ALL BLOG POSTS AND COMMENTS COPYRIGHT (C) 2003-2020 VOX DAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

Thursday, May 20, 2021

The political answer

It's been 100 years since the Emergency Quota Act transformed the USA into the most powerful nation on Earth by limiting immigration and restricting it to compatible nations:

The Emergency Quota Act, also known as the Emergency Immigration Act of 1921, the Immigration Restriction Act of 1921, the Per Centum Law, and the Johnson Quota Act (ch. 8, 42 Stat. 5 of May 19, 1921) restricted immigration into the United States. Although intended as temporary legislation, the Act "proved in the long run the most important turning-point in American immigration policy" because it added two new features to American immigration law: numerical limits on immigration and the use of a quota system for establishing those limits. These limits came to be known as the National Origins Formula.

The Emergency Quota Act restricted the number of immigrants admitted from any country annually to 3% of the number of residents from that same country living in the United States as of the U.S. Census of 1910. This meant that people from northern European countries had a higher quota and were more likely to be admitted to the U.S. than people from eastern Europe, southern Europe, or other, non-European countries. Professionals were to be admitted without regard to their country of origin. The Act set no limits on immigration from Latin America. The act did not apply to countries with bilateral agreements with the US, or to Asian countries listed in the Immigration Act of 1917, known as the Asiatic Barred Zone Act. However, the Act was not seen as restrictive enough since millions of immigrants from eastern and southern Europe had come into the USA since 1890. The Immigration Act of 1924 reduced the Quota to 2% per the Census of 1890 when a fairly small percentage of the population was from the regions regarded as less than desirable.

Based on that formula, the number of new immigrants admitted fell from 805,228 in 1920 to 309,556 in 1921-22. The average annual inflow of immigrants prior to 1921 was 175,983 from Northern and Western Europe, and 685,531 from other countries, principally Southern and Eastern Europe. In 1921, there was a drastic reduction in immigration levels from other countries, principally Southern and Eastern Europe.

Following the end of World War I, both Europe and the United States were experiencing economic and social upheaval. In Europe, the destruction of the war, the Russian Revolution, and the dissolutions of both the Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman empires led to greater immigration to the United States; while in the United States, an economic downturn following post-war demobilization increased unemployment. The combination of increased immigration from Europe at the time of higher American unemployment strengthened the anti-immigrant movement.

The act, sponsored by Rep. Albert Johnson (R-Washington), was passed without a recorded vote in the U.S. House of Representatives and by a vote of 90-2-4 in the U.S. Senate.

100 years later, it is clear that if the USA is going to survive another decade or two intact - which it almost certainly isn't - a new Emergency Quota Act is required, albeit one that restores the 1910 demographics. Since this is a political solution, and since four years of the Trump administration didn't even manage to seriously slow the invasive flow from around the world, we can safely discount any chance of this proven measure being adopted in any meaningful timeframe.

The much more likely alternative is that those demographics are more or less restored in a rump state after a considerable amount of war and ethnic cleansing over the territory of the former empire. Unless, of course, China manages to establish a Chung Kuo-like hegemony over North America, which at this point is probably more likely that the sensible solution.

Labels: ,

69 Comments:

Blogger Critias May 20, 2021 12:18 PM  

USA is in a bad way, interesting to see how it compares with the UK.

USA total population 1921: 108million. Immigrants that year 309k

UK total population 2020: 67million. Immigrants that year 313k

The USA is 40 times bigger than the UK.

Blogger Jose Miguel May 20, 2021 12:24 PM  

The question I'm looking forward to is if such a rump state will turn around its birthrate decline, and how long it would take. The same for el Norte. It took the nation of Georgia 3 decades to reverse declining birthrates and restore natural increase, and was done through a return to Orthodoxy with a living saint as their patriarch.

Blogger Canadian Warlord May 20, 2021 12:56 PM  

The real power on the ground is the US Army. They can ram every barricade and drive under/into every mountain underground complex in a couple of hours. Unfortunately for the US Army Intelligence, they're a bit player in the game of US hegemony and are probably watched hawk-style by the other branches.

The split at the seams that will spill this pinjata all over the place, is the inevitable dispute between military commands during a time of domestic crisis. They will be back-stabbing and throat-slitting each other with no mercy, considering the stakes - nuclear destruction with those tipped bunker-busters. No disruption among the civilian populace required for a practically private, civil nuclear war. What happened to Groom Lake? Oh those poor UFO LARPers - they'll never get their answer.

Blogger Bartolo May 20, 2021 1:03 PM  

To Americans, I feel your pain. But Europe cannot afford to send you people, that would bring us complete ruin (I mean, even worse than now).

Blogger Doktor Jeep May 20, 2021 1:04 PM  

As Matt Bracken said: "Bosnia times Rwanda".

Blogger OneWingedShark May 20, 2021 1:18 PM  

Jose Miguel wrote:The question I'm looking forward to is if such a rump state will turn around its birthrate decline, and how long it would take.
It might have, but given the not-vaccine and its impact on fertility, probably not.
To get birthrates up, the US should pass legislation & policies conducive to the establishment and continuance of families; things like (a) reduced tax-burdens, possibly in relation to the number of children; (b) elimination of no-fault divorce; (c) elimination of abortion; (d) elimination of corporations which favor the foreigner over the Citizen in terms of employment; (e) elimination of ALL social programs that benefit single-mothers.

Do those five things and you would see a massive increase in marriages. (The not-vaccine's impact on fertility may prevent the production of children; it may also be tailored into a recessive gene such that produced offspring of the vaccinated are less-/non-fertile.)

The same for el Norte. It took the nation of Georgia 3 decades to reverse declining birthrates and restore natural increase, and was done through a return to Orthodoxy with a living saint as their patriarch.
I believe that if the US were to turn to Jesus, you would see a miracle WRT productivity, and possibly the birthrate.

Blogger Arch May 20, 2021 1:40 PM  

Pick a country that will be the best rally point for all of us. I’ll meet you there when all hell breaks loose.

Blogger Dice May 20, 2021 1:42 PM  

“Unless, of course, China manages to establish a Chung Kuo-like hegemony over North America, which at this point is probably more likely that the sensible solution.“

I read one of them when I was thirteen and I think then, in its description of one of the Kennedy family changing everything about himself to be more acceptable to his Chinese overlords, that was more plausible and horrific than a lot of future scenarios. It’s been years since I read them, and they’re due for a revisit. Thanks for the reminder.

Blogger Hammerli 280 May 20, 2021 2:03 PM  

Going back to what worked? Heaven forbid! (/dripping sarcasm)

I've long maintained that if you look at American history, there is a consistent 60-year immigration cycle. Thirty years of high immigration, followed by thirty years of low immigration. Wave 6 broke this...the valve was opened and the handle to shut it thrown away.

What's needed, desperately, is to close it for 50 years or so. Assimilate the immigrants. Complete the absorption of Wave 5, get Wave 6 well into the assimilation pipeline.

Or face a civil war. Which gets messy.

Blogger shadohand (akuma sock account# 7373636 ...crazy only responds to crazy) May 20, 2021 2:04 PM  

"To get birthrates up, the US should pass legislation & policies conducive to the establishment and continuance of families"

This part was good, and then you followed with stuff that did not name the problem. The problem being Feminism. People are scared to call it out for some reason. It was obvious during the depths of the lockdown. Parents were becoming anxious and so we're children because both parents were working from home non-stop and couldn't take care of the kids. Nobody wanted to question whether having the Mother's work was a good idea. No, in America, women have free reign to do whatever the hell they want.

To get birthrates up we simply make Feminism Illegal, and borderline Treasonous. No Women in the work force. No rule bending for Women. Boys are taught they have Inalienable Rights Granted by God from a young age. Simping is treated with scorn. Gammas are dealt with swiftly. Your solutions work, but only after Feminism is dealt with.

Blogger T.L. Ciottoli May 20, 2021 2:08 PM  

Send the micks back to their stinkin' island!!

Blogger John Best. May 20, 2021 2:12 PM  

@1 Things are going to get really messy in the UK. As it breaks apart the wars between the nations of Britain will be bad enough, let alone the immigrant populations. Best answer for the UK and US would be to remove the banking cartel, restore demographic integrity and build the walls. I have been impressed by the growing will of the English nation to assert itself politically with the Brexit vote and general election votes. This gives the UK a chance to survive. The US is done because its founding people are too spread out and don't even consider themselves a nation, just people within a state.

Blogger Sapper May 20, 2021 2:16 PM  

@6, I'd also add the complete elimination of all sperm banks to your list.

Blogger Georgiaboy61 May 20, 2021 2:19 PM  

Legislating an "answer" to the immigration crisis won't work, because the globalist elites who want the borders wide-open have already proven that they will observe no law that does not fit their purposes. They will merely devise by-passes, work-arounds and other means of cheating the system, in order to get what they want.

The fundamental problem is that most of these billionaire oligarchs see themselves as above the law, and not subject to it. Ditto for their paid help in the halls of Congress, and throughout the permanent government and many of the boardrooms and executive suites of the nation's biggest companies. Don't like immigration laws? Pay someone in Congress to write an exception for your industry or situation and then hide it in an omnibus bill where it will go unnoticed. Wash, rinse and repeat.

Or, if you are an oligarch with virtually unlimited financial resources, you can simply buy off "non-partisan" organizations like the UN and WHO and use them as conduits to increase immigration and the demographic destruction of the West.

The root of many of the problems ordinary Westerners face can be found in the fact that the so-called "ruling class" - those billionaire oligarchs and their functionaries - are at-war with the rest of humanity. In the U.S. proper, that conflict has seen the ruling class align itself with the underclass to take out the middle class and Middle America, a.k.a. "The Deplorables" who had the temerity to reject them.

Blogger Kevin Pilsner May 20, 2021 3:06 PM  

"Assimilate the immigrants." You spelled repatriate wrong.

Blogger rumpole5 May 20, 2021 3:07 PM  

The only thing that makes sense to me is that our elites have decided that the future role for the average flyover USA resident will be to be led (by the elite, of course) and to consume. The cognitive elite, aided by AI tech will take care of all of our wants. They fear a well educated, armed, and intelligent citizenry. They also fear the demographic collapse that is occurring worldwide. Immigration is a way to circumvent that, at least for a while. It also has the advantage of dumbing down the "flyover" population at an even faster rate than is accomplished by the ongoing debasement of government education. Welcome to the Brave New World, and Please! Put me on the plane to Iceland.

Blogger Emmett Fitz-Hume May 20, 2021 3:26 PM  

"Unless, of course, China manages to establish a Chung Kuo-like hegemony over North America, which at this point is probably more likely that the sensible solution."


Are the Chung Kuo books worth reading? I've seen them at garage sales from time to time and I almost bought one once. Not sure why I didn't.

Blogger Seeingsights May 20, 2021 3:36 PM  

A thing I find interesting is that roughly 90 percent of the US Senate at the time supported immigration restriction.

That can be seen as one way that lawmakers reigned in the power of Big Business. The enactment of anti trust laws in the late 19th and early 20th Centuries was another.

Today, it’s a struggle to get immigration restrictions and new laws against Big Tech enacted. Parliament of whores indeed.

Blogger 7916 May 20, 2021 3:57 PM  

I note that the ideas floated here require you to #vootharder! Additionally, whatever #vootingharder! succeeds, enter the spectre of the US court system.

Inevitably working within the system will fail. This is why the excellent example of the Bears and other communities represent the future; communities of choice now will be the seeds for the greater physical communities later. There was an excellent forward looking book called Trends 2000 published back in the 90's that referred to this as Technotribalism. While this is initially a electronic connection it grows into real world associations. This is where your efforts are best spent, building those real world connections and getting the heck out of cities.

Blogger Jack Amok May 20, 2021 4:07 PM  

Getting birth rates up won't happen via what you might call the "normal legislative process." Just like fixing immigration won't, because the normal legislative process has been captured and corrupted into serving globalist goals.

Getting things fixed will require a shock severe enough to break the current political system completely and replace the method by which leaders are empowered.

Meaning who gets to vote and who gets to count it will change dramatically. And the shock big enough to cause that will reset all sorts of other things too.

Blogger Azimus May 20, 2021 4:11 PM  

2. Jose MiguelMay 20, 2021 12:24 PM
The question I'm looking forward to is if such a rump state will turn around its birthrate decline, and how long it would take.


About 12 months from the banning of abortion, pornography and birth control, things will be back to normal.

Blogger Andrea Daley Utronebel May 20, 2021 4:14 PM  

Whites need REGENERATION to forestall immigration. White men doing manly stuff, white women doing womanly stuff and creating white children together.

Failing that, the West relies on foreigners to take over an emptying society. Same goes for Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Modernity has led to prosperity but decadence and sterility.

Jews know this, which is why they push for REGENERATION in Israel, where the natal policies have led to Jews having more kids than Arabs.

Blogger Eugenius BEar May 20, 2021 4:24 PM  

@18 Easy there buddy....we don't need to be pissing off the whores.

Blogger DeadMeat May 20, 2021 4:29 PM  

Hammerli 280 wrote:What's needed, desperately, is to close it for 50 years or so. Assimilate the immigrants. Complete the absorption of Wave 5, get Wave 6 well into the assimilation pipeline.

I know you're not new here, so you must just not have been paying attention all this time.

They won't, don't, and can't assimilate. We can't turn them into something they are not. Besides, do you really think "assimilating," instead of sending back, millions of Democrat voters is a good idea?

Blogger Akulkis May 20, 2021 4:52 PM  

Assimilate wave 6?

Hell, waves 4 and 5 still aren't fully assimilated, and for that matter, neither are the Louisianans whose families have been under our flag for 210 years now.

Assimilate the wave 6 mystery meats and the wave 5 Jews, neither of which have ever, for even a moment even WANTED to be *AMERICANS*... Hell will freeze over before that happens, and I don't mean the town of Hell, Michigan.

Blogger The Pitchfork Rebel May 20, 2021 4:53 PM  

@10

"To get birthrates up, the US should pass legislation & policies conducive to the establishment and continuance of families"

Here's a thought that shows just how persistent the idolatry of government really is-even in this audience-which should know better.

Legislation can't restore families, only God can cleanse us of our profound antinatalism.

It isn't just abortion, that's merely the tip of the spear. People perhaps under 50, and definitely under 40, have no notion what family really is, because they have no idea what it was like to life in a culture where people married (instead of shacking up), married for life (instead of marrying after a period of shacking up, and then divorcing-and washing rinsing and repeating like Hollywood whoremasters and trollips) or where you had multiple siblings (instead of being the token only child or having a single brother or sister).

Instead of being raised in happy vibrant families, today's kids are often being raised by a woman with no father around or one that they see every other weekend. They have half-siblings or reside with the custodial parent's partners' kids.

Even if the government and its corporate and media symbiotes were to stop pushing abortion, contraception and the LGBTQABCDEFG agenda to promote the formation and stability of families, it would need divine power to do so. It not only doesn't have divine omniscience, it doesn't have the slightest inclination.

If you want more and most importantly more stable families-petition Christ and encourage others to do so as well. Government involvement will only make things worse.

Blogger Silex May 20, 2021 4:59 PM  

It's interesting to read Chapter XXV - The Unnatural Democracy of America - in Charles Woodruff's "Expansion of Races" (written in 1909, you can find it on archive.org).

Blogger Akulkis May 20, 2021 5:00 PM  

Feminism should be punished with the one sentence which the mere prospect horrifies women the most:

Time in the stocks, in a public square, in the middle of a shopping district -- precisely where every other woman in town can take revenge upon her, and of course, with self-soiled clothing, and food, tomatoes, etc. mashed in the face, and with ubiquitous cameras in everyone's pocket to record the resultant make-over, plus Facebook, Instagram, etc.

Men would hate the stocks, because of the physical brutality they would be exposed to, but women would be terrified, because their entire life is about building and maintaining a public image, and it's literally impossible to maintain while her neck and wrists are locked in the stocks.

Blogger wahr01 May 20, 2021 5:23 PM  

I'd say we're already a puppet state of the Chinese.
They've bought out the entire DNC, Mitch and his caucus, a lot of state and local governments, and a number of the NGO's that have led the deindustrialization efforts against the USA disguised as "green initiatives".

The 2020 election steal was the most brazen flex of china's power over the USA. They wanted Trump gone and made him gone.

Blogger bramley bramley bramley May 20, 2021 6:00 PM  

UK total population 2020: 67million. Immigrants that year 313k

The numbers are horrific. To think this was supposed to be a year of restraint and circumspection about movement, and yet a new city's worth of foreigners was allowed to arrive across the borders. Infinite migration into a limited space (an island FFS), it just can't but end in trouble. What continues to surprise me is that the country still functions at all, even after the disruption of the last year. How long will that last?

Blogger Unknown May 20, 2021 6:23 PM  

Anglin is correct. In 2 Chronicles king Jehoshaphat was going to help the wicked northern kingdom of Israel after they had turned away from the Lord in fighting the Syrians.

"And Jehu the son of Hanani the seer went out to meet him, and said to king Jehoshaphat, Shouldest thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate the Lord? therefore is wrath upon thee from before the Lord." - 2 Chronicles 19:2

Blogger Worstpersonintheworld May 20, 2021 8:30 PM  

No its not. Check the math son

Blogger Worstpersonintheworld May 20, 2021 8:31 PM  

The military is full of betas. Nope

Blogger Worstpersonintheworld May 20, 2021 8:33 PM  

Ill stay in Florida. With my guns and skills

Blogger ND May 20, 2021 8:36 PM  

Amen! Prayer is the power we have here.

Blogger JovianStorm May 20, 2021 10:06 PM  

Pay nonwhites $20000 each to get permanently sterilized and require proof of sterilization for all immigrants from undesirable countries.

The problems fix themselves in 25 years.

Blogger GeronL May 20, 2021 11:15 PM  

This insane woke crap on the left is starting to push Hispanics and other minorities toward the "right". If Hispanics keep moving toward the GOP in 2022, I wonder if Biden or Harris might finish the wall before 2024.

Blogger Ominous Cowherd May 20, 2021 11:36 PM  

7916 wrote:Inevitably working within the system will fail.
The system is the problem. Working within the system ensures failure.

Blogger cecilhenry May 21, 2021 12:11 AM  



“If you would propose this idea, this radical idea, that we want political policies in place that would make sure that next year there will be more Swedes in Sweden, more Germans in Germany, and more ethnic Whites as a percentage of the population in whichever of the nations they built (including Canada, Australia, NZ, and America), and the year after that still more – is there really any good argument against that proposal other than outright hostility and genocidal intent?”

Demanding the exact opposite of this, as is government policy, is Genocide and treason.

Transform it back: Repatriation

Blogger Delete May 21, 2021 12:12 AM  

this is that "assimilate" stupidity

Blogger Plassa May 21, 2021 1:10 AM  

What about domestic incompatibility?

Blogger Azure Amaranthine May 21, 2021 2:24 AM  

"To get birthrates up we simply make Feminism Illegal"

With women able to vote, that will never happen through overt and legal means. Worse, in a multi-ethnic setting with no clearly superior nation, and voting for gibs, it weakens your own nation terribly to give up those votes.

If it is to be fixed it will be fixed from the inside out, otherwise it won't be fixed and the broken will die and/or be assimilated.

The law comes from the culture. The culture comes from the people. The People come from their mothers. The mothers are only able to survive long enough and bear children because of the fathers.

Feminism cannot be destroyed until societal support structures for women are obliterated. These support structures cannot be obliterated legally, therefore feminism cannot be destroyed until the law of the land perishes. Welcome to the thunderdome, bring death to unjust law.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine May 21, 2021 2:45 AM  

"Time in the stocks, in a public square, in the middle of a shopping district -- precisely where every other woman in town can take revenge upon her"

This idea is terrible because women, locked in public areas without their male relatives around to protect them, is a really stupid plan. There would be disfigurations, serious injuries, and rapes inflicted while people who would stop these things weren't there or weren't paying attention.

The better and original solution is to allow her husband/father/eldest-living-brother to physically punish a woman, as used to be the case. The same degrees of public shame are thereby easily applied if called for, and there is an ever-present and easy to follow chain of responsibility for what happens to her. Disfiguration or internal injuries, due to his actions, punishable by public flogging. Maiming or serious, permanent internal injuries, due to his actions, punishable by equal maiming or execution, whichever is more practical.

Easy, natural, and nearly foolproof.

Blogger Unknown May 21, 2021 6:04 AM  

@1 please don't quote net migration, it's actually a lot worse than that.

I think it's funny Americans treat Europe/whites as all alike when there are profound national IQ differences. Eastern Europe keeps getting into debt, long before the EU came along, because they're simply not very bright. There's also a mismeasure of urban to real national IQ, like China fiddling its numbers. Like we forget why the naturally Marxist Chinks were banned from America, we forget that most Europeans were not considered white. Then you had the civnat race mixers claiming their half breed kids with low IQ asian women are Honorary Aryans and it's no wonder the right wing seems doomed. Seems. I suggest a DNA test to remain and making it part of the application process, hard to fake that. One before they arrive, re-taken upon entry.

@2 the hook-up culture and all its minions would have to end. No antibiotic shots for thots of either sex, no abortions unless rape has been reported and the culprit sought in good time and no Pill, which has no longitudinal data on fertility, especially when given to still-developing teens. The Bible called fornication cultures whoredom for a reason, they are the primary form of devil worship and we're just... allowing it?

@6 we used to be able to sue adulterers, criminal conversation and/or seduction law, the latter is still on American books. No-fault divorce usually covers up adultery, simply re-criminalise it. In addition, stronger false light laws for people misrepresenting themselves for marriages e.g. income level, sexual past lies, hiding mental illness. That sorts out most other causes. Abortion was always given for victims of rape because it was viewed as theft of fertility and you don't want to enable the sort of rapists England now sees. But if you consent to BABYMAKING, no abortion should be lawful for either parent to seek, although encouraging marriage of parents in that case would be wise. No support for mothers or rape victims leaves women wide open to abuse given the physical inability to defend oneself with less upper body strength. Holding deadbeat parents legally accountable for their spawn, not the taxpayer, would be a good move. We have DNA tests, they couldn't deny it like in days of yore.

Sex Ed needs an overhaul, it grooms children to be easy prey. More focus on biology, responsibility and shame. No Boomer hippy logic of muh pleasure paramount, there is no 'free love' it has consequences like STDs and infertility.
The healthy limit on breeding was restricting who could marry, proving you can handle the basics of parenthood, say with an IQ of 100+, would be a valid requirement to marry and know the gravitas of the decision. No more Bridezilla.
@10 women were always in the work force, it just wasn't taxed and sometimes it was necessary for financial reasons in the area, like the husband couldn't earn enough. Women aren't fertile for very long and still need to earn their keep either side of having/raising kids, for decades, so an incentive to spend time with kids would work, although fathers can't be left out either. Careerism must be stigmatised for both sexes, look what the Mad Men era did to Boomers.

Blogger Unknown May 21, 2021 6:09 AM  

@13 no fertility treatments unless there's a fair medical reason, it's used as a fallback for the stupid. Nature is telling them not to breed if they were lazy and left it too late, having the right person already.

Double passport people expelled, they have no loyalty. No man can serve two ((masters)). We live in plutocracy. Stop the planes.

@15 absorbing a rotten apple spoils the barrel. We owe them NOTHING. Invaders come to rape and pillage. They wouldn't be here if they didn't think they could get/take more than at home. Also, tax remittance at marxist levels, like 60-90%. No welfare permitted as remittance.

@20 no more degenerate tv shows aimed at children, it's corruption. One very low flat tax everyone pays, no ((exceptions)) and then you can vote.

@21 porn causes hypofrontality, a form of brain damage. Cultural stigma needed. It'll go down in history as the tobacco of our time.

@24 reprint The Explanation of Ideology: Family Structure and Social Systems
people cannot be assimilated, it's genetic

@26 ban common law marriage and stigmatise cohabitation based on poor outcomes, couples only respond to shame

@28 historically a lot of women were raped in stocks, no it eats the seed crop
especially after nightfall, the SJWs must be shunned for marriage, that worked and prevented their reproduction

Blogger kerdasi amaq May 21, 2021 6:48 AM  

Allowing abortion for rape is bad idea because the rape rate will become equal to the abortion on demand rate.

Blogger Brant Thacker May 21, 2021 8:25 AM  

The us is approximately 2.8 million sq miles, the uk is approximately 93,600 sq miles. That means the us is approximately 40 times larger than the uk. Shut the fuck up son...

Blogger Ominous Cowherd May 21, 2021 9:22 AM  

Unknown wrote:Eastern Europe keeps getting into debt, long before the EU came along, because they're simply not very bright.
Not bright? or not honest? The calculations come out very differently if you have no intention of repaying.

Either Russians have a high average IQ, or they have a much greater variance in their IQ, because there are many smart Northern Slavs.

Blogger Grandpa Lampshade May 21, 2021 9:29 AM  

The U.S. is so corrupt and those who rule over us are so open about the fact that they hate us that if the Chinese were to bomb Washington and declare they now ruled this land, my reaction would be, "Meh, let's give these guys a chance. How could it be any worse than what we have now?"

Chinese overlords = > Jewish overlords

Blogger Rex Little May 21, 2021 9:48 AM  

The Act set no limits on immigration from Latin America.

People who blame our current demographic situation on the 1965 changes--which did set limits on immigration from Latin American countries--forget this. It's not the laws which are the problem, it's the enforcement, or lack thereof.

Blogger Jack Ward May 21, 2021 10:11 AM  

Somewhat on topic. Denninger over at market ticker today [5-21-21] has a pretty good rundown on all the help wanted signs out there. Reminds me of Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged novel and the great reset strike. The novels original title was 'The Strike'. Unintended consequences of government handing out free money and the killing off of the work ethic.

http://www.market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=242466

Blogger Brant Thacker May 21, 2021 10:48 AM  

Why don’t you share your name if you want to correct everyone.

Blogger Jose Miguel May 21, 2021 11:41 AM  

@21 Azimus

About 12 months from the banning of abortion, pornography and birth control, things will be back to normal.

Azimus, you are overly optimistic about the capacity for legislating the human heart. As I stated before, looking at real world examples, it took 3 decades for 1 Christian nation to fully reject antinatalism and embrace the first commandment.

Porn addicts will still be slaves to fantasies in their own minds, BC will be sold like Ritalin at MIT, banning abortion will do much good, but people will do better to avoid pregnancy in the first place.

Turning a nation's heart towards God takes time, and in the three decade example they had a patriarch who would stand outside of the Soviet Tsibili abortion clinic offering to adopt every woman's unwanted child, and practically turned every church in the country into an orphanage.

That mass adoption of the unwanted is why Georgia has such a religious population now where 67% of the population goes to church more than twice a week. Most young people know they wouldn't exist if not for the actions of the Georgian Patriarch, who himself has 19,000 Godchildren. And they are now only just above replacement with a bimodal distribution of children per woman.

Blogger OneWingedShark May 21, 2021 11:42 AM  

ND wrote:Amen! Prayer is the power we have here.
I mean, this is why I try to encourage and remind my brothers to pray.

JovianStorm wrote:Pay nonwhites $20000 each to get permanently sterilized and require proof of sterilization for all immigrants from undesirable countries.
The problems fix themselves in 25 years.

Good job, you just became the "not-vaccine" pusher.
And utterly rebelled against God's command to ALL humanity to be fruitful and multiply.
Shut your mouth.

GeronL wrote:This insane woke crap on the left is starting to push Hispanics and other minorities toward the "right". If Hispanics keep moving toward the GOP in 2022, I wonder if Biden or Harris might finish the wall before 2024.
Ah, yes, the GOP: a party indefatigably determined to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

Azure Amaranthine wrote:"Time in the stocks, in a public square, in the middle of a shopping district -- precisely where every other woman in town can take revenge upon her"
This idea is terrible because women, locked in public areas without their male relatives around to protect them, is a really stupid plan. There would be disfigurations, serious injuries, and rapes inflicted while people who would stop these things weren't there or weren't paying attention.

I think you missed the part about it being there for the complete and utter terror.

Blogger Jose Miguel May 21, 2021 11:46 AM  

@50 Rex Little

It was normal to have two way flow in immigration between South Texas, NM, Arizona and California with Northern Mexico pre-1965. Historically the Hispanos on both sides of the Rio Grande Valley area see themselves as the same Rio Grande Valley "tribe," neither of Central Mexican nor Tejano. It became one way as the US built out its trade empire and, particularly in the 90's, bankrupted local agricultural production with farming subsidies and forced free trade on food. The CIA turning Colombia and Mexico into narcostates didn't help either.

Actual border enforcement will help stop the flow, ceasing to be a financial usurious empire would stop the pressure on population flow from the South to the US.

Blogger Eugenius BEar May 21, 2021 1:14 PM  

@55 As a Texan, this reminds me I need to work on my tan. When the US finally collapses and the whole CIA/Narcostate runs out of gas, it would seem reasonable to expect an expanded Mexico or Tejano nation would likely emerge as the regional North American superpower.

Blogger Jose Miguel May 21, 2021 1:25 PM  

@56 Eugenius BEar

Mexico will break into multiple pieces, which will coalesce into 3, the south, Central and North. The Northern part will center around Monterrey, and the Tejano/Rio Grande population will gravitate toward it for leadership. El Norte has the best shot at success, though fundamentally I think the one that restores Apostolic Christianity will be the New World's "Byzantinium" equivalent.

Blogger Eugenius BEar May 21, 2021 1:49 PM  

@56 Jose

I may be naïve....but that actually sounds better to me than my/our current situation. Perhaps Monterrey will become the head city of the new unified Apostolic Christendom after the sack of the Vatican by Islam. I think the Europe had a great 2000 year run, but it looks like its over.

Blogger Sapper May 21, 2021 2:11 PM  

@56 As a fellow Texan, I'll work on my tan while keeping my skills up to date at the range.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine May 21, 2021 4:14 PM  

"Abortion was always given for victims of rape"

False. We now classify a fair number of people as rape victims who would have prior been classified rather as "suddenly married". As well, abortion has always been dangerous, and the further you go back the more it became a death sentence for the woman, and would not be offered on that account. Those societies would sometimes kill infants by exposure if they were so-inclined, but abortion has historically been about avoiding social stigma.

The concept of abortion making a woman "free" is a very modern and very perverse one.

Stolen fertility is an especially bad argument for abortion, considering that even modern child-murder methods carry a significant risk of leaving the woman in question permanently infertile, and this risk was also increased the further back you go.

"I think you missed the part about it being there for the complete and utter terror."

You think wrong. Removal of female societal support structures also results in "loose" women out of their family's control being disposed of fairly rapidly. Natural consequences allowed to expedite themselves.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine May 21, 2021 4:27 PM  

"ban common law marriage and stigmatise cohabitation based on poor outcomes"

I'd go the other way and turn common law marriage into original law marriage. If you slept with an un-betrothed virgin you're now married, otherwise someone's either going to die or already has. Simple, easy, fitting, and effective.

Blogger Unknown May 23, 2021 1:07 AM  

@60 you're speaking of America, I'm speaking of historic Europe. Most abortions were chemical, same as now. So there was low risk. Pennyroyal tea and other common weeds were used for the purpose and a main reason to hate 'witches' was providing 'potions' to kill the product of rape, especially man of the house to maid. Even marx raped his maid. Chemical abortion is not dangerous, see the Pill. The woman just has a normal period. Fathers would arrange the thing for their daughters if she were attacked to protect the family honour, back to the days of Austen. I suggest shotgun weddings even if the person is already married. Again, we have the DNA tests, they cannot evade it. Hold BOTH parents responsible. I like your ideas in general but responsibility isn't solely on the woman, especially in a Patriarchy, and women have no legal way to defend themselves. If women could kill an attempted rapist on sight and be lawfully protected, then fine no abortions at all. That would be BIblical too.
Virginity does exist medically but you can't prove a negative, especially re women's anatomy (quite a range) so that wouldn't work. Nice idea. We need the paperwork of the UK Marriage Act, for example, given the high population density of cities. What you posit works tribally, we don't live there anymore.

Blogger Unknown May 23, 2021 1:12 AM  

@61 it's literally live-in prostitution. Most Victorian hookers in london were that type, including Mary Kelly, and Russia with its 'mistress' in apartment system still has it. Cohabitation doesn't exist.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine May 23, 2021 1:35 PM  

"I'm speaking of historic Europe. Most abortions were chemical, same as now. So there was low risk."

Herbal, not chemical, and you have assumed that they were safe and common, because these murders were usually attempted before the woman in question knew for sure she was pregnant, because by the time she was certain, it was too late for any "safe" options. Simple things like poisonous teas had to be attempted early to be "safer", and sometimes didn't work anyway.

By the time anyone knew for sure that a woman was pregnant, there were no "safe" options for most of recorded history, regardless the propaganda --yes, I recognize the boilerplate-- that you've been fed and slurped down from child-murder aficionados.

"Even marx raped his maid."

That's not an "even". Your language betrays you.

"Chemical abortion is not dangerous, see the Pill."

Obviously false. The later it is the more dangerous, and chemical past perhaps a month or so is still dangerous today. It turns out a woman's body isn't meant to have a corpse rotting inside of it. "The Pill" has to be taken well ahead of time, and the "other pill" has to be taken within a day or two at the outside before it becomes ineffective.

"I suggest shotgun weddings even if the person is already married."

No. That's not just making lemonade out of lemons. That's legitimizing perversities.

"I like your ideas in general but responsibility isn't solely on the woman"

You've managed to read me precisely backward. You have a knack for inverting things. The woman has decreased responsibility due to decreased capability, her protection before marriage is on her male kin. Her protection after is primarily on her husband.

The men hold almost all the responsibility in this scenario, directly because they hold almost all of the ability.

"If women could kill an attempted rapist on sight and be lawfully protected, then fine no abortions at all."

Your issue there is legal? I'm speaking to an actual retard. There's never been a time when a woman wouldn't generally be legally protected for injuring or killing someone who attempted to rape her. The issue was never legal protection, it was sheer physical ability. At the same time, she generally did not have the final say over who she would be marrying, and modern society would love ever so dearly to call that rape.

"Cohabitation doesn't exist."

If they're sleeping together they're married according to God, so I agree, but for exactly the opposite reason. Cohabitation stops when sexual relations begin. Virginity is about there only being one proper claim on one womb and knowing lines of descent, and betrothal is about being able to make plans. It turns out that Church and State love to try to usurp God's definition of marriage, but, well, let God be true and every man a liar. The rest is all niceties and rationalizations we like to tell ourselves.

Let's cut to the chase, I'm tired of letting you try to sophistically/dishonestly edge around the bush:
-Marriage occurs when the two are joined, and the process continues as they become one and then literally produce one.
-Intentionally killing a conceived child is murder.
-End of story.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine May 23, 2021 1:36 PM  

"responsibility isn't solely on the woman, especially in a Patriarchy, and women have no legal way to defend themselves."

The second half of that is an overt lie.

Blogger Unknown May 23, 2021 8:23 PM  

@64 I don't know where you learned the relevant biology but I'm guessing they had a few wires crossed. All tinctures qualified as chemical abortifacients, a description of mechanism that also applies to the morning after and regular Pills. The Left rarely mentions them so it's worth pointing out they want women to remain ignorant of how 'contraceptives' actually function.
Actually, women miscarry all the time at all terms. Women evolved biologically to protect the host, because the human umbilicus is the most penetrating of all animal varieties. In later miscarriages, the mother's body places calcium around the dead child and examples exist in museums. I've seen them and recommend it for flipping fence-sitters. They're called stone babies. You can also see photos online to verify what I say. You're mistaken once more in thinking the Pill must be taken promptly, a few days later it can still work because implantation can take a while, as can securing it via the cord depth mentioned.
If there is a child, the duty to it becomes paramount. The parents surrendered original, selfish individual rights when they made a new life dependent on them. Being a solipsist is not going to cheat biology.
Male kin are not babysitters and cannot follow all women in their family around 24/7. In my own family, some generations had no men and only girls. What then? Do the fathers not work, following six girls simultaneously in all directions? Which planet do you live on where that ever happened? Still, if then 100% (or dual party) responsibility is on the man, the Bible has never suggested all men are fit defenders of anything, including the faith. Some men are weak of heart, others weak of body, a few God made congenitally weak. Your fantasy relies on an ideal of manhood that has never existed in recorded history. Meanwhile, the link of low IQ and aggression rears in our current time and demographic reality. God judges men 'according to their deeds' and so must we. It's pro-social or degenerate, and we must have appropriate ways of dealing with both.
If the ad hominem makes you feel better, but I'm not the one getting basic biology wrong here. Humans would've died out long ago if women couldn't repeatedly miscarry without any hope of survival. The Left has modelled this survival for evil. The legal chain of causation must stop at the rape itself or afterward if the rapist father won't marry her, now why would it insist on that if, as you suggest, they were already married? [Hint: they're not.]

Blogger Unknown May 23, 2021 8:31 PM  

@65
Cohabitation was the pagan marriage, including most notably the Egyptian tradition as evidenced by Caesar moving in with Cleopatra and being considered lawfully their son's father. The Bible repeatedly says to shun pagan ways including fornication, sex before the marriage ritual performed publicly. Maybe keep the state out of it, but the church used to be the state. A church must be involved to provide the necessary blessings and prayers of protection. You cannot make a thing of darkness into a creature of light, especially by lust.
Putting words into my mouth is childish. You misinterpret anatomy, history and the context of the marriage ritual and then speak of the chase? What God has made One let no MAN separate. The union is not the act of man, but the rite beforehand asking for his approval of the physical. Learn to read, America is low on the league tables.
Some jurisdictions don't allow weapons of any kind including pepper spray, bite me. The world isn't America. Many white homelands don't permit a woman to murder her rapist, please do check. I'd agree it would make logical sense but here we are. France had to bring in the anti-Muslim laws about street harassment because it was devolving into chimpouts with entitled Asians when the women so much as spoke back, as they're told to do (just say no). Lechery is a sin too. It's in the Bible and everything.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine May 24, 2021 9:02 AM  

"I don't know where you learned the relevant biology but I'm guessing they had a few wires crossed."

"Bounces off of me and sticks to you" is not an argument. It's a revelation that you don't have a rebuttal.

"Actually, women miscarry all the time at all terms."

Yes and that is also dangerous, serious infections fairly common, etc.

"You're mistaken once more in thinking the Pill must be taken promptly, a few days later it can still work because implantation can take a while"

I already mentioned one to two days grace before rapidly decreasing efficacy, but you'd know that if you had bothered to read.

You'd also know that the capital "P" Pill is not the morning-after pill if you knew what you were talking about. The "P"ill routinely taken over years does not have rapid effect, because it operates entirely by interfering with a woman's egg production. It will not interfere with implantation or anything further.

Your "once more" is, as seen above, also a lie. You're wrong on all four assertions in this one sentence. Reliably wrong.

"If there is a child, the duty to it becomes paramount."

You're arguing with your own phantasm here, not me. Thanks for calling out your solipsism I guess? Try that thing, you know, reading as if you were literate.

"Male kin are not babysitters and cannot follow all women in their family around 24/7."

You're ass-backward yet again, men are nowhere required to follow women around 24/7. When it's both impracticable for the men, and protection needful for the women, the women don't go. This is practiced in several current societies with slight variances from one to another, so you're also wrong.

Oh, but look, you're arguing dishonestly again. Our current society operates in the same way, except the responsibility is more distributed, women less directly protected, and far more punitive "protection" by the hyperextended legal system is emplaced. You want to know how/why moslems rape so many of our women, yet not so much their own? They look after their women personally, we trust a now-incompetent and faithless larger system.

"Still, if then 100% (or dual party) responsibility is on the man"

Never said that. Every single one of your rebuttal attempts rests on acting as if I said something I didn't, or asserting one side of a false binary distinction. You're either functionally retarded on these topics and yet continue to speak, or you're pathologically dishonest. I don't care which.

"Cohabitation was the pagan marriage"

You're a historical and Scriptural ignoramus. Genesis 2:22-24:

'Then the Lord God made the rib He had taken from the man into a woman and brought her to the man. And the man said: "This one, at last, is bone of my bone, and flesh of my flesh; this one will be called woman, for she was taken from man."

This is why a man leaves his father and mother and bonds with his wife, and they become one flesh.'


God's definition, the original one, of man and wife. The first mention of a wife, and the delineation between woman and wife. Simply that the man separates from his parents, unites with the woman, and she is his wife.

Now, I've no more patience to waste on you, pearls before swine. Don't hope for any further responses, there's no point arguing with either idiots or the dishonest.

Blogger Azure Amaranthine May 24, 2021 9:04 AM  

"The union is not the act of man, but the rite beforehand asking for his approval of the physical. Learn to read"

The rite is entirely of Man. Nowhere did God place it and that is why you will be unable to show where he did. Learn to read yourself, imbecile.

Post a Comment

Rules of the blog

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts