction for effect. Nonetheless they nearly always give you precisely that. They cannot help themselves.

Blogger S. Thermite June 27, 2018 3:44 AM  

Jewish take on the Golden Rule? Does it involve elevating both mammon and our animal nature like one could argue was done with the golden calf?

Blogger tublecane June 27, 2018 4:28 AM  

@41- The CMQ. (Catholic Mick Question.)

Blogger CarpeOro June 27, 2018 7:29 AM  

Did he really intend to go there, with all of the accusations oozing out of Hollyweird regarding various (((tribe))) members? Harvey W. was far from the only one. Maybe JPod isn't as smart as (((they))) say he is.

Blogger Peter Gent June 27, 2018 8:24 AM  

The theological issue was settled by Paul with two verses:
Romans 11:23 "23 And they also, if they do not continue in unbelief, will be grafted in, for God is able to graft them in again." This requires those who claim to be God's people to give up their rejection of Christ and accept him as the Way, the Truth, and the Life and the ONLY way to the Father. When the Temple veil was rent after the fulfillment of the sacrifice on the cross of Calvary, the old priesthood and sacrificial system was rendered dead and the new Temple was the Christian themselves who Paul noted was Temple of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 6:19).
Galatians 3:29 "And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise." That means all Christians are heirs to all the promises made to Abraham and his descendants. And the previous section in Romans argues that all who reject Christ have been cut off (have no access to the promises). So at this point, only believers in Christ have access to the promises made to Abraham and his descendants.

One issue not addressed very often is that modern Judaism and any the desire to resurrect the Temple is anti-Christ since it denies Jesus the Messiah has come in the flesh and fulfilled the requirements of the law as the perfect sacrifice. John makes this clear in 1 John 2:22 "Who is a liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist who denies the Father and the Son."

It is not rocket science.

Blogger Peter Gent June 27, 2018 10:08 AM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Matamoros June 27, 2018 9:07 PM  

@47 "One issue not addressed very often is that modern Judaism and any the desire to resurrect the Temple is anti-Christ since it denies Jesus the Messiah has come in the flesh and fulfilled the requirements of the law as the perfect sacrifice. John makes this clear in 1 John 2:22 "Who is a liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist who denies the Father and the Son.""

The basis of churchianity is judaizing. Christians are not taught their bible and religious history. The Whore of Babylon is Jerusalem - the city where he was pierced - as St. John clearly tells us.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts