ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2019 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Wednesday, September 05, 2018

White males need not apply

Chalk up another primary win for the Diversity Party:
Another major upset of a Democratic congressman took place in Massachusetts on Tuesday night. And it wasn't even close. Ayanna Pressley, the 44-year-old Boston City Councilor, triumphed over 20-year incumbent Rep. Michael Capuano (D-MA) by a double-digit margin. It was the primary season’s second stunning ousting of a long-term lawmaker by a female progressive challenger and another indicator that the liberal base is hungering for something new in their representation.

Massachusetts’ 7th District, the only majority-minority district in the liberal state, once sent President John F. Kennedy to Congress and was viewed prior to Tuesday’s contest as the kind of area that was ripe for a shakeup. Coupled with Pressley’s compelling candidacy, a late primary the day after Labor Day, and district lines that were redrawn in 2011, Capuano was clearly vulnerable.  
All is proceeding as Steve Sailer and I have predicted. What is more significant about the victories for Diversity is their margins. It's not even close despite the fact that the white liberal incumbents have all of the machinery and money on their side. Identity generally trumps ideology and those who try to play by the ideological rules when they contradict the identity game are not only reliably going to lose, they are going to lose badly.

Key word for the pedants, spergs, Alt-Retards, and other binary thinkers: "generally" and "when".

It's interesting to see there appears to be a pattern to the historical transformation of these districts over time. WASP - Catholic/Jew - Diversity. The game has likely been one of identity all along, it's just that most Americans didn't realize it because they bought into the civic nationalist nonsense made possible due to the insufficient visual distinction between WASPs, Catholics, and Jews.

UPDATE: Steve Sailer usefully points out what is clearly an Diversity tipping point. It might be instructive to see if this pattern holds in other newly Diversity-controlled Congressional districts. The key observation is that even a White plurality isn't sufficient to guarantee control.
33.69% White
26.46% Black
10.71% Asian
21.55% Hispanic
0.39% Native American
7.20% other

UPDATE: The tipping point may be more easily triggered than I'd imagined, especially if you're dealing with the most self-destructive whites of all, Scandihoovians. This is the demographic makeup of the Minnesota 5th District, which is expected to elect Ilhan Omar, the first Somali, to Congress in November. It should be informative to see how much lower her margin of victory is than Keith Ellison's 47 percent, as her identity is much more distinct than Ellison's, his professed Muslim religion notwithstanding.

67.39% White
16.64% Black
6.05% Asian
8.81% Hispanic
1.23% Native American

Labels: ,

75 Comments:

Blogger Matt September 05, 2018 5:37 AM  

All the white liberals voted for Obama because hes black, but they still dont understand

Blogger Halvar Andersen September 05, 2018 5:49 AM  

South Africa 2.0 moving right along...

Blogger GammaCatch September 05, 2018 5:57 AM  

Ayanna Pressley is both interesting as a Jew and as Diversity. I knew a Jacobs in college. I think he was the Jew and I was the Diversity, but I could not be sure. Nowadays, I'm the White Devil, but back then I could have been The Jew. Not sure. I mean, HE was The Jew. But I could have been too. It's complicated. But I think during a certain time and place I could have been The Diversity, but it would have to be with the Jews for Jesus High School...which was a thing. I preferred them to The Baptists, anyway. Their views on Angels are kinda nuts. Not Mormon levels IIRC. Both nuts. But I'll take Dennis Prager over Ben Shapiro. Ecclesiastics 3:15? I think so.

Blogger The Lab Manager September 05, 2018 6:15 AM  

So open border libertardians, what do you say about this result?

Blogger Nihil Dicit September 05, 2018 6:19 AM  

Capuano, Cuomo, probably some others I'm missing: the days of the East Coast Eye-Ties is over, Democrat or otherwise.

Which leads me on a tangent regarding immigrants: wherefore do Jews so rarely aspire to quiet, clean country livin'?

Anonymous Anonymous September 05, 2018 6:29 AM  

Winning a Democrat primary and winning an election are still markedly different challenges.

Funny to see how the loony left doubling down on the lunacy is news to some .... but it’s not news here. As you say, you long predicted it.

The West is only beginning to awaken to the reality that being led by suicidal freaks is itself suicidal, and we do have a choice. Shlaffly would be pleased.

Blogger Sherwood family September 05, 2018 6:31 AM  

Jews seem to do something akin to clean country living in kibbutzim or moshavim. Though the ideals of a kibbutznik are about as far away from the ethos of a Scot-Irish hardscrabble farmer on th American frontier as you can get.

Blogger GammaCatch September 05, 2018 6:32 AM  

Now, here is a puzzle: Why are we not talking about EVS, Glenn Beck's philosophy, Mormon, and how the three share the same Purity Standards:
-Zero Conflict
-Zero use of The Left's tactics against them because "as they are immoral their tactics are immoral"
-The sanctification of "Common/Middle Ground/A-Political" thought which always ended up refined into the chains of capricious and arbitrary submission standards. We saw McCain and Romney do this long before Beck and EVS did. If there are camps we ought mention in all this it is Mormon and Scientology. Banning a religion is OK, and those two and Islam have no place in what I think the USA ought be.

Blogger Ferdinand September 05, 2018 6:36 AM  

I hope that civic nationalism will be considered a failed ideology for hundred of years after this all blows over (literally).

Blogger Duke Norfolk September 05, 2018 6:38 AM  

A big question is, just how long will it take for leftist whites to clue into their displacement/ousting?

How long will they pull the lever for the people who hate them and want them gone?

For some it will no doubt be a very long time; i.e. they'll go to their graves with their delusions.

Blogger The Observer September 05, 2018 6:39 AM  

I hope that civic nationalism will be considered a failed ideology for hundred of years after this all blows over (literally).

Manboons are not a learning animal.

Blogger Sherwood family September 05, 2018 6:49 AM  

GammaCatch, that's fine, we'll take Deseret with its original borders and you can have the rest.

Blogger Stilicho September 05, 2018 6:53 AM  

@Nihil Dicit: in the country, there are too few people sufficiently concentrated to make manipulation of them fun and profitable enough to be worthwhile. Plus, like flies to a midden...

Blogger Maniac September 05, 2018 6:55 AM  

It's not all bad news. Brianna lost:

http://file770.com/brianna-wu-loses-massachusetts-congressional-primary-race/


Maybe (s)he should've serviced some of her voters sexually the way her pal Zoe did. Better luck next time.

Blogger Sherwood family September 05, 2018 6:56 AM  

Purge187, why...why did you put that image in my mind?

Blogger Tim from Nashua September 05, 2018 7:02 AM  

Any conservative in that district might as well have registered as unenrolled, then take the DemocRat primary ballot and vote for the most chaos, AKA Ayanna Pressley. Many chances for voter fraud in Massachusetts also.

Blogger Matt September 05, 2018 7:11 AM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Stilicho September 05, 2018 7:12 AM  

"WASP - Catholic/Jew - Diversity." institution + infiltration = disintegration.

Blogger JACIII September 05, 2018 7:13 AM  

Duke Norfolk wrote:A big question is, just how long will it take for leftist whites to clue into their displacement/ousting?

How long will they pull the lever for the people who hate them and want them gone?

For some it will no doubt be a very long time; i.e. they'll go to their graves with their delusions.


They aren't deluded. They are committed to their perverse ideology. Have you not seen them preening over the bodies of their children?

Blogger Sherwood family September 05, 2018 7:16 AM  

The Mollie Tibbets thing was instructive that way. Even with his daughter dead, the girl's father couldn't call out the people who allowed political correctness/multi-culti to kill her. "Diversity" is a hell of a drug.

Blogger ZhukovG September 05, 2018 7:17 AM  

Vox is right, as usual. It has always been about identity. It will always be about identity. It's how humans are and no amount of wishful thinking and hand waving will change it.

Blogger linesy September 05, 2018 7:20 AM  

..in much higher numbers *when* they lived in majority white areas, not so when they were minority or reduced majority, it should be added

Blogger Sherwood family September 05, 2018 7:23 AM  

I keep having this same conversation with some of my relatives. They still cannot see it. They still think the various groups are going to sing "Kumbaya" together before it is all over.

I have tried logic, examples from history, and, thanks to Vox, rhetoric, but I can't move the needle. Even the issue in SA fails to engage them. It is depressing.

Whatever civic-nationalism is laced with is extremely habit-forming and creates a tremendous dependency.

Blogger tublecane September 05, 2018 7:30 AM  

It's remarkable how quickly the universalists have made white people at least forget about all sorts of distinctions that aren't even that subtle when you're paying attention. It takes being pummeled by the sight of scent of a Turd Worlder to make makes some Notice.

I read domestic and society novels from previous generations, and anything before 1960 or so will take notice of ethnicity, race, class, etc. All the things we pretend don't matter. I come to realize this is probably the reason I never heard of many of the authors before stumbling upon them, despite Pulitzers and movie adaptations.

The 60s did it. Before that, this stuff was obvious. Nowadays, even in post-apocalyptic movies and t.v. shows they have multi-racial gangs. What?

Blogger Stilicho September 05, 2018 7:33 AM  

"Whatever civic-nationalism is laced with is extremely habit-forming and creates a tremendous dependency"

It is laced with social approval

Blogger Sherwood family September 05, 2018 7:40 AM  

Social approval is powerful. But...it is also fickle. As the Wil Wheaton debacle shows the mob is just as likely to stone you as it is to applaud you.

I guess I have been too much of a loner or too socially on the fringes to allow social approval to dictate my worldview. But I guess if you were used to being part of the "hivemind" it would be disorienting to hold opinions that didn't jibe with the everyone else.

Reminds me of the nonconformist kids in high school who rebelled in exactly the same way.

Blogger pyrrhus September 05, 2018 7:43 AM  

Media reports that Pressley actually ran to the right of the incumbent, but voters said they wanted to see a "fresh face."
Hahaha...as long as it's not a white face.

Blogger Sherwood family September 05, 2018 7:46 AM  

That's the best part of Vox Popoli: thanks to Vox, you can disagree, argue, and change your viewpoint when you find information that more closely correlates with reality. It is the opposite of an echo chamber. And the rules of the blog keep people arguing in good faith most of the time.

Anonymous Anonymous September 05, 2018 7:48 AM  

Whatever civic-nationalism is laced with is extremely habit-forming and creates a tremendous dependency

It’s self image.

The vast majority of the human race will cheerfully boil you alive if you threaten their image of themselves.

If you want to change their minds you need to show them that (and how) their current views damage their image of themselves.

Blogger Sherwood family September 05, 2018 7:51 AM  

Do you have an example of that in action, Resident Moron? I'm not disagreeing. Just interested if you have something specific you are thinking of.

Blogger pyrrhus September 05, 2018 7:54 AM  

As some of the commentators have pointed out, the first wave of diversity is relatively mild in its politics.But the next wave will be much more openly anti-white, and what comes after that will make South Africa look like a picnic...

Blogger McChuck September 05, 2018 8:02 AM  

"The rights of Englishmen" never applied to the Irish. Or the Italians. Or the Poles. (You know, the Catholics in America.) They were incapable of understanding and appreciating them, much less defending them. And they never taught them to their children.

Catholics do not have an inherent can-do, "You ain't the boss of me!" attitude. Their religion teaches them that there is a very strict hierarchy. And they cannot do for themselves. Only the Priests can. (Cheap shot - all those little alter boys just won't bugger themselves. And the parents believed and helped cover it all up.)

Blogger Seeingsights September 05, 2018 8:06 AM  

A white liberal, Rahm Emmanuel, decided not to run again for mayor of Chicago.
In the previous election, he didn't get a majority vote so it went to a run off where he fended off a non white candidate who was to his Left.
Clinton type politicians are sliding down in power on the Democratic Party.

Blogger pyrrhus September 05, 2018 8:10 AM  

Another benefit of electing diversity--they won't police criminals...https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-04/london-mayor-sadiq-kahn-has-no-plan-fight-london-crime-former-top-adviser

Blogger Mr.MantraMan September 05, 2018 8:17 AM  

Rahm and the people who supported him positively trounced the black political establishment in Cook county, if you want to see what a passive-aggressive beat down looks like that was textbook.

So after this just coincidently large groups of black youts took to the streets of areas of Chicago that mattered all seemingly wearing white t-shirts another coincidence I'm sure. So the usual beat down of prole sub-caste whites ensued till one day the black youts picked out a gay guy in Boy's Town and whooped him on CCTV, much furor erupted as the Gay upper castes used the media to tell the black politicos that "Hate Crime" charges would suddenly start being applied (there goes Soros bucks).




Next step was all out black anarchy (Jim Jones called this tactic "Crazy Nigger") in the crappy neighborhoods, and this strategy took time to wear out Rahm as being white caretaker Democratic politician for black voters is ridiculously expensive.

But the black political establishment got Rahm and Chicago is toast.

Anonymous Anonymous September 05, 2018 8:18 AM  

Think about how many people advocate barbaric repression of political speech as a means to defending their view of themselves as not racist. Making it a crime to question the holocaust, to advocate embargo of Israel, etc. more extreme still, the ongoing destruction of the Middle East is largely driven by a mixture of anti-antisemitism and evangelical eschatology presumed to require the defense of Israel. Tge people who really believe these things are invested heavily in their view of themselves as (eg) good Christians and they’ve been taught that being a good Christian requires these things.

A lot of people can’t be moved because MPAI, and a lot of people smart enough to understand the argument are not honestly committed enough to the truth to change, especially when doing so will cost them their social context. That’s part social pressure but it’s also that people insecure about themselves need social reinforcement and react more violently than more confident people, ie overcompensate

Blogger GM September 05, 2018 8:19 AM  

This is a small example, but once I picked up the idea from this blog that it was European immigration that set the stage for the dissolution of the American nation, I started seeing it all over the place. Check out the first paragraph of this little piece by Anthony Esolen:

https://www.crisismagazine.com/2018/who-profits

And as far as this sort of thinking is concerned:

"Catholics do not have an inherent can-do, "You ain't the boss of me!" attitude. Their religion teaches them that there is a very strict hierarchy. And they cannot do for themselves. Only the Priests can."

There is an element of truth to it, at least in my family (Italian ancestry). Everyone was always looking for an angle to get the most with the least personal effort. To us the WASP work ethic looks like being uptight and sort of prissy.

But the idea that this is because of the hierarchical (or priestly) aspect of Catholicism isn't quite right. There is a lot of cynicism about priests, and about central authority in general in Catholic culture. And there is a strong anti-authoritarian streak in that culture as well - think Italian anarchists.

One of the interesting aspects of Italian culture meeting American culture is that the antagonism towards central authority got expressed in certain cultural circumstances as libertarianism and in other circumstances in anarchism of a more left-leaning variety. I can see these patterns clearly in my extended family and their social networks.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan September 05, 2018 8:25 AM  

Sherwood never ever allow anyone with a left bend to have the moral level remain uncontested.

Blogger Sherwood family September 05, 2018 8:34 AM  

Mr. MantraMan, you mean don't accept their frame or premise? In other words, if someone asks the old "are you still beating your wife" type of question you don't try to answer it, you dispute the premise?

Blogger Hammerli 280 September 05, 2018 8:52 AM  

I suspect the problem is only tangentially related to religion. It's cultural. The classic Anglo-American culture is very enterprising. We get a dollar, we invest it to make more dollars. Other European cultures...not so much. They understand savings, but not investment. It's not in the culture. But a certain degree of duplicity IS in the culture. To an Anglo-American, taxes are something to be griped about but paid honestly. To the Fake Americans, cheating on taxes is entirely proper.

If civic nationalism is to have any hope of success (yes, I'm an optimist), the heat needs to be turned WAY up...and yes, the people who won't get with the program need a one-way ticket out of the country.

Blogger I’ve Seen Things You People Wouldn’t Believe September 05, 2018 8:52 AM  

Sherwood family wrote:I keep having this same conversation with some of my relatives. They still cannot see it. They still think the various groups are going to sing "Kumbaya" together before it is all over.

I have tried logic, examples from history, and, thanks to Vox, rhetoric, but I can't move the needle. Even the issue in SA fails to engage them. It is depressing.

Whatever civic-nationalism is laced with is extremely habit-forming and creates a tremendous dependency.


Until about 2015, I was in that camp. I even once tweeted that I would automatically dismiss any comment that used the term "cuck". I followed Erickson, NRO, the whole lot. I actually *believed* the Magic Dirt Theory, "That's Not Who We Are", and all the other tropes. It was a comfortable lie to tell myself as I walked the aisles of my local Sam's, filled with the pungent odor of Diversity.

Then I started lurking here; reading, listening. I began to follow people referenced by Vox. I began to wake up to reality.

For me the final tipping point came in 2016 when someone called my daughter's (Private, Christian) school to complain that she was a racist and anti-woman because she supported Donald Trump. The school (rightly) told the mom that made the complaint to go pound sand (It helped that the offended mom's daughter had a habit of yelling at my daughter in the hall nose-to-nose in front of witnesses). The principal actually laughed about it when she told us about the complaint.

That's when I knew CivNat was dead to me. We discuss the issues over dinner nightly. My wife, apolitical when we met, was firmly MAGA from the get-go. My children are fully aware of the stakes now.

There's no going back. Christendom must be saved.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan September 05, 2018 9:00 AM  

I was raised by women, they could care less about intellectual honesty it's all about holding the moral high hand, yeah it's tough for a borderline spergy kid to deal with but I studied it and learned how to handle it.

Conservative intellectuals are like the merit scholars in high school called to the principal's office sitting in the edge of the chair explaining themselves to AUTHORITY.

But in this do or die era I see that conservative intellectuals are actually daring to grow up, and are in time going to tell Mz Fuzzbottom the school principal to fuck off and then walk out the door, pinch the ass of the hot cheerleader, throat punch the antifa PC enforcer and inform the glorious People of Color that negotiations will begin anew and then do donuts around the parking lot before heading down the highway.

Blogger rumpole5 September 05, 2018 9:01 AM  

I think that this win is the result of many white Democrats who no longer are, (Democrat, that is, they are still white and are being reminded of that fact constantly). They therefore were not there to vote for the White primary candidate. They just have not changed their party registration yet, why put up with the "racist" name calling nonsense. Moreover, white "Democrats" don't need to re-register to vote for the Republican candidate in November.

Blogger Sherwood family September 05, 2018 9:08 AM  

Mr. MantraMan: you nailed it and clarified a whole bunch. I've been the guy in the chair trying to explain to AUTHORITY. And AUTHORITY truly doesn't care about anything but its position. Resident Moron is right, it is all about how it makes people feel about themselves. Since that is the case, there is no reason to accept the moral authority/social position/etc. Telling them to pound sand the only courtesy we should extend any of them.

Anonymous Anonymous September 05, 2018 9:53 AM  

Further consider how far the keft has pushed the old right into accepting meekly the destruction of our whole civilization on the basis of not being racist or mean or rude.

The key point is none of us wants to think badly of ourselves and a lot of people - especially SJWs - simply refuse to experience the psychological pain involved in a serious internal accounting of our own integrity. The alternative is savage vicious repression of all contrary intelligence, always predicated on the assertion that it’s ok because nazis. IOW, it’s not vicious savagery because it’s aimed at bad people ... it’s justice, really.

“Your heart is deceitfully wicked above all things; who can know it?”

The power of this rhetorical question is largely overlooked. But it’s implications are hugely significant and relevant. SJWs first victim, the first person they lie to, is always themselves.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey September 05, 2018 10:07 AM  

This is the demographic makeup of the Minnesota 5th District, which is expected to elect Ilhan Omar, the first Somali, to Congress in November. It should be informative to see how much lower her margin of victory is than Keith Ellison's 47 percent, as her identity is much more distinct than Ellison's, his professed Muslim religion notwithstanding.

If I'm not mistaken, Ellison's ties are to the Nation of Islam, rather than mainstream Sunni or Shia Islam. NoI bears much the same relationship to blacks of West African origin living in the US that Judaism does to the Jewish people -- it sacralizes their group identity. So it's probably seen by most blacks in America more as an extension of black nationalism than as a religion.

A Somalian Muslim is a different story -- but it doesn't really matter unless she's running against an American black. When the other side is Whitey... she's still black.

Incidentally, it's remarkable how little coverage was given to Omar's bigamous marriage to her own brother as part of an immigration fraud scheme -- seems like the sort of thing that might be relevant in an election.

https://www.city-journal.org/html/curious-case-ilhan-omar-14724.html

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey September 05, 2018 10:16 AM  

Chalk up another primary win for the Diversity Party:
Another major upset of a Democratic congressman took place in Massachusetts on Tuesday night. And it wasn't even close. Ayanna Pressley, the 44-year-old Boston City Councilor, triumphed over 20-year incumbent Rep. Michael Capuano (D-MA) by a double-digit margin


Looks like there's no safe space for white shitlibs... especially male ones.

Tragic.

Blogger pyrrhus September 05, 2018 10:38 AM  

"I was raised by women, they could care less about intellectual honesty it's all about holding the moral high hand, yeah it's tough for a borderline spergy kid to deal with but I studied it and learned how to handle it."

Ain't that the truth...Women who care about anything except in-group status are a rare breed indeed.

Blogger pyrrhus September 05, 2018 10:45 AM  

The power of this rhetorical question is largely overlooked. But it’s implications are hugely significant and relevant. SJWs first victim, the first person they lie to, is always themselves.

"The easiest person to fool is always yourself." Richard Feynman

Blogger Brett baker September 05, 2018 10:48 AM  

Churchian Christian bs. I believe in civic nationalism, and the helicopter rides to make it work.

Blogger Brett baker September 05, 2018 10:52 AM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Robert Coble September 05, 2018 10:55 AM  

That "tipping point" may be MUCH SMALLER than is generally thought.

N. N. Taleb, Skin in the Game, Chapter 2, The Most Intolerant Wins: The Dominance of the Stubborn Majority

The main idea behind complex systems is that the ensemble behaves in ways not predicted by its components. The interactions matter more than the nature of the units. Studying individual ants will almost never give us a clear indication of how the ant colony operates. For that, one needs to understand an ant colony as an ant colony. This is called an "emergent" property of the whole, by which parts and whole differ because what matters are the interactions between such parts. And interactions can obey very simple rules.

The rule we discuss in this chapter is the MINORITY rule, the mother of all asymmetries. IT SUFFICES FOR AN INTRANSIGENT MINORITY - A CERTAIN TYPE OF INTRANSIGENT MINORITY - WITH SIGNIFICANT SKIN IN THE GAME (OR, BETTER, SOUL IN THE GAME) TO REACH A MINUTELY SMALL LEVEL, SAY 3 OR 4 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL POPULATION, FOR THE ENTIRE POPULATION TO HAVE TO SUBMIT TO THEIR PREFERENCES.

. . .

Among other things, many other things, the minority rule will show us how all it takes is a small number of intolerant, virtuous people with skin in the game, in the form of courage, for society to function properly.


He gives very interesting examples.

The kosher population represents less than three tenths of a percent of the residents of the United States. Yet, it appears that almost all drinks are kosher. Why? Simply because going full kosher allows the producers, grocers, and restaurants to not have to distinguish between kosher and nonkosher for liquids, with special markers, separate aisles, separate inventories, different stocking sub-facilities. And the simple rule that changes the total is as follows:

A kosher (halal) eater will never eat nonkosher (or nonhalal) food, but a nonkosher eater isn't banned from eating kosher.

Or, rephrased in another domain:

A disabled person will not use the regular bathroom, but a non-disabled person will use the bathroom for disabled people.

. . .

Someone with a peanut allergy will not eat products that touch peanuts, but a person without such an allergy can eat items with peanut traces in them.

. . .

An honest person will never commit criminal acts, but a criminal will readily engage in legal acts.

. . .

Two more things. First, the geography of the terrain, that is, the spatial structure, matters a bit; it makes a big difference whether the intransigents are in their own district or are mixed with the rest of the population. . . . Second, the cost structure matters quite a bit.


One more example:

Once you have 10 percent or more women at a party, you cannot serve only beer. But most men will drink wine. So you only need one set of glasses if you serve only wine - the universal donor, to use the language of blood groups.


Blogger Tars Tarkas September 05, 2018 11:02 AM  

The whites who vote for these people are in for a real shocker! They are not 'progressive' they are racial nationalists who benefit from white progressive ideology. They will not be "progressive" for people in their out-group.
After decades of telling these people how evil we white people are, they will be absolutely shocked when the hatred these people have for us is put on full display. They might even live in denial and cheer them on as we march towards the collective gallows.

Anonymous Anonymous September 05, 2018 11:08 AM  

Ain't that the truth...Women who care about anything except in-group status are a rare breed indeed.

This is why civilization requires strong men who know it is our job to BE the dominant in-group of our woman, to counteract the otherwise narcissistic bent.

This is why our civilization requires strong women who know that this means choosing wisely which man to submit to, and not that she doesn’t need a man, a family, a tribe.

Anonymous Anonymous September 05, 2018 11:09 AM  

The combination of weak men and weak women, both deluded that their weakness is strength, is fatal.

Blogger Johnny September 05, 2018 11:26 AM  

@37

>>There is an element of truth to it, at least in my family (Italian ancestry). Everyone was always looking for an angle to get the most with the least personal effort. To us the WASP work ethic looks like being uptight and sort of prissy.

>>One of the interesting aspects of Italian culture meeting American culture is that the antagonism towards central authority got expressed in certain cultural circumstances as libertarianism and in other circumstances in anarchism of a more left-leaning variety. I can see these patterns clearly in my extended family and their social networks.

I suspect Italians are the way they are because of the Roman Empire. Once the Roman Army became professional, the soldiers were effectively taken out of the breeding stream. They might get sex, camp followers or raping women, but way back when successful reproduction required more than a sperm donor. You needed a supportive husband or clan to get the resources to raise the kids.

Secondly, the true productive citizens were the soldiers because they were what produced the tribute and held the empire together. So, you had the most productive people not reproducing. And for several hundred years. This evolved into the anti-obedience attitude, expressed at the time as: up yours I am not going in the army. (Anti-authoritarian is expressing it abstractly. Obedience is what the individual does.)

Plus work hard, accumulate stiff, and they take it. Thus being a slacker was rewarded. So you get a bunch of independently minded slackers, people who won't go along to get along.

Thinking in those terms, while we have not produced the Roman Empire circumstance, we have produced a circumstance where responsible conduct is selected against. The most successful, the wealthy, do not automatically produce more kids than anybody else, while the much more numerous responsible middle class produce few children. Meanwhile the down and out women with ten children from ten sperm donors is a wonderful success on a biological level. Thus we should expect such people to become more numerous.

Thinking of it in political terms, it took the Italians a thousand years to be as they now are. With current policies, looks like, the other European groups are going to do it in under a hundred. Now days everything is speeded up.

Blogger justaguy September 05, 2018 11:32 AM  

As more and more districts become represented by ethnic look-alikes, how is the democrat party going to move forward and actually develop strategies and the tactics that used to give them a huge advantage over honest but clueless and naive repubs? Just like the representatives that come from Voting Rights compelled districts often have absolutely no clue about life/America or even if an island can tip over-- Once the leaders such as Pelosi and Hoyer lose their grip can you see any effective strategy coming from their no-nothing replacements. Hate whitey and hate capitalism isn't a very good strategy until more of the country turns idiot.

Blogger CJ September 05, 2018 11:35 AM  

#43 rumpole5

Good point. There is a group of white voters that are now turned off by the Democrats and are no longer showing up to vote in the primaries. How large that group is I cannot say, but even a small number can be critical.

Blogger GB September 05, 2018 11:50 AM  

The key is that white democrats feel morally virtuous when voting for blacks. They're going to be real surprised and confused when the black democrats ruthlessly purge them.

Blogger Duke Norfolk September 05, 2018 12:20 PM  

seeingsights wrote:A white liberal, Rahm Emmanuel

Uhmmm, don't you mean (((Rahm Emmanuel)))? Yeah, that white guy.

Blogger Jackie Chun September 05, 2018 12:31 PM  

Doesn't cold winter theory imply that he Scandinavians are the whitest of whites... and so the most self-destructive? Yikes.

Blogger Miguel September 05, 2018 12:44 PM  

Thats because whites in diverse areas know what is it like to be sorrounded, no?

Blogger Rough Carrigan September 05, 2018 1:01 PM  

Wow. I live in central Massachusetts. Capuano represents a district immediately north of Boston so he's not my "representative" but he's close enough that I know about him. The left could hardly ask for a more reliable left wing hack than Capuano.

I don't know what you could infer from this result except that identity is everything.

Blogger Zeroh Tollrants September 05, 2018 1:04 PM  

(((White))) liberal, Rahm Emmanuel.
Oy vey.

Blogger Daniele Grech Pereira September 05, 2018 2:40 PM  

Hope you guys don't end up with an Iqra Khalid like we have in Canuckland.

Blogger InformationMerchant September 05, 2018 4:38 PM  

The problem with a formula as you've already pointed out is the white vote is a variable, the minority vote stays almost the same.

Texas for example has whites that vote massively to the right, you mentioned one of the groups of whites with the biggest sympathy for leftism.

Anonymous Anonymous September 05, 2018 5:45 PM  

1.23% Native American

Bloody swing voters.

Blogger Jay in DC September 05, 2018 6:32 PM  

@43 "I think that this win is the result of many white Democrats who no longer are They just have not changed their party registration yet, why put up with the "racist" name calling nonsense."

@59 "The key is that white democrats feel morally virtuous when voting for blacks. They're going to be real surprised and confused when the black democrats ruthlessly purge them."

You had it in the first line 59, you lost it in the second. And 43, you are living in 1999.

I come here for entertainment because invariably a statistically significant number of commenters either are too socially unaware to understand or their watches stopped in 2003.

So much theorizing and hand-wringing over something that is so simple as to be elementary to anyone with eyes to see it. Go to many other alt-right sites and it has been discussed to death already.

You are assigning 'normal' traits to religious fanatics. Diversity requires self-sacrifice as many more radical religions have throughout history including radical Islam. The human spirit cries out for purpose and the 'approved' and 'safe' choice is Diversity.

No sacrifice including your life, the life of your daughter (Tibbets), and your entire standing in society is too great. You will GLADLY go to the back of the line and sit quietly while the swarthy hordes move to the podium.

Why all the fucking useless debate? You are dealing with suicidal zealots. Treat them as ISIS but only killing themselves and their own society vs. the outward destruction of ISIS and all the mysteries wash away.

This mental masturbation about "well, once they SEE they are being marginalized, hated, and shat upon... then..." Umm, no. Not even a little. They will march to the slaughterhouse happy in their content that they weren't racist. Martyrs have died for far less throughout recorded history.

Blogger tublecane September 05, 2018 7:15 PM  

@32- This is probably pointless, but Catholicism wasn't exactly ancient history when the U.S. was founded. It was still in those people's blood and culture in various forms. And don't be overly distracted by Rugged Individualism and other flashy phrases.

The culture of Anglo -American settlers and nation-builders certainly was hierarchical. Hence the Senate and Electoral College, for instance. They left so much unsaid in regards to this because it didn't need to be said because they just assumed everyone knew the culture. Which they did.

A mere coupla generations ago, the lowly in Mother England were still calling people "guv'nor." Heck, they still have a queen, a House of Lords, and a state church.

Which isn't to say Catholics fit in with Heritage America. But that's about so much more than hierarcgy. Also so much more than religion. One thing to bear in mind: our country was born post-Enlightenment, and the Enlightened are always making the world anew. Now, we weren't as radical as some (e.g. France), but our Mad Puritanism was progressive in a sense .And the culture kept changing.

When you have a culture constantly remaking itself and bring in new populations, they never learn the older ways. That accelerates the process.

They also change it themselves, by their very presence. But even if they came from freedom-loving, non-Catholic countries, the U.S. they know would not be the U.S. of generations past.

Blogger TMLutas September 06, 2018 10:52 AM  

Trump won by spending less than Clinton and leveraging modern technology and not throwing money unnecessarily to the political 'pros'.

I suspect that a lot of these insurgents are winning on Trump's formula with flabby, old style campaigning getting clobbered no matter what the ideological situation looks like.

To really prove Vox right, you'd have to account for the tech effect. Vox might have in his head but he didn't give any evidence of doing so in his post that I could spot.

Blogger Dirk Manly September 07, 2018 7:17 PM  

Trump won by suckering the press into being his ad agency with "Can you believe that he just said ... " "How Awful!"

American Public: Sounds just right to me. Keep crying, coasties!

Blogger Northpal September 07, 2018 9:28 PM  

When ever you see posting of population in racial percentages, be damn sure to divide the "white" numbers in half if you want true identity power rankings.

Blogger inthebriarpatch September 07, 2018 11:22 PM  

https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2017/02/06/the-left-hates-you-act-accordingly-n2281602

Blogger GammaCatch September 08, 2018 5:47 PM  

68 and 69 get it.

Blogger Unknown September 09, 2018 1:59 PM  

If you were a young white male with political aspirations, you would be crazy to run as a Democrat. Even if you could win now, you will soon be out of a job as the growing number of non-whites shift to voting for people who look more like they do. Watch the flow of fresh white faces into the Democrat party completely dry up.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts