ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2019 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Tuesday, June 04, 2019

The savage president

The God-Emperor is such a ruthless rhetorical savage:
Prince Harry was noticeably absent from the State Banquet staged in honour of Donald Trump, in the wake of alleged comments made about his wife. The Duke of Sussex appeared less than keen to be pictured with the President - who reportedly branded Harry's wife Meghan 'nasty' at the weekend after learning of comments she made about him while she was an actress.

Earlier in the day Harry had chaperoned Mr Trump's daughter, Ivanka, into Buckingham Palace's Picture Gallery for a display of US-themed artefacts.

But the Queen's grandson quickly disappeared into the background and did not follow other members of the Royal Family as they walked round the exhibition with the American leader and his party.
The reason Prince Harry is so furious is that he knows perfectly well what President Trump means when he said that he didn't know Megan Markle "was nasty". He knows the President wasn't referring to any name-calling, but rather, to his wife's former profession that did not involve acting.

You'd think people would have learned to keep their mouths shut about President Trump by now. At least, people with secrets they don't want distributed around the world by the media.

Labels:

74 Comments:

Blogger Wayne June 04, 2019 6:39 AM  

The aliterate named A list celebrity /yachting professional told Harry to skip out. Then she turned and berated her staff with another hate filled screed.

Blogger Lovekraft June 04, 2019 6:40 AM  

Maybe Harry should focus his attention on how to establish reparations for the Pakistani rape gang holocaust.

side note: banned from reddit for three days for posting "Muslims are next in line" referring to the Canadian racket windfall Trudeau just handed the natives. No chance to inform the hidden nazi that my comment was referring to Muslims likely pushing for their own 'perpetual victimhood shakedown.'

Blogger Solon June 04, 2019 6:40 AM  

Meghan Markle's former "profession" is a secret now? I thought anyone who bothered to look into it already knew about that.

Just kidding. I pointed out to my mother that Markle used to be an escort and she denied it outright, no debate on the subject, no curiosity or anything, just "no she wasn't."

I don't debate with her these days. She's your prototypical lefty NPC Boomer to the core. Like mentioned in a previous thread, Aristotle knew thousands of years ago that "some people simply cannot be instructed."

Blogger Lovekraft June 04, 2019 6:43 AM  

@ VD: o/t but the Wikipedia founder just virtue-signaled about Trump yesterday. Go Infogalactic!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/06/far-left-wikipedia-founder-and-trump-basher-refers-to-all-trump-supporters-as-cultists-as-president-lands-in-london/

Blogger Pope Cleophus I June 04, 2019 7:09 AM  

@Lovekraft
side note: banned from reddit for three days for posting "Muslims are next in line" referring to the Canadian racket windfall Trudeau just handed the natives. No chance to inform the hidden nazi that my comment was referring to Muslims likely pushing for their own 'perpetual victimhood shakedown.'

JIZYA!!!!

Blogger Matt June 04, 2019 7:13 AM  

Your only responsibility is to honor her.

Blogger Borsabil June 04, 2019 7:16 AM  

It's beautiful rhetoric from the GE. Trump uses the word nasty when describing sexual degenerates, it's a thing with him. So he calls the mystery meat princess nasty as a counter punch insult to her remarks about him, on the surface a relatively mild slap down, in fact kinda lame, but to those in the know utterly devastating.

Why did Harry put a ring on that? He's not very bright true, but he's a decent looking Chad, he could literally have any girl he wants. Why a 40 year old prostitute sheboon? She's not even good looking, maybe a solid 7 when she was younger, but sans make up she'd be a horror show to wake up to nowadays.

Blogger Rhys June 04, 2019 7:16 AM  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJce_HcXACQ

More grooming/predictive programming?

Blogger The Observer June 04, 2019 7:24 AM  

Why did Harry put a ring on that? He's not very bright true, but he's a decent looking Chad, he could literally have any girl he wants. Why a 40 year old prostitute sheboon? She's not even good looking, maybe a solid 7 when she was younger, but sans make up she'd be a horror show to wake up to nowadays.

Like so many broken men, he just wants a mommy GF to love him like his mother used to. Boys still seeking to run behind their mother's skirts.

Blogger Jeff aka Orville June 04, 2019 7:26 AM  

Harry is a bigly cuck like his father, who once said he wanted to be reincarnated as a tampon lodged firmly in horseface's nether parts.

The Duchess of Yachting has Harry's balls locked away. She probably figured out he was a sub, and played him.

Blogger Lazarus June 04, 2019 7:31 AM  

I am betting the Queen was secretly Amused.

Blogger Stg58/Animal Mother June 04, 2019 7:37 AM  

That's the only explanation for why a prince who could have any woman on the planet married Markle.

Blogger dienw June 04, 2019 7:45 AM  

Like so many broken men, he just wants a mommy GF to love him like his mother used to. Boys still seeking to run behind their mother's skirts.

As the song goes,"Boys want to grow up and marry a gal like the gal dear old dad married."
This is why men should put off marriage until they are old enough to realize that affinity may lead to a bad choice.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan June 04, 2019 7:45 AM  

The comments are gold as usual. Markle being a perfect example of the American Empire these days, loud and stupid.

Blogger Stilicho June 04, 2019 7:51 AM  

Are bookies taking bets on when the Queen will banish the darkling duchess? I don't think she can stop herself from antagonizing and embarrassing the Queen. A fly in the sugar bowl thinks it has it made. Until the owner of the sugar bowl notices.

If rumours are true, the Queen put and end to Diana for far less.

Blogger pyrrhus June 04, 2019 8:27 AM  

Nobody is more sensitive than an ex-Hoe....

Blogger Robert What? June 04, 2019 8:41 AM  

One day will Harry wake up and say to himself: "What the F did I do?"

Blogger binks webelf June 04, 2019 8:48 AM  

Ukistan.. the latest SJW sperg-out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGmHvAQCUl8
Mark Dice-- You'd Think They Would Be Happy About It

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhKS0TcrAO8
Thinkery-- Trump's UK State Visit Causes an SJW Meltdown

Blogger LSWCHP June 04, 2019 8:59 AM  

I wouldn't be at all surprised if HM the Q arranged for Diana's death.

A second car crash is out, so I expect MM to be slaughtered horribly in a "Muslim terrorist attack". A suicide nail bomb, or perhaps even beheaded on video. Eliminates the problem while generating huge mass sympathy for the family.

You heard it here first. I think.

Blogger Tars Tarkas June 04, 2019 9:04 AM  

Sargon put the full context of this nasty comment up on his channel. Trump was asked what he thought of her and he was praising her and saying what a terrific job she would do. The "journalist" began asking about a bunch of names she apparently called him and he responded that he did not know she had been so nasty. It was quite un-Trump in its politeness. These people never stop lying.

Blogger Matt June 04, 2019 9:05 AM  

Suspended street sweeping for the next 3 days is only thing good about Islam and the bend-over boys running this slum of a city.

Blogger Charles June 04, 2019 9:06 AM  

"... who reportedly branded Harry's wife Meghan 'nasty' at the weekend after learning of comments she made about him while she was an actress...."

The exchange was:

THE SUN: She said she’d move to Canada if you got elected. It turned out she moved to Britain.

TRUMP: There are a lot of people moving here [to the U.S.] So what can I say? No, I didn’t know that she was nasty.

Trump likely said "I didn't know she was no[t] stay[ing]" Trump didn't enunciate the "t" and the "ing" clearly enough (like "bigly" is actually "big league") and the reporter spun it the worst way possible.

Blogger KPKinSunnyPhiladelphia June 04, 2019 9:26 AM  

Tars Tarkas wrote:Sargon put the full context of this nasty comment up on his channel. Trump was asked what he thought of her and he was praising her and saying what a terrific job she would do. The "journalist" began asking about a bunch of names she apparently called him and he responded that he did not know she had been so nasty. It was quite un-Trump in its politeness. These people never stop lying.

Right.

But I will say that for Trump, "nasty" is all purpose word, like a lot his rhetoric. He'll praise in one sentence, and in the next, drive in the shiv.

As Scott Adams has pointed out, Trump is a funny guy -- not the funniest guy around, but if you're in a room with him, he's probably the funniest guy there.

What he said about Khan was hilarious: "As dumb as de Blasio, and half as tall."

As God is my witness - and hey I'm an agnostic -- I want 4 more years of the guy, just for the laughs. And it will be a sad day when he exits the stage.

Blogger riffer73 June 04, 2019 10:04 AM  

I honestly don't think the Queen is going to off her. Otherwise they wouldn't have gone to the trouble of finding a black ginger baby. Took them ten months, but they managed it.

Blogger English Tom June 04, 2019 10:28 AM  

@riffer73

But what if an alleged right winger offed princess mud? I'm sure a certain (((anti white agenda))) would benefit.

Blogger JD Curtis June 04, 2019 10:40 AM  

Rush Limbaugh waded in to this yesterday.
The leftist activist pretending to be a reporter referred to her as the duchess of Sussex in his question to Trump, not Meghan Markle, or Harry's wife.
Rush was 100% certain Trump did specifically know who the reporter was referring to.
Seems quite plausible.

Blogger Akuma June 04, 2019 10:43 AM  

Just goes to show you Military training is worthless for turning boys into men. It clearly did nothing for Harry.

Blogger VFM #7634 June 04, 2019 10:44 AM  

Ukistan.. the latest SJW sperg-out.

@18 binks webelf
Wow, Jimmy Wales of Wikipedia is really, really Gamma...

Blogger Cataline Sergius June 04, 2019 10:55 AM  

Everyone seems to be assuming that Harry will leave her sooner or later.

My money is on her leaving him within a year of Elizabeth dying.

Right now, she and Kate are kinda sorta equals and Meghan loves all the attention she's getting.

But after the queen dies. Kate will officially be bumped way over her Meg's head as Princess of Wales. William not only being the official crown prince but a chief of state in his own right even if that state is Wales.

Meghan will have to officially start bending the knee to a woman she appears detest.

Look for her to move to NYC with her own fashion line and a string of ghosted children's books after that.

Blogger sammibandit June 04, 2019 11:06 AM  

Meghan has to learn to keep her mouth shut. She's not permitted to give her opinion because royal protocol prohibits opining. She is a nasty woman because she wants a royal title but doesn't want the work that goes in it. She does put a lot of works into scams, though.

Blogger sammibandit June 04, 2019 11:07 AM  

Yep. Catherine will be Queen Consort one day.

Blogger Solon June 04, 2019 11:29 AM  

Oh I honor her. She gave birth to me, how could I not?

But the Bible also demands that fathers and mothers respect their children. She's a staunch atheist and thinks that believing in God is a fool's game, and has called me an idiot for being a Christian.

Who deserves more honor, your mother or God?

So, I honor her by respecting her beliefs. From as far away and with as little contact as possible.

Honoring one's mother doesn't require one to like her.

Blogger Solon June 04, 2019 11:37 AM  

No, he won't.

It wouldn't surprise me at all to learn that this marriage was "arranged" by certain people in order to delegitimize the royal family.

Seriously, a Prince of the Royal Family marrying a former(?) whore negress. Honk honk.

Blogger pyrrhus June 04, 2019 11:42 AM  

You would think that once a grifter like Markle had married a gold mine, with the only requirement being that she avoid any mention of politics or controversial figures, that she would shut up and enjoy things.....but nooooo, women are never satisfied unless they are imposing their idiot ideas on the rest of us....

Blogger Snidely Whiplash June 04, 2019 12:06 PM  

sammibandit wrote:Yep. Catherine will be Queen Consort one day.
No, she will be Queen. Prince Consort is an invented title made to prevent Phillip from being King. A King outranks his Queen, and neither the Royal Family nor Parliament ever intended that Phillip be monarch.

Blogger Rhys June 04, 2019 12:08 PM  

pyrrhus wrote:You would think that once a grifter like Markle had married a gold mine, with the only requirement being that she avoid any mention of politics or controversial figures, that she would shut up and enjoy things.....but nooooo, women are never satisfied unless they are imposing their idiot ideas on the rest of us....

Being a person of such starkly low quality character, she's probably unaware of the amazing deal she's managed to strike. In fact, with Markle, I think it's safe to say she probably thinks that Harry is the one who lucked out, not her.

Blogger dc.sunsets June 04, 2019 12:16 PM  

What does it tell us when the "Ubermenchen" people they put on their posters as representatives of our "betters" are Markle, Kardashian, or any major politician in any country today?

While it is Humanity's lot to be ruled by scum, today's condition seems almost a caricature of this. It's as if Idiocracy starts at the top, like a fish rotting.

I continue to maintain that this is a signal that the mortar between the stones of the Castle that rules us is already eroded to nothing. The cohesion of our entire society (economic, political, etc.) is all but gone, like a dandelion whose seeds are ready for the next light breeze to send them each in its own direction.

Blogger sammibandit June 04, 2019 12:28 PM  

No, she will be Queen. Prince Consort is an invented title made to prevent Phillip from being King. A King outranks his Queen, and neither the Royal Family nor Parliament ever intended that Phillip be monarch.

That makes sense. I thought consort meant the person isn't in the bloodline. So you're saying--sorry for that turn of phrase--that the Consort title was gynocentric in the case of Phillip?

Blogger RusticFederalist June 04, 2019 12:34 PM  

Harry my lad, you can have the pick of literally any beauty from our British people, or the Quadroon American casting couch reject and divorcee.

Blogger Akulkis June 04, 2019 12:38 PM  

tell your mom about how famed atheist Madeline Marie O'Hare died a Christian. be prepared for fireworks.

Blogger CF Neal June 04, 2019 12:38 PM  

JD Curtis wrote:Rush Limbaugh waded in to this yesterday.

The leftist activist pretending to be a reporter referred to her as the duchess of Sussex in his question to Trump, not Meghan Markle, or Harry's wife.

Rush was 100% certain Trump did specifically know who the reporter was referring to.

Seems quite plausible.


Uh ... forgive my density, but, trying best as I am able to keep up, did you mean to say:

"Trump did [NOT] specifically know who the reporter was referring to."

Blogger Snidely Whiplash June 04, 2019 12:43 PM  

sammibandit wrote:I thought consort meant the person isn't in the bloodline. So you're saying--sorry for that turn of phrase--that the Consort title was gynocentric in the case of Phillip?

Looks like I'm wrong.

Blogger Silent Draco June 04, 2019 12:46 PM  

sammibandit, goes back to the 12th century and the first of the English civil wars: Matilda, Lady of England and her husband, Stephen of Blois. He was a noble from another region in France, not Norman of the royal line, and not crowned or regarded as king.

Philip listened a little too long to Uncle Louis' tales of how a Mountbatten (not Battenbergs, mind you!) could become the senior line in the House of Saxe-Coburg Gotha, er, Windsor, by an excellent marriage. His mistake disappointment were evident for 60-some years.

Blogger Ominous Cowherd June 04, 2019 12:59 PM  

Solon wrote:Seriously, a Prince of the Royal Family marrying a former(?) whore negress. Honk honk.

Definitely not former. There are old whores, but there are no ex-whores.

Blogger Derrick Bonsell June 04, 2019 1:20 PM  

Prince of Wales doesn't mean he's head of state for Wales, it's the title usually held by the eldest son of the reigning monarch. Wales doesn't have its own monarch.

Blogger Derrick Bonsell June 04, 2019 1:23 PM  

Victoria's husband was also Prince-Consort. Not sure of the exact theory but the wife of a British monarch is Queen as long as her husband is King, but the reverse isn't true.

A lot of it probably has to do with dynastic politics as crowning a Queen's husband opens a whole can of worms like with Philip II of Spain and Queen Mary.

Blogger Derrick Bonsell June 04, 2019 1:27 PM  

Stephen was king though* and the Matilda he was married to was a different one than Empress Matilda.

*Stephen claimed the title and when Henry III (Empress Matilda's son) won the civil war the settlement made him Stephen's heir, thus legitimizing his rule right at the end.

Blogger Annabel Lee June 04, 2019 1:30 PM  

Price Philip was born Prince of Greece and Denmark in Corfu, Greece. His father was Prince Andrew of Greece and Denmark, and his mother was Princess Alice of Battenberg.

Blogger Damelon Brinn June 04, 2019 1:31 PM  

Meanwhile, UK officials are debating whether or not to allow the big baby Trump blimp to fly around events there. But saying "nasty" is going too far.

Personally, I'm hoping the blimp flies high and proud. Nothing like attacks on a US president by foreigners to rally Americans behind him.

Blogger sammibandit June 04, 2019 1:33 PM  

Snidley, kudos for presenting new information. I say this because it's important to show n00bs like me how to behave on the blog.

Silent Draco, thanks for the context. Looks like we have 2 Hesse stories today.

Blogger Silent Draco June 04, 2019 2:35 PM  

Derrick, thanks for catching my mistake. I lose track of the Matildas if I'm not careful. Timewise, that was Henry II because another dynastic mess in the 13th century followed among his sons, leaving Henry III king as son of King John.

Blogger sammibandit June 04, 2019 2:41 PM  

OT

Woman pops Trump balloon and is promptly arrested. She claims police assaulted her. You be the judge.

https://hooktube.com/watch?v=K_HJkyLCJrQ&app=desktop

Blogger Akuma June 04, 2019 3:01 PM  

"What does it tell us when the "Ubermenchen" people they put on their posters as representatives of our "betters" are Markle, Kardashian, or any major politician in any country today?"

It tells us the electorate is filled with with incompotent manboons.

Blogger sammibandit June 04, 2019 3:06 PM  

Price Philip was born Prince of Greece and Denmark in Corfu, Greece. His father was Prince Andrew of Greece and Denmark, and his mother was Princess Alice of Battenberg.

Thanks Annabel Lee. So he is bloodline. I'm so confused!

It doesn't help that some Hessians in the ancient past migrated to the isle of Zealand in Denmark where the capital is.

So which house is Elizabeth II from?

Blogger Tanjil Bren June 04, 2019 3:40 PM  

When I saw Harry interviewing Obama, I knew the writing was on the wall for British Monarchy.
Clearly, the palace's gatekeepers are converged and in the process of stripping away the non-partisan veneer that enables the Monarchy to persist relatively unmolested.
How else to explain Markle (who they'd have known all about within hours of her name first appearing on their security briefings) being allowed to get anywhere near him?

Blogger Richard Martel June 04, 2019 3:45 PM  

It could be worse, Harry could be a bone smuggler.

Blogger Don't Call Me Len June 04, 2019 4:00 PM  

Wee Prince Harry is learning that once you go black, you can never come back.

Blogger Don't Call Me Len June 04, 2019 4:03 PM  

By the way something, did anyone else see what the real Queen of England said about Brexit? Should be worth some votes to Nigel:

https://www.theguardian.com/music/2019/may/31/elton-john-brexit-not-imperialist-english-idiot-verona

Blogger Unknown June 04, 2019 5:17 PM  

The Prince and the Prostitute. Sounds like a good name for a post-modern fairy tale. Eh?

Blogger Up from the pond June 04, 2019 5:33 PM  

dc.sunsets wrote:The cohesion of our entire society (economic, political, etc.) is all but gone, like a dandelion whose seeds are ready for the next light breeze to send them each in its own direction.

Fifty determined men could topple our rulers in all fields when the next economic crisis or war hits.

Blogger Don't Call Me Len June 04, 2019 5:41 PM  

So which house is Elizabeth II from?

Harkonnen.

Or maybe Windsor, which was Saxe-Coburg and Gotha of the House of Wettin until George V changed it in 1917, for obvious reasons.

Blogger S1AL June 04, 2019 6:01 PM  

"How else to explain Markle (who they'd have known all about within hours of her name first appearing on their security briefings) being allowed to get anywhere near him?"

How better to guarantee that neither he nor his descendants get anywhere near the throne?

Blogger Doktor Jeep June 04, 2019 6:11 PM  

Harry's gamma is showing ever more brighter

Blogger MichaelJMaier June 04, 2019 6:40 PM  

Wait... she's a literal ex-whore? Wow.... I thought the prince was a loser BEFORE knowing that.

Blogger eclecticme June 04, 2019 6:41 PM  

I never trust the MSM, especially when they fail to provide a direct Trump quote and in context. Here is a link to the original 'nasty' remark. Not so bad.
https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2019/jun/02/context-donald-trumps-nasty-comment-about-meghan-m/

I am a huge Trump fan but found the UK protest signs funny. Not the usual US NPC stuff. I cannot figure how to link to a single link for all of them.


https://sadanduseless.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/trump-protest9.jpg
https://sadanduseless.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/trump-protest4.jpg
https://sadanduseless.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/trump-protest6.jpg
https://sadanduseless.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/trump-protest14.jpg
https://sadanduseless.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/trump-protest16.jpg

Blogger Terrekain June 04, 2019 6:48 PM  

One thing to understand about Harry is that US troops in Afghanistan mocked him as he fled from a relatively safe base to an even safer distance once news of him being in the region broke.

Basically, he came in with cadres of bodyguards and PR officers - and the slightest whiff that there might be a mortar landing within a hundred miles of his general vicinity was enough to spook him out of the country (He was never in combat, never deigned to be in combat).

The "Prince" is will always have a reputation as a coward in the US, though the world-wide media would pretend otherwise. US veteran personnel had to grit their teeth when they saluted this charlatan on his visit to San Diego (big Naval base, naval air-station, Marine corps, etc)

Blogger sammibandit June 04, 2019 7:01 PM  

Wait... she's a literal ex-whore? Wow.... I thought the prince was a loser BEFORE knowing that.

Harry used to meet her for trysts at Soho House, which is a chain of hip hotels known for escorts.

The story is leagues more creepy than is portrayed in MSM. She followed Harry into the VIP section of the Toronto Invictus Games, uninvited mind you, at the beginning of her stalking, ahh courtship.

Blogger Ominous Cowherd June 04, 2019 7:36 PM  

Wait... she's a literal ex-whore?

"Ex-whore" is like "little bit pregnant:" ain't no such thing. There's old whores, but no ex-whores.

Blogger Mandos June 04, 2019 7:43 PM  

This is minstrel material, a modern parable on the benefits of reactionary marriage.

"And now ladies and gentlemen, the famous tale of the Prince, the Whore and the President..."

Blogger sammibandit June 04, 2019 7:55 PM  

"Ex-whore" is like "little bit pregnant:" ain't no such thing. There's old whores, but no ex-whores.

Exactly. There's an alleged leaking video going around. She can't hide her past just like she can't hide her grifting.

Blogger Annabel Lee June 04, 2019 9:58 PM  

I had heard she and Harry were introduced by a matchmaker. Of course this could all be public relations b.s.:
WM Magazine article.

Blogger Lazzaloveman June 05, 2019 12:15 AM  

You forgot ((()))

Blogger Paul M June 05, 2019 4:19 AM  

Robert What? wrote:One day will Harry wake up and say to himself: "What the F did I do?"
He has. Check out some of his more recent photos.

Blogger Annabel Lee June 05, 2019 8:38 PM  

He comes by his awful taste in significant others honestly. Look who his mother was dating when she was killed. Dodi Fayed, playboy son of the owner of Harrods, an immigrant Pakistani, if I’m recalling correctly.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts