ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2019 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Sunday, February 02, 2020

Bernie must have been winning

The Des Moines Register inexplicably refuses to release its final poll before the Iowa caucuses:
The Des Moines Register, CNN and Selzer & Co. have made the decision to not release the final installment of the CNN/Des Moines Register/Mediacom poll as planned this evening.

Nothing is more important to the Register and its polling partners than the integrity of the Iowa Poll. Today, a respondent raised an issue with the way the survey was administered, which could have compromised the results of the poll. It appears a candidate’s name was omitted in at least one interview in which the respondent was asked to name their preferred candidate.

While this appears to be isolated to one surveyor, we cannot confirm that with certainty. Therefore, the partners made the difficult decision to not to move forward with releasing the Iowa Poll.
Sanders was shown leading by as much as four points in the previous poll. The pollster with the best track record, had him five points ahead of Creepy Joe.
Selzer’s most recent poll, conducted Jan. 2-8, showed Sanders at 20 percent, Warren at 17 percent, Buttigieg at 16 percent and Biden at 15 percent. 
And "subsequent reports said that Pete Buttigieg's name had either been accidentally omitted or mispronounced by a poll worker during at least one call." Yeah, because that would have totally altered the results....

It's obvious that the Democrats desperately want to avoid throwing a decrepit jewish socialist up against the God-Emperor Donald I. As wicked and stupid as they are, even they understand that will end in disaster as blacks and Hispanics either stay home or vote for the only candidate they can possibly respect.

Buttigieg and Klobuchar are nonentities. Biden is as hapless as he is hopeless. Sanders is more obviously unelectable than Dukakis or Mondale ever were. Warren has been unable to generate enthusiasm. They have no one to stop the inevitable Trumpslide 2020.

Labels: ,

57 Comments:

Blogger bodenlose Schweinerei February 02, 2020 6:19 AM  

It appears a candidate’s name was omitted in at least one interview in which the respondent was asked to name their preferred candidate.

So the "respondents" are too stupid to be able to name their own preferred candidate unless they're reminded of that candidate's name? Even for Dem voters, that's pretty sad.

The despair at the thought of the Trumpslide is already palpable. I've even seen it in Amazon reviews.

Blogger Gettimothy February 02, 2020 6:59 AM  

Inexplicably!

Bloomberg < Sanders on Latino black appeal.

Podesta in at DNC means Hildabeast to the rescue

Blogger tuberman February 02, 2020 7:30 AM  

Bernie and his Clockwork Orange henchmen. Just a little of that ultra-violence.

Blogger Cataline Sergius February 02, 2020 7:40 AM  

If you are going to participate in the Iowa caucuses you have to be able to drive several miles to your caucuse's location.

Spend hours listening to people talk about each candidate and then you will be letting everyone know how you voted.

This system does NOT favor families or the middle class in general. You have to pretty much take the day off and hire an all night baby sitter if you have kids.

The Iowa caucuses DO represennt the unemployed, the childless, the university students, the assistant professors at junior colleges and you get my drift.

This is a system that strongly favors the hard left activist base.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan February 02, 2020 7:48 AM  

Iowa to me is the home of lemon sucking face white women of the highest regard for their own virtue, and that the Duh Moines newspaper of record cannot get their fellow lemon sucker over the top has got to be another kick in the pants. It was one thing for the Obama machine to win since he was a blank slate they painted their virtue upon, but this gang of clowns drubbing Princess Pinch Face of their tribe has got to be devastating.

True story FWIW, two months ago I met a 70 year old Boomer at the range who had lived most of his adult life in Iowa City, and as I was listening to him decry that he and his wife's gal friends were impervious to his logic it dawned on me that we deserved to lose our country. This smart accomplished man held the belief that women care about logic, reason and intellectual clarity over status.

Blogger Dave February 02, 2020 7:56 AM  

The DNC are like crazy bloodhounds that have locked onto the scent of all that cash Mini Mike is waving around. They’ve already changed the debate rules for Mini Mike.

Blogger Lazarus February 02, 2020 8:10 AM  

Sanders run in 2016 was the most lucrative thing he has ever done, plus he got a $795,000 advance on the subsequent book, probably as a reward for not complaining about the rigged convention.

Why not run again? The buyout will be even more lucrative this time.

Blogger tublecane February 02, 2020 8:21 AM  

@1- Maybe it was set up like "Which of the following..." then the respondent would simply be picking their favorite from a list instead of overall . Whatever.

The idea that results would be withheld because no one can pronounce Butt-gig would be HILARIOUS.

Blogger Balkan Yankee February 02, 2020 8:21 AM  

The infighting within the Democratic Party is going to be vicious, especially if Bernie gets screwed out of the nomination again.

If that happens, Antifa are going to burn Milwaukee to the ground.

Blogger Dave February 02, 2020 8:50 AM  

Lazarus wrote:Sanders run in 2016 was the most lucrative thing he has ever done, plus he got a $795,000 advance on the subsequent book, probably as a reward for not complaining about the rigged convention.

Why not run again? The buyout will be even more lucrative this time.


Sanders can't even negotiate a decent book advance. Obama got $65 million. What has Bernie been doing all this time in the Senate? As a politician, he's not even a 3rd rate grifter.

Blogger Damelon Brinn February 02, 2020 9:03 AM  

@9, We can only hope. It's lining up perfectly for HRC to jump in and instantly poll the majority of Dems. If that happens when Bernie is in the lead, it'll set off the Berntards. But with weed being legalized in so many states now, will they be able to focus enough to riot?

Blogger Newscaper312 February 02, 2020 9:03 AM  

Drudge has an article with a Thailand team saying they successfully treated a guy w a combination of flu and HIV antivirals.
A. That's some good news.
B. Another datapoint dovetailing with the suggestions that some HIV genes were grafted into it.

Blogger Attila is my bro February 02, 2020 9:07 AM  

Whatever is to be will be.

How much leeway will the cops give them when there are no notsees around to punch?

Blogger Johnny February 02, 2020 9:32 AM  

>>This system does NOT favor families or the middle class in general.

That is true of our social system in general. Kids are a drain on finances and an enormous distraction. I suspect that is why sexual deviates have as much political power as they do. Lacking kids, they have surplus time and money to spend on other things, and one of those other things is the political arena.

Blogger MagnusStout February 02, 2020 9:39 AM  

Theory: electoral “winning” means less to Corrupt Democrats than enjoying the spoils of legalized bribery (the “revolving door,” profitable non-profits like the Clintons, etc...). Whether Bernie was/is a good candidate is irrelevant (see Hillary—who had super high negatives)—Bernie would not have permitted the same kind of grifting. And, he would have pushed to heavily tax the rich friends of Dems—basically, being a big party pooper to them.

Blogger Ominous Cowherd February 02, 2020 9:44 AM  

bodenlose Schweinerei wrote:So the "respondents" are too stupid to be able to name their own preferred candidate unless they're reminded of that candidate's name? Even for Dem voters, that's pretty sad.
If I wanted to know who was going to win in Iowa, I'd ask likely Dem caucusers ``Who do you favor to win the primary?'' If they don't know the name, he's not a contender. If I suggest names, I've introduced bias.

Introducing bias is doubtless why they were giving a list of names.

Blogger David Ray Milton February 02, 2020 9:46 AM  

The problem the moderate Dems are going to have going up against Sanders and Warren in this primary... and mostly just Sanders at this point... is that the commies are the only ones who have followings with enough enthusiasm for their candidate to show up to the damn primary vote.

I have met many comrades of Bernie Bolshevik and Pochahontas, but I have yet to meet a supporter of creepy Joe or Buttplug. I’m sure the latter exist, but they’re not excited enough about them to vocalize it... or to make time for a primary vote.

Blogger Ominous Cowherd February 02, 2020 9:50 AM  

Attila is my bro wrote:How much leeway will the cops give them when there are no notsees around to punch?
I'm starting to think TGE is playing ``worse is better,'' letting the enemies fly their freak flag, letting the Leftist faction of the Swamp overreach so far that even Boomertard normie cuckservatives will be ready when Trump drains it and burns what's left.

Blogger Balkan Yankee February 02, 2020 9:53 AM  

@11: I expect weed will take the edge off the rage, but not by too much.

With Her Majesty in or out, the Dems are looking at a serious party crack up - 1968 and 1974 combined.

Blogger Uncompliant February 02, 2020 9:55 AM  

With regard to Biden: Sundance has a theory -- strong IMO -- that Biden was asked to run only as a predicate for the Ukraine hoax effort to impeach Pres. Trump. Without Biden as a "candidate," there could be no self-interested "quid pro quo," no attempt to undercut an "opponent," or otherwise "interfere" in an election by the GE. Thus, without Biden, a main support for their impeachment hoax would not have existed.

Biden's bizarre behavior on the campaign trail certainly would support this theory. The theory also suggests that Biden's poll numbers have been faked or at least inflated to keep him at the top.

Now that this particular effort to remove Trump has failed, the Dims no longer need Biden. He will now go "poof."

Link: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/02/01/the-biden-purpose-is-finished-watch-how-fast-he-plummets/

Blogger carnaby February 02, 2020 10:17 AM  

So when do we see the last second entry of the Oprah / Michelle Obama ticket to save the day?

Blogger Doktor Jeep February 02, 2020 11:16 AM  

You don't have to be Ron Paul to get Ron Pauled.

Blogger Hammerli 280 February 02, 2020 11:22 AM  

Here's the way I think this plays out...

Sanders will win Iowa and New Hampshire. In doing so, he will take out Fauxchantas, Butt-plug, and the minor Dem players. This will leave Biden...and Bloomberg.

Biden is Mr. Gaffe-O-Matic, with the specter of arrest for bribery hanging over him. He'll do well enough in Nevada and South Carolina to keep in the fight, but the Dem party leadership would really like to ease him out.

I think the Democrat leadership is trying desperately to figure out a way to make Bloomberg the candidate without getting Sanders' supporters too enraged. They are thinking (correctly, I believe) that Bloomberg can fund his own campaign...which will allow party resources to be used elsewhere.

Is Bloomberg going to beat Trump? Probably not. Bloomberg has two things going for him...money, and the fact that he's NOT part of the Obama/Biden/Clinton corruption. On the other hand, Bloomberg is a New Yawker with STRONG fascist tendencies. Which will not play well west of the Hudson or south of Staten Island.

Blogger Joe Smith February 02, 2020 11:44 AM  

I had my Boomer in-laws confidently tell me that anyone, literally anyone, can beat Trump in 2020 because he’s so disliked. That rumbling you hear in the background? Yeah, the media says that’s nothing. Don’t worry about it. And anyway, whatever it is, it’s certainly not a Trumpslide.

Blogger furor kek tonicus ( no need to be racist, Ratchets can Karen better than anybody ) February 02, 2020 11:50 AM  

The American Association for Public Opinion Research, the leading organization of pollsters, sent a press release to reporters this week urging “pundits and journalists not to rush to judgment on the performance of polls in the aftermath of the Iowa Democratic [c]aucuses.”


hey everybody, just because reading entrails has the same +/- accuracy rating as a telephone poll is no reason to stop slaughtering chickens.

Blogger furor kek tonicus ( no need to be racist, Ratchets can Karen better than anybody ) February 02, 2020 12:05 PM  

Hillary thinks she could win the 2020 election.

the question is whether or not the Demonrat donor base would give any significant money to her for a campaign.

i hope she runs, i want an excuse to wear a t-shirt that has a picture of Cthulhu and says:

"Why vote for the lesser evil when I can vote for Hillary?"

Blogger Tallen February 02, 2020 12:12 PM  

You don't have to be Ron Paul to get Ron Pauled.

My sentiment as well.

Blogger tuberman February 02, 2020 12:14 PM  

@21

"So when do we see the last second entry of the Oprah / Michelle Obama ticket to save the day?"
Mid-Spring?

Blogger Freeholder February 02, 2020 12:32 PM  

Meanwhile, my Gen-X democrat sister said they are all going to get wiped by Trump and she isn't sure which one she can support.

Blogger Pathfinderlight February 02, 2020 12:32 PM  

Accelerating the leftist propaganda machine has finally caught up with the deep state. They now have to cheat openly to keep their own peons from willingly selecting someone so anti-American that they will never win the presidency. Unfortunately, it will take a series of God Emperor + presidents in a row to dismantle the deep state. I hope we can do that in time.

Blogger tuberman February 02, 2020 12:53 PM  

@23 "Is Bloomberg going to beat Trump? Probably not" Ha!

Despite his money, it will get out, even among the Dems that he's paying his way to the top. A percent of Dems will hate him for that -- with violent reactions. Will anyone, not paid, show up for his speeches? No.

Longtime is correct:

"With Her Majesty in or out, the Dems are looking at a serious party crack up - 1968 and 1974 combined."

Blogger Hammerli 280 February 02, 2020 1:40 PM  

@31: I agree that we're looking at a replay of the 1972 election...a one-sided thrashing, with a side-helping of political violence.

It raises the question of when Trump will unleash the Storm. I'd figured about September of 2018 that he was holding it for his own reelection campaign, but what if he doesn't need it? I could see him keeping it in reserve, using it to demolish the Dems in 2022.

At a grand strategic level, the GOP has always been a coalition between the Populists and the Plutocrats. The Plutocrats have usually held control, but win small if they win at all. Only the Populists win big. But maintaining control requires more than winning once, getting dispirited because you didn't get everything you wanted, and walking away. You have to keep up the pressure.

We're at a cusp. The Populists won in 2010, 2014, and 2016. The Plutocrats lost in 2012 and 2018. One more Populist win will give them long-term control of the Republican party, TWO more will cement it. And the Storm could nail it down for two or three elections in a row - an electoral change that lasts decades.

Blogger Damelon Brinn February 02, 2020 1:56 PM  

So when do we see the last second entry of the Oprah / Michelle Obama ticket to save the day?

Never. Oprah has Weinsteinian issues, and Michelle isn't even a midwit.

Blogger Balkan Yankee February 02, 2020 2:25 PM  

@31: Correction. Meant to write: "1968 and 1972 combined."

I must be getting old.

Blogger Duke Norfolk February 02, 2020 3:00 PM  

Whatever else can be said about Bloomberg, having (((him))) become president of the ZOG of the USA would be apt. Of course (((TPTB))) might not want that to happen, as even the most blind might start noticing.

Besides, they've always preferred to be whispering into a puppet's ear.

Blogger doctrev February 02, 2020 4:01 PM  

Hammerli 280 wrote:@31:It raises the question of when Trump will unleash the Storm. I'd figured about September of 2018 that he was holding it for his own reelection campaign, but what if he doesn't need it? I could see him keeping it in reserve, using it to demolish the Dems in 2022.



Millions of people would wonder if the Storm was only done to enhance Trump's control of government if it was before an election, which is why I think it will happen shortly -after- he wins 2020, to minimize its political value and therefore maximize its legitimacy with the broader population. If Trump doesn't unleash it he and his family will be hounded for the rest of their lives.

I was so certain Sanders would win, just to take advantage of idiotic socialists and maximize civil tensions, but it looks like they're really committed to making Bloomberg happen. Idiots. There's a reason the puppeteer doesn't try to command all the attention at a Punch and Judy show.

Blogger Derrick Bonsell February 02, 2020 4:11 PM  

Sanders wasn't "screwed out of the nomination." He earned over a million less votes than Clinton did. If anyone has been screwed over in the past few cycles it was Hillary in 2008, who won a plurality of primary votes.

Blogger boogeyman February 02, 2020 4:28 PM  

My dream scenario:

Bernie wins the nomination despite all the cheating and MSM propaganda.

The convention is a nightmare.

3 months before election night, Bernie has another heart attack. He either dies, or has to drop out.

Utter chaos ensues as the party apparatchiks scramble to install their own replacement.

HILLARY TO THE RESCUE! Bernie-bro's start burning shit and punching people. They vow to stay home.

With just a dozen weeks to go and no money in the war chest - not to mention the burning animosity coming from the Free Shit Army - the Lizard Queen loses to the God-emperor, again. He wins by bigger margins in the electoral college as well as winning the popular vote.

The communists in the Democrat party leave to form their own party.

I do not get to see Trump sworn in for his second term because I die on election night; 3 hours of continuous laughter causes a heart attack. I'm buried with a giant, Joker-like grin plastered on my face.

Blogger daddynichol February 02, 2020 4:34 PM  

I would think there would be a brokered Democrat convention, but Hillary is too damaged and carries too much stink at this point. Mike Obama has a shot providing they select an appropriate VP that will fill in all or most of the SJW tick boxes. AOC would fit right in and all of that would detonate the implosion of what remains of the Democrat party. Good times.

Blogger FUBARwest February 02, 2020 4:35 PM  

What's the strategic reason for not wanting Bernie to run? Trump wins 99.9% of the time so shouldn't the DNC put the looney left out to dry to show the rest of the country we cant move in that direction?

Blogger Up from the pond February 02, 2020 4:36 PM  

>>"Bernie would not have permitted the same kind of grifting. And, he would have pushed to heavily tax the rich friends of Dem"

Why do you believe that Bernie is an enemy of corruption?

We're noticing the same kind of assumptions about Bolshie Bernie among the wignat set as well. Led by would-be Pied Piper Dicko ("the Glow-worm") Spencer, many wigs buh-lieve that an old Jewish Bolshevik with openly White-genocidal campaign staffers will be the the Savior of White America, not because his presidency would be an accelerant of social upheaval, but instead because he would make good on his promises to end student debt, soak the billionaires, "get money out of politics," and let "the Zionist entity" burn. They are this gullible, apparently. They say race > ideology except in the case of Bernie, whom they never even suspect of being disingenuous in any way.

One nice thing about the Trumpslide: like a flood, it will wash away many glowsticks, cryptids, nihilists, shills, and other boneheads, ncluding all the Bernie Bros.

Blogger Haxo Angmark February 02, 2020 4:40 PM  

Blacks and Spics and Jews

will vote overwhelmingly for the generic demoncrat, no matter

who it is. Fact is, Bernie led Trump by 5+ points in the last 2016 poll

that he was in. Plus: the overall electorate will be 2% less White.

adios, Drumpf.

Blogger Damelon Brinn February 02, 2020 5:30 PM  

shouldn't the DNC put the looney left out to dry to show the rest of the country we cant move in that direction?

Of course. But the loony left runs the DNC now. There's no longer a backroom of crafty, relatively sensible union leader types making the real decisions. They've been replaced by the pantsuited harridans, token vibrants, and genital mutilators.

Blogger Yukichi Sensei February 02, 2020 5:38 PM  

Anyone complaining about demographics, play the long game, have kids, join a church, actually work on tradition.

Blogger Ransom Smith February 02, 2020 5:54 PM  

Mike Obama has a shot providing they select an appropriate VP that will fill in all or most of the SJW tick boxes. AOC would fit right in and all of that would detonate the implosion of what remains of the Democrat party.
1. Won't happen because she won't risk the cushy life for a brutal campaign and risk of failure.
2. Won't happen for reason of she isn't 35

Blogger Akulkis February 02, 2020 6:08 PM  

"Whether Bernie was/is a good candidate is irrelevant (see Hillary—who had super high negatives)—Bernie would not have permitted the same kind of grifting. And, he would have pushed to heavily tax the rich friends of Dems—basically, being a big party pooper to them."

Bernie is a very rare specimen: A financially/materially honest Communist. He's fairly honest in identifying problems within our country, and what is causing them. The dishonest (and bat-[excrement] crazy) part is his solutions, all of which will exacerbate the very same problems which he has accurately identified both condition and cause.

What a waste of intelligence and perception.

"I'm starting to think TGE is playing ``worse is better,'' letting the enemies fly their freak flag, letting the Leftist faction of the Swamp overreach so far that even Boomertard normie cuckservatives will be ready when Trump drains it and burns what's left."

Psychological preparation of the battlefield. If your soldiers aren't motivated to win, they won't. Let them have a few atrocities to mull about before sending them into battle -- then they will risk EVERYTHING to win, because they see that if they lose, losing everything isn't a risk, it's a guarantee.

"With Her Majesty in or out, the Dems are looking at a serious party crack up - 1968 and 1974 combined."

We are in the middle of a re-alignment, akin to the Whig /Democratic-Republicans => Republicans/Democrats in the 1848-1856 era.

Trump has already brought many Democrats into the Republican party, while chasing the upper-tiers of cronyism out of the part, who are the core of the "Never Trump"er brigades and who pay the bow-tie spinners like David French and George Will to put plaster smiley-face stickers on all of the harmful effect of their cronyism (such as our still open border with Mexico).

Since the Communists took hold of the Democratic Party in 1968 (although a good portion of the UAW blue-collar types STILL haven't grokked this completely), the influx of the Republican plutocrats and their hoity-toity narcissist wives* who the blue-collars types of ALL races despise will complete the re-alignment, as throngs of non-communist blue-collar workers (both union and non-union) will see the private-sector fat-cats whom they despise the most migrating into the Democratic Party. The Republican fat-cats won't go willingly, but Trump is proficient at getting them to reveal their hostility to honest working men (both blue collar AND white collar), and Trump's army of devoted followers is doing a very good job of chasing them out of the Republican party. But it won't be complete until they are driven out of the RNC and banished for good. Having no home, these plutocrats will barge into the DNC. The foodfight within the DNC is going to get worse than it already is when the RNC plutocrats invade the DNC.

* you know the type: they would rather be stuck in a hospital intensive care unit for a month than to share an elevator with a man whose hands get dirty at work)

Blogger Akulkis February 02, 2020 6:18 PM  

"So when do we see the last second entry of the Oprah / Michelle Obama ticket to save the day?"

What makes you think Michael Obama wants Trump exposing him for being the tranny that he is?

"I had my Boomer in-laws confidently tell me that anyone, literally anyone, can beat Trump in 2020 because he’s so disliked."

The day before the election, send them anonymous post-cards or letters. Draw a BIG RED ARROW at where the post-mark (which always has a date) will be, labelled "Note the date."

Congratulate them for successfully supporting the re-election of President Trump.

Use a friend or acquaintance at work to do the hand-written stuff, and drop them in a mailbox a fair distance from your home, so that it can't be traced back to you.

When they complain to everybody who will listen, chuckle, and ask "Who...who would do such a terrible thing to such deluded people?"

Some people just need the smugness wiped off their faces, by the most rude (but non-violent) means available.

Blogger Akulkis February 02, 2020 6:33 PM  

"Sanders wasn't "screwed out of the nomination." He earned over a million less votes than Clinton did.""

You really, truly, believe that?
Clinton had a million more ballots COUNTED than Sanders.
Sanders had more votes cast than Clinton.
Refer to Stalin's dictum with regards to votes cast vs votes counted.

Haxo, you're such a never-trumper used baby-wipe, and you have all the personality of a rotting carp carcass on a beach, covered in flies and maggots crawling out it's mouth and gills.

Blogger MNW February 02, 2020 7:36 PM  

That and Bloomberg has almost single handedly funded gun a lot of control efforts in the US and is well known in the 2A community is not going to play well.

Blogger MNW February 02, 2020 8:01 PM  

Yes, except the horse is out of the barn. Immigration would have to be effectively 0 today for a recovery to begin.

I pray that I am wrong and that the electoral college will insulate us form the demographic change a bit more.

Blogger Boomer55 February 02, 2020 8:28 PM  

@43
Something is really messed up at the DNC. If one sees 25% support for Sanders, why are so many opponents still running? The Biden type lukewarm vote is the one being split! This appears like a repeat of the 2016 RNC screwup, the 15 other candidates were to split Trump's vote and help Bush, and it backfired.

Blogger Up from the pond February 02, 2020 8:49 PM  

I support Bernie strategically, to wash the other Democrats out of the running. But there are people reading this, and they know who they are, who have a good opinion of Bernie himself. Their support is based on believing a communist Jew. That shows an incredible level of gullibility.

Maybe they can't learn from experience. Words > reality is the formula of mental deficiency.

Or maybe I'm paying too much attention to online wiggers and need to go outside.

Blogger Ominous Cowherd February 03, 2020 8:35 AM  

FUBARwest wrote:What's the strategic reason for not wanting Bernie to run? Trump wins 99.9% of the time so shouldn't the DNC put the looney left out to dry to show the rest of the country we cant move in that direction?
You are assuming the DNC and the looney left are different. I don't think the evidence supports that assumption.

Blogger OneWingedShark February 03, 2020 5:27 PM  

Yukichi Sensei wrote:Anyone complaining about demographics, play the long game, have kids, join a church, actually work on tradition.
Kinda have to have a wife for that… which I don't see in the hand I've been dealt, maybe in a few draws but I'm not holding my breath on that.

Akulkis wrote:We are in the middle of a re-alignment, akin to the Whig /Democratic-Republicans => Republicans/Democrats in the 1848-1856 era.
This is an excellent observation; aside from all that you said, there's also the Real-American/Paper-American/Illegal split, where the Democrat party seems to be obsessed with playing toward the replaced-population, acting like Real-Americans (and even a non-negligible chunk of legal-immigrants) simply don't exist by catering so hard toward the invaders.

Seen that way, it's truly astounding… and these actions indicate that the establishment believes that there's an actual chance to "get away with it" — which, in turn, suggests that they believe they've replaced enough Real-Americans to have a realistic chance of taking over should blood flow.

Ominous Cowherd wrote:FUBARwest wrote:What's the strategic reason for not wanting Bernie to run? Trump wins 99.9% of the time so shouldn't the DNC put the looney left out to dry to show the rest of the country we cant move in that direction?
You are assuming the DNC and the looney left are different. I don't think the evidence supports that assumption.

Having seen a few of Tim Pool's videos on some of the insanity in the Democrat party, he seems to agree with this evaluation… and he's a self-described "left-leaning fence-sitting centrist".

Blogger Private February 04, 2020 5:00 AM  

In a perfect world it'd be Trump in 2020, Cruz in 2024 and 2028, and DJT-JR in 2032 and 2036. After that, maybe Ivanka?

Blogger OneWingedShark February 04, 2020 8:56 AM  

Private wrote:In a perfect world it'd be Trump in 2020, Cruz in 2024 and 2028,
Yeah, because putting a foreign-born person, with at most one citizen parent, is a GREAT idea… what could go wrong?

and DJT-JR in 2032 and 2036. After that, maybe Ivanka?
Because, as our host has pointed out, being ruled over by women is literally a biblical curse… what could go wrong?

[/sarcasm]

Blogger Ominous Cowherd February 05, 2020 8:25 AM  

OneWingedShark wrote:Yeah, because putting a foreign-born person, with at most one citizen parent, is a GREAT idea… what could go wrong?
Are you criticizing 0bammy?

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts