ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2020 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Wednesday, November 11, 2020

Vote fraud proved

In Georgia, among ballots that only voted for President and no other races, these are the number of votes:

  • Trump: 818
  • Biden: 95,801
In Georgia, among ballots that voted for President and at least one other race:
  • Trump: 2,456,915
  • Biden: 2,376,081
Translation: Trump won Georgia. Once Pennsylvania is straightened out, it's going to become obvious that the President was legitimately reelected.

UPDATE: It looks like the carelessness of the culprits, will allow coders to not only catch them, but prove their treasonous fraud beyond any shadow of reasonable doubt by recreating it from the data:
I made a script to run through the data and gather all instances where votes switched from Trump to Biden, Lost Votes means that the total amount of votes counted decreased by that amount throughout the counting.

Switched votes are votes that were taken from Trump and given to Biden.

Lost votes are voted that disappeared during the counting, from both candidates.

Dominion Voting Systems :

Pennsylvania : Switched : 220,883 Lost Votes : 941,248

New Jersey : Switched : 80,242 Lost Votes : 20

Florida : Switched : 21,422 Lost Votes : 456

Michigan : Switched : 20,213 Lost Votes : 21,882

New York : Switched : 18,124 Lost Votes : 623,213

Georgia : Switched : 17,407 Lost Votes : 33,574

Ohio : Switched : 14,965 Lost Votes : 5,102

Virginia : Switched : 12,163 Lost Votes : 789,023

Keep in mind that this does not count fraudulent Biden votes. We already know that Biden received more than 100k fake votes in Hennepin county based on the historical voting totals. If that is combined with the 195,650 lost votes almost certainly consist of mostly Trump votes, it's entirely possible that Trump won Minnesota too.

UPDATE: Georgia is now holding its first ever election audit. Not recount, audit.

Labels: , ,

96 Comments:

Blogger Unknown November 11, 2020 8:04 AM  

And Epstein didn't kill himself.

Blogger Rek. November 11, 2020 8:10 AM  

The globosatanic whining is intensifying by the day. Trump's inauguration is going to be glorious.

Blogger David Wright November 11, 2020 8:16 AM  

And more to the point it is going to be obvious that many need to be imprisoned for the most egregious election fraud.

Blogger Otto November 11, 2020 8:16 AM  

GA had not one but two hot US senate races.

It begs credulity to imagine someone voting for president and not voting in at least the Perdue vs Ossoff senate race.

Blogger bramley bramley bramley November 11, 2020 8:20 AM  

This comment has been removed by the author.

Blogger Subversive Saint November 11, 2020 8:29 AM  

Posted to parler: no errors.
https://parler.com/post/0e88e432b4054be8911a165338365cd2

Blogger shoe November 11, 2020 8:37 AM  

I have seen this all over twitter but nobody has bothered to lay out what exactly the dataset is and how this scropt proves anything. It looks like they used page data from NYT but that's as far as I get.

Blogger JayD November 11, 2020 8:49 AM  

Dr. Shiva has allegedly figured out that the algorithm switches (in an impossible linear fashion) more Trump votes the redder the precinct. If that's the case, my vote was probably switched or tossed to make room for one of the fraudulent Hennepin County votes. Will a manual recount figure this out, or is a full audit needed to root this out? I'm afraid that the strategy is going to be to admit to a bit of fraud, do a recount, and then say that the fraud wasn't widespread enough to alter the election.

Blogger Wayne November 11, 2020 8:51 AM  

He also voted in the election.

Blogger Yukichi Sensei November 11, 2020 8:56 AM  

The longer this goes, the more is revealed.

If we are not back to full paper ballots after this, there can be no republic.

Manual counting.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan November 11, 2020 8:56 AM  

The District of Columbia had 0 and 0 versus mainly swing states plus VA and NY which had lost votes out the ying yang. VA being Deep State central, maybe a Storm will blow thru it. I did notice that WI had relatively few switched or lost votes, so so much for that Rock County thing best I can tell.

I imagine the electronic comms of the vote fraud criminals will verify all these charges. Now that Trump is supposedly "stealing" the election there is no call from the D-party to have their precious IC agencies to verify that the election was all on the up and up.

Blogger Mr. B.A.D. November 11, 2020 8:56 AM  

I honestly believe Trump won NY.

Blogger basementhomebrewer November 11, 2020 8:57 AM  

I was pondering this the other day. The people who know what they did have to be terrified. It's clear their initial fraud efforts were not enough which is what caused the 3am resets to cascade through the swing states. They know how overwhelmingly people voted for Trump. They likely planned to fraud enough votes to set Biden's number at Obama 2008 levels and realized they would come up well short. VD disagrees with me, but I maintain that the ridiculous Biden polls were to provide cover in case they way over did the fraud and Biden looked like he had a landslide.

Assuming all that, The people who know, know exactly how many people they have swindled and how angry that huge segment of the population is going to be if they find out.

Blogger LoneWolf November 11, 2020 8:57 AM  

One question: Who has controlling ownership of ESS & Dominion voting machines?

Blogger Gr8Again November 11, 2020 9:02 AM  

shoe wrote:I have seen this all over twitter but nobody has bothered to lay out what exactly the dataset is and how this scropt proves anything. It looks like they used page data from NYT but that's as far as I get.

Yeah, I don't follow it either. We're talking about A LOT of votes that switched, enough that would completely change the election and undermine our faith in elections for years. If this analysis is accurate and irrefutable, then why haven't we heard anything from the Trump team? Individual dead people voting is peanuts compared to this.

Blogger xevious2030 November 11, 2020 9:08 AM  

Based on the list notes ratios for the other States, altered States, and relatively unaltered States, Minnesota is likely Trump. They were also trying to build a narrative of a plausible 2024 Texas flip, among narratives. 95k to 818. These are not their granddaddy’s stealers.

Blogger FisherOfMen November 11, 2020 9:17 AM  

>I have seen this all over twitter but nobody has bothered to lay out what exactly the dataset is and how this scropt proves anything. It looks like they used page data from NYT but that's as far as I get.

Here, imagine an election of ten people. Four voted Trump, four voted Biden. Now the last two votes matter. The race is 50% Trump, 50% Biden so far (4 each). 20% (2 votes) left to go.

The last two votes come in. Max scenario, Biden has 6/10 votes, or 60% of the race. But the numbers say 30% Trump, 70% Biden. Therefore, some of the four Trump votes must now be in the other column.

Blogger FUBARwest November 11, 2020 9:25 AM  

"Yeah, I don't follow it either. We're talking about A LOT of votes that switched, enough that would completely change the election and undermine our faith in elections for years. If this analysis is accurate and irrefutable, then why haven't we heard anything from the Trump team? Individual dead people voting is peanuts compared to this."

Trump isn't trying to destroy the country. If this is true and can be proven, as already mentioned, it undermines confidence in elections for years if not decades. It could quite possibly be the final nail in the coffin. Trump doesn't want that. This could very well be a scalpel vs hacksaw situation in his opinion which is why IF this is true it isn't being pushed out as much as other sources of election fraud.

Blogger David The Good November 11, 2020 9:27 AM  

I think Trump won VA as well.

Blogger Mr.MantraMan November 11, 2020 9:27 AM  

This could well be just morale boosting crap but Sydney Powell retweeted yesterday about Trump won 40 states. The tweet was by the benktallmadge and in reference to the NH down ticket going mainly but not all for Repubs. Ben K is followed by General Flynn.

Blogger bramley bramley bramley November 11, 2020 9:29 AM  

I've just been crunching the numbers on the edison data. It does certainly look very dodgy. I cant post my working out just now, but in the Antrim county vote data for counts 27 & 28, the increase is only 560 but Trump loses over 5000 votes by percentage. This has to be a slam dunk in terms of evidence. I was uncertain of using this for evidence because of the way actual vote count per candidate is not shown, meaning the numbers of total votes were not absolute, but the change vs the actual number of votes counted is off by an order of magnitude. The flip is clearly there to see. Trump loses 1% of the vote, which is split evenly between Biden and Other candidates, but the actual count difference is less than 0.1% of the total. Really important discovery.

Blogger dienw November 11, 2020 9:30 AM  

@14 L'ame Cherry does an excellent analysis:
Dominion is in Canada, is owned by British MI6, tied to George Soros....he Dominion software is not open sourced and no one outside the inner sanctum has had a look at it. What is it, is a high end hacking program, with security overrides that plugs into the NSA's obsolete Windows platforms to link to the main vote gathering hubs.
Windows was built by the CIA to have windows in it....What MI6 did was strap an advanced vote hacking software onto an operating system which could be easily hacked. That is how Biden magically had 400,000 votes dumped into his pile in Virginia, 150,000 each in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, and in Minnesota they played reverse engineering cute in spiking the metro numbers high first, in knowing Trump outstate would never catch up.




Blogger AJ November 11, 2020 9:34 AM  

@17, the data is a json file that you can obtain from NYT page that lists timestamped updates of the vote tallies as it unfolded over time. So you can go from one timestamp to the next and it will have the share of the votes between candidates.

So the question really is why if 1 candidate has X votes in 1 timestamp, in a subsequent timestamp that vote gets reduced to X-Y?

For example you can pull from NYT for PA the dataset like this : https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json

Then search for timestamp and then you'll find all the updates that happened over Nov 3-4. I'm trying to replicate the findings.

Blogger Teleport me off this rock November 11, 2020 9:34 AM  

Massive disavowals of belief in SCIENCE!, especially math, incoming from the scum soon. Better be carryin' if you wear your glasses when out and about.

Blogger Oswald November 11, 2020 9:38 AM  

Response to 22. Of course the British are involved. (No surprise, but thanks for exposing them.) They spied on Trump for the Obama administration in 2016. Forget Russian collusion. It was collusion by Hillary Clinton and the Obama Administration with the British.

Remember how the media was claiming Trump broke laws by contacting world leaders while he was only the presidential elect. Now they report Biden speaking with foreign leaders without nary a comment, and he hasn't even won the election yet.

Blogger Gregory the Tall November 11, 2020 9:41 AM  

@bramley says:
are the Edison data still available somewhere?

Blogger Fozzy Bear November 11, 2020 9:41 AM  

My earlier comment seems to have vanished, so reposting.
I took the initial QAnon rumors of isotopic watermarking of legitimate ballots with a grain of salt. That is until last night, when my contact in the top levels of the Trump campaign confirmed that is what they are hearing from the top.

Blogger shoe November 11, 2020 9:42 AM  

I get that's what they're claiming but I don't understand how this data proves it period explain it to me like I'm a supreme Court Justice who knows nothing about computer science. How do I know this data is actual election data? How is the script producing these results that indicate most were changed?

Blogger Fozzy Bear November 11, 2020 9:42 AM  

My earlier comment seems to have vanished, so reposting.
I took the initial QAnon rumors of isotopic watermarking of legitimate ballots with a grain of salt. That is until last night, when my contact in the top levels of the Trump campaign confirmed that is what they are hearing from the top.

Blogger AJ November 11, 2020 9:48 AM  

@13
I think that's the key to explaining the vote tallies. Why did these batttleground states have to stop counting i.e. send the poll observers home but count in secret.
If that can be shown in the data with timestamps that would be good - the narrative has to be derived from the data

Blogger justthinkin November 11, 2020 9:58 AM  

@15 If this analysis is accurate and irrefutable, then why haven't we heard anything from the Trump team?

Donald Trump did tweet replay to Lou Dobbs, "True, and wait until you see what's coming!"

Blogger Ogden Frost November 11, 2020 10:00 AM  

https://everylegalvote.com/country

The electoral college results for legal votes only (also with the option to see what fraudulent totals are as well.)

Blogger FALPhil November 11, 2020 10:02 AM  

dienw wrote:@14 L'ame Cherry does an excellent analysis:

Dominion is in Canada, is owned by British MI6, tied to George Soros....


Revenge of the Serbs?

Blogger Shane Bradman November 11, 2020 10:04 AM  

There was video evidence of votes being switched from Trump to Biden, so this doesn't surprise me. It was happening over the course of days. The highest number of lost votes are all the states where Trump had the biggest leads.

Blogger Brant Thacker November 11, 2020 10:05 AM  

Just keeps getting better! Still not tired of winning.

Blogger Ominous Cowherd November 11, 2020 10:06 AM  

FUBARwest wrote:Trump isn't trying to destroy the country. ... Trump doesn't want that. This could very well be a scalpel vs hacksaw situation in his opinion which is why IF this is true it isn't being pushed out as much as other sources of election fraud.
That's my guess, too. Trump is a reformer, not an arsonist.

Blogger Brant Thacker November 11, 2020 10:11 AM  

Yep. Nearly 800,000 lost and a little over 400,000 lead for Biden. How do they loose that many ballots and get away with it? I don’t think they will.

Blogger Curlytop November 11, 2020 10:12 AM  

Yesterday, Purdue's numbers reached 50%. This audit will most likely eliminate need for that Senate run off.

Trump tweeted yesterday morning that progress was being made but results wouldn't start coming in til next week. Curious how many cities are still boarded up.

Blogger bramley bramley bramley November 11, 2020 10:29 AM  

This is my working, using the figures given in the first screencap on the post (https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png). I'm showing the number calculated from the formula 'total votes counted x vote share' as the vote allocations for each candidate group. I worked out a vote share for the Others group by summing the numbers for Biden and Trump then deducting that total from 1 to get the remainder.

Count 27 shows 573,857 votes:

Trump at 331,689.346
Biden at 230,116.657
Others at 12,050.997

You'll see these add to 573,857 perfectly.

Then count 28 shows 574,417 (+560):

Trump at 326,268.856
Biden at 233,213.302
Others at 14,934.842

Again, these sum to the total of 574,417 perfectly.

On the face of it, this shows Trump losing votes, and the votes being allocated to the other two. The vote difference is as follows:

Trump down 5420.49
Biden + Others up 5980.49

This is the total loss from Trump plus the count difference of 560. It sums perfectly.

Trump is losing 1% of the total between the two counts according to the share shown in the table, but the total votes counted are only increasing by 560 which is 0.0974901508% of 574,417. So it is off by more than one order of magnitude.

Also of note is that the timestamp shows this change happened in less than 30 seconds. Can a counting machine (or multiple machines) process and verify more than 5000 votes in less than half a minute?

Something is definitely not right in the state of Denmark.

If anybody would like to check my figures and confirm, i'd appreciate it. I can't be sure that i am not getting this wrong and making an erroneous conclusion, or not missing something that would be obvious to a data scientist or mathematician.

Blogger Cinco November 11, 2020 10:29 AM  

Those numbers out of PA are not even close to reasonable.

Blogger Turpentine November 11, 2020 10:31 AM  

"Not recount, audit."

Popcorn anyone?

Blogger LZ November 11, 2020 10:32 AM  

Look up the NCLB fraud in Atlanta. They had more than 100 people in involved in that conspiracy.

Blogger PJW Gent November 11, 2020 10:34 AM  

I have been trying to post this for a while but Blogger keeps refusing. This is a significant analysis by an anon of voting patterns, flipping, and lost votes with all of it explained.

https://centipedenation.com/transmissions/bombshell-anon-crunches-voter-data-discovers-election-software-dominion-producing-massive-fraud/

Blogger SemiSpook37 November 11, 2020 10:38 AM  

To respond to VD's initial translation for the slow kids: DUH. I think Perdue's runoff will be called off because, like Trump, he won his race outright. Really pissed that folks went for Loffler instead of Collins (but man is that primary going to be fun to watch for that seat).

Blogger Canadian Warlord November 11, 2020 10:48 AM  

I can't believe something called "Dominion" is so central to the plot.

I was under the impression that giant canadian banks like "Royal Bank of Canada" and "Toronto Dominion" re-branded as "RBC" and "TD" so they could enter the US market. Don't the Boston Bruins play at "TD Centre" and the Carolina Hurricanes at "RBC Arena"? I can't imagine US fans from New England (where the revolution started), filing in to see a storied sports franchise in anything called "Dominion."

Anywhere that Americans see that word, beware. It might as well say "Royal Canadian." Until relatively recently, "canada day" was "dominion day." Was also on the money until 2000 ish.

Blogger Sillon November 11, 2020 10:51 AM  

"carelessness"

They told the minions to cheat, and the minions at every level of the democrat machine, high on righteousness and anti-orange man sentiments (muh feelings) overreached.

Hopefully not only Trump will show he was elected and will get the second term.

The Republicans should push for electoral reform.

Blogger Snidely Whiplash November 11, 2020 10:55 AM  

The data is time series data of vote count totals. Every time data came into the system it is time stamped and entered into a data base. A typical entry will look so.ething like
PA Nov 4 21:58 BucksCounty Biden 12840 Trump 23461
Not that voting is inherently a cumulative process. The totals reported should always increase, never decrease. Any decrease should be a manual intervention, with documentation.
"Flips" are points in the data where Trump's total went down and Biden's went up by the exact same amount. "Lost" are points where the total for one or the other candidate decreased but it was impossible to determine whether they were allocated to another candidate.

It would be helpful to break out "Lost" votes by candidate.

Blogger Matrick November 11, 2020 11:01 AM  

I can't be the only one who remembers the 2004 election and the left claiming that Bush stole the election from John Kerry. I remember the left talking about vote fraud via the machines, and perhaps they were right as Bush was the deep state candidate.

Blogger SonyAD November 11, 2020 11:03 AM  

What could be the explanation? Ineptitude? Or did they actually want to get caught? Or were they in a pinch for time trying to fake enough ballots fast enough to deal with Trump's organic leads everywhere?

Blogger bramley bramley bramley November 11, 2020 11:05 AM  

@26 Gregory

The .json tables are available on the thedonald.win post VD linked above, there are a few complete sources at the bottom of the post, and he also mentions various ways to get them from the NYT servers if you dont feel comfortable downloading the rar archive he collated them into.

If you open the json files directly in your browser you should be able to look through them by unfolding the arrows (depending on what browser you use). Think chrome and firefox would both work. Did for me on firefox.

Blogger DaveD November 11, 2020 11:10 AM  

Remember, as Larry Correia said, Mitch McConnel went to talk to Barr and after that meeting publicly took the stance of "fight in every state". Whatever they have, it's damning enough to make Surrender Monkey Republicans stand up and fight.

Blogger Bob November 11, 2020 11:12 AM  

Dr Shiva offers statistical analysis showing how vote switching works in the software. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ztu5Y5obWPk

Blogger bramley bramley bramley November 11, 2020 11:13 AM  

@47

Snidely, the reason i did working out myself was to see what i could discern from the numbers. The major problem i have with the NYT .json data set is that it is not reporting an exact count total per candidate, only a fractional share. It's very difficult to say exactly if votes are being discounted by this method, as it would be normal for a vote share to go up and down as the count increases, very likely by some kind of random function. But, the fact the share repeatedly changes disproportionately to the count seems to be a huge red flag, unless votes are being discounted at the same time by some other method which is not then reflected in the total count.

Blogger Unknown November 11, 2020 11:14 AM  

I'm so angry at our country right now - to dislike Trump is one thing, we've gotten used to hearing all the false negative things said about him, but to illegally steal the election is an entirely different story. I've already lost faith in the FBI, the Attorney General, Congress, the Senate. Today I can no longer say I'm proud to be an American. God we need your intervention and we need it now!

Blogger Newscaper312 November 11, 2020 11:15 AM  

I appreciated the ease of the straight ticket voting option here in Alabama, but in light of this think it should go away, because these count discrepancies would not be visible. Thank God the cheaters lazy/stupid

Blogger Submitted2Christ November 11, 2020 11:26 AM  

Is3nt a candidate's vote count decreasing enough to show there was an error and possible fraud?

Or is there ever a situation where votes legitimately decrease?

Blogger Submitted2Christ November 11, 2020 11:26 AM  

TrumpSlide BTW!

Blogger VD November 11, 2020 11:30 AM  

What could be the explanation? Ineptitude? Or did they actually want to get caught? Or were they in a pinch for time trying to fake enough ballots fast enough to deal with Trump's organic leads everywhere?

Pinch for time. They didn't expect the Trumpslide, so they didn't have enough fake votes.

Blogger Submitted2Christ November 11, 2020 11:45 AM  

"What could be the explanation? Ineptitude? Or did they actually want to get caught? Or were they in a pinch for time trying to fake enough ballots fast enough to deal with Trump's organic leads everywhere?"

They had absolutely no choice. They had to get to 270 by any means possible. And then bet on the MSM to cover for them.

It probably would have worked in 2016 or earlier. But now we have a digital army that controls their own information and voluntarily dedicates time to find the truth and expose darkness.

Blogger basementhomebrewer November 11, 2020 11:55 AM  

For all the people inexplicably skeptical that widespread fraud can exist. I ask a few very simple questions.

Do people lie, cheat and steal for money? Why would they not do it for power, which gives them both power, and the ability to funnel money to themselves?

Was there not a clear organized network before the election that was coordinating riots? One which the media continually denies exists despite the fact they have things like matching preprinted signs and the same people keep showing up at different riots across the country?

Do many people on the left literally think Trump is Hitler or worse? Many people justify killing Hitler as a baby let alone killing him as an adult. Is it not a much smaller step to justify filling out some fake ballots or falsify some counts to stop Hitler from taking power?

Do you generally think low level government workers are competent and diligent in their work? Do you think they are more competent and diligent when they are working a temp job that they only work 1-3 days and get maybe a day of training on?

Do you think someone could come up with a way to take advantage of their lack of skill, intelligence and diligence?

These are just basic questions. There are many more that point to whether the means, motive and opportunities exist to commit voter fraud on a large scale.

Blogger Ominous Cowherd November 11, 2020 12:00 PM  

Snidely Whiplash wrote:Not that voting is inherently a cumulative process. The totals reported should always increase, never decrease. Any decrease should be a manual intervention, with documentation.
Statistics are cool, but arithmetic is absolute proof. Anytime the total decreases, we have incontrovertible evidence something is WRONG. Just that is enough to justify audits, followed by recounts. All the statistics and affidavits ice the cake, but this is all the cake we need.

Blogger NoobishTitan November 11, 2020 12:07 PM  

I wasn't expecting it to be close enough for fraud to even work. Why was it so damn close? Biden is demented and Harris is a trifling ass hoe

Blogger Paulito November 11, 2020 12:26 PM  

@54 We've been busily kicking the Creator our of our country for the past century - why would He intervene on our behalf? We made this mess (or at the very least, allowed the mess to be made) and we have to clean it up ourselves. Otherwise, we'll not learn our lesson.

Blogger FUBARwest November 11, 2020 12:35 PM  

@NoobishTitan

It wasn't close. That's why the fraud was so sloppily done. It had to be overcompensate for the Trumpslide. Which is why there are so many anamolies and why they are in the process of getting caught right now.

Not close at all, and in fact this is going to make some people start looking at previous elections a little more closely.

Blogger crescent wrench November 11, 2020 12:41 PM  

NoobishTitan wrote:I wasn't expecting it to be close enough for fraud to even work. Why was it so damn close? Biden is demented and Harris is a trifling ass hoe

It wasn't.
The fraud was ridiculous.
Philadelphia "found" so many votes it was +14% (for the STATE) to a return that was already 91% in.

The computers that produced the news chyrons were actually caught out showing 105% return for the entire state.

Blogger liberranter November 11, 2020 12:42 PM  

Or were they in a pinch for time trying to fake enough ballots fast enough to deal with Trump's organic leads everywhere?

Good grief, they had FOUR WHOLE YEARS to plan this caper, more than enough time to iron out every conceivable wrinkle. That they were this sloppy and cavalier in executing it shows that they are both terminally delusional and arrogant and really, REALLY not very smart at all.

Blogger Paulito November 11, 2020 12:45 PM  

@62 It wasn't close, which is why the fraud didn't work.

Blogger Ominous Cowherd November 11, 2020 12:46 PM  

@62, it wasn't close enough for fraud to even work. That's why the fraud isn't working.

Blogger Jehu November 11, 2020 12:54 PM  

If we consider 2016 to be a baseline level of fraud, about how many bogus votes do you think were added this election nationwide? It seems unlikely that total real turnout increased all that much this year, and Trump added a lot of new votes.

Blogger weka November 11, 2020 1:03 PM  

@Wayne. Epstein voted twice. In New York and Florida.

Blogger John Best. November 11, 2020 1:08 PM  

Just delighted.

Blogger weka November 11, 2020 1:08 PM  

You should have dates a Dominion and kept the red ensign. Sadly, the old Commonwealth dominions are run by globomorons.

Blogger PJW Gent November 11, 2020 1:10 PM  

liberranter wrote:Good grief, they had FOUR WHOLE YEARS to plan this caper, more than enough time to iron out every conceivable wrinkle. That they were this sloppy and cavalier in executing it shows that they are both terminally delusional and arrogant and really, REALLY not very smart at all.
They did prepare. The Dominion machines and software were all they thought they needed, but when they entered 2020 with everything going great guns, enter COVID and their chance to suppress voting and turn to the proven method of skewing results, mail-in ballots. Despite that effort, they grossly underestimated Trump's popularity because they believed their own hype. Trump rallies over the last three weeks of the campaign showed them how far behind they were and they had to begin scrambling to avert the Trumpslide. By noon on Nov. 3 they knew they were in trouble because Florida was already lost and it portended a problem everywhere, so the scramble began. You always make mistakes when you scramble and I believe the amount they needed to manufacture surprised the hell out of them. They saw their tickets going up in flames and in the rush to counter by any means possible they couldn't help but loose because mathematics was their enemy and their only chance was to declare victory on the bogus totals and hope, with the help of the complicit media and politicians Trump's support would be demoralized (projection on how they would have reacted) and Trump would conceded. They had one play left and they lost because we were not demoralized and Trump refused to concede, instead actually relished the fight!

Blogger map November 11, 2020 1:19 PM  

liberranter wrote:Good grief, they had FOUR WHOLE YEARS to plan this caper, more than enough time to iron out every conceivable wrinkle. That they were this sloppy and cavalier in executing it shows that they are both terminally delusional and arrogant and really, REALLY not very smart at all.

This is because they believed their own propaganda about Donald Trump.

Blogger Damelon Brinn November 11, 2020 1:34 PM  

What could be the explanation? Ineptitude?

Ineptitude, desperation, and derangement. They didn't expect Trump to run away with Florida, having it won beyond any margin of cheating before the Panhandle could even weigh in. At that point, Democrats were already starting to give up and point fingers, and Nate Silver was hopefully tweeting out that maybe other Latinos wouldn't break for Trump like Cubans did, so the Dems might not be as totally screwed as it appeared. Then Ohio showed that the pattern was likely to hold, and Trump was catching up on the early voting numbers in all the battleground states. That's when I had a celebratory drink and started thinking I'd get to turn in early.

I think when they saw that Trump was not only going to win, but win in a real Trumpslide, their TDS kicked in and they stopped caring about getting caught. They had planned to cheat, of course, but I doubt they planned from the top all the eye-catching, ham-fisted methods that we saw. This was not a smooth operation. Instead of just having the voting machines flip enough votes, they also had people manually entering false numbers (causing the Benford's Law problems), truckloads of votes coming in all for one candidate, Republican observers being evicted from counting rooms by cops, etc. You wouldn't plan to do all those things and be so obvious about it if you controlled the machines. But the vision of Trump grinning over a 330-plus electors win and Trump supporters holding Trump Victory Trains for the next four years broke their brains, and a lot of them tried to pitch in. The left hand didn't know what the left hand was doing, and they made a mess of it.

Blogger SecondComingOfBast November 11, 2020 1:35 PM  

Yep, so I. Trump should demand a recount there based on the ongoing nationwide evidence of fraud overall, even if the vote margins don't ordinarily allow for a recount.

Same with Minnesota, New Hampshire, Rhode Island. Maybe even NJ and NY.

And not just Trump. A lot of Senate and House races should be recounted as well.

Blogger Ominous Cowherd November 11, 2020 1:43 PM  

And not just Trump. A lot of Senate and House races should be recounted as well.
Every Dem win is suspect, and must be audited.

Blogger JM November 11, 2020 2:08 PM  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ztu5Y5obWPk&feature=youtu.be&t=1125

Blogger phil g November 11, 2020 2:09 PM  

It didn't work. The required fraud was so great it blew up in their face.

Blogger David November 11, 2020 3:11 PM  

Subversive Saint wrote:Posted to parler: no errors.

https://parler.com/post/0e88e432b4054be8911a165338365cd2


I opened a support ticket with Parler yesterday asking why this site was blocked.

Blogger Josh Brown November 11, 2020 6:03 PM  

Binged for "trump report fraud" and various. A number of links are returned but in each case trying them has the web browser blocking the site as Dangerous and highly recommending to not visit. Maybe it is a genuine malware match i.e. the links returned are indeed malicious or the link has been hacked to redirect to a malicious site or perhaps it means the security database has in effect shadow banned the site.

Blogger Canada78Bear November 11, 2020 7:22 PM  

I don't think this will erode confidence in the process IF Trump not only wins but forces or pushes for all states to cut the bs and full audit.
A whole lot of cheating found is the only way to prove to people to drop online/mail voting and put real measures in place. A little bit won't.

Blogger Jefferson Kim November 11, 2020 8:14 PM  

FYI this post is featured on Unz's new News aggregator. Congrats and I hope more traffic to come https://www.unz.com/news/

Blogger VFM #7634 November 11, 2020 9:15 PM  

I don't think this will erode confidence in the process IF Trump not only wins but forces or pushes for all states to cut the bs and full audit.

Georgia’s hand recount plus audit will have the same effect of spurring more such actions if it produces a decisive Trump victory.

Blogger Jake November 11, 2020 11:17 PM  

Finally getting a chance to look at this data (the vote totals). Not as impressive as I had hoped.

Because of the stupid format (total votes, % Trump, % Biden) it's not as easy to interpret as it should be, calculating the vote totals from this data is not perfect because the percentages are only given to 0.1% resolution. This creates a lot of "subtracted votes" for both Trump and Biden which I'm labeling as false and the result of rounding error.

Example: consecutive data points in MI show Trump up 54.9%/43.3% and then Trump up 54.9%/43.2% after 208 additional votes are added. This shows up as a 1494 vote LOSS for Biden, but is most likely just a rounding error. In reality Biden probably went from something like 43.252% to 43.248% based on Trump improving slightly in that 208 vote increase, but because we're looking at 0.1% resolution of approximately 1.7 million votes at that point small shifts in percentage can show up as 1,700 vote swings.

Once I filter for this by ignoring any vote shifts of 0.1% the data cleans up quite a bit but also gets a lot smaller. For example I see:

GA: Trump loses 3908, Biden 0
MI: Trump loses 5692, Biden 0
WI: Trump loses 0, Biden 0
AZ: Trump loses 0, Biden 0
MN: Trump loses 107,663, Biden 81,215 (1)
PN: Trump loses 336,408, Biden 613,108 (2)

As a control:

CA: Trump loses 0, Biden 0
FL: Trump loses 0, Biden 0
NY: Trump loses 93,509, Biden 536,013 (3)
OH: Trump loses 0, Biden 0
VA: Trump loses 117,903, Biden 638,495 (4)


(1)At about 10:38pm CST the vote total in MN was cut from 2.07 million to 1.88 million. The the majority of these votes were Trump as the ratio went from 43.7%/54.2% to 42.5%/55.5%. Seems fishy, I'm not sure why vote totals decrease, but it's not as uncommon in this data as one would hope.

(2) I put very little stock in the PN results. These large vote loss totals are due to two very dramatic changes in the vote total occuring around 9:14 PM EST (1.11 million to 0.87 million) and again at 9:22 PM. (1.33 to 0.74 million). Both of these changes improved Trump's percentage, there was also a loss of 115,000 votes at 9:16PM which appears to have been 100% Trump votes. This data is crazy and I don't know that any conclusion can be drawn from it except that the way the data is reported sucks.

(3) In the last 5 data points from NY (occuring Nov 8th and 9th) the total vote count dropped from 7.26 million to 6.65 million which created large vote total drops for both. This cut in Votes also improved the ratio for Trump from 40.4% to 42.9%. Not sure what's happening there.

(4) VA is kind of like NY, in that relatively late in the count (at 12:12 AM and 12:30 AM on 11/4) The vote total was reduced substantially (373k and then 388k respectively) with Biden taking the brunt of the damage. I've looked at every state called for Trump and none of them have big swings like we see in NY and VA.

Other than a loss that shows up for both candidates in WV (5) and what looks like a true data-entry error NE (6) the data in states Trump won is MUCH cleaner than we see in places like PA, NY and VA. That may well be suggestive of manipulation. But I don't think this data is the smoking gun I'd hoped it to be...

(5) A large drop in vote total occurred on 11/8 which did not impact the ratio by even .5%

(6) Consecutive data points very late in the count first flipped about 23k votes to Trump and then took them away 3 minutes later, with on net about a 0.2% reduction in Trump's lead)

Blogger Just Mark November 12, 2020 12:02 AM  

Has anyone looked for down ballot fraud? Did the rats really keep the house? Are they truly erroding the senate?

Blogger Shimshon November 12, 2020 12:13 AM  

@51 "Remember, as Larry Correia said, Mitch McConnel went to talk to Barr and after that meeting publicly took the stance of "fight in every state". Whatever they have, it's damning enough to make Surrender Monkey Republicans stand up and fight."

Yeah, once McConnell and his ilk got on board, you could be certain they're willing to go down with the ship, because it's not their ship going down. They are all total opportunists, and they will go with whichever side looks like it will win, whatever the methods resorted to in the end. Coming out so strongly for Trump means Trump's going to win.

Anonymous Anonymous November 12, 2020 3:19 AM  

Canadian Warlord wrote:I can't imagine US fans from New England (where the revolution started), filing in to see a storied sports franchise in anything called "Dominion."

People are barely literate these days, not to mention ignorant of history. The word doesn't mean anything to most of them these days, I'd bet.

Blogger Avalanche November 12, 2020 7:51 AM  

@15 "If this analysis is accurate and irrefutable, then why haven't we heard anything from the Trump team?"

Why has the God Emperor allowed and allowed and allowed bad things without pointing them out, even though he actually has pointed them out? Riots, beatings, murders, masks, lockdowns, play-for-pay, child abductions and hundreds more? Has not continual pointing to 'fake news' gotten the majority of folks looking closely at the "news media," and many of them discarding it in disgust?

If he had started out sounding like a tin-hat conspiracy nut, would there even BE thousands of anons/autistes out digging like mad terriers and unearthing the most horrendous "prizes" we never knew? How would Hunter's laptop stuff be "received" by the masses -- not the idiot leftists, the vast mumbling masses who kinda-sorta are beginning to get it -- if the groundwork had not been laid?

Would everyone be joking/not-joking about "Epstein didn't kill himself" if 'Trump's team' had kept mum about our enemies? Would Seth Rich's name even be recognizable in this country?

A partly awake friend called me asking: know if all this vote fraud was going on, why had Trump not done anything to prevent it and arrest the malfeasers? If you know someone is criminal and you want to prosecute and jail him, do you not have to 'let' him commit the crime?! If you stop him from committing it, what-then? A RICO conviction? BAH! Put up cameras and record the crime in ways the courts cannot discard.

Manipulation of the population is necessary before you can enlist them in stopping the evil.

p.s. Is Guiliani on Trump's team, dyah think?

Blogger Avalanche November 12, 2020 7:58 AM  

@25 "Of course the British are involved."

Oh, come on man! Don't leave out the Aussies and the Italians, the FIVEYES. Do you not follow Neon Revolt?

Blogger Avalanche November 12, 2020 8:18 AM  

@73 "they couldn't help but loose because mathematics was their enemy"

That's only because: mathematics is raycisssssss.

Blogger Avalanche November 12, 2020 8:30 AM  

@85 "calculating the vote totals from this data is not perfect because the percentages are only given to 0.1% resolution."

Hey y'all. Math-is-hard Barbie here.

HOW, if voting works by integers -- with whole numbers, with one-vote-per-American, with actual VOTES that cannot be split into partials/decimals -- is it ever possible for there to be less than a full, single, unbreakable vote total?

I watched some math whiz on YT laying out scheme involving 'fractional vote totals' and did not understand any of her words but "the" and "and."

Where do our enemies in the media and the left come up with 46.9% and 52.8% and so on? Why is not it: 1,495,234 as against 1,213,195 VOTES. what are they 'dividing by to GET decimal percentages?

Blogger Avalanche November 12, 2020 8:35 AM  

@88 "People are barely literate these days, not to mention ignorant of history. The word doesn't mean anything to most of them these days, I'd bet."

They think it means something to do with Christianity... Well, with churchianity...

Blogger Jake November 12, 2020 11:38 AM  

Why fractional votes? I presume to hide and obfuscate fraud.

Anonymous Anonymous November 12, 2020 3:56 PM  

Thought I would mention this entry was linked by Ron Unz in his new Aggregated Newslinks

Blogger Unknown November 13, 2020 12:36 PM  

Fraud vitiates everything. If they can't get the votes back for him Trump will win by the law.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts