ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2020 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Sunday, July 12, 2020

The Einstein Fraud

The propagandistic myth of genius that was constructed around Albert Einstein is rapidly crumbling:
One of the greatest mythical frauds in history is that of Albert Einstein, the famous physicist who invented the Theory of Relativity, E=mc² and so many other esoteric things. But this is all fabrication. The claims about Einstein inventing any theory of relativity, or light and photons, or time, are false. Almost every claim – almost everything – attributed to Einstein is simply a lie. Einstein was an inept who contributed nothing original to the field of quantum mechanics, nor any other science. Far from being a competent physicist, he once even flatly denied that the atom could be split and, much later, admitted that the idea of a chain reaction in fissile material “had never occurred to me”.

Einstein was a third-class clerk at the government patent office in Bern, and never progressed beyond this level even with years of experience. By all contemporary reports, Einstein wasn’t even an accomplished mathematician. It has been well documented that much of the mathematical content of Einstein’s so-called theories were well beyond his ability. Walter Isaacson, president of the Aspen Institute, stated that Einstein’s first wife Mileva Marić was a “Serbian physicist who had helped him with (his) math . . .” Other prominent scientists have made the claim that his wife did most of his math for him.

Henri Poincaré was the foremost expert on relativity in the late 19th century and the first person to formally present the theories, having published more than 30 books and over 500 papers on the topics. Extensive documentation exists that Einstein and his associates had studied Poincaré’s theories and mathematics for years, yet when Einstein published his almost wholly-plagiarised versions he made no reference whatever to these other works.

In the accepted historical account, Einstein is credited with having written the correct field equations for general relativity, an enormous falsehood. It is an undisputed fact that David Hilbert sent Einstein a draft of his work (which had already been submitted for publication), containing precisely these equations, evidenced by the existence of a letter from Einstein to Hilbert thanking him for doing so. Yet a few weeks later, Einstein delivered a public speech of Hilbert’s work, claiming full credit for the derivation of Hilbert’s equations. Similarly, E=mc², the famous equation relating mass, energy, and the speed of light, had been published several times by Italian physicist Olinto De Pretto, long before Einstein was suddenly given credit for it. In multiple thorough reviews of scientific literature, prominent scientists have unanimously stated that there is “absolutely nothing to connect Einstein to the derivation of this formula.”

Einstein’s papers, theories, mathematics, documentation, were almost 100% plagiarised from others. He combined the prior published works of several people into one paper and claimed ownership of all of it. His so-called theories were nothing more than a composition encompassing the prior work of men like James Maxwell, Hendrik Lorentz, Joseph Larmor, Olinto De Pretto, Robert Brown, Ludwig Boltzmann, Friedrich Hasenöhrl, and many more.

In a paper he wrote in 1907, in part responding to (already-virulent) accusations of plagiarism, Einstein declared that plagiarism was perfectly acceptable as a form of ethical research, stating “… the nature [of physics is] that what follows has already been partly solved by other authors. I am [therefore] entitled to leave out a thoroughly pedantic survey of the literature…”[6][7][8] In other words, scientists all build on each others’ work, so Einstein could freely compile the work of everyone before him and re-present it as his own, with no obligation to even mention them or their work. His view of ethical science was like building a tower where each person adds one stone and, if I add the last stone, I not only take credit for the entire design and construction of the tower, but I own the building.

Perhaps the most damning evidence was when in 1953 Sir Edmund Whittaker published a very detailed account of the origin and development of all these theories and equations of physics, with extensive reference to the primary sources, documenting beyond doubt that Einstein had no priority in any of it, and clearly stating so. Einstein was alive and well when Whittaker published his book, yet he offered no dispute to the conclusions, no refutation of Whittaker’s claim that he (Einstein) had been irrelevant to the entire process. Einstein made no attempts in his own defense but simply hid in the bushes and refused to make any public comment whatever.[9]

Einstein was almost certainly the greatest fraud and plagiarist in modern science, an unashamed intellectual thief but, according to sources like Wikipedia, this is all just a minor “priority dispute” about who said what first in the realm of relativity physics. These sources misleadingly imply that several people made a discovery independently and more or less simultaneously, and we are simply debating who went public first. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Wikipedia is renowned as being virtually useless as an information source due to widespread ideological bias and censorship.

Einstein was Jewish and had the support of the Jewish-controlled media who conspired to create yet another historical myth. His fame and popularity today, his status as a hero of the scientific world, are due only to decades of a well-planned force-feeding of the Einstein myth to the masses by the media. The propaganda machine simply airbrushed out of the history books all the physicists who formulated these theories, and credited everything to Einstein. Without the extravagant generations-long PR and propaganda campaign, Einstein would have remained in the dustbin of obscurity where he belongs.

There are many Einstein apologists who produce reams of heavily-documented irrelevancies masquerading as proof, items such as a schoolmate who claimed “the flight of his mathematical genius was so high that I could no longer follow.” Many scientists and scientific historians know the truth of all this, and the accurate historical record is readily available, but many appear afraid to speak out for fear of damaging their careers.
I always had my doubts about Einstein's so-called "genius" after reading a few of his writings; his thinking simply didn't exhibit any evidence of high, let alone superlative, intelligence. But lacking any rationale for why anyone would bother to construct a myth around a single individual, I simply assumed that he was strong in some areas and normal in others.

It wasn't until I kept seeing judeochristians repeatedly pointing to Einstein and various Nobel Prize winners as proof of their own ethnic superiority, combined with the absolutely unjustified lionization of literary mediocrities such as Philip Roth and Saul Bellow, that I began to understand why the Einstein Myth had been constructed, and to pay attention to the scientific history that completely undermined his fraudulent claims to genius. It's stupid, really. Why build up fake figures like Einstein instead of celebrating the accomplishments of legitimate geniuses from their tribe, such as Martin van Creveld?

But the 20th Century judeochristian propagandists are hardly the only ones to have built up obviously false myths around famous individuals. As Larry Romanoff points out, Alexander Graham Bell, Thomas Edison, and the Wright Brothers are three previous frauds that served a similar role as elements in the construction of the mythology concerning American ingenuity.

Labels:

204 Comments:

«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 204 of 204
Blogger M Cephas July 15, 2020 8:11 PM  

@193. One Deplorable DT

It's GPS scientist Ron Hatch you're arguing with, among others. Look up his views regarding GPS in relation to relativity. These aren't my personal meanderings.

If you want to watch a doc/film on some of this, mostly Einstein, Sungenis' Einstein: The Closet Geocentrist is good.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hKCO-TeVEgM&t=135s

It's long though, like 2.5 hours.

But a more entertaining, higher quality doc, that's also a lot shorter would be The Principle. Which discusses the Copernican Principle, and Relativity, among other things. With an appearance from Ron Hatch as well.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yHnwl22hxiE

It shows scientists that argue the other side of the argument as well, including very well known one's like Krauss, Kaku, etc...

Blogger eclecticme July 16, 2020 9:43 PM  

140. mapJuly 13, 2020 1:17 AM


again, you have the Stoner rifle (M16), the BAR (Browning automatic rifle), etc.
My suspicion that the Kalyshnikov invention was really soviet propaganda.

Point well taken. It may well be propaganda but why not commie collectivist propaganda?
It struck me one day that so many USSR weapons had individuals names and the US had names like M-16. In the US land of rugged individualism the individuals were erased. I own 3 of those below.
Mosin-Nagant, SKS, Tokarev, MIG, Kololev cross, Kalashunikov, Dragunov.

Blogger Akulkis July 17, 2020 12:12 AM  

map wrote:Akulkis wrote:You don't understand that the rate of an atomic clock has nothing to do with air pressure, as air has NOTHING to do with the oscillations between two electronic states of cesium (?) atoms.

The air density affects how the object moves through the atmosphere. It's slightly faster because of less air resistance.


I am to believe that people who are experts in AEROspace engineering and AEROspace science don't understand the effects of air pressure on a low-orbit satellite?

Your other wrong argument at least looked plausible to people who don't understand that atomic clocks aren't mechanical. This one is just retarded.

Blogger "William Berke" July 25, 2020 5:14 PM  

It's an outdated theory, but it was still a theory.

10.1016/0168-9274(93)90133-C
No longer readable on doi.org, perhaps other users of this blog will still have access.

λ = M λ/M=1
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.14079.pdf

«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 204 of 204

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts