ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2018 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Saturday, June 30, 2018

The science of Q

It will not be Gowdy.
Q

That's not even remotely opaque. Now, it will obviously not prove that Q is reliable if the Supreme Court nomination turns out to be someone other than Trey Gowdy. But if the hypothesis is falsified, that will demonstrate Q's fallibility.

Labels: ,

95 Comments:

Blogger Haxo Angmark June 30, 2018 5:00 PM  

when "Q" is reduced to making 100% certain "predictions",

it's an even more evident fraud than before. Incidentally,

it will also not be Rita Hayworth.

Blogger Miguel June 30, 2018 5:03 PM  

Lil Ben advertized himself (jokingly, of course). A Never Trumper Israel Firster with a short memory,it seems.

Blogger Jack Ward June 30, 2018 5:05 PM  

I admit to not knowing all that much about Trey Gowdy, other than a sound bite the last day or so where he was very much in the FBI
directors face and using some bad words. That was refreshing. Would he make a good, solid SCJ on the bench? Or, something we might not like?

Blogger Jack Ward June 30, 2018 5:10 PM  

After my first comment this thread I had a sudden thought. looking at the way Q does his posts reminds me of Ivan Throne. Could it be...?

Blogger Cetera June 30, 2018 5:10 PM  

Jack Ward wrote:I admit to not knowing all that much about Trey Gowdy, other than a sound bite the last day or so where he was very much in the FBI

directors face and using some bad words. That was refreshing. Would he make a good, solid SCJ on the bench? Or, something we might not like?


Gowdy is a very-much bought-and-paid-for swamp creature. He's all bark, and never, ever bites. He was instrumental in obfuscating the Benghazi investigation of Hillary, and saw his personal wealth balloon from ~100k to several million over the last four years.

He is basically controlled opposition, there to make the GOPe look good while they are "fighting" the uniparty, but somehow always managing to lose.

Blogger Unknown June 30, 2018 5:11 PM  

Nice. Q knows is Popper. State your prediction, then demonstrate it.

Blogger Christopher B June 30, 2018 5:12 PM  

I believe it's already been announced that Trump and his team are using the list of 25 possibles he announced during the campaign.

Blogger qualitycontrol June 30, 2018 5:13 PM  

@2. Miguel
To be fair, the point he made was good. Let's nominate someone in his late 30s or early 40s that will sit on the bench for at least 40 years.

Blogger Were-Puppy June 30, 2018 5:16 PM  

People were saying it might be Gowdy because he is already stepping down and commented that he wanted to get back into the justice system.

Then they were speculating that Trump would appoint him to the SC.

That is the backstory behind this Q post.

Blogger tuberman June 30, 2018 5:19 PM  

Yes, this was just to put an end to much Anon speculation.

Blogger tuberman June 30, 2018 5:21 PM  

The shills are quick on the draw for any thread with Q in title.

Blogger Mercy June 30, 2018 5:21 PM  

Linked at infogalactic:
https://www.apnews.com/ca70f1b2c8e94feebf8af80638616e76/Trump's-Supreme-Court-search-begins,-with-youth-a-key-factor

This is why, when Alex Jones recently said Napolitano was a top pick, I thought "I hope not.". Well, that and because a libertarian would work to slow the God-Emperor's ascendance.

Blogger Dave June 30, 2018 5:22 PM  

Sen. Mike Lee (Utah) was one of the first names to pop up all over the MSM. His Google ties are _problematic_, but hell, Google probably won't even be around in 10 years.

Blogger Nikephoros II Phokas June 30, 2018 5:26 PM  

Mike Lee was one of the cucks trying to stop Trump's nomination at the RNC and refusing to endorse him during the general election.

No, thanks. Same for Cruz.

Blogger OGRE June 30, 2018 5:38 PM  

Gowdy's background isn't really one that's considered suited for a Supreme Court nomination. He has no significant appellate experience either as a judge or attorney or any background in legal education. Almost all nominees for the past several decades have a CV that includes serving as judge on a US Circuit Court or at least as a District Court judge or state Supreme Court justice, or as an attorney heavily involved in cases before the federal Circuit or Supreme courts (e.g. US Solicitor General, US Attorney General).

Gowdy's background includes none of these things and he could readily be challenged as unqualified for this reason. Its already known the Dems will fight the nomination no matter what, but a pick like Gowdy gives them some actual ammunition to use in that fight.

Blogger Looking Glass June 30, 2018 5:40 PM  

Gowdy is compromised, like so much of the swamp. The weirdest swamp creature, to me, is Lindsey Graham. There's a reason he can seem utterly reasonably, then go hard RINO all of a sudden. None of the effect aligns with either ideology or politics local to his State. They are fine on certain topics, but their cord gets yanked on other ones. (One can start to get an idea of who has their chains, from inspection on the outliers.)

I hope Gowdy can untangle himself from whatever the control network has over him. Got great hair.

On the issue of SCOTUS pick, I'd appreciate a Protestant for the first time in a very long time.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash June 30, 2018 5:41 PM  

Trump will work with former opponents, but not with 'former' enemies. Cruz is out because he had his mistress mail nudes of Melania to every voter in Utah. Lee, because of underhanded shenannigans at the convention.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother June 30, 2018 5:47 PM  

So if Q is a human being, he'd have to know this is calling his shot. Is Q The Bambino? He / they / 0211 has to know that if the prediction is wrong, it will seriously degrade Q's credibility.

Blogger Salt June 30, 2018 5:51 PM  

Twenty bucks it's a woman.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother June 30, 2018 5:52 PM  

Any Coney Barrett or Diane Sykes, if true.

Blogger dienw June 30, 2018 5:57 PM  

Jack Ward wrote:I admit to not knowing all that much about Trey Gowdy, other than a sound bite the last day or so where he was very much in the FBI

directors face and using some bad words. That was refreshing. Would he make a good, solid SCJ on the bench? Or, something we might not like?


None of these Congress critters criticizing the DOJ, the FBI, or Mueller should be considered for any post until teh Congress' Sgt. at Arms is sent to haul Rothstien (even Sessions), the FBI criminals, and Mueller before Congress along with all the unredacted papers and recordings being demanded by Congress; otherwise, these Congressional committees are just theater.

Blogger Skylark Thibedeau June 30, 2018 5:59 PM  

Needs to be Sessions so he can get someone at Justice to tear Mueller a new one.

Blogger dienw June 30, 2018 6:00 PM  

On the issue of SCOTUS pick, I'd appreciate a Protestant for the first time in a very long time.

As there should be.

Blogger Anno Ruse June 30, 2018 6:09 PM  

"The shills are quick on the draw for any thread with Q in title."

No, this blog simply has a large readership and occasionally someone disagrees with a premise.

A prediction on the gender would be more entertaining and actually risk Q's credibility. Why wasn't that done? There only seems to be one answer.

Blogger cavalier973 June 30, 2018 6:26 PM  

There are arguments on Twitter that Rosenstein is doing Trump's bidding while pretending to be antagonistic to the President, but Q has been adamant that RR is going to resign or be terminated from the DAG position because he is compromised.

If RR turns out to be a white hat, that would destroy Q's credibility, in my mind.

Blogger Zeroh Tollrants June 30, 2018 6:28 PM  

Please no women or Jews!!!!

Blogger Howard Stone June 30, 2018 6:37 PM  

Gowdy’s all bark, no bite.

Blogger Dirk Manly June 30, 2018 6:39 PM  

@24

"A prediction on the gender would be more entertaining and actually risk Q's credibility. Why wasn't that done? There only seems to be one answer."

Who the pick is, is not settled.
That Gowdy is NOT the pick, IS settled.

Blogger Chase June 30, 2018 6:43 PM  

The obvious answer to me is: the decision is not yet made, but one man is ruled out (for whatever reason you want to believe).

Blogger Andrew June 30, 2018 6:52 PM  

It will be Amy Coney Barrett. Makes the Dems look bad before midterms to oppose a qualified, pretty woman. Also, this means Trump won't have to appoint a woman when RBG is next to go.

Blogger Lance E June 30, 2018 6:55 PM  

Gowdy's not even on the shortlist. Great "prediction". I'll also stake my reputation on it not being Maxine Waters or ¡Jeb!

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother June 30, 2018 6:56 PM  

ACB is a staunch Catholic, mother of a bunch of kids, law professor, etc. Just on identity politics she'll be pretty good. Her legal qualifications are also impeccable.

Blogger Brick Hardslab June 30, 2018 7:10 PM  

If Q is real, how much is disinformation?

Blogger Zimri June 30, 2018 7:11 PM  

We already know Qanon is fallible. He predicted Podesta's arrest in March. Didn't happen.

Blogger Che Dolf June 30, 2018 7:13 PM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Anchorman June 30, 2018 7:18 PM  

Is Gowdy even on the list of 25?

The best part of blowing up the filibuster is there is no need for "blank slate" nominees, like Roberts. You can go rock-ribbed and not look back.

Blogger Doug Cranmer June 30, 2018 7:20 PM  

The shills are obvious. They all have the same tone that I could train a machine to pick out just for kicks.

They don't even seem to try anymore.

Blogger Edgar Abbey June 30, 2018 7:23 PM  

I agree that Gowdy is compromised. Most of us sense something wrong there. All that effort on Benghazi and nothing?

Blogger camperbot June 30, 2018 7:26 PM  

Q has not been genuine since Jan 5. There are dozens of examples where he's lied:

- the Russian air crash - wrong
- the hotel in Shanghai - made up
- being locked out of his own board - a lie
- Black Forest - wrong
- Red Cross Pakistan - there is no such org
- poorly photoshopped pictures
- spelling and grammar errors
- Snowden in Hong Kong - nonsense

Q before Jan 5 provided overwhelming proofs he was real. Q after Jan 5 is a LARP.

Blogger Ken Prescott June 30, 2018 7:35 PM  

"it will also not be Rita Hayworth."

This just in: it will also not not be Francisco Franco, as he's still dead.

Blogger Avalanche June 30, 2018 7:42 PM  

@15 "Almost all nominees for the past several decades have a CV that includes serving as judge on a US Circuit Court or at least as a District Court judge or state Supreme Court justice, or as an attorney heavily involved in cases before the federal Circuit or Supreme courts (e.g. US Solicitor General, US Attorney General)."

Not sure that's a reccie -- just like the God Emperor had no political experience?

Blogger NO GOOGLES June 30, 2018 7:51 PM  

I would seriously hope that Trump doesn't pick Gowdy. Gowdy's only talent is showing off for the cameras when he's questioning someone, not getting results.

Just give me someone who is loyal and is under 55.

Blogger cavalier973 June 30, 2018 7:56 PM  

Did the real Q just give up posting at all, then?

Blogger Greg Hunt June 30, 2018 7:57 PM  

Can anyone confirm if camperbot is telling the truth?

Blogger tublecane June 30, 2018 7:58 PM  

@5- Not just all bark no bite. He also makes statements against our interests. Like how he rejected Spygate shortly before the IG report came out. That was bad PR for us.

If that was kayfabe, intended to produce the natrative "Wow, even Gowdy's convinced now," it was stupid.

Blogger Crush Limbraw June 30, 2018 7:59 PM  

I agree - we will not be saying 'Howdy Gowdy' - all bark but never finishes.
Prima donna!

Blogger OGRE June 30, 2018 8:05 PM  

@41 Avalanche

My point was that Gowdy would be a very unconventional pick as hes not from the subset of attorneys from which Supreme Court picks are almost always made. Its expected that a Justice would have some experience as a federal judge, or at the very least a high level academic or appellate lawyer position. I'm not saying he would be a bad justice, or that he would be good one. But because of his background he could be construed as inexperienced and unqualified for the position. And that is a narrative that could actually be sold...enough to sway a handful of RINOs in the Senate for instance.

Blogger Daniel June 30, 2018 8:12 PM  

Senator Scott plans to recommend Gowdy.

Blogger Dirk Manly June 30, 2018 8:15 PM  

@44

camperbot is a LARP

Blogger Rick June 30, 2018 8:21 PM  

Camperbot needs to provide links. Period.

Blogger tuberman June 30, 2018 8:26 PM  

Brick Hardslab wrote:If Q is real, how much is disinformation?

Several times at least, but they were always misleading the Deep State. The first time was the Mr, Pedo arrest projection, and it was used to distract from what was going on in SA, or the actual arrests of the Saudi Princes supplying much of the bribe money keeping the USA Congress under the Deep State's thumb. There was a deal being made with the SA King and the reform Prince. This also caught the antifa and BLM pawns flat footed as they planned riots on November 4th, but was left with nothing to riot about.

Blogger seeingsights June 30, 2018 8:34 PM  

Assorted comments:

1. I don't consider the prediction that Gowdy won't be the Supreme Court nominee to be risky.
Now, if Q had given a list of three names, and one of them got selected by the god-emperor, then I would be seriously intrigued and would probably follow Q in a cult like way.

2. Concerning qualifications for SCOTUS: One does not need a law license, or a law degree, in order to be a Supreme Court Justice. For what its worth, I'm a paralegal, and an attorney said my views on the US Constitution are as good as anybody's. I've discussed older Supreme Court cases with attorneys.

3. I've been thinking about Q. Vox Day sees Q as a morale booster. I think that Vox Day is on to something. Its sort of like the legend of Prester John
https://infogalactic.com/info/Prester_John
Prester John was an alleged Christian monarch in the East. This legend started during the Crusades and inspired a notion of deliverance from the East.
Q is, unlike Prester John, a real person(s), but each is considered to be a mysterious and powerful ally for a social/political movement.

Blogger SciVo June 30, 2018 8:35 PM  

camperbot wrote:Q before Jan 5 provided overwhelming proofs he was real. Q after Jan 5 is a LARP.

Hypothesis: Q knew that not being caught was a gamble, and the only way to win at gambling in the long run is to pick an endpoint and stick with it. It is easier to remember round numbers. Therefore, Jan. 5 will be some nice round amount of time from when he started, like "3 months" or "100 days."

Test: Quick search indicates that the first verified Q post on /pol was Saturday, Oct. 28, 2017. That makes Friday, Jan. 5, 2018 the last day of the 10th week.

Result: The hypothesis has failed to be disconfirmed. Jan. 5 as an endpoint for Q's activity is consistent with postdictably rational planning and execution.

Blogger Zimri June 30, 2018 8:43 PM  

"I've been thinking about Q. Vox Day sees Q as a morale booster. I think that Vox Day is on to something."

Corceptive.

Fake But Accurate, as others would put it.

Blogger tuberman June 30, 2018 8:45 PM  

52. seeingsights

Exactly, it would take most people too many hours in the day to follow it all anyway, as it requires more than the drops themselves. But watch the morale boosts during the Trump Stumps when speaking to crowds. Q will be a larger and larger part of that, and morale will shoot through the big top. Moar Q T's at these events, and even greater amounts of Memes... who knows what else, yet new and tremendous momentum.

Then the PROOFS...will be there, supplied, not by Q, but by the Anons.

Blogger bosscauser June 30, 2018 9:09 PM  

Google Kagan's qualifications...

Blogger jb June 30, 2018 9:09 PM  

Spend some time learning to read Q's drops.

Given the IQ range around these parts, it shouldn't be difficult to accomplish, I would think.

There isn't a single political "prophet" any near 100% accuracy, but next to Vox and Q, the others kind of pale by comparison. ;-)

Blogger Anno Ruse June 30, 2018 9:11 PM  

What if Q is actually anti-Trump? How would our enemies benefit from Q's actions?

We would see a split between Q-believers and non-believers in the Trump camp, eroding support of the man himself and leading each side to believe they're the savvier Trump supporters. DIVISION!
We would see a movement form around Q-belief. Q shirts and banners with that acronym he uses. Nothing comes of Q, or is revealed as fake? HUMILIATION!
We would see anons pulled away from their investigations to follow Q's breadcrumbs which never quite lead to anything major. DISTRACTION!

It's a sensible theory, though kind of dull. I'll see if I can work in Prester John.

Blogger Ned June 30, 2018 9:12 PM  

Of course it won't be controlled opposition Gowdy. All he ever does is hold useless hearings and jack his jaw. Then NOTHING happens. None of his tirades in Congress ever accomplished a single damned thing. What happened with the Benghazi hearings? Waste of time. Big Zero. But Trey was shocked, SHOCKED about the issue. and it only cost taxpayers 7.1 million for that useless report. That report was so bad that Pompeo and Jordan released their own addendums to the committee's report. Gowdy found no fault with Clinton.
Gowdy even believes that the FBI spying on the Trump campaign was "what the American public would want the FBI to do". That ought to be enough for the GE to eliminate Gowdy.

One thing's for sure - Gowdy is a master at releasing useless statements and holding useless hearings. He must have given great closing statements in all the cases he lost as a lawyer.
Gowdy also believes that the Mueller investigation should not be shut down. So whatever he says regarding Rosenstein is word salad and window dressing. Good riddance, Trey - you ineffective twat.

Blogger jb June 30, 2018 9:16 PM  

AR -

I take it you need the anons to translate.

Blogger Baseball Savant June 30, 2018 9:20 PM  

I'm kind of pulling for Kevin Newsom just from a cursory glance at Trump's original list of 25, although I don't know much about any of the candidates.

Blogger jb June 30, 2018 9:22 PM  

Ned -

Trey - door - glutes - beware.

Blogger OGRE June 30, 2018 9:26 PM  

@52 seeingsights

You're missing my point. The Constitution doesn't set any requirements for a Supreme Court justice, so no they don't even need a legal education, nor do they even need to be an American citizen or of a certain age. But they do need to be confirmed. And anyone outside of that circle of appellate judges and lawyers has a weakness as a nominee, one that can be exploited by the Dems in the Senate when it comes to confirmation.

Gowdy would be a very weak nominee as he has no experience in appellate practice of any kind. And that weakness can and will be used by Trump's enemies in the confirmation process.

Trump has his list, and every single one of the people on that list are either current or former Federal Circuit or District Court judges or state Supreme Court justices. Why should he look elsewhere, what should he hope to find? This is one of the most important decisions he'll ever make in his life, so why would he look for someone that can be attacked for being inexperienced when he has a list of extremely qualified candidates that presumably have impeccable backgrounds and share his views?

Blogger Jeff aka Orville June 30, 2018 9:34 PM  

Gowdy Doody is on the long list of Congressmen not seeking re-election. That list itself is a bit of an oddball. While some of them resigned or decided not to seek re-election due to known scandals, others are apparently quitting mid-stride of their political career. I've tried to find historical info to see how that compares to the usual turnover in Congress that is not due to losing an election. Very strange.

Blogger Jeff aka Orville June 30, 2018 9:42 PM  

There is also the Senior Judge of the Third Circuit US Court of Appeals, Maryanne Barry, Donald's older sister who testified at Alito's nomination, and was presented an award by Sandra Day O'Connor.

Blogger DraveckysHumerus June 30, 2018 9:44 PM  

Judge Raymond Kethledge, 6th Circuit. Third-youngest jurist appointed to a federal appellate court in US history. Squeaky clean, perfect family, age 50, and just wrote a book on leadership. Authored the Lois Lerner/IRS decision as well as some others. I initiated him in our college fraternity and he possessed the demeanor of a man who believes he is destined for the history books; he'll align with many of the positions discussed here. Consider.

Blogger Brett baker June 30, 2018 10:05 PM  

According to Rush Limbaugh, many of those resigning are losing their committee chairmanships. They would make more as lobbyists than Congressmen without chairmanships.

Blogger Brett baker June 30, 2018 10:05 PM  

According to Rush Limbaugh, many of those resigning are losing their committee chairmanships. They would make more as lobbyists than Congressmen without chairmanships.

Blogger SciVo June 30, 2018 10:26 PM  

Ned wrote:So whatever he says regarding Rosenstein is word salad and window dressing.

I'm gonna call that "word salad dressing."

Jeff aka Orville wrote:Gowdy Doody is on the long list of Congressmen not seeking re-election. That list itself is a bit of an oddball. While some of them resigned or decided not to seek re-election due to known scandals, others are apparently quitting mid-stride of their political career.

Possibilities:

1. Expecting to be in the minority, and preferring to make bank as a lobbyist.

2. Getting out of the spotlight before a scandal can be exposed.

3. Tired of accumulating big-league money, power, and status. Too much winning!

4. Baseball has become too risky, and was the only reason for being there.

5. It's getting too hard to maintain the kayfabe with all three branches and no excuses, and quitting would be better than actually delivering for the voters.

Blogger Dirk Manly June 30, 2018 10:44 PM  

@64

"Gowdy Doody is on the long list of Congressmen not seeking re-election. That list itself is a bit of an oddball. While some of them resigned or decided not to seek re-election due to known scandals, others are apparently quitting mid-stride of their political career. I've tried to find historical info to see how that compares to the usual turnover in Congress that is not due to losing an election. Very strange."

They have been, so to say, touched.

Or in other words, it's blackmailing of the already blackmailed.

Reminds me of back in the late 90's when Media Bypass printed a story about a bunch of Senators who all had huge Swiss bank accounts, which some group of NSA-types with a satellite dish and a tractor-trailer truck had managed to completely empty (fund wire-transferred towards payment of the national debt). The story went that they had delivered to each of the Senators a note saying, "Check your Swiss account," followed by another note saying, "You will retire to spend more time with your family, or we go public."

The names of 6 Senators were listed... one of them being the detestable Pat Schroeder.

Sure enough, when primary season rolled around a few months later, every single one of the 6 on that list retired, "to spend more time with my family."

Same thing is going on now. Thank goodness.

Blogger CynicalMan June 30, 2018 10:58 PM  

The next Supreme needs to be a conservative black man.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother June 30, 2018 11:20 PM  

No

Blogger Azure Amaranthine June 30, 2018 11:22 PM  

"There only seems to be one answer."

That you like jumping to conclusions you preselected?

That something is not firmly proven does not mean that it is in any way disproven.

Blogger Chase June 30, 2018 11:37 PM  

The Q sites, including the 8ch site are down for me. Is this true for anyone else?

Blogger Freddy June 30, 2018 11:53 PM  

Gowdy is fake and owned. It's all theater. Get your preps together.

Blogger Starboard July 01, 2018 12:09 AM  

69. SciVo

5. It's getting too hard to maintain the kayfabe with all three branches and no excuses, and quitting would be better than actually delivering for the voters.

If only they had a stronger majority in the congress and senate they could deliver on their promises....

Blogger tuberman July 01, 2018 12:12 AM  

71. CynicalMan

Are you really Jordan Peterson, or perhaps Ben Shapiro?

Blogger pyrrhus July 01, 2018 12:12 AM  

@63 I agree, the nominee will be a federal appeals Judge (most likely) or a circuit judge...State Supreme Court justice is a longshot, and guys like Gowdy, no way.

Blogger Freddy July 01, 2018 12:23 AM  

If only our people ruled the Swamp then it would all get straightened out. Wake up! Nothing will get fixed with the global depop program running on all cylinders. Stop the crime .net and and that nasty NASA war doc on exterminating you and your family. Directed Energy Weapons all around us now, creating "mysterious" fires and Tesla energy systems to do the flash flood dance while you sleep in your pathetic willful ignorance. I'm clean now. I've warned some of you.

Blogger S. Thermite July 01, 2018 1:56 AM  

I'm clean now.

Doesn’t sound like it.

Blogger camperbot July 01, 2018 4:00 AM  

I've found this thread on Twitter helpful to see the difference between the real and the LARP:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/980789585801351168.html

Also the original 8chan thread is still up:
https://8ch.net/cbts/res/258430.html

Blogger VD July 01, 2018 4:22 AM  

We would see a movement form around Q-belief. Q shirts and banners with that acronym he uses. Nothing comes of Q, or is revealed as fake? HUMILIATION!

Give the Gamma Fear a rest already.

Blogger Stilicho July 01, 2018 7:28 AM  

Well, an actual prediction is better than the usual Q-stradamus gobbledygook. But Q's not even giving Madame Cleo competition at this point though.

Blogger Christopher B July 01, 2018 7:29 AM  

Re Gowdy wanting to get back in the justice system - I belive that was a signal he wants an appointment as a US Attorney or to the DOJ, not a seat on any court.

Blogger cavalier973 July 01, 2018 9:03 AM  

camperbot links below to a Twitter thread that makes a persuasive argument (based on a change in tone, presentation, types of info released, etc.) that a different person has been posting as Q since early January of this year. Although it discusses the errors in forecasting made by "New Q", the feed doesn't necessarily prove the contention that "New Q" is a fake. I read the twitter thread, then glanced through the Tweets of the author, then of an associated account that makes the same arguments, and they admit that "New Q" gets some stuff right, but is not nearly as accurate as "Classic Q".

The value in Q is that people are inspired to do a lot of in-depth research, and a lot of interesting stories are being uncovered, even during New Q's tenure.

What would be funny is if the narrative is backward, and that "Classic Q" was a very good LARP, but was shut down, and President Trump took over as "New Q".

Blogger cavalier973 July 01, 2018 9:13 AM  

Being thought of as "stupid" by the likes of Maxine Waters is unconcerning.

Blogger James Jones July 01, 2018 9:23 AM  

It will not be Oprah.
J

I will soon have a 100% record.

Blogger artensoll July 01, 2018 11:12 AM  

As an outsider and relative newcomer to US politics, Gowdy appears to me to be a good man caught between a rock and a hard place. Something changed for him recently, he is not a happy bunny and his appearance reflects this.

Blogger Rebel Skate July 01, 2018 11:25 AM  

It never fails to amaze me how many of these comments are people disavowing Q as valid. Trump could/would have crushed a fake Q months ago with just 1 tweet. Many times has Q been shown to be high within Trump admin and Trump himself has done lots of things to show Q as real.
The only way Q is a LARP is if Trump is part of the swamp and its a massive disinformation campaign meant to break the will of the people. Nothing I've seen from Trump makes me believe that but you can live in fear and doubt as much as you wish.
Me? I'm an optimist.
WWG1WGA

Blogger Were-Puppy July 01, 2018 1:38 PM  

@19 Salt
Twenty bucks it's a woman.
---

No offense ladies, but hell no.

Women such as RBG, Wise Latrina .. we've got enough of those.

Who would they pick from? Pelosi, Waters, Feinstein, Boxer, Clinton, Manchelle, Pocahontas, etc?

Women in politics looks like a disaster if you pile it together like this.

Blogger Were-Puppy July 01, 2018 1:40 PM  

@26 Zeroh Tollrants
Please no women or Jews!!!!
---

Or Catholics, or Muslims!

Blogger SciVo July 01, 2018 5:20 PM  

Rebel Skate wrote:The only way Q is a LARP is if Trump is part of the swamp and its a massive disinformation campaign meant to break the will of the people.

That does not follow. Your logic is peccable.

Rebel Skate wrote:Nothing I've seen from Trump makes me believe that but you can live in fear and doubt as much as you wish.

I'm barely aware of Q's existence, primarily through this blog, and I assure you that nothing involving him affects my emotional state at all. (While I have my ups and downs, I've got 99 problems but a psyop ain't one.) Sounds like projection.

Blogger Dirk Manly July 01, 2018 9:33 PM  

@76

>> 5. It's getting too hard to maintain the kayfabe with all three branches and no excuses, and quitting would be better than actually delivering for the voters.

> If only they had a stronger majority in the congress and senate they could deliver on their promises....

And TWO presidents. They only have one Republican President in the White House... how can they get anything done with only ONE President on their side?

Line up ALL of Congress against a wall, and give them the Ceaușescu, so as to encourage their replacements to take an interest in the public good, not dicking it over.

Blogger Dirk Manly July 01, 2018 9:39 PM  

@88

"Something changed for him recently, he is not a happy bunny and his appearance reflects this."

Either his wife is threatening divorce, or someone is blackmailing him -- probably with something ridiculously stupid that the voting public probably doesn't give 2 shits about.

Blogger Dirk Manly July 01, 2018 9:42 PM  

@90

"
Women in politics looks like a disaster if you pile it together like this."

Remember the "European Ministers of Defense" photograph, that looked like an afternoon coffee-clatch?

How many of those female Defense Ministers have taken a single step to defending their nation's borders against the Afro-Arab invasion?

hint: it's less than one.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts