ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2020 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Sunday, August 26, 2018

Why Corbyn is under attack

Trump is why British Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn is under relentless attack in Britain:
“Besieged for four years, Corbyn has been abandoned. Few respected politicians want to risk being cast out into the wilderness, like Ken Livingstone, as an anti-Semite. Corbyn himself has conceded too much ground on anti-semitism. He has tried to placate rather than defy the smearers.”

Cook points out that by conceding ground, Corbyn betrayed Palestinians and betrayed anti-Zionist Jews who were expelled by droves from Labour. Even Tony Greenstein, a Jewish nationalist though anti-Zionist, had been expelled; the same Tony Greenstein who attacked me and Gilad Atzmon for our anti-Semitism (I responded to him here). He was also sent home packing. The late Hajo Meyer, a Holocaust survivor and defender of Palestinian rights, a personal friend of Corbyn, had been denounced. Palestinians were betrayed, and we should care about them more than about Jewish fine feelings.

But why should we give a damn about Corbyn and/or Palestinians if we aren’t British voters? I’ll tell you.

In the British establishment, pro-Jewish forces decided to side with the Washington War Party to push us close to war. The recent visit of the British Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt (the man on the shortlist of Israel’s agents within the British establishment) to Washington where Hunt delivered a speech calling for full-out war on Russia, “has been read as an intervention on the side of the anti-Russian faction in the split and divided US administration”, said the Guardian.

The speech is just an opening, missiles will follow soon. Today, I was informed by my contacts, the Russians have delivered a demarche to the State Department, warning the Americans to desist from their plans to attack Syria. Russian intelligence learned that eight tanks containing chlorine have been delivered to Halluz village of Idlib province where the group of specially trained militants has already been deployed in order to simulate the rescue of the victims of chemical attack. The militants were trained by the British private military company Olive (which had merged with the American Constellis Group.
This explains a lot. I have been wondering why the British media have been waging such an over-the-top campaign against Jeremy Corbyn of late, with several MPs throwing massive hissy fits of the sort that would normally suffice to get them kicked out of the Labour Party. The reason is that Britain has become the favored weapon of the neocons and the Deep State to provoke war with Russia now that it is clear that Trump has no intention of playing ball. But Corbyn, who is far more popular than any of his party rivals, stands in their way, so they are desperate to get him out of the picture before Trump manages to turn his attention to Britain and the three other Five Eyes states.

To date, Corbyn has simply remained passive and calmly weathered the attacks. Since that hasn't worked, I suspect he will soon take action to expel his attackers from the party. After all, what are they going to do, join the Conservative Party?

It's not a coincidence that both Trump and Corbyn are under assault. Despite their ideological differences, both men are sane enough to be determined to avoid more totally unnecessary wars that are not in the American or the British national interests.

Labels: , ,

42 Comments:

Blogger Antony August 26, 2018 7:41 AM  

Both Vox and Israel Shamir hit the nail on the head here - I disagree with Corbyn on pretty much everything, especially his pro-immigration stance, but honourably he has always stood against getting involved in wars on behalf of the evil cabal in the middle east. One article you may wish to check out is from the Electronic Intifada website who have been following this tawdry smear campaign against Corbyn ; https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/asa-winstanley/new-challenge-israels-effort-undermine-jeremy-corbyn

Blogger Shimshon August 26, 2018 8:08 AM  

"Ron Unz wrote that the British establishment together with Organised Jewry were able to push unwilling America into the world wars twice, and perhaps they will be able to repeat this feat a third time."

I don't know about WWI, but how exactly were (((they))) successful in goading America into WWII? Was it when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Or when the Japanese unilaterally declared war on America in return? All kidding aside, I believe the Jews were entirely unsuccessful in dragging America into war, and had almost no impact on strategy as well. Am I wrong?

Blogger Miguel August 26, 2018 8:20 AM  

Yes you are since Chaim Weizman is quoted by historian David Irving as admiting jews influencing America into war twice.

Blogger Thad Tuiol August 26, 2018 8:22 AM  

"Gee, those buck-toothed, four-eyed little yellow Jewish bastards sure kicked our asses at Pearl Harbor!"

Blogger Johnny August 26, 2018 8:22 AM  

>>Ron Unz wrote that the British establishment together with Organised Jewry were able to push unwilling America into the world wars twice...

We got into WWI because of Woodrow Wilson and the ability of the British establishment to sell the war with periodic news releases. As the Brits wanted us in for obvious reasons, that I know of there would be no reason to assign undue influence to the Jewish Minority. We got into WWII because of trade sanctions on Japan and some remarkably bad thinking on the part of the Japanese.

Blogger Steb August 26, 2018 8:27 AM  

The domestic angle to the Corbyn drama is the same one being played out by the Dems in the USA.
The champagne socialists that ran labour since Blair had forgotten that the immigrants they brought in to vote for them weren't kidding when they talked about socialism. They only let Corbyn stand for leader because they assumed everyone thought like they did, and would talk a good game on redistribution of wealth before quietly voting for whoever the banks told them to. But the new voting bloc were listening to their imams instead. And that's how we got Corbyn.

Blogger Teleros August 26, 2018 8:28 AM  

Despite their ideological differences, both men are sane enough to be determined to avoid more totally unnecessary wars that are not in the American or the British national interests.

Perhaps, but the trouble is that even if Corbyn wasn't an unreconstructed commie (I bet MI5 has a big fat file on him from the Cold War), he's in charge of the Labour Party. As in, the Labour Party being overrun with far-left Antifa types who love open borders and oppose Brexit. Corbyn to his credit seems to be pro-Brexit, or at least in favour of respecting the referendum result, but I have almost no confidence in the Labour Party. It's not that I'm sorry to see the Blairites get purged from Labour, but their replacements don't exactly inspire confidence either.

As far as wars go, I do think the Tories have the sense not to get involved without US hand-holding. So, provided Trump doesn't agree to help (read: provide the lion's share), you won't be seeing much from the UK.

Blogger Randomatos August 26, 2018 8:30 AM  

Be sure to note the kind of sanctions that pushed Japan over the edge. Russia doesn't have a strategic resource shortage, so notice where the meddlers today are trying to prod them.

Blogger Shimshon August 26, 2018 8:31 AM  

@3 "Yes you are since Chaim Weizman is quoted by historian David Irving as admiting jews influencing America into war twice."

There's no point in even asking for a citation. Chaim Weizmann says (((we))) did...so, we did? Jews WANTED America to enter the war. Jews even AGITATED to try to GOAD America into war. Jews did NOT SUCCEED in doing so. Would there have been war without Pearl Harbor? Not that speculation even matters.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan August 26, 2018 8:37 AM  

Well I do know that some jews took exception to Charles Lindberg correctly calling Germany's Luftwaffe a defensive orientated outfit.

Blogger David August 26, 2018 8:45 AM  

What seems like the entire British media has been banging on with the 'anti-Semitism' attacks on Corbyn for months, and this is the second time they've tried it. I don't get the feeling that they are any closer to bringing him down.

Blogger tuberman August 26, 2018 8:48 AM  

War with Russia is the last super Hail Mary for the Globalists in the USA. Enough is Enough.

The more intelligent ones knows there will be no "Blue Wave" 2018.

Blogger Lazarus August 26, 2018 8:51 AM  

Shimshon wrote:Would there have been war without Pearl Harbor?

Who or what was driving FDR to goad Japan into an attack? When Jews continually hold prominent positions in US administrations, it is difficult to assert they have no influence in the actions of said administrations.

Blogger ZhukovG August 26, 2018 8:53 AM  

Some Jews may have had a hand in influencing the USA into both World Wars. But Jews are not some homogeneous mass. Was it Zionists? Was it Bolsheviks?

I suspect then, as now, it is the Globalists(Jewish and Gentile) and their desire for a single global government,'of the elite, by the elite and for the elite', that is to blame.

Blogger tuberman August 26, 2018 8:54 AM  

UK war planes have been involved inciting incidences against Russian planes over 1500 miles away from the UK shores, using NATO as a cover.

Trying Hard!

Blogger Mr.MantraMan August 26, 2018 8:54 AM  

I'm sure China and Emperor Xi enjoy watching tigers fight (hat tip Kratman). I'm pretty sure China even pays our traitors well.

Blogger paranoid August 26, 2018 8:56 AM  

"The reason is that Britain has become the favored weapon of the neocons and the Deep State to provoke war with Russia now that it is clear that Trump no intention of playing ball. "
And why would they want war with Russia? Deep state needs it for its competition with China. And Russia has way too powerful military anyway to invade.

Treatment of Corbyn could be cause of some inner struggle for leadership of Labour party(Corbyn seems to be marginal figure outside of mainstream of the party who got into power) with antisemitism nothing more than tool to oust Corbyn and his follower.

It could also be cause of breaking taboos that Corbyn and especially one of corbinites Ken Livingstone did. Saying that Hitler was at one time Zionist really is inexcusable in liberal democracies. Holocaustianism is after all official religion of such regimes and what Corbyn and his follower do might weaken its grip. That's why moral panic around him. Look at words of Deborah Lipdstad, one of muftis of holocaustinity in UK:
----
Dr Lipstadt said full-blown Holocaust denial had been 'seriously weakened' with people who promote it widely seen as 'at best loony at worst hateful anti-Semites'.

But speaking at the Holocaust Educational Trust's annual conference in Westminster, London, said: 'Softcore Holocaust denial is where everything becomes a genocide.

'Softcore Holocaust denial is where people say 'I'm so tired of hearing about this, why am I always hearing about the Holocaust, too much about the Holocaust, oh you Jews and the Holocaust, jokes about the Holocaust…'
Dr Lipstadt, who is the Dorot Professor of Holocaust Studies at Emory University in Atlanta, said she believes anti-Semitism and 'softcore Holocaust denial' are both on the rise in the UK, in part due to the Labour Party.

She said: 'You have a former mayor here in London [Ken Livingstone] who would talk about the cooperation between the Zionists and the Nazis,' she said.

'He took one little historical fact and blew it up into something that never existed, completely twisted the truth. Irrespective of how you feel about him politically - its historically rubbish.
A Labour Party spokesperson said: 'Jeremy Corbyn has been absolutely clear that he is a militant opponent of anti-Semitism and is committed to driving it out of politics and our society.
----
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5913129/Corbyns-Labour-Party-breeding-softcore-Holocaust-denial-claims-leading-academic.html

Blogger Desdichado August 26, 2018 8:57 AM  

You should do some research on the personal causes of WW2. America goaded Japan into attacking us. There's even credible evidence Roosevelt knew the attack was coming and deliberately didn't tell his commanders in Hawaii.

The story is much more complicated than, "Well, the Japanese attached us!"

Blogger Desdichado August 26, 2018 8:57 AM  

Uh... Proximal. Not personal.

Blogger Darth Dharmakīrti August 26, 2018 9:02 AM  

This is going to backfire massively. Current Year Leftists simply do not give a damn about Israel, or to the extent they do, view them as the aggressive oppressive colonizers.

The Jewish attempt to oust Corbyn, even if successful, is going to leave them without any allies on left or (increasingly) right.

Blogger Teleros August 26, 2018 9:13 AM  

Darth Dharmakīrti wrote:This is going to backfire massively. Current Year Leftists simply do not give a damn about Israel, or to the extent they do, view them as the aggressive oppressive colonizers.

Doubly so in the UK, where our growing urban Mohammedan population tends to vote for Labour.

Blogger Unknown August 26, 2018 9:20 AM  

Thr US was pushing for war both times. Who places sanctions on waring nations without expecting an aggressive retaliation?

Blogger VD August 26, 2018 9:35 AM  

All kidding aside, I believe the Jews were entirely unsuccessful in dragging America into war, and had almost no impact on strategy as well. Am I wrong?

No, although they were apparently very successful in influencing how the post-war establishment was set up, particularly as related to the savage treatment of the German population by the Western allies. The Russians were even worse, but that was just reprisal.

Blogger TMLutas August 26, 2018 9:36 AM  

From the article "Israeli Left and Israeli Right is their unwillingness to give Palestinians freedom and restore the stolen goods".

What is common in cases of theft where the theft stretches back decades is that the victims have a specific list of what has been stolen and who has it now, where that is known. Surely, the palestinians, with all their international friends, must have such a list. If they do, I have not seen such a thing, describing who was robbed of what and who has it now.

Furthermore, where things get fuzzy and there are accusations on both sides, the common solution is to come up with a valid settlement amount with the less wronged party paying the differential in claims to the more wronged party.

All over E. Europe after the communist regimes fell, legitimate land claims have been settled with cash and not restoration. I have received zero reasonable explanation why palestinians should have better treatment but this expectation is largely treated as a norm not to be questioned.

To hell with that.

Jews are not lily white angels incapable of sin and without a history of bad behavior. They can and have played rough. They should be held to account to normal standards, not higher or lower ones than everyone else. That would be a refreshing change of pace welcomed by a lot of people.

Palestinians need to take the settlement checks, cut the best deal they can, and get on with their lives. But that's not what they're doing. Instead, the palestinian arab leadership demand that wounds be kept alive and open and the actual suffering of the people be of secondary importance.

That's wrong.

Blogger pyrrhus August 26, 2018 9:49 AM  

All kidding aside, I believe the Jews were entirely unsuccessful in dragging America into war, and had almost no impact on strategy as well. Am I wrong?
It's known that FDR wanted to drag America into war in Europe from 1939 on, and that his regime was heavily infiltrated by (((bankers))) and communists. But FDR was smart enough not to leave incriminating documents lying around.

Blogger Jonathon Davies August 26, 2018 10:07 AM  

Corbyn, as much as I detest him, is also pro-Brexit. Those seeking to stop Brexit want to remove him, as all his likely replacements are pro-EU globalists e.g. Keir Starmer, Chuka Umunna. They can then oppose any Brexit deal or a no deal scenario, and insist on a second vote, which would naturally be rigged so we remain in the EU. As mentioned, Corbyn will also whip his MPs to oppose any Syria military intervention. This is why he is under constant attack.

Blogger Homesteader August 26, 2018 11:13 AM  

WWI- The Balfour Declaration.

http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Others/Others-Doc-Jews/+Doc-Jews-National&InternationalConspiracy&NWO/BalfourDeclarationBroughtUSIntoWWISaysJew.htm

WW2-

https://archive.org/stream/HowTheJewsForcedAmericaIntoWorldWarII/How%20the%20Jews%20Forced%20America%20into%20World%20War%20II_djvu.txt

Blogger pyrrhus August 26, 2018 11:14 AM  

From Israel Shamir's article:
Uri Avnery was one of the best of his kind. But he was not a liberal, nor a non-racist, neither a leftist by a long shot. As Ron Unz made a point in his widely read piece on Jews and Nazis, he was a living example of a Jew informed by Nazi Germany. He was brought up there; and upon arrival to Palestine, he joined a fascist terrorist group that courted Nazi Germany. He wrote in fascist newspapers, he actively participated in ethnic cleansing, and he freely admitted that.

His attitude to Arabs was similar of Adolf Eichmann to Jews in 1930s, mutatis mutandis. As Unz correctly stated, Eichmann was a big fan of Jews and a top liaison with Zionists at that time. He wanted Jews to prosper, just not in Germany. Avnery wanted Arabs to prosper, but on the other side of the border.

Blogger LES August 26, 2018 11:56 AM  

What border? "From the river in Egypt to the Euphrates river?" Genesis 15:18

Blogger Nostromo August 26, 2018 12:24 PM  

Anti-Semitism: the act of hating Jews more than they deserve.

Anonymous Anonymous August 26, 2018 1:54 PM  

This could be nothing more than tribal political muscle-flexing. The Palestinians are still the weaker party, but they're moving up fast in the progressive hierarchy. It's going to get uglier and uglier among the coalition of the ascendant.

Blogger John Best. August 26, 2018 10:26 PM  

Corbyn has always been rational when it comes to wars, he hasn't seen a reason for war ever. Something to be respected in him which the globalists fear. He is like Trump a lot smart than the media thinks, he set up a very good strategy for the last elections and implemented it very well, he nearly won the election and massively increased his vote. However I am not sure what will happen after we leave the EU, as that will break the internal British settlement and will see a time of conflict and war in Britain over the new settlement. I believe the DUP will have a great deal of power and the Conservative party will split. The last election will be the high water mark for Corbyn and Labour, as they have to balance between the not-British population and the British people, they will struggle to unite both. the Neo-Liberal faction in the Conservatives and Labour will form a new party, to keep the not-British population here. Whereas the DUP, High Tory Conservatives and what is left of Labour will come together to create a political alliance which will take power and remove the not-British population, sealing the end of globalism in Britain and the new constitutional settlement.

Blogger Harry Goldblatt MD August 27, 2018 4:44 AM  

To date, Corbyn has simply remained passive and calmly weathered the attacks. Since that hasn't worked, I suspect he will soon take action to expel his attackers from the party. After all, what are they going to do, join the Conservative Party?

That would actually be a good move for Corbyn. You could reliably expect a good part of them to do just that and they would start weakening the Tories by watering down the conservative message even further.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey August 27, 2018 1:28 PM  

Would there have been war without Pearl Harbor?

Undeclared naval war against Germany, combined with all-out logistical support for Britain, was the #1 plan to get us into the war. That failed.

Sanctions against Japan, coupled with withholding knowledge of the approaching Japanese fleet from the commanders on scene (Kimmel and Short) was a backup plan. That worked.

Other backup plans included getting the US Navy in defending the Dutch East Indies -- not needed.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey August 27, 2018 1:57 PM  

The "problem" with Corbyn is that, unlike someone like Tony Blair, he actually has some kind of principles beyond his own immediate personal best interests. Of course, many of them are the wrong principles...

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey August 27, 2018 1:59 PM  

@34
Should be "involved in defending" rather than "in defending."

Blogger Bilroy August 27, 2018 2:48 PM  

Interestingly, two of my leftist, anti-racist friends in the UK seemed to kick up remarkably little fuss when I went on the discuss the Jewish question after they expressed dismay about this smear campaign.

Blogger Dirk Manly August 27, 2018 3:56 PM  

@2

"I don't know about WWI, but how exactly were (((they))) successful in goading America into WWII? Was it when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Or when the Japanese unilaterally declared war on America in return? All kidding aside, I believe the Jews were entirely unsuccessful in dragging America into war, and had almost no impact on strategy as well. Am I wrong?"

One man: Henry Morganthou

Read "The Jew Who Defeated Hitler"
The title isn't an accusation, it's a boast.

Blogger Dirk Manly August 27, 2018 4:01 PM  

@5

"We got into WWI because of Woodrow Wilson and the ability of the British establishment to sell the war with periodic news releases. As the Brits wanted us in for obvious reasons, that I know of there would be no reason to assign undue influence to the Jewish Minority. We got into WWII because of trade sanctions on Japan and some remarkably bad thinking on the part of the Japanese."

WW1: Zimmerman Telegram.

Sent by Jews in the German State Department, and "decrypted" by Jews in Britain. The ONLY telegraph cable route from Germany to Mexico went through Britain.

Search Youtube for:

Benjamin Freedman Willard Hotel Speech 1961


Note that Benjamin Freedman was a Jewish man.

Blogger Dirk Manly August 27, 2018 4:05 PM  

@9

"Jews WANTED America to enter the war. Jews even AGITATED to try to GOAD America into war. Jews did NOT SUCCEED in doing so. Would there have been war without Pearl Harbor? Not that speculation even matters."

U.S. Navy destroyers were conducting Anti-Submarine Warfare against German subs almost a year before Pearl Harbor. Under the guise of "protecting American shipping."

Blogger Dirk Manly August 27, 2018 4:11 PM  

@10

"Well I do know that some jews took exception to Charles Lindberg correctly calling Germany's Luftwaffe a defensive orientated outfit."

The Luftwaffe was bomber-heavy (offensive) and NEVER had enough fighter (let alone interceptor) aircraft for the entire duration of the war.

They, (which is to say, Herman Goerin) took Douhet's "The Bomber Will Always Get Through" without exercising due diligence.

The RAF, loaded with Spitfires (short range) and Hawker Hurricanes started the war as a defensive outfit.

In 1944, the joke was, "The P-51 can't do many of the things the Spitfire can do, but the P-51 has the advantage of being able to not do them over Berlin"

Even with drop tanks, Spitfires were unable to reach Berlin until very late in the war.

Blogger Dirk Manly August 27, 2018 4:13 PM  

@16

Speaking of Col. Kratman, anybody have any idea where his latest writing appears these days?

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts