Pages

Wednesday, December 23, 2020

Congress is getting nervous

The House passes an amendment to the omnibus defense bill in an attempt to inhibit the President's ability to invoke the Insurrection Act:

H. Amdt. 833 (Escobar) to H.R. 6395: To require certification be made to Congress when the President deploys active duty military within the United States during civil unrest by amending the Insurrection Act in Title 10, Chapter 13 of U.S. Code.

Alex Macris delves into the details, which amount to little more than the President will have to tell Congress why he's doing what he's doing, which is hardly a problem. And congressmen aren't the only Swamp creatures getting nervous. So is the neo-trotskian's chief rabbi, Bill Kristol:

Yesterday Barr suggested there were several things he wouldn't do that Trump wanted him to do as AG ranging from appointing special counsels for Hunter Biden or election fraud, to giving a legal ok for seizing voting machines or for various types of Insurrection Act-type moves by the president. Can one be confident Barr's successor as AG, Jeffrey Rosen, will also say no?

I'm told not. I'm told the very ambitious Rosen has pushed on earlier occasions for carrying out Trump's will only to be stopped by Barr. And people who've worked with Rosen say they wouldn't be surprised to see him, as AG, hasten to try to do Trump's will. In the past, Rosen has been allied with some in the White House counsel's office and others elsewhere in the White House who've been for going whole hog for Trump, as a friend put it. They've run up against resistance from Barr but also from WH Counsel Pat Cipollone.

The departure of Cipollone would be a signal, as one person put it, that "all bets are off." I'm also reliably told senior military officials in the Pentagon are more, not less, alarmed than they were a few weeks ago when Mark Esper was fired. The new crew of Trump loyalists in the most senior civilian positions don't seem there only to burnish their resumes, as one person put it. They're trying to figure out, in coordination with people in the White House, "how to make things happen." The senior military obviously retain considerable clout, to say the least. But the discussions they're having among themselves are unprecedented--more sober and weighty than those of 1974 in the weeks before Nixon's resignation. And the difference is that Jim Schlesinger was then Secretary of Defense, committed to checking an unstable and desperate president, not to helping one.

All of these alarms, one hopes and trusts, will come to nothing, or at least to not too much. And the coup, in the end, will fail. But that something more than we've seen so far won't be tried--of that people aren't so confident.

The first thing to look for is what, if anything, happens on Dec. 24.

Cipollone, by the way, is the lawyer who was identified as Patrick Byrne as being the lead surrender monkey among the President's advisors. The media, too, appears to be increasingly nervous:

With Trump's days in office dwindling, QAnon influencers have become increasingly restless and militant, urging him to #crosstherubicon, a reference to Julius Caesar's crossing the Rubicon river after the Roman Senate explicitly told him not to, effectively kick-starting the Roman civil war and Caesar's dictatorship... The "Rubicon" hashtag wasn't new to QAnon followers, who have repeatedly tweeted the phrase in the last week. But the hashtag had minimal success last week until Ron Watkins, who previously ran the message board and QAnon hub 8kun, posted a series of viral tweets Thursday and Friday about Caesar and crossing the Rubicon.

It is amusing to observe how those who think can keep themselves well informed by the mainstream media are always at least a month behind. In any event, the Congressional gambit will fail as long as President Trump refuses to sign it, due to the coming end of the Congressional term.

A pocket veto occurs when Congress adjourns during the 10-day period. The President cannot return the bill to Congress. The President's decision not to sign the legislation is a pocket veto and Congress does not have the opportunity to override.

104 comments:

  1. Macris claims there is some teeth in section 257, where the military may be
    limited in engaging in a policing function.

    "Now, Sec 257 does have teeth to it. It forbids the use of the Armed Forces in any “search, seizure, arrest, or other similar activity.” Had this applied during the Civil War, for instance, President Lincoln could have used the US Army to fight at the Battle of Gettysburg, but not to arrest Jefferson Davis or search Atlanta for Confederate spies. Sec 257 lets the President use the troops for warmaking, but not for peacekeeping."

    "So where does that leave us? Can Trump still ‘cross the Rubicon’?

    I do not see anything in Sec 253 or Sec 256 that would change my assessment that Trump could use the Insurrection Act if he felt it necessary to do so. Sec 257 would, however, provide justification for members of the Armed Forces refusing to comply with his orders if they involved domestic law enforcement, and therefore make it more likely he’d have call on the militia. Calling on the militia makes it much more likely that events escalate into unpleasantry."

    ReplyDelete
  2. Barr is another sorry swamp creature that needs to be in front of a firing squad or at least in a concentration camp. I hope Trump had some purpose for hiring him while he worked behind the scenes to screw Trump over. Besides, it appear Barr made a few bucks from Dominion, so no wonder he can not find any fraud.

    ReplyDelete
  3. KristolMeth is the personification of the smug, condescending "never right, always certain" attitude of CONservative, Inc. - who conserved precisely nothing over 60-years, and is a large part of #HowYouGotTrump

    But I guess all that billionaire leftist graft mammon ain't gonna spend itself, right?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have been seeing the Left write about crossing the Rubicon lately as well. It has been fun, while talking to smug leftists, to casually mention Trump crossing the Rubicon without explaining it to them. Their lack of historical knowledge shows on their faces.

    ReplyDelete
  5. What might certification to the swamp critters look like? Perhaps one way tickets to Gitmo?

    ReplyDelete
  6. "And the coup, in the end, will fail"

    Well, Kristol is right on that.... except it's NOT the coup HE is working for!

    ReplyDelete
  7. It’s almost like one side has a Trump card they might use in the end.

    ReplyDelete
  8. They only noticed the Rubicon hashtag in the past week? These people are desperate to not pay attention to anything outside their bubble.

    ReplyDelete
  9. And Biden and Harris are NOT behaving like President/VP-elect. It's as though they can't even believe the Lie themselves. What a time to be alive!

    ReplyDelete
  10. "#crosstherubicon, a reference to Julius Caesar's crossing the Rubicon river after the Roman Senate explicitly told him not to, effectively kick-starting the Roman civil war and Caesar's dictatorship"

    I have never seen anyone so trivialize "crossing the Rubicon". It was not an act of disobedience or trespassing or even insubordination. Senator Cato's resolution demanded that Caesar be stripped of his governorship of Gaul, his legions be disbanded, that he return to Rome to be tried for all manner of crimes.... including treason, murder, theft, unlawful warfare... very likely to be put to death after show trials and humiliation. Caesar was at the time co-counsel with Pompey, one of the two rulers of Republican Rome. Crossing the Rubicon was not mere disobedience of the Roman Senate, but an act of "gross treason", the soldiers not being permitted by Roman law under arms in the vicinity of Rome (or even in uniform), except for a Triumph parade. Caesar was left with no choice but to march on Rome or be put to death. He was a threat to the establishment because he was of noble blood, had become extremely wealthy by his conquest of Gaul, had the love of the people, and the support of his soldiers. Civil war was inevitable. Sound familiar?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Excellent clarification....but are those on the left educated enough to know these historical facts about the Rubicon? Are they just relying on the majority of of America to be ignorant of History.Intellectually reliant on media "smart people. Most people I speak to think the Rubicon is a place in Utah for challenging your 4WD capabilities.

      Delete
    2. "You cheated on me, after I specifically asked you not to?" That's the level of intellect we're dealing with here.

      Delete
  11. Note all the people wringing their hands about unprecedented actions on Trumps part. They are all midwit enough to understand the size and extent of the voter fraud. Note all of them were ok with it and help carry water to cover it up. The handwringing is all theater. They don't care about the Republic.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Amusing antics by the commies and surrender monkeys....Wonder if Trump will sign this bill....

    ReplyDelete
  13. Is Bill Kristol's tweetstorm the storm? Probably just an early squall.

    ReplyDelete
  14. It's funny how a presidential appointee going "whole hog" for the president who appointed him is supposed to be a surprising, scary thing all of a sudden, instead of the norm. Political appointees are *supposed* to carry out the president's agenda. That's the only reason they're there.

    ReplyDelete
  15. "You're out Pat. You're not a war time consuleri."

    ReplyDelete
  16. The language restricting the military's ability to perform "search, seizure, arrest, or other similar activity" might be a significant inconvenience.

    Nevertheless, DJT is in complete control here because he has the option to pocket veto the entire legislation and run out the clock until a new Congress convenes. It'll trigger a government shutdown, but that could be a feature, not a bug.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wonder if a govt shutdown is part of the strategy?

      Delete
    2. Let's just hope he's not having to deal with a Democrat majority Senate after the 3rd.

      Delete
  17. 'And the coup, in the end, will fail.' Unwittingly correct.

    ReplyDelete
  18. The Obama generals are slow, but they will get fired eventually.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Damelon Brinn wrote:It's funny how a presidential appointee going "whole hog" for the president who appointed him is supposed to be a surprising, scary thing all of a sudden, instead of the norm. Political appointees are *supposed* to carry out the president's agenda. That's the only reason they're there.

    It IS the norm - for Democrat administrations.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Crossing the Rubicon was not mere disobedience of the Roman Senate, but an act of "gross treason",

    Right. People who say Trump can't cross the Rubicon because of such-and-such legislation don't understand what the term means. I'll repeat myself from another thread, since it's more germane here: when Caesar crossed the Rubicon, he wasn't taking advantage of a legal loophole. He was breaking the law that the Senate had stacked against him precisely so that if he tried to defend himself he would be made a criminal.

    If Trump is forced to follow his example, it won't matter what weasel words were slipped into an appropriations bill. All that will matter is where the loyalties of the military and the people lie. If they aren't loyal to the president, he can't even start to cross. If they are, then the media can whine "But muh Amendment 833 to HR8395!" all the way to the gallows and no one will care.

    ReplyDelete
  21. If we're crossing the Rubicon, I call dibs on being Titus Pullo.

    ReplyDelete
  22. It's almost as if most CongressCritters are dumbasses who know nothing about the law.

    I am hearing as well that some troops have been brought back from overseas. I wonder why that would be? Promises kept or more?

    ReplyDelete
  23. OT: have you guys seen this?

    https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1341757008991694848

    apparently Facebook secretly gave Google access to WhatsApp conversations whihc it claims were "End-to-End encrypted" ... quelle surprise

    ReplyDelete
  24. “Congress does not have the opportunity to override.”

    That is like the best punchline ever.

    ReplyDelete
  25. map wrote:Calling on the militia makes it much more likely that events escalate into unpleasantry.

    That's the reason they put it in, to make it as bloody as possible when they lose.

    ReplyDelete
  26. The first thing to look for is what, if anything, happens on Dec. 24.

    Hi Vox, From my rowing days I know that there is nice little marina run by GSA tucked between the Pentagon and the Potomac. Just a quick paddle really across to The Mall.

    ReplyDelete
  27. They better be nervous, the treasonous bastards.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I think it was Teddy Roosevelt who said "If Bill Kristol is against it, then I'm for it." Sound advice, even in the 21st century.

    ReplyDelete
  29. “when Congress adjourns during the 10-day period”

    Sounds like they are trying to get him to give an advanced show of his hand and intention.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Gr8Again wrote:The language restricting the military's ability to perform "search, seizure, arrest, or other similar activity" might be a significant inconvenience.

    Nevertheless, DJT is in complete control here because he has the option to pocket veto the entire legislation and run out the clock until a new Congress convenes. It'll trigger a government shutdown, but that could be a feature, not a bug.


    The "search, seizure, arrest or other similar activities" cab be performed by Federal Marshals or those deputized as federal marshals, as happened with the Oregon State Police and elements of National Guard defending DC, earlier this year!

    Were you not paying attention? This sort of perceived "kink" was straightened out some time ago.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Steghorn21 wrote:And Biden and Harris are NOT behaving like President/VP-elect. It's as though they can't even believe the Lie themselves. What a time to be alive!

    They know something, but not much since PedoJoe can't keep his mouth shut. The Dark Winter thing came up again, like they're prepping normies for more biological attacks by China.

    Most of what they say is tightly scripted and they are only given need-to-know info. They are acting like they are not in charge of their own staffs, but are being led around by handlers. I wouldn't want to be either one of them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @DaninGeorgia
      Even their attempts to campaign in Ga Run-offs are phone ins, and still no announcement of resignation date for KamelToe's Senate seat.

      Delete
  32. @16
    Seeing as all fed govt employees have been fully paid during the pandemic, the public probably would not care less if these employees went hungry for awhile due to a govt shutdown. The press will not be able to shame Trump to do something about the plight of these "poor" unfortunate public servants (who have been doing very well compared to the many who have lost jobs and businesses). A govt shutdown probably would boast Trump's poll numbers and greatly encourage his followers.

    ReplyDelete
  33. A paper tiger is a tiger if you treat it as such. Trump is gettin ready to pull out a lighter and set it ablaze.

    Like the little boy said "the emperor is naked". I know Shumer and Pelosi think they are titans because the cuckservatives are the tailors, but Trump is fixing to send them to a final few wearing diapers in a 6' x 9'.

    ReplyDelete
  34. God, I can only imagine the emotional stamina and energy of Trump. Just as a manager of a team of 25 it's an endless nightmare with people who won't do their job, drag their feet, bungle it, etc. Look at how much even people "on his side" obstruct. And he and the real patriots keep going. Godspeed the God Emperor!

    ReplyDelete
  35. "The language restricting the military's ability to perform "search, seizure, arrest, or other similar activity" might be a significant inconvenience."

    How many rules did Caesar follow after he crossed the Rubicon? All those rules passed by the Democrats *after* their in the open treason really shouldn't matter for much. Maybe they should petition the supreme court while they are hanging and bleeding on crosses outside the Capital building. Oops the court won't hear their case... can't imagine why.

    ReplyDelete
  36. These globalist swamprats are increasingly attempting to cut off any avenue of retreat or compromise for Trump and making his only options remaining crossing the Rubicon or die. That's just terrible strategy.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Congress should be getting nervous about getting charged with Insurrection.

    ReplyDelete
  38. The excorcist, Fr. Chad Ripperger has a video series on the common characteristics of demons and communists; Communists like Bill Kristol.

    As in rhetoric, which our host has graciously educated us here, so as with communists, it is a category error to resort to dialectic. There is no truth in demons, but they will use truth to achieve their goals--the subversion and destruction of souls and Christendom. Similarly, there is no truth in Bill Kristol, but he will use the truth to achieve his demonic goals.

    It is a form of crypsis, and was very effective, until you grasp the underlying nature of these evil men and women.

    When Bill Kristol, or Jennifer Rubin, or David Frum or the Krassenstein Brothers say "we" they are talking to each other, not to us. Example, Krassenstein tweets, "We need more porn, otherwise we will have mass shooters" , the "we" is not Christendom. The chameleon from hell is not one of us.


    Since grokking Fr. Ripperger's point on the matter, I stopped reading and trying to parse the neo-cons. They do not possess the presupposition of Truth that you and I have . They do possess the presupposition of "The Lie".

    It is a category error, such as ConInc has engaged in for decades, to presume there is anything but the destruction of Christendom (and Christ) as their goal.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Certification to Congress or individual critters may be in a form they won't like: "In the name of the United States, you are under arrest for ..."

    ReplyDelete
  40. It occurred to me this morning that when one wishes to do spiritual war upon true evil, what better terrain and timing than Christmas?

    ReplyDelete
  41. @38: If Trump uses a pocket veto on that bill, then the provisions in it that restrict him are moot!

    ReplyDelete
  42. basementhomebrewer wrote:The handwringing is all theater. They don't care about the Republic.

    That's because the Republic hasn't existed since the end of the civil war. They don't even care about the corrupt semblance of democracy that the US had up to this election. These people are only out to extract whatever remaining scraps of resources the US has before it fully collapses.

    ReplyDelete
  43. 4. Rognuald. "smug leftists". Think of all the time you could have saved by just typing "leftists". That time will never come back, bro!

    ReplyDelete
  44. “That's just terrible strategy”

    It is. And they do it with a sense of confidence they have assured victory. Well beyond the black thief on camera. And here it is. They think their plans are based on the number 3 prodigy, leaving them the numbers 1 and 2 as failsafes.

    What do you do though, when your actual number 1 lied, cheated, threw the test to come out number 3, to get the job making the plan. And the official numbers 1 and 2 can’t hold a candle. And you don’t know that. You get evil to show it’s’ true colors, attempting to do it’s’ worst, undermining the deal, resulting in the undoing of itself.

    They think they can’t lose, and their every choice insures they do. Because they are given over to a reprobate mind and can’t help themselves. Figuring that out was the key to the honest deal where the integrity of the other party was unknown. They had a path of assured victory, and pissed it away.

    ReplyDelete
  45. I don't pay much attention to mainstream news and haven't for many years. I knew enough from you and other dissidents to load up on supplies a fortnight before everyone raided supermarket shelves where I live earlier this year.

    I'll be less surprised by Trump's second inauguration than I would be a sudden thunderstorm.

    ReplyDelete
  46. It is good to see all the worms squirm.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Trump's enemies are starting to understand they are stuck in the room with Trump, not the other way around.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Like that scene from A Bronx Tale where the biker gang comes into a Mafia owned bar and starts acting like assholes. The owner was respectful and gave them every chance to be nice until they went over the line. The best line is, "Now youz can't leave..." as the other Mafia guys storm in from the back, lock the doors, and proceed to beat the living shit out of the gang. They even destroy their motorcycles and the people in town join in on the ass kicking. Great scene!

      Delete
    2. Here's the movie clip. Someone should make a meme from this one

      https://youtu.be/5_TXbixIk_A

      Delete
  48. An interesting question is:

    Can you create a constitution that cannot be subverted by a sufficiently determined (((group)))?

    I suspect not, but would be interested in affirmative answers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Crew They were given laws directly from God Himself, then look what happened. You really think there is any Law or writ devised by Man that they can't subvert and twist?

      Delete
    2. Hereditary aristocrats who were raised with a sense of honor and duty would make nearly anything work. You can blame the Sun King for getting rid of them.

      Delete
  49. Ted Wheeler "kick-started" the Civil Insurrection of the Twenty-First Century by publically refusing to police the Antifa riots in Portland, Oregon.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Crew wrote:Can you create a constitution that cannot be subverted by a sufficiently determined (((group)))?
    A Constitution is just words on paper, or otherwise, like the ephemeral British Constitution. Words cannot enforce or interpret themselves. They require honesty. Any sufficiently dishonest group can hijack a Constitution.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well put!
      This is why culture trumps institutions (and pretty much everything else).

      Delete
  51. In the same twitter post it says Trump will veto this bill anyway? Can someone explain is this is true or has the bill been passed already?

    ReplyDelete
  52. A day may come when the courage of men fails,

    when we forsake our friends

    and break all bonds of fellowship,

    but it is not this day.

    An hour of wolves and shattered shields,

    when the age of men comes crashing down,

    but it is not this day!

    This day we fight!

    By all that you hold dear on this good Earth,

    I bid you stand, Men of the West!

    http://forthesonsofthewest.home.blog

    ReplyDelete
  53. “Can you create a constitution that cannot be subverted”

    Not as a simple Constitution. What you consider would require something that occasionally took measure, and is responsive. (((They))) certainly can’t.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is a long history of countries dealing with this situation with varying degrees of success and abject failure. Byzantium's way was interesting.

      Delete
    2. “and abject failure”

      Indeed.

      Delete
  54. It’s quite startling how the quislings are openly touting their disloyalty and disobedience to their lawful executive.

    Plainly they’re of the opinion that they retain complete impunity.

    To which I can only say; merry Christmas, you sons of bitches.

    ReplyDelete
  55. , ...I call dibs on being Titus Pullo....

    For me, marking the dead with Alia for water collection.

    ReplyDelete
  56. @59 Based on news, the NDAA is due today for signature or veto. The covid stimulus is still in congress, looks like an amendment vote will be on thursday to make the checks $2,000 ($3200 for aliens).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Zero for aliens - illegal or not so. Zero or veto!
      Zero for Cambodia, Egypt, Israel, or the Phillipines etc

      Delete
  57. Must. See. This.

    https://mobile.twitter.com/RowdyRep/status/1341499773455622145

    ReplyDelete
  58. would a sufficiently determined (((group))) simply claim that the Constitution is a "living document" and has not been subverted?

    ReplyDelete
  59. Trump won't act AGAINST the law. He's shown great (if not excessive) deference to the law in the last 47 months. But he might just find the nerve to act forcefully WITH the law.

    ReplyDelete
  60. furor kek tonicus ( you can't untuck the Cuck, but the real question is "Why were you trying to touch a Cuck like that?" ) wrote:Congress should be getting nervous about getting charged with Insurrection.

    Given the manner in which so many have violated their Oaths, that's affirmative.

    ReplyDelete
  61. @65
    An amendment or a separate stand-alone bill?

    ReplyDelete
  62. @4 Leftists only know history as far as it advances their agendas. They do not care about truth; they care about narratives. This is why they shut us out on social media platforms and this is why they so easily resort to childish and ludicrous epithets such as "Nazi" (to the extent even a black woman like Candace Owens has been called a Nazi). This is why they shout out in unison when confronted in public conversations with conservatives, as if their echoed incantations have any argument or truth to them.

    ReplyDelete
  63. @8 their bubble is a gigantic safe space. Anything from outside which doesn't agree with their macro-echo chamber is too much for their brittle personas to handle.

    In other words, to them it must be said, "you can't handle the truth!"

    ReplyDelete
  64. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  65. I picked the right time to listen to A Throne of Bones. Did Vox write that with the break-up and/or civil war in the US in mind? Would be interesting to hear him discuss parallels.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Hi Vox: More to be nervous about.

    Trump signs yesterday a memo giving the AG authority to declassify any intelligence "as he sees fit" for his prosecuting needs -- by passing all other agencies who would otherwise grumble and stonewall.

    https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/memorandum-attorney-generals-authority-use-classified-information-connection-review-intelligence-activities/

    ReplyDelete
  67. Twitter says that the first tweet about the amendment to the omnibus bill is unavailable - maybe just a glitch...

    ReplyDelete

  68. A Constitution is just words on paper, or otherwise, like the ephemeral British Constitution. Words cannot enforce or interpret themselves. They require honesty.

    Ultimately, we have to be willing to shed the blood of wannabe tyrants. A constitution is only as strong as its defenders. Not willing to kill judges or legislators? Then your constitution is worthless because you are worthless.

    ReplyDelete
  69. Well, ha!

    Dec 22 Kevin Sorbo
    Is anyone else concerned that the members of Congress made over $100,000 this year debating whether or not to give the American people $600?

    And millions to foreign aide for places that probably hate us and offer zero return on the money given to them at our expense.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Crew wrote:An interesting question is:

    Can you create a constitution that cannot be subverted by a sufficiently determined (((group)))?

    I suspect not, but would be interested in affirmative answers.


    Constitution is just a document. It's the people that matters. It doesn't matter how air tight you make your constitution if most of your demographics refuse to follow it or lack the will to enforce it.

    There's no magic dirt. There's no magic document. There's just the people.

    The real question is can you have a people that can't be subverted by a sufficiently determined (((group)))? The answer is most likely yes as demonstrated (at least thus far) by the Han. I suspect it's because the Han has had thousands of years of experience dealing with Nomadic tribes.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Could someone post definitively on that "pocket veto" point?

    1. Could congress simply not adjourn to block the pocket veto maneouvre?
    2. Lugenpresse is reporting that Trump plans to definitely veto - while to try "pocket veto" he would have to neither sign nor veto for 10 days?

    anyone know this?

    ReplyDelete
  72. ""I am returning, without my approval, H.R. 6395, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021," Trump said in a statement to the House of Representatives, saying the NDAA "fails to include critical national security measures, includes provisions that fail to respect our veterans and our military's history, and contradicts efforts by my Administration to put America first in our national security and foreign policy actions. It is a "gift" to China and Russia."

    One down!

    ReplyDelete
  73. MC wrote:Could someone post definitively on that "pocket veto" point?

    1. Could congress simply not adjourn to block the pocket veto maneouvre?

    2. Lugenpresse is reporting that Trump plans to definitely veto - while to try "pocket veto" he would have to neither sign nor veto for 10 days?

    anyone know this?


    Trump could just cross the Rubicon before they have a chance to override his veto. It all depends on whether or not his forces are prepared for it.

    ReplyDelete
  74. @88: Great answer!

    No magic dirt, no magic document is going to save your people!

    ReplyDelete
  75. interesting. Very interesting. Key test will

    be IF Trump follows through on his threat to veto the Covid Porkulus bill

    and what the Senate does about it. If he vetos and the Senate ovverrides (67 votes)

    he's finished. Because it indicates that Pence/Brutus will validate Biden when

    the EC envelopes are opened. If the veto is sustained,

    it indicates substantial support in the Senate for whatever Trump plans to do.

    ....still won't work, though, but fun to watch unfold.

    ReplyDelete
  76. "1. Could congress simply not adjourn to block the pocket veto maneouvre?"

    I don't think Congress has a choice not to adjourn at the end of the term.

    "Key test will

    be IF Trump follows through on his threat to veto the Covid Porkulus bill

    and what the Senate does about it. If he vetos and the Senate ovverrides (67 votes)"

    If he pocket vetoes, there is no override.

    ReplyDelete
  77. it claims were "End-to-End encrypted"

    Which could be entirely true, if they're just sharing what comes out at the ends.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Among my list of things to be optimistic about, seeing Bill Kristol's panties in a knot is on the first page. The little squeaker is just now beginning to pay attention.

    ReplyDelete
  79. Donald J. Trump Retweeted
    Ivan #PenceCard Raiklin
    @Raiklin
    America, @VP
    @Mike_Pence
    MUST do this, tomorrow!

    To defend our Constitution from our enemies:

    Foreign: China, Russia, Iran

    &

    Domestic: BigTech Censorship, MSM Censorship, Corrupt Officials at the Federal, State, and Local levels!

    Let him know!
    Image
    Image
    Image
    6:07 PM · Dec 22, 2020·Twitter Web App

    https://twitter.com/Raiklin/status/1341520753984942081

    ReplyDelete
  80. Trump has vetoed, not pocket-vetoed, the bill. Congress can revisit on Monday.

    ReplyDelete
  81. So far, on the night of 23 December, no sign of troop movements into Washington from Quantico up I-95. Or from elsewhere. There has not been any signs of VA ARNG call-ups; they have the closest Guard infantry divisions to the DMV and can support any on-the-ground actions in DC (being Fed jurisdictions).

    Trump can easily activate active active military anywhere on the East Coast to begin Insurrection Act operations in the DC area and fly them into JB Andrews for staging, so unless someone low-level is talking on the Interwebs about losing their holiday because of unit activation or call-up, we won't know about it until the former CNN and other legacy MSMs have Army public affairs units on-air reading statements and the news.

    DC is talking tonight about the indoor dining options for restaurants being eliminated for three weeks by the psycho Mayor and the scamdemic. If all goes well, that will change.

    If SOCOM is tasked with the spearhead actions and waiting until 24 December to act, we won't know about it until it happens. It won't take much; seize the vital points in DC quickly and prohibit a response. MPD won't do anything but sit in their cruisers and let the military play political games. Fed LEOs will carry out the initial arrests of Deep State and Democratic Party conspirators/traitors. They'll start tall and work their way down the arrest lists, which probably number in the tens of thousands in the DMV.

    Much like April 1961 and Parisians staring at the sky wondering when the 1er REP was going to drop on Paris and remove de Gaulle, those in Washington tonight await our loyal Special Forces and the 82ABN to liberate the National Capital Area--and our Constitution--from our treasonous political classes.

    I already told my Trump Admin contacts I want to volunteer for the firing squads for these bastards. None of them laughed.

    ReplyDelete

  82. MaReQ⭐⭐⭐
    @Mareq16
    1h
    Trump supporters file a lawsuit against Mike Pence

    The lawsuit against Trump's vice president is a desperate last-ditch effort to overturn the election

    https://nitter.net/Mareq16/status/1341929367040045057#m

    lawsuit:

    https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/DC-WVA-20201222-complaint.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  83. Donald J. Trump
    @realDonaldTrump
    Embedded video
    9:28
    510.8K views
    From
    Team Trump (Text TRUMP to 88022)
    This claim about election fraud is disputed

    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1341948611131822083

    ReplyDelete
  84. CJTRUTH
    @truthandlife
    23m
    ·
    Lin Wood posts this tonight and 3 year Q delta tomorrow.

    https://gab.com/truthandlife/posts/105433296397067716

    ReplyDelete

Rules of the blog