ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2018 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Saturday, December 22, 2018

"A nation of immigrants"

How strange it is that no one noticed the USA was "a nation of immigrants" for more nearly 200 years, until Immanuel Cellar was actively pushing for what eventually became the nation-destroying 1965 Naturalization Act.



And now, remarkably, we are informed that both Britain and Sweden are "nations of immigrants" as well.

Labels: ,

45 Comments:

Blogger VFM #4388 December 22, 2018 2:02 PM  

"Britain is a nation of immigrants." -Vortigern

Blogger Johnny December 22, 2018 2:06 PM  

We are being screwed over. That is all. The rest is details.

Blogger MendoScot December 22, 2018 2:25 PM  

Killing immigrants is part of my culture.

Historically, since the Roman times, but I am sure we were doing it unrecorded since we arrived and killed whoever was living there.

Blogger C.B. Robertson December 22, 2018 2:26 PM  

Apologies for my confusion, but what is the Y-axis here?

Blogger Yordan Yordanov December 22, 2018 2:30 PM  

Wait...what happened in the 1900, before the '65? When the flatline stop being flatline?

Blogger CM December 22, 2018 2:31 PM  

Britain is a nation of immigrants." -Vortigern

I think William the Conqueror said that.

Blogger Servant December 22, 2018 2:35 PM  

Not julius caesar?

Blogger Pierre Truc December 22, 2018 2:41 PM  

According to Macron, France is "a nation of immigrants" also.

Blogger Robert Browning December 22, 2018 2:45 PM  

Immigration, the promotion of racial conflict, and racial antagonism are all part of a plan to destroy Christ and Christianity. Don't take the bait.

Blogger bob kuk mando ( Maps are only Meaningful insofar as they correspond to Reality ) December 22, 2018 2:49 PM  

i'm curious how immigrant is being defined here.

i'm also curious why i'm supposed to think that ".00000600%" ( add two more decimal places left of the 6 ) is a significant number.


5. Yordan Yordanov December 22, 2018 2:30 PM
Wait...what happened in the 1900, before the '65? When the flatline stop being flatline?



that's probably when the Lawful prohibitions against Asians ( and others ) becoming citizens were abolished.

yes Virginia, it is a Founding Principle of these United States to only permit foreigners to Naturalize as citizens of the United States if the foreigner be a White person of reputed Good Character.

http://www.indiana.edu/~kdhist/H105-documents-web/week08/naturalization1790.html
"That any Alien being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof on application to any common law Court of record in any one of the States wherein he shall have resided for the term of one year at least, and making proof to the satisfaction of such Court that he is a person of good character, and taking the oath or affirmation prescribed by law to support the Constitution of the United States, which Oath or Affirmation such Court shall administer, and the Clerk of such Court shall record such Application, and the proceedings thereon; and thereupon such person shall be considered as a Citizen of the United States."


Blogger Crew December 22, 2018 3:29 PM  

Oh my:

nation (n.)
c. 1300, nacioun, "a race of people, large group of people with common ancestry and language," from Old French nacion "birth, rank; descendants, relatives; country, homeland" (12c.) and directly from Latin nationem (nominative natio) "birth, origin; breed, stock, kind, species; race of people, tribe," literally "that which has been born," from natus, past participle of nasci "be born" (Old Latin gnasci), from PIE root *gene- "give birth, beget," with derivatives referring to procreation and familial and tribal groups.


Doesn't mention immigration anywhere ...

Blogger Servant of the Chief December 22, 2018 3:39 PM  

"And now, remarkably, we are informed that both Britain and Sweden are "nations of immigrants" as well."

They're trying variations of this old game everywhere. Here in Ireland its especially egregious in claiming Ireland was 'always' a globalised society... Because we were a colony of Britain for nearly 8 centuries and it was a world spanning Empire. And also because we emigrated everywhere we should welcome immigrants to Ireland all the more readily, even though we were nearly universally hated everywhere we went. But fuck that I guess, we should welcome our browning out of existence with open arms.

Sooner or later someone is going to publicly make the comparison of this invasion to the plantations of previous centuries and this house of cards is going to explode. I'm still amazed Britain hasn't descended into revolution yet.

Blogger OneWingedShark December 22, 2018 3:43 PM  

Servant of the Chief wrote:I'm still amazed Britain hasn't descended into revolution yet.
There's still time for that.

Blogger Hunsdon December 22, 2018 4:06 PM  

Judeo-Christ is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I've ever known in my life

Blogger Dave December 22, 2018 4:24 PM  

Is this ngram for American English? Curious to contrast to British English.

Blogger Rhys December 22, 2018 4:42 PM  

If you're really a "nation of immigrants" then the immigrants are citizens of the nation, therefor making them...not immigrants? The concept doesn't even make sense semantically.

Blogger Drew December 22, 2018 4:52 PM  

Israel is a nation of immigrants.

Blogger Pseudotsuga December 22, 2018 5:04 PM  

Is the Cherokee nation one of immigrants, too? Just asking for a friend of mine from the Boston area....

Blogger Chuck December 22, 2018 5:05 PM  

The assholes who use that stupid slogan only bring it up when referring to illegal, third world invaders, so what they really mean is "America is a nation of illegal immigrants". Leftists are the scum of the earth.

Blogger Dirk Manly December 22, 2018 5:07 PM  

@5

"Wait...what happened in the 1900, before the '65? When the flatline stop being flatline? "

That's when Cuellar started pushing his B.S. immigration law. It took him a few DECADES.

Blogger Dirk Manly December 22, 2018 5:10 PM  

@12

" I'm still amazed Britain hasn't descended into revolution yet."

The sheep were disarmed 2 decades ago -- over one measly school shooting.

Blogger VFM #4388 December 22, 2018 5:20 PM  

Willy the conqueror was an honest invader. Vortigern "legally" settled the land of the britons with Saxon "immigrants". Their 60%-brythonic descendants are despised and called "Saxon" by the handful of britons in Cornwall and Wales to this day.

But we imagine we can integrate in a couple of years in America the way 1600 years have not managed in England.

Blogger spinoza December 22, 2018 5:38 PM  

Most commonly used leftist terms, common responses to criticism, colloquialisms, and even one word concepts follow a similar path on n-gram viewer (check out multicultural,racism,utopia,racist, the incidences of racist and racism prelude to the rise of multicultural and utopia which all seem to peak at the same time.
I often reference terms there but it is only useful for displaying pre 2008 data. This could be a useful alt tech campign to make an up to date published word usage tool and improve where google is lacking.

Blogger The Lab Manager December 22, 2018 5:47 PM  

I've asked the libertardians at the Economic Policy Journal where are all the non-white libertarians from these turd world countries the open border libertardians want to import. Crickets as usual.

Blogger Dr Caveman December 22, 2018 6:50 PM  

Is that y-axis correct?

Blogger Bob December 22, 2018 7:45 PM  

@25:

No, that Y axis is way the hell off. The population of the U. S. in 2017 was 325.7 million more or less. If we have roughly 60 million immigrants here today (legal and illegal), then they are around 20% of the population, NOT 0.000006%.

Blogger Haxo Angmark December 22, 2018 7:47 PM  

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Blogger eclecticme December 22, 2018 7:56 PM  

OT
Black Swan Man Comics?
The one below discusses 'tariff man.'
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DtrVCc5XgAEIToZ.jpg:large


https://twitter.com/black_swan_man

Blogger Matrick December 22, 2018 8:21 PM  

Dirk Manly:"
The sheep were disarmed 2 decades ago -- over one measly school shooting."

It isn't true that we were completely disarmed, but whether we have firearms or not is irrelevant. Easy access to guns isn't preventing the same things from happening in the US.

Blogger Fozzy Bear December 22, 2018 8:23 PM  

@Bob what you are looking at is a Google nGram showing something like the percentage of books in a given year that includes the phrase “Nation of immigrants”.

Blogger Francis Parker Yockey December 22, 2018 8:33 PM  

@C.B. Robertson
Apologies for my confusion, but what is the Y-axis here?

@Bob
No, that Y axis is way the hell off. The population of the U. S. in 2017 was 325.7 million more or less. If we have roughly 60 million immigrants here today (legal and illegal), then they are around 20% of the population, NOT 0.000006%.

The graph is a Google Ngram. It displays relative frequency of usage for the term "nation of immigrants" relative to the total text in the Google Books database of scanned/ OCR'd books published each year.

The Y axis represents percentage of text consisting of that phrase. As a percentage, it is obviously a dimensionless number.

The absolute number doesn't have much significance in itself, but the trend is very useful for looking at when a particular term first came into use, and the speed with which it was adopted.

Again -- the graph represents usage of the term "nation of immigrants" as a percentage of words in books published that year, and does not have any direct relationship to the number of actual, real world immigrants in America in any given year.

Blogger VD December 22, 2018 8:39 PM  

No, that Y axis is way the hell off.

You have no idea what you're talking about, Bob.

Blogger S1AL December 22, 2018 8:40 PM  

Just to clarify, this graph shows usage of the term "nation of immigrants", correct?

Blogger Cecil Henry December 22, 2018 9:27 PM  

'Amerika' Blog has a rather nice synopsis of the Diversity agenda. And its political manifestation.


Access to White people is not a human right:


https://i.imgur.com/bMqLjol.png



AS no doubt nost are well aware, there is not a single White nation anywhere now that is not propagandized with the 'nation of immigrants' lie.

Ricardo Duchesne wrote a whole book to attack its Canadian manifestation in academia:
'Canada in Decay'

Blogger Hammerli280 December 22, 2018 9:47 PM  

Yup. It's like "Diversity". 100 years ago, even 60 years ago, immigrants were expected to abandon the ways of their homeland and adopt American ways. Today, it's the reverse. I'm old enough to remember a sea change in the 1970s, with more and more people embracing ethnic identities that they had not held (or weakly held) before.

The United States has serious challenges in maintaining a national identity. Keeping one is essential for stability, but it takes constant maintenance. And we're behind on that.

Blogger Hammerli280 December 22, 2018 9:48 PM  

Diversity is NOT our strength. It is our weakness. UNITY is our strength. E Pluribus, Unum!

Blogger bob kuk mando ( Maps are only Meaningful insofar as they correspond to Reality ) December 23, 2018 12:52 AM  

31. Francis Parker Yockey December 22, 2018 8:33 PM
The graph is a Google Ngram.


okay, that makes sense.

so the 'nation of immigrants' nomenclature didn't even exist until after the play "The Melting Pot" was composed.

and by the 1970s, it was taught to all schoolchildren as part of their curriculum.

quite impressive.

Blogger nidus of inflection December 23, 2018 12:56 AM  

There certainly is a nation consisting of nothing but immigrants, wherever it goes.

Interesting to see the two-pronged approach: They partially blend into your society then convince you that you are no different.

"Hello, fellow nation of immigrants."

Blogger DonReynolds December 23, 2018 2:14 AM  

NONE of the people who came to the original 13 British colonies were immigrants, except those few whose trades were in keen demand in the colonies.

Balts were welcome because of their experience with pine forests in northern Germany, naval stores being a major part of American commerce.

Polish glass blowers were the first workers to have gone on strike in North America....they went on strike in Virginia because they were not allowed to vote. (The British government caved and let them vote.)

Many of the Dutch arrived when New York City was still called New Amsterdam and was a large Dutch colony. There were also some Swedish colonies, particularly at Delaware.

Of course, Quebec was French long before it was folded into British America. In fact, Quebec at times extended down the Mississippi river and included much of the Ohio River valley.

An immigrant is a person who leaves his own country to become part of another country. The 13 original colonies were a great part of the 17 British colonies in North America, but until 1783 they were part of British America and not another country. The British Crown guaranteed every person who left the UK for the colonies that their status would be unchanged by migrating. None of them would be considered an immigrant and their citizenship would be unchanged, like any person who moves from New York to Florida today. No, they are not immigrants, nor were they immigrants when they moved from anywhere in the UK to the Carolinas or Massachusetts in colonial America.

Blogger DonReynolds December 23, 2018 2:34 AM  

On the claim that the UK is a nation of immigrants, I would make the point that the Roman army and administration were not immigrants, nor were they considered tourists. The Vikings were not considered immigrants when they occupied significant portions of the British Isles. The Saxons, Angles, Jutes and Picts were not immigrants and they had no intention of assimilating into the native society. The Normans were never immigrants anywhere they went, including England....but those who have arrived in the British Isles since the Normans, primarily from the colonies of the British Empire sorta look like immigrants, but they were not. They left India and South Afrika and Canada for England as members of the Empire with a basic civil right to go to Britain.

It is only slowly, in the past century, and especially since WWII, that many of the former colonies of the British Empire have achieved home rule status or outright independence from the Crown of England. Now that these independent colonies are separate nations, they can rightly claim that immigrants per se have begun arriving in significant numbers.

Blogger Dirk Manly December 23, 2018 4:25 AM  

@20

"No, that Y axis is way the hell off. The population of the U. S. in 2017 was 325.7 million more or less. If we have roughly 60 million immigrants here today (legal and illegal), then they are around 20% of the population, NOT 0.000006%. "

It's a statistical analysis of textual sources, not human population demographics.

Blogger Dirk Manly December 23, 2018 4:31 AM  

@35

"Yup. It's like "Diversity". 100 years ago, even 60 years ago, immigrants were expected to abandon the ways of their homeland and adopt American ways. Today, it's the reverse. I'm old enough to remember a sea change in the 1970s, with more and more people embracing ethnic identities that they had not held (or weakly held) before."

Maybe then, whites should go back to their ancient European ways of just killing anybody with dark skin. As efficiently as possible. After all, that's what multi-culturalism is all about, isn't it.

Blogger S1AL December 23, 2018 12:08 PM  

"Maybe then, whites should go back to their ancient European ways of just killing anybody with dark skin. As efficiently as possible. After all, that's what multi-culturalism is all about, isn't it."

99% of European killing was directed at other Europeans. Anyone who wants to go back to "the old ways" is a total nutter.

Blogger Dirk Manly December 23, 2018 2:49 PM  

"99% of European killing was directed at other Europeans."

And why do you think that was the case?


"Anyone who wants to go back to "the old ways" is a total nutter."

A good bluff is just as good as an Ace high straight flush.

Blogger John Smith December 23, 2018 11:47 PM  

Access to computers and other control systems which might provide you with information about the way the world revolves around technology should be unlimited and total. All information should be free and accessible to all. That is why we at INTEGRATEDHACKS have come up with a team of highly motivated and dedicated hackers to help you get access to information you are being deprived of. Our services include and are not limited to hacking of social media accounts,email accounts, tracking of phones hacking of bank cards and many more.
Have you ever been hacked? Need to recover your stolen account, Want to monitor your kids,spouse or partner, Change your school results track messages from an email or mobile number and many more, INTEGRATEDHACKS is the one for you. Hundreds of our clients have their phones, social media accounts, emails, servers, may bots and PCs hacked consistently and efficiently. Our professional hackers for hire team is highly qualified and can hack anything or device you desire without giving the target any form of notification which makes us one of the best.


★ Contact Us For Your Desired Hacking services via : integratedhacks@protonmail.com and experience cyber hacking like never before.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts